GAME ANALYSIS

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

NYK New York Knicks
S Jalen Brunson 33.7m
22
pts
0
reb
6
ast
Impact
-1.7

A brutal shooting night defined by forced floaters and contested mid-range pull-ups torpedoed his efficiency. While he generated plenty of offense through sheer volume and playmaking, the high number of wasted possessions gave the opponent too many transition opportunities. His inability to find the bottom of the net ultimately outweighed his creation.

Shooting
FG 9/24 (37.5%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 43.4%
USG% 31.4%
Net Rtg -18.8
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.7m
Offense +9.3
Hustle +6.0
Defense -0.2
Raw total +15.1
Avg player in 33.7m -16.8
Impact -1.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 18
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S Mikal Bridges 33.1m
7
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
-2.5

Phenomenal screen navigation and relentless on-ball pressure defined his defensive shift, completely stifling his matchup. However, his jumper was completely broken, leading to empty possessions that repeatedly stalled the offense. The defensive brilliance simply couldn't overcome the mathematical damage done by his persistent bricklaying.

Shooting
FG 3/10 (30.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 35.0%
USG% 13.9%
Net Rtg -27.6
+/- -21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.1m
Offense +1.0
Hustle +5.6
Defense +7.5
Raw total +14.1
Avg player in 33.1m -16.6
Impact -2.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 45.5%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 1
S OG Anunoby 31.4m
9
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
-0.1

An absolute menace on the defensive end, he locked down his primary assignment and blew up multiple screening actions to generate stops. Unfortunately, his offensive rhythm completely vanished, as he clanked several wide-open corner looks that usually keep the defense honest. That stark contrast between elite containment and scoring inefficiency resulted in a perfectly flat net impact.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.7%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg -19.3
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.4m
Offense +2.8
Hustle +3.2
Defense +9.6
Raw total +15.6
Avg player in 31.4m -15.7
Impact -0.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 22.2%
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 3
22
pts
18
reb
4
ast
Impact
+4.6

Commanding constant double-teams in the post, his sheer physical presence warped the opponent's defensive shell and opened up the floor. He paired this offensive gravity with disciplined verticality at the rim, avoiding cheap fouls while contesting drives. Even with a few forced shots in traffic, his two-way footprint was undeniably positive.

Shooting
FG 9/19 (47.4%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 53.0%
USG% 32.9%
Net Rtg -22.1
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.3m
Offense +11.4
Hustle +2.9
Defense +5.5
Raw total +19.8
Avg player in 30.3m -15.2
Impact +4.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 53.8%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 5
S Josh Hart 27.6m
8
pts
6
reb
3
ast
Impact
-4.9

His trademark chaotic energy generated plenty of extra possessions, but defensive lapses on the perimeter proved costly. He was repeatedly caught ball-watching, surrendering back-door cuts that negated the value of his hustle plays. The lack of offensive assertiveness further compounded those defensive mistakes, resulting in a negative shift.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 66.7%
USG% 11.8%
Net Rtg -21.1
+/- -16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.6m
Offense +4.5
Hustle +5.0
Defense -0.6
Raw total +8.9
Avg player in 27.6m -13.8
Impact -4.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
5
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-2.2

Dogged point-of-attack defense and relentless loose-ball recoveries kept him viable on the floor and boosted his hustle metrics. Yet, his shot selection was disastrous, repeatedly settling for contested jumpers early in the shot clock. Those offensive dead-ends erased the immense value he created through sheer effort.

Shooting
FG 1/8 (12.5%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 28.2%
USG% 15.5%
Net Rtg +1.8
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.8m
Offense -2.1
Hustle +7.5
Defense +5.9
Raw total +11.3
Avg player in 26.8m -13.5
Impact -2.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
6
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.0

Failing to bend the defense with his movement, he struggled to find clean looks and became a non-factor in half-court sets. His inability to punish closeouts allowed defenders to sag off and clog the driving lanes for the primary creators. This lack of offensive gravity quietly suffocated the team's spacing and tanked his rating.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 1/3 (33.3%)
Advanced
TS% 47.5%
USG% 9.2%
Net Rtg -11.4
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.2m
Offense +1.9
Hustle +1.0
Defense +2.7
Raw total +5.6
Avg player in 23.2m -11.6
Impact -6.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
12
pts
14
reb
0
ast
Impact
+12.2

Total domination of the offensive glass created a devastating loop of second-chance opportunities for his squad. He feasted on dump-offs and putbacks, maintaining a flawless streak of interior efficiency that broke the opponent's spirit. By completely controlling the paint without demanding post touches, he drove a massive positive impact.

Shooting
FG 6/8 (75.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 67.6%
USG% 18.5%
Net Rtg -25.6
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.8m
Offense +16.9
Hustle +1.2
Defense +3.5
Raw total +21.6
Avg player in 18.8m -9.4
Impact +12.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 1
1
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.4

Thrown in for a brief stint, he looked out of sync with the defensive coverages and failed to secure the interior. He offered zero resistance or rim pressure, allowing opponents to operate comfortably in his vicinity. It was a forgettable shift that dragged down the lineup's efficiency through sheer passivity.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 56.8%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg +20.0
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.7m
Offense -1.6
Hustle 0.0
Defense +0.6
Raw total -1.0
Avg player in 2.7m -1.4
Impact -2.4
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-0.8

Barely registering on the radar during his garbage-time minutes, he floated on the perimeter without engaging in the offense. He avoided making glaring mistakes but also failed to generate any positive momentum or defensive stops. The slight negative impact reflects a completely passive stint where he just filled space.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +20.0
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.7m
Offense +0.5
Hustle 0.0
Defense 0.0
Raw total +0.5
Avg player in 2.7m -1.3
Impact -0.8
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
+0.2

Capitalizing on his lone offensive touch, he executed decisively during a very short run to get on the board. He looked slightly lost on a couple of defensive rotations, but the quick bucket kept his overall impact slightly above water. It was a textbook definition of a neutral spot-minute appearance.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg +20.0
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.7m
Offense +2.0
Hustle 0.0
Defense -0.5
Raw total +1.5
Avg player in 2.7m -1.3
Impact +0.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.4

Rushing his reads in a frantic late-game appearance, he forced ill-advised floaters that killed possessions. He tried to push the pace, but the lack of execution resulted in empty trips down the floor. The minor negative score is purely a result of those wasted offensive sequences in limited time.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 50.0%
Net Rtg +20.0
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.7m
Offense +0.4
Hustle +0.2
Defense +0.3
Raw total +0.9
Avg player in 2.7m -1.3
Impact -0.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.8

Completely disconnected from the offensive flow, he failed to attempt a single shot or set a meaningful screen during his brief run. The defense essentially ignored him, which bogged down the spacing for the second unit. A stark departure from his recent double-digit scoring, this shift was entirely devoid of impact.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +20.0
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.7m
Offense 0.0
Hustle +0.2
Defense +0.3
Raw total +0.5
Avg player in 2.7m -1.3
Impact -0.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
1
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.3

A hyper-aggressive but fruitless cameo saw him force multiple bad shots in less than two minutes of action. While he showed surprising effort on defensive rotations, his tunnel vision on offense killed the ball movement. The quick hook from the coaching staff prevented further damage to his net rating.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 12.9%
USG% 50.0%
Net Rtg +25.0
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.7m
Offense -2.4
Hustle +0.7
Defense +2.3
Raw total +0.6
Avg player in 1.7m -0.9
Impact -0.3
How is this calculated?
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
DAL Dallas Mavericks
S Max Christie 35.3m
26
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
+11.0

An absolute flamethrower from the perimeter, he punished every late closeout to shatter his recent scoring averages. His shot selection was impeccable, taking only high-value looks within the flow of the offense rather than forcing isolation plays. This lethal floor-spacing single-handedly warped the opposing defense and drove a massive positive impact.

Shooting
FG 9/13 (69.2%)
3PT 8/10 (80.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 16.1%
Net Rtg +26.0
+/- +20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.3m
Offense +23.0
Hustle +1.6
Defense +4.0
Raw total +28.6
Avg player in 35.3m -17.6
Impact +11.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 23.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Naji Marshall 33.5m
19
pts
8
reb
4
ast
Impact
+7.8

Smothering perimeter defense anchored his highly positive impact, as he completely disrupted the opponent's primary screening actions. Even though he struggled to find the range from deep and wasted several possessions on forced jumpers, his sheer disruption on the other end outweighed the offensive clunkiness. He proved that elite containment can salvage a poor shooting night.

Shooting
FG 7/18 (38.9%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 48.1%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg +20.0
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.5m
Offense +10.0
Hustle +4.0
Defense +10.6
Raw total +24.6
Avg player in 33.5m -16.8
Impact +7.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 20
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Dwight Powell 28.2m
2
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
-2.5

Relentless energy on the glass and in 50/50 situations drove a stellar hustle rating during his shift. However, his complete lack of offensive gravity allowed the defense to sag off him entirely, heavily clogging the paint for his teammates. That severe spacing penalty ultimately pushed his net impact into the red despite the blue-collar effort.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 53.2%
USG% 4.3%
Net Rtg +29.2
+/- +19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.2m
Offense +0.8
Hustle +7.2
Defense +3.5
Raw total +11.5
Avg player in 28.2m -14.0
Impact -2.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 43.8%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S Cooper Flagg 27.8m
18
pts
7
reb
3
ast
Impact
-5.7

A significant drop-off from his recent scoring tear resulted in a sluggish offensive rhythm that stalled team possessions. While his defensive rotations remained sharp and deterred drives, forcing contested perimeter looks dragged down his overall efficiency. The negative overall impact stems directly from these empty offensive trips when he couldn't find his usual spots.

Shooting
FG 7/14 (50.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 3/6 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 54.1%
USG% 30.9%
Net Rtg +34.1
+/- +21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.8m
Offense +2.9
Hustle +1.7
Defense +3.6
Raw total +8.2
Avg player in 27.8m -13.9
Impact -5.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 4
S Caleb Martin 23.8m
3
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
+1.0

Elite point-of-attack pressure defined his minutes, generating massive defensive and hustle value by blowing up opponent actions. He completely abandoned his own scoring aggression, barely looking at the rim, but made up for the offensive invisibility by creating chaos on the perimeter. This relentless disruption kept his net impact firmly in the green.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 52.1%
USG% 8.6%
Net Rtg +35.8
+/- +19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.8m
Offense -0.4
Hustle +5.8
Defense +7.4
Raw total +12.8
Avg player in 23.8m -11.8
Impact +1.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 9.1%
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 2
4
pts
3
reb
5
ast
Impact
-8.1

Poor shot selection and forced attempts in the paint severely damaged his offensive rating. Despite showing some fight at the point of attack defensively, his empty offensive possessions consistently handed transition momentum back to the opponent. The inability to orchestrate clean sets ultimately cratered his net impact.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 28.6%
USG% 17.6%
Net Rtg +21.7
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.5m
Offense -1.2
Hustle +1.1
Defense +2.8
Raw total +2.7
Avg player in 21.5m -10.8
Impact -8.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
14
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
+5.1

Breaking out of a recent shooting slump, he provided crucial gravity by burying catch-and-shoot opportunities from the wings. His veteran positioning on the defensive end quietly neutralized several transition threats without gambling for steals. By staying within his role and avoiding forced drives, he delivered a highly efficient two-way shift.

Shooting
FG 5/12 (41.7%)
3PT 4/7 (57.1%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 58.3%
USG% 24.5%
Net Rtg -15.6
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.1m
Offense +9.2
Hustle +1.5
Defense +5.0
Raw total +15.7
Avg player in 21.1m -10.6
Impact +5.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
Moussa Cisse 19.8m
15
pts
9
reb
1
ast
Impact
+10.1

Dominating the interior with ruthless efficiency, he converted nearly every look around the rim while sealing off the paint defensively. His ability to anchor the drop coverage without fouling allowed the perimeter defenders to play aggressively and funnel drivers toward him. This textbook rim-running performance maximized his value on both ends of the floor.

Shooting
FG 5/6 (83.3%)
3PT 0/0
FT 5/8 (62.5%)
Advanced
TS% 78.8%
USG% 28.3%
Net Rtg -2.2
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.8m
Offense +11.5
Hustle +2.9
Defense +5.7
Raw total +20.1
Avg player in 19.8m -10.0
Impact +10.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 1
BLK 4
TO 3
4
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-2.2

Bricking multiple open looks from outside derailed his offensive utility and allowed the defense to completely ignore him. While he wasn't a glaring liability on defense, his inability to stretch the floor cramped the spacing for the primary ball-handlers. That offensive stagnation dragged his overall rating into negative territory.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 41.0%
USG% 15.2%
Net Rtg +10.6
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.2m
Offense +3.8
Hustle +0.8
Defense +0.3
Raw total +4.9
Avg player in 14.2m -7.1
Impact -2.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 80.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
6
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.2

Failing to establish any offensive rhythm, he was largely invisible during his brief stint on the floor. Without his usual scoring punch to keep defenders honest, he became a liability in half-court sets by allowing his man to roam. The steep drop-off from his recent production left the second unit devoid of vital creation.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 52.1%
USG% 32.0%
Net Rtg -34.4
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.6m
Offense -1.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense -0.5
Raw total -0.9
Avg player in 10.6m -5.3
Impact -6.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
0
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
+0.9

Making the most of a brief cameo, he stayed active off the ball and executed defensive rotations cleanly. He didn't force any action offensively, simply keeping the ball moving to preserve the team's rhythm. It was a perfectly neutral, mistake-free shift that kept the engine running smoothly.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -25.0
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.1m
Offense +0.5
Hustle +0.8
Defense +0.6
Raw total +1.9
Avg player in 2.1m -1.0
Impact +0.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
+2.0

A quick trigger from beyond the arc provided an instant spark during his highly limited run. He didn't have time to impact the game in other areas, but maximizing his sole offensive touch ensured a positive footprint. The sharp drop from his usual volume was purely a product of the rotation rather than poor play.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 150.0%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg -25.0
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.1m
Offense +3.0
Hustle 0.0
Defense 0.0
Raw total +3.0
Avg player in 2.1m -1.0
Impact +2.0
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0