PHI

2025-26 Season

JABARI WALKER

Philadelphia 76ers | Forward | 6-7
Jabari Walker
4.4 PPG
3.1 RPG
0.5 APG
12.2 MPG
-0.8 Impact

Walker produces at an average rate for a 12-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-0.8
Scoring +2.5
Points 4.4 PPG × +1.00 = +4.4
Missed 2PT 0.9/g × -0.78 = -0.7
Missed 3PT 1.0/g × -0.87 = -0.9
Missed FT 0.3/g × -1.00 = -0.3
Creation +1.2
Assists 0.5/g × +0.50 = +0.2
Off. Rebounds 0.8/g × +1.26 = +1.0
Turnovers -0.8
Turnovers 0.4/g × -1.95 = -0.8
Defense -0.1
Steals 0.4/g × +2.30 = +0.9
Blocks 0.2/g × +0.90 = +0.2
Def. Rebounds 2.3/g × +0.30 = +0.7
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +1.4
Contested Shots 1.6/g × +0.20 = +0.3
Deflections 0.9/g × +0.65 = +0.6
Charges Drawn 0.1/g × +2.70 = +0.3
Loose Balls 0.2/g × +0.60 = +0.1
Screen Assists 0.4/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Raw Impact +4.2
Baseline (game-average expected) −5.0
Net Impact
-0.8
41st pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 19th
5.3 PPG
Efficiency 19th
51.5% TS
Playmaking 7th
0.6 APG
Rebounding 37th
3.6 RPG
Rim Protection 22th
0.10/min
Hustle 40th
0.10/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 75th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Jabari Walker spent his first twenty games oscillating between fleeting bench sparks and complete offensive invisibility. Even when he found the bottom of the net, the underlying metrics often painted a grim picture. During the 11/25 vs ORL matchup, Walker tripled his recent scoring average with 9 points by attacking closeouts. Yet, he still posted a dismal -6.3 impact score because his minutes remained a massive net negative overall. Poor decision-making routinely sabotaged his stints on the floor. Look no further than 10/27 vs ORL, where a disastrous diet of forced, contested jumpers derailed the offense and earned him a -6.0 impact score. Ironically, his most helpful shifts occurred when he stopped hunting his own shot. He logged a +2.0 impact score on 11/05 vs CLE despite scoring zero points, generating real value entirely through sharp off-ball activity and sound defensive positioning.

Jabari Walker’s midseason stretch was defined by maddening inconsistency, oscillating between game-changing floor spacing and completely hollow offensive shifts. He flashed immense upside on 12/05 vs MIL, catching fire from beyond the arc to rack up 18 points and a massive +7.7 impact score. Hitting four three-pointers in that contest completely altered the floor geometry and forced the defense to scramble. However, that shooting touch frequently abandoned him, leading to actively damaging outings like his -5.6 impact mark on 12/19 vs NYK. Empty possessions and a total failure to finish around the basket severely depressed his value during that 14-minute stint. Thankfully, Walker occasionally found ways to salvage his floor time when his jumper failed him. On 01/19 vs IND, he managed a meager 5 points but still generated a highly positive +3.6 impact rating. He earned that number by seamlessly switching across multiple positions, grabbing 6 rebounds, and providing the crucial defensive boost his team desperately needed.

Jabari Walker's midseason stretch was defined by maddening inconsistency, oscillating wildly between unplayable ghost and hyper-efficient offensive flamethrower. He routinely disappeared during brief rotation stints, completely tanking the second unit with erratic decision-making and defensive lapses. On 03/19 vs SAC, his impact cratered to a dismal -5.6 in just six minutes because he hijacked the offense with forced, low-quality shots early in the clock. Yet, just when his rotation spot seemed dead, he would randomly erupt. He was an absolute revelation on 03/03 vs SAS, posting a massive +11.2 impact by punishing mismatches in the post for 20 points and 7 rebounds. When the scoring wasn't there, he had to rely entirely on his motor to stay on the floor. During his outing on 03/23 vs OKC, Walker managed to salvage a +0.8 impact despite scoring just four points, using hard-nosed rebounding and active positioning on the margins to keep his head above water. This Jekyll-and-Hyde routine makes him a fascinating, albeit terrifying, wild card for any coaching staff trying to manage a bench rotation.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Walker's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~5 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 50% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Average defender. Walker doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: -1.8, second-half: +0.1. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 2 games. Longest cold streak: 6 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 68 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

S. Mamukelashvili 34.2 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 4
P. Banchero 32.1 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 4
J. Brown 31.7 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
S. Barnes 27.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Walker 25.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.04
PTS 1
N. Claxton 23.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 4
M. Porter Jr. 23.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 5
P. Siakam 22.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
J. Johnson 22.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 3
J. Giddey 20.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

S. Barnes 47.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 5
P. Banchero 28.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 4
N. Claxton 27.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 6
S. Mamukelashvili 27.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 4
J. Walker 24.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
P. Siakam 22.6 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 5
J. Brown 21.3 poss
FG% 71.4%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.56
PTS 12
K. Kuzma 20.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 4
J. Johnson 18.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 2
N. Clowney 18.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 4

SEASON STATS

61
Games
4.4
PPG
3.1
RPG
0.5
APG
0.4
SPG
0.2
BPG
44.8
FG%
33.0
3P%
75.0
FT%
12.2
MPG

GAME LOG

61 games played