PHI

2025-26 Season

JABARI WALKER

Philadelphia 76ers | Forward | 6-7
Jabari Walker
4.0PPG
2.8RPG
0.5APG
11.3MPG
-6.5 Impact

Walker produces at an poor rate for a 11-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-6.5
Scoring +3.2
Points Scored 4.0 PPG = +4.0
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -1.6
Shot Making above expected FG% = +0.8
Creation +0.4
Assists & Self-Creation 0.5 AST/g + self-creation = +0.4
Turnovers -0.9
Turnovers 0.4/g (live + dead blend) = -0.9
Defense -0.5
Steals 0.3/g = +0.7
Blocks 0.2/g = +0.2
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -1.4
Hustle & Effort +2.8
Rebounds 2.8 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +1.6
Contested Shots 1.4/g = +0.3
Deflections 0.7/g = +0.5
Charges Drawn 0.1/g = +0.2
Loose Balls 0.2/g = +0.1
Screen Assists 0.3/g = +0.1
Raw Impact +5.0
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.5
Net Impact
-6.5
6th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 16th
5.2 PPG
Efficiency 18th
51.0% TS
Playmaking 5th
0.6 APG
Rebounding 36th
3.5 RPG
Defense 70th
+8.6/g
Hustle 74th
+15.2/g
Creation 19th
+1.54/g
Shot Making 35th
+4.75/g
TO Discipline 76th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Jabari Walker’s opening stretch of the season was defined by a brutal struggle to establish an NBA identity, bouncing between the starting five and the deep bench while actively bleeding value on the floor. His early woes culminated on 10/25 vs CHA, where he put up zero points on 0-for-3 shooting to earn a ghastly -17.8 Impact score. That abysmal rating was the direct result of empty offensive possessions and a total lack of playmaking, rendering him a massive liability for the rotation. Fortunately, a permanent move to the second unit eventually sparked a minor late-season revival. Walker finally generated genuine value on 12/03 vs WAS, posting a +6.2 Impact score alongside a modest 10 points and 12 rebounds. He earned that positive mark despite the low scoring output by dominating the glass and executing flawless defensive rotations. He even caught fire offensively on 12/06 vs MIL, drilling four three-pointers for 18 points and a +10.2 Impact score simply by punishing late closeouts. Still, these fleeting moments of competence hardly erase weeks of otherwise invisible basketball.

Jabari Walker spent the middle of the winter desperately trying to find a consistent role, oscillating between brief flashes of utility and long stretches of offensive invisibility. His brutal outing on 01/17 vs CLE captured the worst of this slump, as he went scoreless in four minutes and posted a disastrous -14.5 Impact score by forcing bad jumpers before getting swiftly benched. Even when he actually found the basket, the underlying metrics were often ugly. Take his 7-point effort on 01/11 vs TOR, where a -5.4 Impact score revealed the hidden costs of his terrible perimeter shot selection after he bricked all four of his three-point attempts. Yet, Walker occasionally flipped the script by doing the dirty work. On 01/20 vs IND, he managed just 5 points but registered a stellar +7.7 Impact score. He earned 24 minutes of burn by relentlessly crashing the glass for 6 rebounds and blowing up plays defensively, showing exactly how he can survive in this league without a reliable jumper.

This stretch of the season was defined by extreme, whiplash-inducing volatility for Jabari Walker, who oscillated wildly between unplayable bench warmer and sudden offensive juggernaut. He erupted out of nowhere during a back-to-back set, first hanging 20 points on 03/03 vs SAS before torching the nets for 22 points and 10 rebounds on 03/04 vs UTA. That Utah performance yielded a staggering +23.0 impact score because he paired his hot perimeter shooting with relentless work on the glass and stout defensive effort. Yet, his offensive outbursts didn't always translate to dominant basketball. On 03/12 vs DET, Walker poured in 16 points on flawless 6-for-6 shooting, but managed a surprisingly meager +2.2 impact. By grabbing just a single rebound and providing absolutely zero resistance on the defensive end, his perfect shooting was essentially empty calories. When the jumper stopped falling entirely, he became an active liability on the floor. Look no further than his scoreless outing on 03/19 vs SAC, which generated a disastrous -17.4 impact due to forced shots and completely blown defensive assignments.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Walker has posted negative impact in 86% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 50% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: -7.3, second-half: -5.7. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

In a rough stretch — 14 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 17 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 68 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

S. Mamukelashvili 34.2 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 4
P. Banchero 32.1 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 4
J. Brown 31.7 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
S. Barnes 27.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Walker 25.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.04
PTS 1
N. Claxton 23.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 4
M. Porter Jr. 23.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 5
P. Siakam 22.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
J. Johnson 22.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 3
J. Giddey 20.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

S. Barnes 47.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 5
P. Banchero 28.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 4
N. Claxton 27.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 6
S. Mamukelashvili 27.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 4
J. Walker 24.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
P. Siakam 22.6 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 5
J. Brown 21.3 poss
FG% 71.4%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.56
PTS 12
K. Kuzma 20.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 4
J. Johnson 18.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 2
N. Clowney 18.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 4

SEASON STATS

70
Games
4.0
PPG
2.8
RPG
0.5
APG
0.3
SPG
0.2
BPG
43.9
FG%
32.0
3P%
74.3
FT%
11.3
MPG

GAME LOG

70 games played