2025-26 Season
PAUL GEORGE
2025-26 Season
PAUL GEORGE
George produces at an elite rate for a 32-minute workload.
George produces at an elite rate for a 32-minute workload.
PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology
TEAM COMPARISON
of 14 teammates (10+ games, 10+ min)
Similar Players
Same position, closest production profile this season.
SKILL DNA
Percentile rank vs 235 Forwards with 10+ games
THE SEASON SO FAR
Paul George’s early 2025-26 campaign was defined by extreme volatility, swinging wildly between vintage offensive mastery and brutal shooting slumps. When his jumper was falling, he looked utterly unstoppable, peaking on 12/14 vs ATL with a brilliant 35-point barrage. By burying 7 of his 10 three-point attempts, he generated a massive +21.2 Impact score, punishing the defense with pristine shot selection. Yet, even when his touch vanished, George found ways to influence winning, as seen on 11/30 vs ATL. Despite clanking his way to 16 points on a dismal 6-for-17 from the floor, he still registered a +11.3 Impact because of his relentless defensive effort and timely hustle plays. That two-way motor wasn't always running, however. On 12/20 vs NYK, his offense completely collapsed into a 7-point, 2-for-10 shooting nightmare, yielding a dismal -8.9 Impact as poor execution dragged the entire rotation down.
Paul George spent this midseason stretch morphing from a primary offensive engine into a gritty, high-variance glue guy. His rhythm was wildly unpredictable, perfectly illustrated on 12/31 vs MEM where he scored 17 points but registered a dismal -11.8 Impact. That ugly rating stemmed directly from poor shot selection, as he chucked his way to a 3-for-11 mark from deep while offering little resistance on the defensive end. He finally found his stroke on 01/08 vs WAS. Dropping a highly efficient 23 points on 7-of-11 shooting, he posted a dominant +21.2 Impact. He also learned to affect winning without filling up the scoring column, as seen on 12/27 vs CHI. Despite managing just 15 points on a clunky 5-for-15 shooting night, George still generated a solid +5.0 Impact. He salvaged his value through relentless hustle, ripping down 11 rebounds and playing suffocating defense to lift his team when his jumper completely abandoned him.
Paul George's late-season stretch was defined by a blistering offensive peak that eventually gave way to a gritty, grind-it-out survival mode. He looked utterly unstoppable during the 04/01 vs WAS matchup, erupting for 39 points on brilliant 15-for-22 shooting. That pristine shot selection and relentless offensive pressure earned him a massive +38.7 Impact score. Just days later, his jumper abandoned him during the 04/06 vs SAS contest, where he managed only 16 points on a rough 5-for-15 from the floor. Yet he still salvaged a +6.2 Impact score in that game by leaning heavily into his defensive rotations and creating extra possessions through sheer hustle. The wheels finally fell off completely during the 04/09 vs HOU game. A miserable 7-point outing on 2-for-8 shooting, compounded by a complete lack of playmaking, resulted in a brutal -14.1 Impact score. It was a stark reminder that while his veteran savvy can often mask a cold shooting night, even George cannot hide when his entire offensive arsenal vanishes.
IMPACT TIMELINE
Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.
Very consistent. George posts positive impact in 76% of games — you almost always get a productive night. Scoring varies by ~7 points, but the overall contribution stays positive.
Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 54% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.
Defensive difference-maker. George consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.
Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: +4.9, second-half: +8.9. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.
Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 10 games. Longest cold streak: 3 games.
MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago
Based on 38 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.
ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM
His shooting stats against each primary defender this season
ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED
How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.
SEASON STATS
GAME LOG
50 games played