January 20, 2026
EXPLORE THE GAME
Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.
IND
2P —
3P —
PHI
2P —
3P —
IND
PHI
IND
PLAYER PERFORMANCE
Philadelphia 76ers
Dictated the tempo from the opening tip, using his elite burst to compromise the defense and create high-value looks. His relentless ball pressure and exceptional defensive rotations completely smothered Indiana's perimeter attack.
Poor shot selection and an inability to finish through contact severely dragged down his offensive rating. He tried to compensate with active hands and transition hustle, but the empty offensive trips were too damaging.
Punished defensive rotations with decisive, aggressive drives to the rim. His length and anticipation on the perimeter disrupted Indiana's passing lanes, fueling a highly productive two-way performance.
Completely overpowered single coverage in the post, forcing the defense into impossible rotation decisions. His sheer gravity as a scorer opened up the floor, while his paint intimidation deterred countless drives.
Thrived as a rim-runner and lob threat, converting his touches with excellent efficiency around the basket. His vertical spacing and disciplined drop coverage against the pick-and-roll were essential to the bench unit's success.
Provided a massive defensive boost by seamlessly switching across multiple positions and shutting down isolation attempts. His timely cuts and willingness to battle for positioning on the glass solidified a highly effective rotation stint.
Clanked a series of wide-open spot-up looks that stalled the half-court offense. He remained engaged defensively and fought through screens, but the lack of shooting gravity allowed defenders to aggressively pack the paint.
Played his role perfectly as an energy big, using his athleticism to contest shots and secure the defensive glass. He didn't demand the ball offensively, focusing entirely on setting hard screens and protecting the paint.
Struggled to find the rhythm of the game, forcing a few contested looks early in the shot clock. His inability to stay attached to shooters on the perimeter led to several easy breakdowns for the opposition.
Entered the game solely for the final seconds to close out the clock. Did not log enough action to register a tangible statistical footprint.
Subbed in during the final minute of garbage time. The sample size was entirely too small to evaluate any aspect of his play.
Indiana Pacers
A massive scoring surge masked underlying issues with defensive containment and likely turnover leakage. He repeatedly broke down the primary defender off the bounce, but gave back too much value on the other end against Philadelphia's quick guards.
High-volume inefficiency and defensive lapses tanked his overall rating despite a heavy offensive workload. The sheer number of empty possessions from forced mid-range jumpers allowed Philadelphia to dictate the transition pace.
An absolutely glacial shooting night from beyond the arc cratered his offensive value. He fought hard on the glass and provided excellent point-of-attack defense, but the spacing issues he created were too costly to overcome.
Strong rim protection and efficient interior finishing kept his defensive metrics solidly in the green. However, a few ill-advised perimeter attempts and minor rotational mistakes kept him just below a positive net impact.
Lack of defensive resistance and low usage dragged down his overall impact despite flawless execution on his few touches. He struggled to stay in front of his matchups during his brief rotation minutes, bleeding value on the other end.
Overcame a miserable perimeter shooting performance by generating massive value through sheer energy and hustle plays. His ability to extend possessions with offensive rebounds and deflections completely changed the complexion of the second unit's minutes.
Provided sturdy weak-side help defense and picked his spots well offensively to snap a streak of high-usage games. His impact hovered near neutral due to a lack of overall aggression and failing to command defensive attention on the perimeter.
Capitalized on dump-off passes and offensive putbacks to provide a highly efficient interior spark. He anchored the paint well enough during his shifts to post a positive net rating despite limited lateral mobility.
Maintained his usual relentless pace, probing the paint effectively to generate high-quality looks for the second unit. His defensive pressure at the point of attack kept the bench afloat, resulting in a slightly positive overall shift.
Faded into the background offensively, failing to capitalize on the spacing created by the primary ball-handlers. While he showed flashes of active hands in the passing lanes, the lack of offensive gravity limited his overall effectiveness.
A complete non-factor in his limited run, failing to register any meaningful offensive production. He was quickly played off the floor after struggling to anchor the pick-and-roll coverage.
Only saw the floor for a brief garbage-time cameo at the final buzzer. There simply wasn't enough time to register any meaningful impact on either end of the court.
