PHI

2025-26 Season

TRENDON WATFORD

Philadelphia 76ers | Guard-Forward | 6-8
Trendon Watford
6.1PPG
3.0RPG
2.2APG
15.1MPG
-4.8 Impact

Watford produces at an below average rate for a 15-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-4.8
Scoring +5.4
Points Scored 6.1 PPG = +6.1
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -1.9
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.2
Creation +0.7
Assists & Self-Creation 2.2 AST/g + self-creation = +0.7
Turnovers -2.6
Turnovers 1.1/g (live + dead blend) = -2.6
Defense -0.8
Steals 0.3/g = +0.7
Blocks 0.4/g = +0.4
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +2.5
Rebounds 3.0 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +1.1
Contested Shots 3.0/g = +0.6
Deflections 0.7/g = +0.5
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.3/g = +0.2
Screen Assists 0.3/g = +0.1
Raw Impact +5.2
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.0
Net Impact
-4.8
26th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 246 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 29th
7.1 PPG
Efficiency 64th
56.5% TS
Playmaking 48th
2.5 APG
Rebounding 64th
3.5 RPG
Defense 15th
+4.7/g
Hustle 99th
+21.6/g
Creation 79th
+4.00/g
Shot Making 19th
+4.40/g
TO Discipline 23th
0.07/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Trendon Watford's first eighteen games of the 2025-26 campaign were defined by maddening, extreme inconsistency that eventually cost him a spot in the rotation. The absolute peak of his season arrived on 11/09 vs TOR, where a promotion to the starting lineup resulted in a monstrous 20-point, 17-rebound, 10-assist triple-double. He posted a staggering +27.5 Impact score in that contest, dominating the glass and picking apart the defense with surgical passing and highly efficient 8-of-10 shooting. Yet, that brilliant two-way effort vanished entirely just days later on 11/12 vs BOS. Clanking his way to a 3-for-10 shooting night, his forced attempts and defensive lapses dragged him down to a dismal -10.5 Impact. The bottom completely fell out on 11/21 vs MIL, where he went scoreless on four attempts and registered a brutal -14.6 Impact in just 14 minutes of empty floor time. Unable to string together consecutive positive outings or sustain his defensive energy, Watford ultimately watched his role evaporate into garbage-time cameos by January.

Trendon Watford spent this midseason stretch fighting for relevance at the end of the bench, battling wildly inconsistent minutes and a string of deeply negative performances. On 01/20 vs IND, he managed just two points on 1-for-4 shooting, resulting in a dismal -13.4 impact score as his erratic shot selection actively harmed the offensive flow. He briefly flipped the script on 02/03 vs GSW, exploding for 16 points and eight rebounds in 27 minutes. His aggressive hustle on the glass and efficient inside scoring drove a stellar +11.6 impact score that night. However, extended playing time rarely translated to winning basketball. Look at his 25-minute outing on 02/11 vs NYK; despite a well-rounded line of six points, four rebounds, and four assists, his brutal 3-for-10 chucking and poor defensive rotations cratered his impact to -9.1. Ultimately, his inability to string together positive shifts kept him firmly entrenched as a fringe rotation piece.

This late-season stretch was defined by erratic offensive utility and a complete inability to stretch the floor, ultimately reducing Trendon Watford to a fringe rotation piece. His jumper completely abandoned him, leading to ugly outings like the 03/03 vs SAS matchup. Despite playing hard and generating active hustle plays, his 0-for-4 shooting from deep dragged his Impact score down to -6.2 because of the sheer cost of those wasted possessions. Even when his raw scoring looked solid, hidden defensive lapses often ruined his overall value. During the 03/10 vs MEM game, he scored 11 points on an efficient 4-of-5 from the field, yet still posted a -5.7 Impact score due to poor rotations and bleeding points on the other end. He did find a fleeting rhythm during the 03/21 vs UTA contest, racking up 20 points, nine boards, and four assists. His +13.7 Impact score that night stemmed from relentless rebounding and smart interior finishing rather than settling for outside shots. Unfortunately, those flashes were too rare, and his playing time subsequently vanished by April.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Watford has posted negative impact in 82% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 54% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

In a rough stretch — 11 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 14 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 56 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

S. Cissoko 30.4 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
J. Grant 25.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 3
R. Barrett 23.0 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.52
PTS 12
B. Ingram 22.4 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 5
J. Tyson 22.4 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.22
PTS 5
S. Barnes 22.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 4
J. Green 21.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 2
K. Johnson 19.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 2
J. Minott 19.5 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 2
P. Pritchard 19.4 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 2

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

J. Minott 27.0 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 75.0%
PPP 0.41
PTS 11
J. Grant 27.0 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.41
PTS 11
J. Tyson 25.3 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.36
PTS 9
R. Barrett 24.9 poss
FG% 83.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.44
PTS 11
S. Barnes 23.8 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
J. Jaquez Jr. 21.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
M. Diawara 21.6 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 75.0%
PPP 0.51
PTS 11
S. Cissoko 21.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 4
L. Nance Jr. 20.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.29
PTS 6
R. Holland II 20.4 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 5

SEASON STATS

60
Games
6.1
PPG
3.0
RPG
2.2
APG
0.3
SPG
0.4
BPG
52.0
FG%
19.6
3P%
77.6
FT%
15.1
MPG

GAME LOG

60 games played