Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
BOS lead PHI lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
PHI 2P — 3P —
BOS 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 180 attempts

PHI PHI Shot-making Δ

Maxey 8/20 -3.8
Edgecombe 6/16 -4.1
Oubre Jr. 5/14 -6.7
Edwards 3/9 -3.4
George Hard 4/8 +1.6
Grimes Hard 3/6 +1.1
Barlow Open 1/6 -5.7
Watford Open 3/4 +0.6
Bona Open 1/3 -1.4
Drummond 1/2 -0.5

BOS BOS Shot-making Δ

Brown 11/21 +2.3
Tatum 9/17 +0.5
Pritchard Hard 4/12 -2.3
White Hard 4/10 +0.2
Hauser Hard 4/6 +6.3
Queta Open 5/5 +4.1
Scheierman Hard 2/5 +1.6
Walsh 2/5 -0.4
Garza Hard 1/4 -0.6
Vučević Hard 1/3 +0.2
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
PHI
BOS
35/90 Field Goals 45/90
38.9% Field Goal % 50.0%
4/23 3-Pointers 16/44
17.4% 3-Point % 36.4%
17/23 Free Throws 17/22
73.9% Free Throw % 77.3%
45.4% True Shooting % 61.7%
53 Total Rebounds 58
11 Offensive 5
29 Defensive 38
20 Assists 31
1.33 Assist/TO Ratio 3.10
14 Turnovers 8
3 Steals 7
1 Blocks 3
20 Fouls 21
58 Points in Paint 42
10 Fast Break Pts 20
3 Points off TOs 22
10 Second Chance Pts 12
27 Bench Points 37
0 Largest Lead 35
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Jayson Tatum
25 PTS · 11 REB · 7 AST · 32.4 MIN
+26.89
2
Jaylen Brown
26 PTS · 4 REB · 3 AST · 30.0 MIN
+20.27
3
Sam Hauser
12 PTS · 7 REB · 2 AST · 28.5 MIN
+15.12
4
Neemias Queta
13 PTS · 2 REB · 1 AST · 15.1 MIN
+10.25
5
Paul George
17 PTS · 4 REB · 1 AST · 28.4 MIN
+9.82
6
VJ Edgecombe
13 PTS · 3 REB · 3 AST · 34.0 MIN
+9.2
7
Derrick White
10 PTS · 3 REB · 6 AST · 32.7 MIN
+8.31
8
Luka Garza
7 PTS · 2 REB · 1 AST · 14.2 MIN
+5.91
9
Tyrese Maxey
21 PTS · 1 REB · 8 AST · 36.5 MIN
+5.77
10
Trendon Watford
6 PTS · 1 REB · 0 AST · 7.0 MIN
+5.52
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:11 BOS shot clock Team TURNOVER 91–123
Q4 0:36 H. González REBOUND (Off:0 Def:1) 91–123
Q4 0:38 MISS Q. Grimes 24' pullup 3PT 91–123
Q4 0:44 B. Scheierman 25' 3PT running (5 PTS) (J. Walsh 2 AST) 91–123
Q4 0:48 J. Walsh REBOUND (Off:0 Def:2) 91–120
Q4 0:49 H. González BLOCK (1 BLK) 91–120
Q4 0:49 MISS D. Barlow cutting DUNK - blocked 91–120
Q4 1:01 TEAM defensive REBOUND 91–120
Q4 1:02 MISS B. Scheierman 33' 3PT 91–120
Q4 1:23 T. Watford running Layup (6 PTS) (D. Terry 2 AST) 91–120
Q4 1:28 D. Terry REBOUND (Off:0 Def:2) 89–120
Q4 1:30 MISS L. Garza 26' 3PT 89–120
Q4 1:43 T. Watford driving Layup (4 PTS) 89–120
Q4 1:52 Q. Grimes REBOUND (Off:0 Def:4) 87–120
Q4 1:54 MISS B. Scheierman 30' 3PT 87–120

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

BOS Boston Celtics
S Derrick White 32.7m
10
pts
3
reb
6
ast
Impact
+4.9

Despite generating solid defensive events (+2.1), heavy miss penalties from a rough perimeter shooting night dragged his overall score into the red. He struggled to find his rhythm from deep, accumulating negative value on contested attempts that failed to drop. The connective playmaking was present, but the shot-making deficit ultimately sabotaged his impact.

Shooting
FG 4/10 (40.0%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 47.9%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg +36.4
+/- +24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.7m
Scoring +5.2
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +3.8
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Jayson Tatum 32.4m
25
pts
11
reb
7
ast
Impact
+23.5

Elite defensive playmaking (+7.2) and high-level creation completely overpowered the miss penalties from a cold night beyond the arc. He dictated the geometry of the floor, using his gravity to generate high-value looks for teammates while shutting down his individual matchups. It was a masterclass in leveraging two-way dominance even when the outside jumper betrays him.

Shooting
FG 9/17 (52.9%)
3PT 1/7 (14.3%)
FT 6/6 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 63.6%
USG% 27.6%
Net Rtg +31.7
+/- +20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.4m
Scoring +19.5
Creation +2.8
Shot Making +4.1
Hustle +3.3
Defense +3.2
Turnovers -2.4
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
S Jaylen Brown 30.0m
26
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
+19.8

A brute-force scoring onslaught and disruptive defensive effort (+3.2) drove a dominant overall impact. He balanced his aggressive shot profile by converting high-difficulty attempts, avoiding the miss penalties that sometimes plague his high-usage nights. This was a quintessential performance of his late-season evolution into an unstoppable two-way engine.

Shooting
FG 11/21 (52.4%)
3PT 2/2 (100.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 59.4%
USG% 34.8%
Net Rtg +36.7
+/- +23
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.0m
Scoring +19.1
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +6.2
Hustle +3.1
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -5.4
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
S Sam Hauser 28.5m
12
pts
7
reb
2
ast
Impact
+12.3

Blistering perimeter shot-making and solid defensive execution (+2.6) fueled a highly productive shift. By converting high-difficulty looks from beyond the arc without forcing bad shots, he maximized his offensive bonus. This performance perfectly illustrates his value as a nuclear floor-spacer when his rhythm is locked in.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 4/6 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 9.1%
Net Rtg +23.3
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.5m
Scoring +10.5
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +3.9
Hustle +5.0
Defense -0.8
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
S Neemias Queta 15.1m
13
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
+1.9

Flawless interior finishing generated a massive shot-making bonus that easily offset his defensive bleeding (-2.2). He operated as a ruthless enforcer around the basket, punishing mismatches and converting every look he was given. This hyper-efficient outing underscores his evolution into a low-maintenance, high-reward offensive anchor.

Shooting
FG 5/5 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 96.2%
USG% 20.6%
Net Rtg +48.2
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.1m
Scoring +12.5
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.3
Hustle +0.6
Defense -6.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
12
pts
3
reb
6
ast
Impact
+0.1

A blindingly green light resulted in severe shot-making penalties that completely erased his marginal defensive contributions (+1.7). He continually forced difficult perimeter looks that failed to convert, actively hurting the offensive flow. It was a highly volatile microwave shift where the heat check simply never arrived.

Shooting
FG 4/12 (33.3%)
3PT 2/9 (22.2%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 45.0%
USG% 18.5%
Net Rtg +31.8
+/- +21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.4m
Scoring +5.7
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +0.9
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -5.4
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
3
pts
6
reb
3
ast
Impact
-12.9

A complete lack of offensive gravity and poor defensive metrics (-1.2) culminated in a disastrous rotational shift. He failed to establish any interior presence or create for others, while simultaneously bleeding value on the other end of the floor. This outing reflects his ongoing midseason struggles with erratic efficiency and diminished utility.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 12.8%
Net Rtg +38.2
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.5m
Scoring +1.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +1.8
Defense -4.7
Turnovers -5.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
5
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.0

A lack of offensive assertiveness and minor miss penalties resulted in a slightly negative impact score. While he held his own defensively (+0.8), he failed to generate meaningful creation or shot-making bonuses to boost his value. This quiet outing is indicative of his erratic late-season rhythm as he bounces between roles.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 14.7%
Net Rtg +28.7
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.3m
Scoring +2.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.2
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
Jordan Walsh 14.7m
5
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-3.3

Marginal miss penalties and a lack of creation volume kept him trapped in the negative despite a decent defensive effort (+0.6). He struggled to assert himself offensively, floating through possessions without applying pressure to the rim. This performance highlights his ongoing struggle to provide consistent two-way value when his jumper isn't falling.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 42.5%
USG% 17.1%
Net Rtg +44.0
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.7m
Scoring +1.9
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +1.3
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Luka Garza 14.2m
7
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-1.2

Severe miss penalties from a cold perimeter shooting night dragged his overall impact down significantly from his baseline box production. While he managed to survive the shift, his defensive liabilities (-1.5) and forced outside looks capped his effectiveness. It was a gritty but flawed outing for a player who usually relies heavily on efficient interior scoring bursts.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 60.8%
USG% 17.1%
Net Rtg +16.7
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.2m
Scoring +4.6
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +2.5
Defense -3.1
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
5
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.7

Perfect shooting execution in a brief window generated a highly efficient shot-making bonus. He capitalized on every single touch without forcing the issue, maximizing his offensive value in limited minutes. This sudden burst of competence is a stark contrast to his usual garbage-time irrelevance.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 125.0%
USG% 22.2%
Net Rtg +33.3
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.2m
Scoring +5.0
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +1.3
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.3

In just over a minute of action, he managed to generate a quick burst of defensive value (+1.2) without attempting a single shot. He strictly played his role, avoiding any negative offensive penalties while disrupting the opponent's flow. It was a microscopic but effective cameo for a player struggling to find consistent rotation minutes.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +150.0
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.0m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.5
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
PHI Philadelphia 76ers
S Tyrese Maxey 36.5m
21
pts
1
reb
8
ast
Impact
+0.6

A heavy volume of missed shots and severe defensive liabilities (-2.7) completely overshadowed his creation credit. Operating as the primary battering ram, his forced attempts against set defenses resulted in steep shot-making penalties that tanked his overall value. This performance highlights the downside of his relentless offensive burden when the efficiency isn't there to match the usage.

Shooting
FG 8/20 (40.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 47.3%
USG% 27.3%
Net Rtg -40.4
+/- -29
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.5m
Scoring +12.4
Creation +2.2
Shot Making +4.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -3.4
Turnovers -7.8
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
S VJ Edgecombe 34.0m
13
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
+3.7

Excellent defensive event creation (+3.1) was entirely undone by a barrage of difficulty-adjusted miss penalties on the perimeter. His insistence on firing through an icy outside shooting slump actively sabotaged the offense and dragged his total impact into the red. While his defensive motor remains high, poor shot selection continues to cap his overall effectiveness.

Shooting
FG 6/16 (37.5%)
3PT 0/5 (0.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 39.5%
USG% 22.5%
Net Rtg -35.3
+/- -26
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.0m
Scoring +5.7
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +3.8
Defense +1.6
Turnovers -3.5
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
S Kelly Oubre Jr. 31.3m
10
pts
7
reb
2
ast
Impact
-1.6

A brutal barrage of difficulty-adjusted miss penalties completely derailed his offensive utility, dragging his total impact to -7.4. Continuing a troubling perimeter slump, his inability to convert contested looks erased any marginal defensive contributions (+0.3). He actively bled value by forcing the issue rather than finding alternative ways to create.

Shooting
FG 5/14 (35.7%)
3PT 0/5 (0.0%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 34.6%
USG% 19.2%
Net Rtg -29.1
+/- -21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.3m
Scoring +2.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +5.0
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Paul George 28.4m
17
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
+7.8

Severe turnover costs or a lack of high-leverage creation dragged his overall impact down to a modest +3.0 despite efficient shooting. He picked his spots well but failed to dictate the offensive geometry, resulting in a lower ceiling for his total value. This low-volume, high-efficiency pattern reflects his recent transition into a more connective, high-variance glue guy.

Shooting
FG 4/8 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 8/9 (88.9%)
Advanced
TS% 71.1%
USG% 18.8%
Net Rtg -14.9
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.4m
Scoring +14.1
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +1.2
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -4.7
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S Adem Bona 14.3m
3
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.7

Defensive bleeding (-1.9) and a complete lack of offensive gravity kept him firmly in the negative for this chaotic shift. He struggled to anchor the paint or deter at the rim, compounding the miss penalties from his limited touch around the basket. It was another invisible stint that mirrors his ongoing struggles to secure rotational trust.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 38.7%
USG% 13.5%
Net Rtg -3.7
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.3m
Scoring +0.7
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +2.8
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -3.1
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
7
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
-2.2

Invisible peripheral contributions and likely turnover damage drove a deeply negative overall score despite decent shooting splits. He operated as a hesitant floor-spacer rather than an aggressive focal point, failing to generate any creation or defensive value (-0.3). This passive outing is a stark regression from his recent aggressive mid-March surge.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 58.3%
USG% 14.5%
Net Rtg -28.4
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.7m
Scoring +5.0
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +1.2
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -3.5
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
2
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
-11.1

While he provided some rim deterrence (+2.5 defense), his complete lack of offensive utility and severe turnover costs plummeted his overall impact to a dismal -7.9. He failed to generate any hustle value on the glass, neutralizing his primary elite skill. Without his usual rebounding dominance, his limitations as an offensive anchor were glaringly exposed.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 10.2%
Net Rtg -44.2
+/- -19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.4m
Scoring +1.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +1.5
Defense +0.7
Turnovers -7.8
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 3
7
pts
6
reb
0
ast
Impact
+1.7

Inefficient perimeter execution generated enough miss penalties to drag his otherwise decent box production into the red. He failed to find a rhythm within the flow of the offense, settling for contested looks that the model heavily punishes. This outing continues a brutal fight for rotation survival defined by erratic offensive impact.

Shooting
FG 3/9 (33.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 37.1%
USG% 21.4%
Net Rtg -57.8
+/- -21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.1m
Scoring +1.9
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +6.7
Defense -1.9
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
4
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.4

Steep miss penalties from a rough shooting night overshadowed any marginal connective value he provided. He struggled to finish through contact, bleeding offensive impact with every empty possession that ended in a contested brick. It was a classic example of his maddening inconsistency, rendering him a net-negative placeholder in the frontcourt.

Shooting
FG 1/6 (16.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 29.1%
USG% 22.6%
Net Rtg -51.7
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.9m
Scoring -0.4
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +3.8
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
6
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.1

Flawless shot selection and efficient interior finishing drove a highly positive impact score in extremely limited minutes. He capitalized on every touch without forcing the issue, avoiding the miss penalties that often plague erratic bench scorers. This quick burst of connective utility highlights his value when he plays strictly within his means.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg -12.1
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.0m
Scoring +5.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
1
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-6.8

A complete lack of offensive gravity and missed attempts tanked his brief appearance. While he offered a slight defensive bump (+0.6), his inability to pressure the rim or space the floor made him an offensive liability. It was another frustrating cardio session in his ongoing search for a reliable rotational role.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 17.4%
USG% 21.4%
Net Rtg -14.3
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.2m
Scoring -0.9
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.8

Absolute offensive invisibility resulted in a negative overall impact, as he failed to register a single shot attempt or creation event. He merely occupied space on the floor, offering only a marginal defensive presence (+0.3) to justify his minutes. This ghost-like stint perfectly encapsulates his brutal struggle to establish a consistent NBA identity.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -33.3
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.2m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0