PHI

2025-26 Season

PAUL GEORGE

Philadelphia 76ers | Forward | 6-8
Paul George
17.5PPG
5.1RPG
3.5APG
32.1MPG
+6.9 Impact

George produces at an elite rate for a 32-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+6.9
Scoring +14.8
Points Scored 17.5 PPG = +17.5
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -6.8
Shot Making above expected FG% = +4.1
Creation +1.1
Assists & Self-Creation 3.5 AST/g + self-creation = +1.1
Turnovers -4.0
Turnovers 1.8/g (live + dead blend) = -4.0
Defense +1.9
Steals 1.6/g = +3.7
Blocks 0.4/g = +0.4
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -2.2
Hustle & Effort +2.9
Rebounds 5.1 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +0.0
Contested Shots 3.3/g = +0.7
Deflections 2.7/g = +1.7
Charges Drawn 0.1/g = +0.2
Loose Balls 0.4/g = +0.2
Screen Assists 0.2/g = +0.1
Raw Impact +16.7
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.8
Net Impact
+6.9
81st pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 84th
17.5 PPG
Efficiency 56th
57.1% TS
Playmaking 88th
3.5 APG
Rebounding 64th
5.1 RPG
Defense 70th
+8.4/g
Hustle 76th
+15.5/g
Creation 74th
+3.28/g
Shot Making 96th
+10.21/g
TO Discipline 28th
0.06/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Paul George’s early 2025-26 campaign was defined by extreme volatility, swinging wildly between vintage offensive mastery and brutal shooting slumps. When his jumper was falling, he looked utterly unstoppable, peaking on 12/14 vs ATL with a brilliant 35-point barrage. By burying 7 of his 10 three-point attempts, he generated a massive +21.2 Impact score, punishing the defense with pristine shot selection. Yet, even when his touch vanished, George found ways to influence winning, as seen on 11/30 vs ATL. Despite clanking his way to 16 points on a dismal 6-for-17 from the floor, he still registered a +11.3 Impact because of his relentless defensive effort and timely hustle plays. That two-way motor wasn't always running, however. On 12/20 vs NYK, his offense completely collapsed into a 7-point, 2-for-10 shooting nightmare, yielding a dismal -8.9 Impact as poor execution dragged the entire rotation down.

Paul George spent this midseason stretch morphing from a primary offensive engine into a gritty, high-variance glue guy. His rhythm was wildly unpredictable, perfectly illustrated on 12/31 vs MEM where he scored 17 points but registered a dismal -11.8 Impact. That ugly rating stemmed directly from poor shot selection, as he chucked his way to a 3-for-11 mark from deep while offering little resistance on the defensive end. He finally found his stroke on 01/08 vs WAS. Dropping a highly efficient 23 points on 7-of-11 shooting, he posted a dominant +21.2 Impact. He also learned to affect winning without filling up the scoring column, as seen on 12/27 vs CHI. Despite managing just 15 points on a clunky 5-for-15 shooting night, George still generated a solid +5.0 Impact. He salvaged his value through relentless hustle, ripping down 11 rebounds and playing suffocating defense to lift his team when his jumper completely abandoned him.

Paul George's late-season stretch was defined by a blistering offensive peak that eventually gave way to a gritty, grind-it-out survival mode. He looked utterly unstoppable during the 04/01 vs WAS matchup, erupting for 39 points on brilliant 15-for-22 shooting. That pristine shot selection and relentless offensive pressure earned him a massive +38.7 Impact score. Just days later, his jumper abandoned him during the 04/06 vs SAS contest, where he managed only 16 points on a rough 5-for-15 from the floor. Yet he still salvaged a +6.2 Impact score in that game by leaning heavily into his defensive rotations and creating extra possessions through sheer hustle. The wheels finally fell off completely during the 04/09 vs HOU game. A miserable 7-point outing on 2-for-8 shooting, compounded by a complete lack of playmaking, resulted in a brutal -14.1 Impact score. It was a stark reminder that while his veteran savvy can often mask a cold shooting night, even George cannot hide when his entire offensive arsenal vanishes.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Very consistent. George posts positive impact in 76% of games — you almost always get a productive night. Scoring varies by ~7 points, but the overall contribution stays positive.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 54% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. George consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: +4.9, second-half: +8.9. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 10 games. Longest cold streak: 3 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 38 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

O. Anunoby 86.6 poss
FG% 36.4%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 10
K. Kuzma 67.4 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 45.5%
PPP 0.24
PTS 16
Z. Risacher 64.7 poss
FG% 36.4%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.26
PTS 17
J. Hart 37.4 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 7
D. Mitchell 34.3 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.09
PTS 3
J. Williams 32.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
P. Achiuwa 30.9 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 4
M. Bridges 30.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.16
PTS 5
P. Washington 30.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
N. Clowney 28.2 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 7

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

O. Anunoby 64.7 poss
FG% 55.6%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 13
K. Kuzma 59.6 poss
FG% 36.4%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 10
B. Portis 45.6 poss
FG% 46.2%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 14
D. Daniels 38.6 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 5
J. Hart 37.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 5
Z. Risacher 36.0 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
P. Washington 34.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 4
M. Porter Jr. 31.7 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
M. Bridges 29.8 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 5
B. Coulibaly 28.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 4

SEASON STATS

50
Games
17.5
PPG
5.1
RPG
3.5
APG
1.6
SPG
0.4
BPG
44.9
FG%
40.9
3P%
79.7
FT%
32.1
MPG

GAME LOG

50 games played