Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
UTA lead DAL lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
DAL 2P — 3P —
UTA 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 195 attempts

DAL DAL Shot-making Δ

Flagg 13/27 +0.3
Washington 10/20 -1.0
Nembhard Hard 6/12 +3.3
Marshall 7/12 +3.1
Thompson Hard 4/10 +3.3
Christie 2/5 -1.9
Cisse Open 2/4 -1.1
Powell Open 2/4 -1.6
Hardy Hard 1/3 -0.8
Gafford Hard 1/1 +1.1

UTA UTA Shot-making Δ

Markkanen 11/23 -2.3
George Hard 11/20 +6.8
Filipowski 9/13 +6.9
Williams 5/9 +1.1
Bailey Hard 3/9 -2.0
Collier 4/8 +0.2
Hendricks 4/5 +5.1
Anderson 0/4 -3.9
Sensabaugh Open 2/3 +0.3
Clayton Jr. Hard 1/3 -1.3
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
DAL
UTA
48/98 Field Goals 50/97
49.0% Field Goal % 51.5%
9/27 3-Pointers 13/36
33.3% 3-Point % 36.1%
28/41 Free Throws 27/33
68.3% Free Throw % 81.8%
57.3% True Shooting % 62.8%
67 Total Rebounds 50
14 Offensive 8
40 Defensive 39
24 Assists 33
1.60 Assist/TO Ratio 2.54
14 Turnovers 13
6 Steals 8
6 Blocks 4
26 Fouls 32
64 Points in Paint 66
10 Fast Break Pts 17
17 Points off TOs 18
15 Second Chance Pts 10
35 Bench Points 34
10 Largest Lead 10
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Lauri Markkanen
33 PTS · 16 REB · 5 AST · 39.8 MIN
+36.27
2
Cooper Flagg
42 PTS · 7 REB · 6 AST · 41.8 MIN
+25.87
3
Keyonte George
37 PTS · 5 REB · 6 AST · 40.9 MIN
+25.09
4
Kyle Filipowski
25 PTS · 9 REB · 1 AST · 37.5 MIN
+19.6
5
P.J. Washington
25 PTS · 13 REB · 0 AST · 39.2 MIN
+15.08
6
Isaiah Collier
10 PTS · 3 REB · 8 AST · 31.3 MIN
+14.83
7
Naji Marshall
15 PTS · 3 REB · 1 AST · 36.3 MIN
+13.85
8
Max Christie
8 PTS · 5 REB · 3 AST · 28.3 MIN
+9.8
9
Taylor Hendricks
11 PTS · 4 REB · 1 AST · 18.4 MIN
+9.55
10
Moussa Cisse
6 PTS · 7 REB · 0 AST · 13.5 MIN
+9.1
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q5 0:18 K. George REBOUND (Off:0 Def:5) 133–140
Q5 0:18 MISS D. Powell tip Layup 133–140
Q5 0:18 D. Powell REBOUND (Off:2 Def:7) 133–140
Q5 0:26 MISS K. Thompson 26' pullup 3PT 133–140
Q5 0:31 K. Filipowski 7' turnaround fadeaway Jump Shot (25 PTS) 133–140
Q5 0:56 P. Washington cutting DUNK (25 PTS) (R. Nembhard 11 AST) 133–138
Q5 1:11 L. Markkanen tip DUNK (33 PTS) 131–138
Q5 1:11 L. Markkanen REBOUND (Off:2 Def:14) 131–136
Q5 1:12 MISS C. Williams 3PT 131–136
Q5 1:32 C. Flagg personal FOUL (3 PF) 131–136
Q5 1:32 L. Markkanen REBOUND (Off:1 Def:14) 131–136
Q5 1:32 MISS C. Flagg driving Layup 131–136
Q5 1:43 L. Markkanen tip Layup (31 PTS) 131–136
Q5 1:43 L. Markkanen REBOUND (Off:1 Def:13) 131–134
Q5 1:46 MISS C. Williams cutting Layup 131–134

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

UTA Utah Jazz
S Keyonte George 40.9m
37
pts
5
reb
6
ast
Impact
+20.9

Explosive perimeter shot-making carried his impact, though defensive lapses (-0.7 Def) prevented his score from matching his massive box-score production. He broke down the primary point-of-attack defense at will, burying pull-up threes in transition.

Shooting
FG 11/20 (55.0%)
3PT 5/10 (50.0%)
FT 10/12 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 73.2%
USG% 30.0%
Net Rtg -4.4
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.9m
Scoring +29.5
Creation +2.7
Shot Making +7.8
Hustle +1.5
Defense -3.7
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 21
FGM Against 13
Opp FG% 61.9%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S Lauri Markkanen 39.8m
33
pts
16
reb
5
ast
Impact
+34.1

An absolute masterclass in two-way dominance, driven by suffocating help defense (+13.8 Def) and relentless board work (+6.8 Hustle). He completely neutralized the opposing frontcourt while punishing mismatches on the perimeter.

Shooting
FG 11/23 (47.8%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 10/12 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 58.3%
USG% 28.0%
Net Rtg +27.2
+/- +27
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.8m
Scoring +23.4
Creation +3.2
Shot Making +5.3
Hustle +7.7
Defense +7.8
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 36.4%
STL 4
BLK 1
TO 1
S Kyle Filipowski 37.5m
25
pts
9
reb
1
ast
Impact
+18.5

Sustained his hyper-efficient scoring streak while adding massive value through physical screens and loose-ball recoveries (+5.8 Hustle). His ability to read the floor from the high post kept the offense humming seamlessly.

Shooting
FG 9/13 (69.2%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 79.9%
USG% 19.3%
Net Rtg +32.5
+/- +27
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.5m
Scoring +21.8
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +5.2
Hustle +9.5
Defense -2.9
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 20
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 30.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
S Ace Bailey 24.3m
7
pts
2
reb
3
ast
Impact
-15.4

Poor shot selection derailed his offensive rhythm, and he compounded the issue with missed defensive assignments (-2.3 Def). He repeatedly settled for contested midrange pull-ups instead of attacking the paint.

Shooting
FG 3/9 (33.3%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 38.9%
USG% 18.5%
Net Rtg +1.1
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.3m
Scoring +2.6
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +1.7
Hustle +2.5
Defense -6.8
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 53.8%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
4
pts
2
reb
3
ast
Impact
-13.5

Impact plummeted as his usual scoring punch vanished, leaving him as a net-negative when forced to create late in the clock. Opposing guards exploited his lateral quickness, turning his minutes into a defensive liability.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 66.7%
USG% 7.8%
Net Rtg -31.2
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.6m
Scoring +3.2
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +0.6
Defense -2.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
10
pts
3
reb
8
ast
Impact
+3.3

Generated immense value through sheer effort, diving for loose balls and disrupting passing lanes (+5.7 Hustle). His aggressive downhill drives collapsed the defense, perfectly balancing his playmaking and scoring.

Shooting
FG 4/8 (50.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 56.3%
USG% 12.9%
Net Rtg +1.5
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.2m
Scoring +7.0
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +0.9
Defense +4.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 41.2%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 0
11
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-4.0

Kept his head above water by crashing the glass and making timely cuts (+3.7 Hustle) despite a dip in scoring volume. His length bothered shooters on the perimeter, providing just enough disruption to stay positive.

Shooting
FG 5/9 (55.6%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 58.3%
USG% 16.4%
Net Rtg +29.3
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.3m
Scoring +7.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +1.3
Defense -2.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
11
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-0.5

Found success spotting up in the corners, but his overall impact was muted by poor weakside defensive awareness (-0.9 Def). He capitalized on open looks generated by teammates, yet struggled to contain dribble penetration.

Shooting
FG 4/5 (80.0%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 110.0%
USG% 13.0%
Net Rtg +10.0
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.4m
Scoring +10.2
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +5.1
Defense -3.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-21.1

A complete offensive zero who clogged the spacing and stalled half-court sets. His inability to keep pace in transition allowed the opponent to capitalize on cross-matches repeatedly.

Shooting
FG 0/4 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -49.1
+/- -20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.4m
Scoring -2.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 71.4%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
2
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
-11.8

Rushed decisions and poor spacing cratered his offensive impact during his brief stint on the floor. He failed to navigate screens effectively, allowing his matchup to dictate the flow of the game.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 17.1%
Net Rtg +16.2
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.5m
Scoring +0.4
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +5.1
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
DAL Dallas Mavericks
S Cooper Flagg 41.8m
42
pts
7
reb
6
ast
Impact
+29.6

Massive offensive usage and defensive anchoring (+5.2 Def) carried his overall impact. Midrange isolation scoring overwhelmed the defense, though a few forced perimeter shots slightly capped his ceiling.

Shooting
FG 13/27 (48.1%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 15/20 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 58.7%
USG% 37.1%
Net Rtg -9.9
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 41.8m
Scoring +30.4
Creation +3.8
Shot Making +7.5
Hustle +4.0
Defense +1.2
Turnovers -7.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 43.8%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 4
S P.J. Washington 39.2m
25
pts
14
reb
0
ast
Impact
+11.8

Despite a massive scoring spike, his overall impact flatlined due to defensive breakdowns in rotation. He feasted on mismatch post-ups, but gave back value by bleeding points in transition.

Shooting
FG 10/20 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 4/7 (57.1%)
Advanced
TS% 54.2%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg -15.5
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.2m
Scoring +16.2
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +4.2
Hustle +12.9
Defense -4.8
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
S Ryan Nembhard 38.1m
14
pts
3
reb
11
ast
Impact
-4.4

The massive jump in offensive production was completely undone by defensive bleeding and live-ball turnovers that fueled opponent runs. While he orchestrated the offense well in the first half, his inability to navigate ball screens on the other end cratered his overall value.

Shooting
FG 6/12 (50.0%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 58.3%
USG% 17.6%
Net Rtg -22.1
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.1m
Scoring +9.7
Creation +2.7
Shot Making +4.0
Hustle +0.9
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 4
S Naji Marshall 36.3m
15
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
+5.0

Defensive versatility (+4.4 Def) and aggressive drives were negated by empty possessions and likely costly turnovers. He locked down the perimeter effectively, yet his offensive execution stalled out during critical half-court sets.

Shooting
FG 7/12 (58.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 62.5%
USG% 12.5%
Net Rtg -10.7
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.3m
Scoring +10.9
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +4.1
Hustle +0.9
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
S Daniel Gafford 12.9m
2
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-11.6

Impact suffered from a severe drop in offensive involvement, completely disappearing from the pick-and-roll game. He managed to salvage some value with solid rim deterrence (+2.2 Def), but couldn't stay on the floor long enough to establish a rhythm.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 6.1%
Net Rtg -30.0
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.9m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +0.6
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
Max Christie 28.3m
8
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
-2.7

Found ways to contribute without scoring by generating crucial extra possessions (+4.3 Hustle). His relentless perimeter ball pressure disrupted the opponent's timing, proving that his value isn't tied to his jumper.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 59.2%
USG% 8.2%
Net Rtg +12.7
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.3m
Scoring +5.6
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +4.4
Defense -2.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 27.3%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
7
pts
9
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.9

Solid weakside rotations (+3.1 Def) kept his defensive impact positive, but offensive limitations hindered the unit's spacing. He set bruising screens to free up shooters, yet his inability to finish through contact resulted in empty trips.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 3/6 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 52.7%
USG% 12.1%
Net Rtg +7.7
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.6m
Scoring +4.0
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +4.6
Defense -4.7
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
12
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.2

Elite spacing and gravity opened up driving lanes for teammates, while his veteran positioning (+3.4 Def) shut down baseline drives. He hit timely catch-and-shoot daggers that stalled opponent momentum, even if his overall volume was modest.

Shooting
FG 4/10 (40.0%)
3PT 4/9 (44.4%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 60.0%
USG% 17.2%
Net Rtg -8.2
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.9m
Scoring +7.9
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +3.9
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Moussa Cisse 13.5m
6
pts
7
reb
0
ast
Impact
+0.1

Anchored the interior during a crucial second-quarter stretch, altering multiple shots at the rim (+3.5 Def). His high-energy rim runs and offensive rebounding created a distinct physical advantage inside.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 52.1%
USG% 18.4%
Net Rtg +1.1
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.5m
Scoring +3.6
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +8.9
Defense +1.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
Jaden Hardy 10.5m
2
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-20.4

A complete offensive disappearing act was compounded by getting routinely hunted in isolation (-2.4 Def). He forced bad shots early in the shot clock, allowing the opponent to dictate the tempo.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg +26.9
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.5m
Scoring +0.5
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +0.6
Defense -2.2
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2