PHI

2025-26 Season

PAUL GEORGE

Philadelphia 76ers | Forward | 6-8
Paul George
17.7 PPG
5.4 RPG
3.8 APG
30.9 MPG
+4.7 Impact

George produces at an above average rate for a 31-minute workload. Elite defensive value (+3.9/game) is a major strength.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+4.7
Scoring +10.6
Points 17.7 PPG × +1.00 = +17.7
Missed 2PT 3.6/g × -0.78 = -2.8
Missed 3PT 4.3/g × -0.87 = -3.8
Missed FT 0.5/g × -1.00 = -0.5
Creation +3.7
Assists 3.8/g × +0.50 = +1.9
Off. Rebounds 1.4/g × +1.26 = +1.8
Turnovers -3.3
Turnovers 1.7/g × -1.95 = -3.3
Defense +3.9
Steals 1.8/g × +2.30 = +4.1
Blocks 0.5/g × +0.90 = +0.5
Def. Rebounds 4.1/g × +0.30 = +1.2
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +4.9
Contested Shots 5.1/g × +0.20 = +1.0
Deflections 4.2/g × +0.65 = +2.7
Charges Drawn 0.1/g × +2.70 = +0.3
Loose Balls 0.6/g × +0.60 = +0.4
Screen Assists 0.3/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.2/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.4
Raw Impact +19.8
Baseline (game-average expected) −15.1
Net Impact
+4.7
90th pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 84th
17.7 PPG
Efficiency 46th
56.2% TS
Playmaking 88th
3.8 APG
Rebounding 72th
5.4 RPG
Rim Protection 92th
0.21/min
Hustle 95th
0.16/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 31th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Paul George’s opening stretch of the 2025-26 campaign was defined by a jarring identity crisis, oscillating wildly between two-way dominance and stagnant isolation ball. When he leaned into defensive disruption, his value skyrocketed regardless of his shooting touch. Look at his 01/09 vs ORL performance. Despite bricking all seven of his three-point attempts en route to a modest 18 points, he generated a massive +13.2 impact score simply by overwhelming the opposition with relentless defensive pressure and off-ball activity. Conversely, when he forced the issue offensively, the hidden costs completely tanked his value. During the 12/30 vs MEM matchup, George managed 17 points but suffered a disastrous -20.3 impact because he stubbornly settled for heavily contested perimeter looks instead of moving the ball. He was at his absolute best when letting the game come to him, like on 11/20 vs MIL, where his 21 points were paired with a +13.8 impact driven by suffocating wing defense and timely weak-side rotations. Ultimately, this stretch revealed a veteran wing who can still dictate winning basketball, provided he stops sabotaging his own rhythm with forced jumpers.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Volatile for his role. George has noticeable ups and downs, with scoring moving ~8 points between games.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 47% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. George consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: +2.4, second-half: +7.0. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 38 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

O. Anunoby 86.6 poss
FG% 36.4%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 10
K. Kuzma 67.4 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 45.5%
PPP 0.24
PTS 16
Z. Risacher 64.7 poss
FG% 36.4%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.26
PTS 17
J. Hart 37.4 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 7
D. Mitchell 34.3 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.09
PTS 3
J. Williams 32.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
P. Achiuwa 30.9 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 4
M. Bridges 30.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.16
PTS 5
P. Washington 30.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
N. Clowney 28.2 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 7

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

O. Anunoby 64.7 poss
FG% 55.6%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 13
K. Kuzma 59.6 poss
FG% 36.4%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 10
B. Portis 45.6 poss
FG% 46.2%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 14
D. Daniels 38.6 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 5
J. Hart 37.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 5
Z. Risacher 36.0 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
P. Washington 34.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 4
M. Porter Jr. 31.7 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
M. Bridges 29.8 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 5
B. Coulibaly 28.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 4

SEASON STATS

32
Games
17.7
PPG
5.4
RPG
3.8
APG
1.8
SPG
0.5
BPG
44.0
FG%
39.2
3P%
84.4
FT%
30.9
MPG

GAME LOG

32 games played