Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
PHI lead BOS lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
BOS 2P — 3P —
PHI 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 175 attempts

BOS BOS Shot-making Δ

Brown Hard 7/17 -0.1
Pritchard 6/16 -4.0
Tatum 6/13 +0.4
White Hard 3/8 +1.5
Hauser Hard 2/6 -1.1
Garza 4/5 +3.0
Queta 2/5 -1.3
Vučević 1/5 -3.4
Scheierman Hard 2/4 +0.5
Harper Jr. Hard 1/3 +0.1

PHI PHI Shot-making Δ

Maxey 11/22 +2.5
Embiid Hard 6/18 -3.3
George Hard 8/17 +4.5
Oubre Jr. 6/11 +1.1
Edgecombe 5/11 -1.4
Grimes 1/6 -4.8
Edwards Hard 1/3 0.0
Drummond Open 1/1 +0.8
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
BOS
PHI
36/86 Field Goals 39/89
41.9% Field Goal % 43.8%
12/41 3-Pointers 11/33
29.3% 3-Point % 33.3%
9/16 Free Throws 17/19
56.2% Free Throw % 89.5%
50.0% True Shooting % 54.4%
52 Total Rebounds 57
8 Offensive 8
38 Defensive 40
18 Assists 22
1.38 Assist/TO Ratio 1.83
13 Turnovers 10
7 Steals 7
3 Blocks 6
18 Fouls 15
42 Points in Paint 40
14 Fast Break Pts 16
14 Points off TOs 17
10 Second Chance Pts 9
38 Bench Points 6
5 Largest Lead 23
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Tyrese Maxey
30 PTS · 2 REB · 5 AST · 39.8 MIN
+29.11
2
Joel Embiid
19 PTS · 10 REB · 8 AST · 34.2 MIN
+15.05
3
Paul George
23 PTS · 4 REB · 3 AST · 39.6 MIN
+14.48
4
Kelly Oubre Jr.
14 PTS · 9 REB · 1 AST · 38.7 MIN
+13.29
5
VJ Edgecombe
14 PTS · 8 REB · 3 AST · 38.0 MIN
+12.3
6
Luka Garza
9 PTS · 2 REB · 1 AST · 13.6 MIN
+9.65
7
Derrick White
11 PTS · 1 REB · 1 AST · 31.5 MIN
+9.32
8
Jayson Tatum
17 PTS · 11 REB · 3 AST · 28.8 MIN
+7.35
9
Payton Pritchard
14 PTS · 3 REB · 5 AST · 36.1 MIN
+6.98
10
Baylor Scheierman
5 PTS · 3 REB · 1 AST · 15.2 MIN
+5.8
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:19 PHI shot clock Team TURNOVER 93–106
Q4 0:19 TEAM offensive REBOUND 93–106
Q4 0:21 MISS J. Edwards 32' pullup 3PT 93–106
Q4 0:43 J. Walsh running DUNK (3 PTS) 93–106
Q4 0:46 B. Scheierman STEAL (2 STL) 91–106
Q4 0:46 J. Edwards lost ball TURNOVER (2 TO) 91–106
Q4 0:59 D. Banton driving finger roll Layup (2 PTS) (B. Scheierman 1 AST) 91–106
Q4 1:13 J. Edwards take personal FOUL (2 PF) 89–106
Q4 1:14 T. Maxey Free Throw 2 of 2 (30 PTS) 89–106
Q4 1:14 T. Maxey Free Throw 1 of 2 (29 PTS) 89–105
Q4 1:14 T. Maxey technical Free Throw 1 of 1 (28 PTS) 89–104
Q4 1:14 R. Harper Jr. technical FOUL (1 Tech) 89–103
Q4 1:14 L. Garza shooting personal FOUL (2 PF) (Maxey 2 FT) 89–103
Q4 1:19 A. Drummond REBOUND (Off:1 Def:6) 89–103
Q4 1:22 MISS P. Pritchard 24' step back 3PT 89–103

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

PHI Philadelphia 76ers
S Tyrese Maxey 39.8m
30
pts
2
reb
5
ast
Impact
+27.9

Maxey was an absolute offensive supernova, torching the defense for 30 points on 50% shooting to generate a staggering +26.1 offensive credit. He operated as a relentless scoring engine, hitting 3-of-5 from deep while also disrupting passing lanes for 2 steals (+5.2 defense credit). His blinding speed and shot-making simply overwhelmed the opposition from the opening tip.

Shooting
FG 11/22 (50.0%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 5/5 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 62.0%
USG% 26.4%
Net Rtg +18.1
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.8m
Scoring +22.2
Creation +2.3
Shot Making +6.5
Hustle +2.5
Defense +3.2
Turnovers +0.0
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
S Paul George 39.6m
23
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
+9.9

A blistering perimeter display defined George's night, as he drilled 5 triples to power a +9.7 offensive credit despite battling turnover issues (4 giveaways). He was equally engaged on the other end, logging 10 shot contests and 2 steals to secure a robust +6.5 defensive credit. His two-way aggression set the tone, even if his ball security wavered.

Shooting
FG 8/17 (47.1%)
3PT 5/9 (55.6%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 64.3%
USG% 24.2%
Net Rtg +13.3
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.6m
Scoring +16.4
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +6.3
Hustle +1.2
Defense +3.1
Turnovers -9.5
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 4
S Kelly Oubre Jr. 38.7m
14
pts
9
reb
1
ast
Impact
+7.5

Oubre Jr. was a terror on the defensive end, racking up 2 steals and 2 blocks to anchor a massive +7.2 defensive credit. He paired that defensive havoc with relentless work on the glass (9 rebounds) and efficient finishing (6-of-11) to generate a +7.8 offensive credit. This was a complete, two-way performance that showcased his value as a high-energy starter.

Shooting
FG 6/11 (54.5%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 58.9%
USG% 17.0%
Net Rtg +30.2
+/- +23
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.7m
Scoring +9.5
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +7.5
Defense +3.6
Turnovers -7.1
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 3
S VJ Edgecombe 38.0m
14
pts
8
reb
3
ast
Impact
+4.0

Edgecombe provided a steadying, highly efficient secondary scoring punch, converting 5-of-11 shots to earn a +11.0 offensive credit. He supplemented his scoring by crashing the boards for 8 rebounds and challenging 8 shots on the perimeter. It was a mature, controlled shift that highlighted his growing comfort as a two-way wing.

Shooting
FG 5/11 (45.5%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 56.8%
USG% 13.8%
Net Rtg +23.1
+/- +18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.0m
Scoring +9.2
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +2.4
Defense -2.4
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 0
S Joel Embiid 34.2m
19
pts
10
reb
8
ast
Impact
+15.2

Embiid struggled mightily to find his shooting touch (6-of-18), but he masterfully pivoted to a playmaking hub, dishing out 8 assists to drive a stellar +14.6 offensive credit. He dominated the glass with 10 boards and set 5 screen assists, ensuring the offense flowed even when his own jumpers clanked. His +4.8 defensive credit proves he remained an imposing anchor despite the scoring dip.

Shooting
FG 6/18 (33.3%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 6/7 (85.7%)
Advanced
TS% 45.1%
USG% 28.2%
Net Rtg +11.2
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.2m
Scoring +10.2
Creation +3.0
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +8.8
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
2
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-6.5

An icy shooting night completely neutralized Grimes, who managed just 2 points on a brutal 1-of-6 from the floor. His offensive credit flatlined at +0.1, and while he tried to stay engaged with 2 deflections and 3 contests, it wasn't enough to salvage his shift. When his perimeter shot abandons him, his overall utility takes a massive hit.

Shooting
FG 1/6 (16.7%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 16.7%
USG% 11.8%
Net Rtg +4.3
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.1m
Scoring -2.3
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +0.2
Hustle +3.8
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
7
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.6

Drummond operated strictly as a blue-collar enforcer, taking just one shot while focusing entirely on setting bruising picks (5 screen assists) and clearing the glass (7 rebounds). His screen-setting helped pave the way for a +4.8 offensive credit despite scoring only 2 points. He played his exact role perfectly, doing the dirty work in his 12 minutes of action.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 3.2%
Net Rtg +29.9
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.6m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +7.0
Defense -1.4
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
2
pts
5
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.6

Edwards struggled to find any positive rhythm during his 10 minutes, coughing up 2 turnovers that dragged his offensive credit down to -2.4. While he did manage to pull down 5 rebounds, his offensive hesitation and mistakes made him a liability on that end of the floor. He remains trapped in a deep rotational slump.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 19.2%
Net Rtg -21.7
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.0m
Scoring +0.5
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +3.4
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -4.7
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.3

Watford saw just over a minute of garbage-time action, recording a single shot contest. He had no time to make any statistical impact.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -133.3
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.2m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.5

Terry logged a mere 74 seconds of mop-up duty, failing to record a single stat. He was strictly a spectator at the end of the bench.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -133.3
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.2m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Adem Bona 1.2m
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.6

Bona appeared for just over a minute in garbage time, registering zero statistics. He had no opportunity to influence the game.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -133.3
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.2m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Kyle Lowry 1.2m
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.5

Lowry played a single minute of garbage time, recording no stats. The veteran guard was essentially given the night off.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -133.3
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.2m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
BOS Boston Celtics
S Derrick White 31.5m
11
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
+3.6

White made his mark as a disruptive defensive presence, generating 3 steals and 3 deflections to power a robust +4.7 defensive credit. While his overall counting stats were quiet, his perimeter efficiency (3-of-6 from deep) helped secure a +5.7 offensive credit. He played the ultimate connective role, tilting the math through high-leverage defensive events rather than raw scoring.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 61.9%
USG% 15.5%
Net Rtg -39.1
+/- -25
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.5m
Scoring +7.2
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +1.3
Defense +3.7
Turnovers -3.5
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 2
S Jayson Tatum 28.8m
17
pts
11
reb
3
ast
Impact
+1.5

Tatum's scoring aggression took a backseat, as he managed just 13 field goal attempts while his playmaking volume also dipped to 3 assists. Despite the muted raw production, he still generated a +5.9 offensive credit by picking his spots efficiently (6-of-13 shooting). His +3.2 defensive credit highlights a solid effort on the other end, even if this wasn't his typical alpha performance.

Shooting
FG 6/13 (46.2%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 3/5 (60.0%)
Advanced
TS% 55.9%
USG% 27.3%
Net Rtg -19.2
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.8m
Scoring +10.8
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +3.2
Hustle +3.3
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -7.1
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
S Jaylen Brown 28.5m
18
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-7.8

Sloppy decision-making and inefficient volume completely derailed Brown's night, highlighted by 5 turnovers that dragged down his offensive credit to a dismal -1.6. He struggled to find any rhythm from the floor (7-of-17) and was equally ineffective on the other end, bleeding value with a -2.7 defensive credit. It was a disjointed performance where his forced offense actively hurt the team.

Shooting
FG 7/17 (41.2%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 2/6 (33.3%)
Advanced
TS% 45.8%
USG% 41.0%
Net Rtg -39.4
+/- -24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.5m
Scoring +9.1
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +4.7
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -13.2
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 5
S Sam Hauser 21.0m
5
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-4.5

A prolonged perimeter freeze continued to sap Hauser's value, as he connected on just 1-of-5 from deep to finish with 5 points. When his jumper isn't falling, his utility plummets, reflected in a modest +2.3 offensive credit. He offered little resistance or supplementary value elsewhere, making it a quiet night overall.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 41.7%
USG% 12.2%
Net Rtg -25.5
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.0m
Scoring +1.8
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +1.3
Hustle +1.2
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Neemias Queta 20.3m
4
pts
11
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.9

Queta completely abandoned his typical scoring role to focus entirely on being a defensive enforcer and glass-cleaner. His immense +4.2 defensive credit and +4.0 hustle credit were fueled by a relentless 14 shot contests and 11 rebounds. He thrived purely in the margins, anchoring the paint even while his offensive touches vanished.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 40.0%
USG% 13.0%
Net Rtg -29.4
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.3m
Scoring +1.6
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +0.7
Hustle +4.3
Defense -2.1
Turnovers -3.1
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 1
14
pts
3
reb
5
ast
Impact
-0.0

A brutal perimeter freeze defined Pritchard's outing, as he clanked his way to a 1-of-8 mark from beyond the arc. Despite the icy shooting, his +6.3 offensive credit shows he still found ways to create value, leaning on his playmaking (5 assists) to keep the offense moving. However, the sheer volume of missed triples ultimately capped his overall effectiveness.

Shooting
FG 6/16 (37.5%)
3PT 1/8 (12.5%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 42.6%
USG% 20.7%
Net Rtg -6.7
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.1m
Scoring +5.5
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +3.1
Hustle +0.9
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Jordan Walsh 19.3m
3
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
-3.6

Walsh leaned into a gritty, connective role, pulling down 5 rebounds and generating 3 deflections to make his presence felt without needing the ball. His surprising playmaking (3 assists) helped drive a solid +4.8 offensive credit despite scoring only 3 points. It was a blue-collar shift that showcased his ability to contribute through hustle and quick decisions.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 38.7%
USG% 8.7%
Net Rtg +22.7
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.3m
Scoring +0.5
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +3.4
Defense +0.2
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
5
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-2.4

Scheierman made his most significant impact on the defensive end, swiping 2 steals to fuel an impressive +4.0 defensive credit. He was highly selective on offense, taking just 4 shots, but his defensive activity allowed him to leave a positive footprint in his 15 minutes. It was a disciplined, low-usage shift defined by opportunistic defense.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 62.5%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg +6.7
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.2m
Scoring +3.4
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.3
Hustle +0.9
Defense +1.6
Turnovers -1.1
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
2
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-5.2

Vučević was a complete non-factor offensively, managing just 2 points on a dismal 1-of-5 shooting clip. He managed to salvage his brief 14-minute stint through sheer effort, logging 6 contests to earn a +2.6 defensive credit. Still, his inability to stretch the floor or score inside rendered him an afterthought on the offensive end.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 20.0%
USG% 15.2%
Net Rtg -19.7
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.2m
Scoring -1.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +1.6
Defense +2.4
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Luka Garza 13.6m
9
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
+1.0

Garza was an absolute offensive flamethrower in his limited 13 minutes, converting 4 of his 5 attempts to rack up a massive +11.8 offensive credit. He supplemented his scoring punch with high energy inside, challenging shooters with 7 contests to earn a +2.7 hustle credit. He provided exactly the kind of instant-offense spark required of a bench big.

Shooting
FG 4/5 (80.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 90.0%
USG% 15.6%
Net Rtg +18.5
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.6m
Scoring +8.2
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +2.5
Defense -3.1
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.0

Harper Jr. provided a brief but steadying presence off the bench, using a steal and solid positioning to post a +2.9 defensive credit. He didn't force the issue offensively (+2.6 offense credit), hitting one of his two three-point looks while grabbing 3 boards. He executed his narrow role perfectly without making mistakes.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 12.0%
Net Rtg +45.3
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.4m
Scoring +1.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +3.8
Defense +0.5
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.4

Banton saw just over a minute of garbage-time action, converting his only field goal attempt for 2 points. He had no time to establish any meaningful rhythm or impact the game's outcome.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg +133.3
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.2m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0