GAME ANALYSIS

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

PHI Philadelphia 76ers
S VJ Edgecombe 34.6m
6
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
-8.8

A severe regression in shot-making completely overshadowed his commendable defensive effort and high-motor closeouts. He repeatedly forced bad looks against set defenses, generating empty possessions that directly fueled the opponent's transition attack and tanked his score.

Shooting
FG 2/11 (18.2%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 27.3%
USG% 15.5%
Net Rtg +13.6
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.6m
Offense +0.1
Hustle +3.8
Defense +3.0
Raw total +6.9
Avg player in 34.6m -15.7
Impact -8.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 31.2%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 0
S Tyrese Maxey 33.6m
21
pts
5
reb
9
ast
Impact
+10.0

Elite playmaking and relentless hustle (+5.5) completely masked a brutal shooting night inside the arc. He consistently weaponized his speed to collapse the defense and create for others, driving a massive +10.0 impact despite clanking 12 field goals.

Shooting
FG 5/17 (29.4%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 8/8 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.2%
USG% 27.6%
Net Rtg -9.1
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.6m
Offense +16.4
Hustle +5.5
Defense +3.3
Raw total +25.2
Avg player in 33.6m -15.2
Impact +10.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
S Andre Drummond 33.3m
14
pts
13
reb
0
ast
Impact
+6.9

Dominated the interior with a massive scoring resurgence and suffocating paint protection (+4.7 Def). He consistently bullied opposing bigs for deep post position, turning a normally quiet offensive role into a major catalyst for the team's positive impact.

Shooting
FG 6/11 (54.5%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 56.8%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg +17.5
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.3m
Offense +14.3
Hustle +2.9
Defense +4.7
Raw total +21.9
Avg player in 33.3m -15.0
Impact +6.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
S Kelly Oubre Jr. 30.8m
12
pts
7
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.5

A complete inability to connect from beyond the arc tanked his overall efficiency and allowed defenders to sag heavily into the paint. While he found some success slashing to the rim, the spacing issues he created ultimately hurt the team's half-court flow and drove a negative rating.

Shooting
FG 5/11 (45.5%)
3PT 0/5 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.5%
USG% 21.2%
Net Rtg -4.8
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.8m
Offense +5.5
Hustle +1.9
Defense 0.0
Raw total +7.4
Avg player in 30.8m -13.9
Impact -6.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S Trendon Watford 21.4m
7
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-5.5

Tremendous effort plays and 50/50 ball recoveries (+4.4 Hustle) were entirely undone by poor finishing around the basket. His inability to consistently convert high-percentage looks bogged down the offense and resulted in a steep negative rating.

Shooting
FG 3/10 (30.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 35.0%
USG% 23.4%
Net Rtg -18.1
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.4m
Offense +0.2
Hustle +4.4
Defense -0.4
Raw total +4.2
Avg player in 21.4m -9.7
Impact -5.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
18
pts
6
reb
4
ast
Impact
+1.9

Capitalized on excellent shot selection to sustain his recent hot streak, punishing late rotations with timely perimeter daggers. His sturdy point-of-attack defense (+4.8 Def) perfectly complemented this offensive surge, cementing a highly effective two-way performance.

Shooting
FG 6/10 (60.0%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 79.5%
USG% 23.4%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.8m
Offense +9.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +4.8
Raw total +14.4
Avg player in 27.8m -12.5
Impact +1.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 41.7%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 4
22
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
+14.6

Delivered an absolute masterclass in shot selection and spacing, torching the nets to drive a monstrous +14.6 overall impact. He ruthlessly capitalized on every defensive breakdown on the perimeter, turning a massive scoring leap into the defining performance of the night.

Shooting
FG 8/9 (88.9%)
3PT 5/6 (83.3%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 116.5%
USG% 17.9%
Net Rtg +26.0
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.6m
Offense +23.2
Hustle +1.6
Defense +1.8
Raw total +26.6
Avg player in 26.6m -12.0
Impact +14.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 14.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Adem Bona 14.6m
2
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
+1.1

Offensive involvement was practically non-existent, but he anchored the second unit with spectacular rim deterrence (+6.3 Def). He altered multiple shots at the summit during a crucial rotation stretch, keeping his overall impact safely in the green.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 53.2%
USG% 6.5%
Net Rtg -22.3
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.6m
Offense +0.3
Hustle +1.0
Defense +6.3
Raw total +7.6
Avg player in 14.6m -6.5
Impact +1.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
3
ast
Impact
-2.6

Brought commendable energy to the glass (+3.1 Hustle) but completely derailed offensive possessions with ill-advised perimeter attempts. His failure to stretch the floor, combined with minor defensive miscommunications, resulted in a net negative stint.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 7.4%
Net Rtg +18.2
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.3m
Offense -0.2
Hustle +3.1
Defense -0.8
Raw total +2.1
Avg player in 10.3m -4.7
Impact -2.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-3.8

Rushed his limited offensive opportunities, resulting in a pair of empty trips that stalled the offensive flow. Despite showing some spark in loose-ball situations (+1.9 Hustle), his inability to execute half-court sets quickly earned him a spot back on the bench.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 21.4%
Net Rtg +7.7
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.8m
Offense -3.0
Hustle +1.9
Defense +0.5
Raw total -0.6
Avg player in 6.8m -3.2
Impact -3.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
BOS Boston Celtics
S Jaylen Brown 35.2m
24
pts
6
reb
5
ast
Impact
+5.8

Despite a dip from his recent scoring tear, his robust perimeter containment (+4.6 Def) kept his overall impact firmly in the green. He compensated for a slew of missed jumpers by forcing the issue inside the arc rather than settling from deep.

Shooting
FG 8/18 (44.4%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 7/8 (87.5%)
Advanced
TS% 55.8%
USG% 28.4%
Net Rtg -7.2
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.2m
Offense +15.1
Hustle +1.9
Defense +4.6
Raw total +21.6
Avg player in 35.2m -15.8
Impact +5.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 43.8%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S Derrick White 35.0m
18
pts
5
reb
7
ast
Impact
-1.5

High-volume misfires from the field suppressed his net score despite a massive spike in his overall scoring production. Elite rotational defense and deflections (+4.5 Hustle) kept him afloat, but the sheer inefficiency of his shot selection ultimately dragged his rating into the red.

Shooting
FG 7/20 (35.0%)
3PT 4/11 (36.4%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 44.0%
USG% 26.8%
Net Rtg +1.5
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.0m
Offense +6.3
Hustle +4.5
Defense +3.4
Raw total +14.2
Avg player in 35.0m -15.7
Impact -1.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 63.6%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 2
5
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
-10.4

A brutal shooting slump completely short-circuited the second-unit offense and cratered his overall impact (-10.4). While he generated decent point-of-attack pressure, the sheer volume of bricked perimeter looks completely derailed his value on the night.

Shooting
FG 2/9 (22.2%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 27.8%
USG% 13.3%
Net Rtg -16.7
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.4m
Offense +0.8
Hustle +0.8
Defense +2.0
Raw total +3.6
Avg player in 31.4m -14.0
Impact -10.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 45.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Neemias Queta 28.7m
8
pts
10
reb
2
ast
Impact
-0.8

Solid rim protection (+3.3 Def) couldn't quite rescue a slightly negative overall rating during his interior shifts. His usually elite finishing efficiency dipped just enough to stall out offensive possessions, while a lack of high-energy loose ball recoveries limited his ability to swing momentum.

Shooting
FG 4/8 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 14.7%
Net Rtg -2.1
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.7m
Offense +8.1
Hustle +0.6
Defense +3.3
Raw total +12.0
Avg player in 28.7m -12.8
Impact -0.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 2
S Josh Minott 8.3m
3
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.7

A drastic reduction in touches caused his offensive production to plummet compared to his recent double-digit scoring stretch. Defensive lapses in his brief stint ultimately dragged his net impact into the negative despite perfect shooting on his lone attempt.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 150.0%
USG% 5.0%
Net Rtg -62.5
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.3m
Offense +3.0
Hustle +1.2
Defense -1.2
Raw total +3.0
Avg player in 8.3m -3.7
Impact -0.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Jordan Walsh 29.3m
8
pts
7
reb
1
ast
Impact
+6.0

Defensive dominance (+7.5 Def) and elite energy plays (+5.0 Hustle) were the absolute engines of his stellar performance. He completely disrupted the opponent's wing rotation with his length, capitalizing on a slight scoring bump to round out a phenomenal two-way showing.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.8%
USG% 11.8%
Net Rtg +10.8
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.3m
Offense +6.7
Hustle +5.0
Defense +7.5
Raw total +19.2
Avg player in 29.3m -13.2
Impact +6.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 29.4%
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 0
17
pts
4
reb
5
ast
Impact
-1.3

Poor shot selection inside the arc torpedoed what could have been a highly productive offensive outing. He found some rhythm from deep, but clanking 10 total shots allowed the opposition to leak out in transition and resulted in a slightly negative final tally.

Shooting
FG 5/15 (33.3%)
3PT 3/8 (37.5%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.7%
USG% 29.2%
Net Rtg +18.7
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.9m
Offense +7.9
Hustle +1.2
Defense +1.2
Raw total +10.3
Avg player in 25.9m -11.6
Impact -1.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
Sam Hauser 21.1m
3
pts
7
reb
0
ast
Impact
-3.8

An uncharacteristic cold snap from the perimeter tanked his offensive utility and dragged down his overall score. He remained highly engaged on the other end with excellent closeouts (+4.6 Def), but the lack of floor-spacing gravity severely hindered the half-court offense.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 30.0%
USG% 9.4%
Net Rtg +6.5
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.1m
Offense -0.1
Hustle +1.2
Defense +4.6
Raw total +5.7
Avg player in 21.1m -9.5
Impact -3.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 12.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Luka Garza 19.3m
9
pts
8
reb
0
ast
Impact
+6.7

Relentless activity in the paint (+4.1 Hustle) drove a highly positive impact score despite his finishing efficiency finally cooling off. He generated crucial extra possessions by outworking opposing bigs on the glass, proving his value extends beyond just soft scoring touch.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.4%
USG% 19.1%
Net Rtg -5.1
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.3m
Offense +10.4
Hustle +4.1
Defense +0.9
Raw total +15.4
Avg player in 19.3m -8.7
Impact +6.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
5
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
+3.5

Maximized a tiny window of playing time by taking and making high-value shots strictly within the flow of the offense. His perfect shooting execution provided a massive per-minute boost (+3.5 Total) that stabilized the second unit during a brief rotational transition.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 125.0%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -45.5
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 5.8m
Offense +4.3
Hustle +0.7
Defense +1.1
Raw total +6.1
Avg player in 5.8m -2.6
Impact +3.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1