PHI

2025-26 Season

JUSTIN EDWARDS

Philadelphia 76ers | Forward | 6-7
Justin Edwards
6.1 PPG
1.5 RPG
1.3 APG
15.4 MPG
-1.2 Impact

Edwards produces at an below average rate for a 15-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-1.2
Scoring +3.7
Points 6.1 PPG × +1.00 = +6.1
Missed 2PT 0.9/g × -0.78 = -0.7
Missed 3PT 1.8/g × -0.87 = -1.6
Missed FT 0.1/g × -1.00 = -0.1
Creation +1.2
Assists 1.3/g × +0.50 = +0.7
Off. Rebounds 0.4/g × +1.26 = +0.5
Turnovers -1.2
Turnovers 0.6/g × -1.95 = -1.2
Defense +0.4
Steals 0.8/g × +2.30 = +1.8
Blocks 0.2/g × +0.90 = +0.2
Def. Rebounds 1.1/g × +0.30 = +0.3
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +1.6
Contested Shots 1.3/g × +0.20 = +0.3
Deflections 1.6/g × +0.65 = +1.0
Loose Balls 0.2/g × +0.60 = +0.1
Screen Assists 0.3/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.0/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.1
Raw Impact +5.7
Baseline (game-average expected) −6.9
Net Impact
-1.2
34th pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 37th
7.2 PPG
Efficiency 32th
54.5% TS
Playmaking 49th
1.6 APG
Rebounding 4th
1.8 RPG
Rim Protection 35th
0.12/min
Hustle 46th
0.10/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 70th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

A maddening slump defined the opening stretch of Justin Edwards's season, plagued by erratic shot selection and a recurring inability to stay attached to perimeter assignments. Even when his jumper occasionally fell, hidden costs routinely tanked his overall value on the floor. Look no further than 11/25 vs ORL, where he poured in 13 points on 5/7 shooting but still posted a miserable -3.6 impact score because underlying defensive breakdowns dragged his net value into the red. Conversely, he occasionally found ways to contribute without dominating the box score. During the 12/19 vs NYK game, Edwards managed just 8 points but recorded a highly efficient +5.7 impact score by generating value through active hands in the passing lanes and timely perimeter shooting. Still, those positive blips were vastly outnumbered by nights of sheer offensive futility. Aside from an absolute masterclass of spacing on 11/11 vs BOS—where he torched the nets for 22 points and a staggering +14.5 impact—his persistent bricking routinely allowed defenders to sag off and clog driving lanes. Until he stops bleeding points in transition and forcing contested looks, his minutes will remain a severe liability.

Justin Edwards spent this stretch battling wild inconsistency, oscillating between a reliable bench spark and an active liability. When dialed in, his value was obvious, peaking on 02/09 vs POR. He poured in 12 points and logged a massive +7.1 impact score because his flawless perimeter execution was paired with high-level defensive engagement. He didn't even need high volume to swing a game, generating a stellar +4.3 impact on just 6 points on 01/14 vs CLE by decisively attacking the basket. Yet, even when his outside shot was falling, hidden costs often dragged him down. During the 03/03 vs SAS matchup, he hit three triples for 9 points but still posted a dismal -6.2 impact score due to brutal off-ball defensive lapses and poor closeout angles that constantly compromised the scheme. Until he cleans up those mental errors, his minutes will remain completely erratic.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Edwards's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~6 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 42% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Edwards locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: -3.0, second-half: +0.6. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

In a rough stretch — 6 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 13 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 74 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

D. Mitchell 31.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 6
B. Ingram 30.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 4
J. Grant 25.2 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 5
D. Avdija 23.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
N. Powell 22.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
B. Carrington 21.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Bane 21.8 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 6
J. Brunson 21.6 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
J. Harden 21.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
R. Westbrook 21.2 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.28
PTS 6

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

R. Rollins 34.8 poss
FG% 55.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 10
D. DeRozan 27.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Harden 27.1 poss
FG% 71.4%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.41
PTS 11
B. Carrington 25.3 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.43
PTS 11
B. Ingram 24.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 5
D. Avdija 23.4 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 5
N. Powell 23.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.43
PTS 10
D. Mitchell 23.0 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.61
PTS 14
K. Kuzma 20.9 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 2
T. Camara 20.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

59
Games
6.1
PPG
1.5
RPG
1.3
APG
0.8
SPG
0.2
BPG
45.2
FG%
36.9
3P%
84.6
FT%
15.4
MPG

GAME LOG

59 games played