GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

Share Post

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

DAL Dallas Mavericks
S Anthony Davis 32.5m
22
pts
13
reb
1
ast
Impact
+27.9

Elite rim deterrence and relentless rebounding completely overshadowed a brutal shooting night. He anchored the defense by swallowing up pick-and-roll actions, forcing San Antonio's guards to repeatedly reset the offense. Even though he forced too many contested mid-range jumpers, his ability to generate second-chance opportunities through sheer hustle kept his overall impact massively positive.

Shooting
FG 7/22 (31.8%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 6/6 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 44.6%
USG% 32.0%
Net Rtg -34.4
+/- -24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.5m
Scoring +11.5
Creation +2.7
Shot Making +4.0
Hustle +16.5
Defense +0.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 0
S Cooper Flagg 31.5m
10
pts
10
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.9

Offensive growing pains were on full display as he repeatedly drove into crowded paint areas, resulting in blocked shots and empty possessions. Despite these struggles, his weak-side shot-blocking remains a major plus, highlighted by a sequence where he erased two attempts at the rim. However, the sheer volume of wasted offensive trips and poor spacing dragged his overall impact heavily into the negatives.

Shooting
FG 4/13 (30.8%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 36.0%
USG% 21.8%
Net Rtg -40.2
+/- -29
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.5m
Scoring +3.0
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +2.1
Hustle +4.9
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 70.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
S P.J. Washington 29.4m
17
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
+6.7

High-percentage shot-making masked a series of costly defensive breakdowns that dragged his net impact down to near-neutral. He repeatedly lost track of his man on back-door cuts, surrendering easy layups that offset his offensive efficiency. A pair of careless offensive fouls while setting screens further bled away the value of his scoring.

Shooting
FG 7/11 (63.6%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 74.3%
USG% 19.7%
Net Rtg -33.3
+/- -20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.4m
Scoring +13.9
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +4.5
Hustle +5.4
Defense -5.8
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
S Klay Thompson 22.3m
10
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-3.3

Settling for heavily contested perimeter jumpers early in the shot clock derailed the team's offensive flow. His lack of burst was evident when trying to separate from younger defenders, leading to forced attempts and long rebounds that fueled transition breaks for the Spurs. Without any supplementary hustle plays or defensive playmaking to fall back on, his cold shooting resulted in a punishing -7.9 impact.

Shooting
FG 4/13 (30.8%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 37.2%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg -47.9
+/- -23
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.3m
Scoring +3.4
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +2.7
Hustle +2.5
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
4
pts
2
reb
3
ast
Impact
-8.5

Foul trouble and poor positioning against Wembanyama severely limited his effectiveness and court time. He was consistently outmuscled in the paint, leading to a negative defensive rating as opponents finished through him. While he set a few solid screens to free up shooters, his inability to anchor the interior resulted in a net-negative performance.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 69.4%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg -12.6
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.3m
Scoring +3.3
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +1.6
Defense -3.7
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Max Christie 25.9m
9
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
+1.0

Tremendous effort on 50/50 balls and crisp perimeter shooting were undercut by hidden mistakes in the margins. He was repeatedly caught out of position in transition defense, allowing the Spurs to leak out for easy scores before the defense could set. So while his hustle metrics popped, those rotational lapses ultimately flattened his net impact to slightly below zero.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 112.5%
USG% 9.7%
Net Rtg -23.6
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.9m
Scoring +8.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 11
Opp FG% 73.3%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
3
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-7.6

A complete lack of offensive aggression allowed his defender to freely roam and double-team other Dallas ball-handlers. He passed up several open catch-and-shoot opportunities from the wing, bogging down the half-court spacing. This extreme passivity, combined with a few poorly timed defensive gambles, resulted in a steep -8.0 net impact.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 39.9%
USG% 7.3%
Net Rtg -33.6
+/- -17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.6m
Scoring +1.3
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -3.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
8
pts
0
reb
5
ast
Impact
-6.0

Pushing the pace effectively generated quality looks, but his defensive limitations at the point of attack gave those points right back. Opposing guards easily navigated around his ball pressure, forcing Dallas into constant rotation and scramble mode. His excellent hustle in tracking down long rebounds wasn't quite enough to overcome the defensive bleeding.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 68.0%
USG% 26.5%
Net Rtg -9.2
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.5m
Scoring +6.5
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +1.7
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
6
pts
2
reb
3
ast
Impact
-9.2

Careless ball security and forced isolation plays completely derailed his minutes running the second unit. He repeatedly tried to thread the needle through heavy traffic in the pick-and-roll, leading to deflections and live-ball turnovers. This sloppy orchestration, paired with a string of clanked pull-up jumpers, tanked his overall rating.

Shooting
FG 1/6 (16.7%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 4/6 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 34.7%
USG% 26.3%
Net Rtg -9.3
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.1m
Scoring +1.4
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +0.6
Defense -3.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 16.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
-9.4

Tenacious full-court pressing defined his minutes, generating several deflections that boosted his defensive and hustle metrics. Unfortunately, his offensive execution was entirely chaotic, frequently driving into traffic without an exit plan. The resulting offensive fouls and stalled possessions ultimately dragged his high-energy performance into the red.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 12.0%
Net Rtg -38.8
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.6m
Scoring -1.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-8.9

Hard hedges on the perimeter showcased his usual high-motor defensive effort during a brief rotation. However, his inability to provide any vertical spacing as a roll man allowed the Spurs to completely ignore him offensively. The offense bogged down into isolation sets whenever he was on the floor, resulting in a slightly negative stint.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 4.5%
Net Rtg -32.7
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.9m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +1.8
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
3
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.0

Tunnel vision plagued his short stint on the floor, as he consistently looked for his own shot at the expense of ball movement. He forced a highly contested baseline floater early in the shot clock that immediately led to a transition score the other way. Without any playmaking or defensive hustle to balance his shot-hunting, his impact naturally skewed negative.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 17.6%
Net Rtg -38.8
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.2m
Scoring +1.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.7

Clogging the dunker spot without making decisive movements disrupted the team's driving lanes during garbage time. While he provided a sturdy body for boxing out on the defensive glass, his lack of offensive awareness resulted in a pair of three-second violations. That clumsiness in the paint was the sole driver behind his slightly negative rating.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -44.4
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.1m
Scoring +2.9
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +6.0
Defense -2.1
Turnovers -1.9
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-10.5

A failure to close out under control allowed shooters to easily blow past him during his brief appearance. He was caught ball-watching on a crucial weak-side rotation, giving up a wide-open corner three. These quick mental lapses ensured a negative impact despite the tiny sample size.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -44.4
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.1m
Scoring -1.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
SAS San Antonio Spurs
S Devin Vassell 30.9m
13
pts
3
reb
4
ast
Impact
+11.4

Aggressive point-of-attack defense elevated his overall rating, as he consistently fought through screens to disrupt the Mavericks' perimeter rhythm. While his perimeter jumper was flat, he compensated by generating extra possessions through deflected passes and loose ball recoveries. This two-way effort ensured a positive net rating despite a streaky offensive stretch in the third quarter.

Shooting
FG 6/14 (42.9%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 45.0%
USG% 18.9%
Net Rtg +36.0
+/- +25
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.9m
Scoring +6.8
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +3.1
Hustle +1.9
Defense +4.7
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
S Harrison Barnes 30.3m
7
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.6

A brutal -12.2 overall impact was driven by getting repeatedly targeted in isolation during the second half. He struggled to stay in front of quicker forwards, leading to defensive breakdowns that erased any value from his hustle plays. His shot selection was also overly passive, stalling the offensive flow when the team needed a release valve.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 13.0%
Net Rtg +39.5
+/- +27
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.3m
Scoring +4.0
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +0.6
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
40
pts
15
reb
1
ast
Impact
+53.9

Absolute dominance in the paint dictated this astronomical +35.1 impact score. He completely neutralized Dallas's interior attack as a rim deterrent, altering countless floaters and layups to fuel his +9.0 defensive metric. Offensively, his shot selection was impeccable, punishing mismatches with high-percentage looks at the basket rather than settling for jumpers.

Shooting
FG 15/21 (71.4%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 9/11 (81.8%)
Advanced
TS% 77.4%
USG% 36.2%
Net Rtg +45.9
+/- +31
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.7m
Scoring +34.4
Creation +3.2
Shot Making +5.7
Hustle +13.2
Defense +1.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 23.5%
STL 1
BLK 3
TO 0
S Stephon Castle 28.5m
22
pts
7
reb
6
ast
Impact
+16.2

Slashing to the rim with purpose allowed him to generate high-quality looks and collapse the defense. His +6.1 defensive impact was equally crucial, highlighted by a sequence of physical closeouts that forced late-clock turnovers. He maximized his minutes by making quick, decisive reads rather than pounding the air out of the ball.

Shooting
FG 8/12 (66.7%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 5/10 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 67.1%
USG% 31.3%
Net Rtg +41.4
+/- +24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.5m
Scoring +16.7
Creation +4.5
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +6.0
Defense +4.1
Turnovers -11.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 18.2%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 5
5
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
+1.5

Defensive rotations defined his minutes, consistently blowing up pick-and-roll actions on the perimeter. Despite minimal offensive involvement, his off-ball movement and constant closeouts generated a strong +7.0 defensive rating. The overall positive impact stems entirely from doing the dirty work against opposing wings.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 57.9%
USG% 6.7%
Net Rtg +31.9
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.4m
Scoring +2.9
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +2.2
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 47.1%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
11
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
+9.0

Relentless energy in transition was the catalyst for a stellar +10.1 impact rating. He consistently beat his man down the floor for easy finishes, punishing a sluggish Dallas transition defense. Combined with excellent closeouts and loose ball recoveries, his high-motor playstyle perfectly maximized his time on the court.

Shooting
FG 5/6 (83.3%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 91.7%
USG% 9.4%
Net Rtg +15.6
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.6m
Scoring +10.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +2.7
Hustle +3.4
Defense -0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Dylan Harper 22.7m
15
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
-1.4

Getting caught on screens repeatedly derailed his defensive rating and dragged his overall impact deeply into the red. Opponents targeted him in isolation during a crucial second-quarter stretch, generating easy blow-by opportunities. Even with a decent scoring rhythm, the defensive bleeding and a few costly live-ball turnovers completely negated his offensive contributions.

Shooting
FG 7/14 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.4%
USG% 33.9%
Net Rtg +15.3
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.7m
Scoring +8.6
Creation +2.4
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +4.1
Defense -5.3
Turnovers -7.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 4
Luke Kornet 15.8m
2
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
-4.0

Drop coverage execution kept his defensive metrics afloat, successfully walling off the paint against driving guards. However, his overall impact dipped into the negative due to offensive spacing issues and clogged driving lanes. A lack of vertical gravity on roll attempts allowed the defense to cheat off him and blow up perimeter actions.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 9.5%
Net Rtg +17.6
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.8m
Scoring -0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +4.1
Defense +0.4
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 1
0
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.6

A complete lack of offensive rhythm and zero hustle plays resulted in a noticeable drag on the team's momentum. He looked hesitant when catching the ball on the perimeter, allowing the defense to reset and stall the possession. While his weak-side rotations offered a slight defensive positive, his inability to generate gravity cratered his overall score.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 9.5%
Net Rtg +31.1
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.3m
Scoring -1.5
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-3.1

Steadying the offense during the non-Wembanyama minutes defined this brief but effective stint. He applied relentless ball pressure at the top of the key, disrupting the opponent's initiation of their offensive sets. By simply keeping the ball moving and avoiding costly mistakes, he secured a modest positive impact.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 10.5%
Net Rtg +16.7
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.1m
Scoring +1.1
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +0.0
Defense +2.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.2

Rim protection was his sole contribution during a quick five-minute rotation, highlighted by two physical contests that denied easy layups. Unfortunately, his presence severely cramped the floor on the other end, leading to stagnant offensive sets. The inability to set effective screens or roll with purpose left the offense playing four-on-five, resulting in a negative net rating.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg +39.1
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.9m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +4.7
Turnovers -6.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
5
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-1.3

Capitalizing on broken plays allowed him to maximize a very short stint on the floor. He made decisive cuts to the basket when the defense fell asleep, converting high-percentage looks without forcing the issue. This opportunistic off-ball movement completely drove his highly efficient +5.5 impact score.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 102.5%
USG% 18.2%
Net Rtg +44.4
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.1m
Scoring +5.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +1.3
Defense -1.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.9

Instant offense in garbage time provided a quick jolt to his impact metrics. He confidently stepped into a spot-up look from the corner, showcasing excellent shot preparation. Beyond that single sequence, he mostly stayed out of the way, allowing his brief efficiency to carry his positive rating.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 150.0%
USG% 9.1%
Net Rtg +44.4
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.1m
Scoring +3.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +1.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.8

Entering the game strictly for end-of-quarter defensive purposes, he executed his assignment without error. He stayed attached to his man during a final baseline out-of-bounds play, preventing a clean look. The microscopic sample size resulted in a perfectly neutral offensive impact and a slight defensive bump.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +110.0
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.6m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0