PHI

2025-26 Season

ADEM BONA

Philadelphia 76ers | Forward | 6-10
Adem Bona
4.5PPG
4.0RPG
0.4APG
16.4MPG
-4.6 Impact

Bona produces at an below average rate for a 16-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-4.6
Scoring +3.7
Points Scored 4.5 PPG = +4.5
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -1.3
Shot Making above expected FG% = +0.5
Creation +0.5
Assists & Self-Creation 0.4 AST/g + self-creation = +0.5
Turnovers -1.9
Turnovers 0.8/g (live + dead blend) = -1.9
Defense -0.3
Steals 0.4/g = +0.9
Blocks 1.1/g = +1.0
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -2.2
Hustle & Effort +4.1
Rebounds 4.0 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +2.0
Contested Shots 4.3/g = +0.9
Deflections 0.9/g = +0.6
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.3/g = +0.2
Screen Assists 1.3/g = +0.4
Raw Impact +6.1
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.7
Net Impact
-4.6
19th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 15th
4.8 PPG
Efficiency 74th
59.7% TS
Playmaking 1th
0.4 APG
Rebounding 53th
4.3 RPG
Defense 12th
+4.4/g
Hustle 53th
+12.7/g
Creation 60th
+2.65/g
Shot Making 10th
+2.65/g
TO Discipline 50th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Adem Bona’s first 24 games were defined by sheer offensive invisibility, rendering him a net-negative placeholder at the end of the rotation. During a brutal outing on 10/22 vs BOS, he logged 15 minutes without attempting a single field goal, resulting in a dismal Impact: -14.0. When a big man refuses to look at the basket, the ensuing spacing issues and dead possessions severely drag down his overall value. He is essentially forcing his teammates to play four-on-five basketball. Bona finally found a pulse on 11/29 vs BKN. By aggressively attacking the rim and hitting six of his seven shots, he tallied 13 points and earned an Impact: +7.3. He mirrored that physical interior play on 12/28 vs OKC, grabbing eight rebounds and scoring 11 points for a strong Impact: +6.7. Unless he consistently hunts the paint for second-chance points and provides reliable hustle, Bona will struggle to survive in this league.

Adem Bona spent the middle of his season oscillating between high-energy flashes and completely invisible stints off the bench. He finally put the puzzle together on 01/21 vs PHX. Grabbing 10 rebounds and scoring 11 points, the big man drove a +5.6 impact score through relentless board work and highly efficient finishing. Yet, that momentum vanished instantly. On 01/23 vs HOU, he stumbled to an abysmal -16.7 impact score in just seven minutes of action. He failed to attempt a single field goal against Houston, actively hurting the team by occupying space without generating any offensive gravity. He briefly resurrected his value on 02/03 vs GSW, converting five of his six shots for 11 points to earn a stellar +12.5 impact. Until he stops alternating between an imposing interior presence and an unplayable liability, Bona will remain trapped on the fringes of the rotation.

Adem Bona’s late-season stretch was defined by a chaotic promotion to the starting lineup, resulting in wild swings between dominant efficiency and complete invisibility. He finally cracked the starting five on 03/04 vs UTA, logging 12 points on 6-of-8 shooting to generate a stellar +11.0 Impact score. Even when his touch vanished, he occasionally found ways to stay on the floor through sheer grit. Look at his 33-minute grind on 03/14 vs BKN, where 10 hard-fought rebounds salvaged a +2.9 Impact score despite a quiet 9-point, 2-for-5 shooting night. Yet, his offensive limitations frequently crippled the team's spacing when he stopped crashing the glass. During an abysmal start on 04/09 vs HOU, Bona attempted just a single shot and grabbed only two rebounds in 15 minutes, suffering a brutal -13.9 Impact score because he provided absolutely zero rim pressure or secondary value. He is an explosive athlete, but until he demands the ball in the paint consistently, he remains a frustratingly volatile rotation piece.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Bona has posted negative impact in 78% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Reliable shooter — hits 45%+ from the field in 71% of games. You can count on efficient nights more often than not.

Defensive difference-maker. Bona consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: -5.6, second-half: -3.6. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

In a rough stretch — 7 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 12 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 69 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

E. Mobley 68.2 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 10
K. Towns 54.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.04
PTS 2
O. Ighodaro 43.7 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 4
C. Murray-Boyles 41.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
M. Robinson 40.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 3
N. Claxton 40.4 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
K. Filipowski 39.7 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 9
D. Wolf 38.6 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 7
R. Kalkbrenner 38.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.03
PTS 1
O. Okongwu 38.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

E. Mobley 71.8 poss
FG% 58.8%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 24
K. Towns 49.1 poss
FG% 63.6%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.41
PTS 20
K. Filipowski 46.7 poss
FG% 12.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 6
N. Claxton 41.2 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 8
O. Ighodaro 40.7 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 8
C. Murray-Boyles 39.5 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
M. Robinson 39.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 5
R. Kalkbrenner 36.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 4
I. Hartenstein 36.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 4
M. Bagley III 35.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2

SEASON STATS

82
Games
4.5
PPG
4.0
RPG
0.4
APG
0.4
SPG
1.1
BPG
58.6
FG%
33.3
3P%
70.2
FT%
16.4
MPG

GAME LOG

82 games played