PHI

2025-26 Season

ADEM BONA

Philadelphia 76ers | Forward | 6-10
Adem Bona
4.9 PPG
4.4 RPG
0.4 APG
17.3 MPG
+1.2 Impact

Bona produces at an above average rate for a 17-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+1.2
Scoring +3.4
Points 4.9 PPG × +1.00 = +4.9
Missed 2PT 1.2/g × -0.78 = -0.9
Missed 3PT 0.1/g × -0.87 = -0.1
Missed FT 0.5/g × -1.00 = -0.5
Creation +1.6
Assists 0.4/g × +0.50 = +0.2
Off. Rebounds 1.1/g × +1.26 = +1.4
Turnovers -1.6
Turnovers 0.8/g × -1.95 = -1.6
Defense +1.1
Steals 0.4/g × +2.30 = +0.9
Blocks 1.2/g × +0.90 = +1.1
Def. Rebounds 3.3/g × +0.30 = +1.0
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +2.6
Contested Shots 5.2/g × +0.20 = +1.0
Deflections 1.1/g × +0.65 = +0.7
Loose Balls 0.4/g × +0.60 = +0.2
Screen Assists 1.6/g × +0.30 = +0.5
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.1/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.2
Raw Impact +7.1
Baseline (game-average expected) −5.9
Net Impact
+1.2
66th pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 16th
4.9 PPG
Efficiency 73th
60.2% TS
Playmaking 2th
0.4 APG
Rebounding 55th
4.4 RPG
Rim Protection 87th
0.20/min
Hustle 82th
0.13/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 55th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Adem Bona's opening stretch was defined by a chaotic tug-of-war between his game-wrecking defensive energy and severe offensive limitations. On 10/22 vs BOS, his complete offensive invisibility severely handicapped his lineup, resulting in an abysmal -8.6 impact score despite logging just 15 minutes. Yet, he could completely flip a game without ever looking at the basket. He generated a massive +5.8 impact on 10/28 vs WAS by relying entirely on elite rim protection and relentless hustle to swing the momentum while scoring just two points. When Bona stayed within his limits, his verticality and bone-crushing screens created immense value as a defensive anchor for the second unit. He finally put both ends together on 11/28 vs BKN, pairing his usual defensive intensity with explosive rim-running to post 13 points and a +7.4 impact. However, when he fell into constant foul trouble—like the missed rotations that dragged him to a -4.8 impact on 12/23 vs BKN despite perfect shooting efficiency—his floor time became a massive liability.

Adem Bona’s midseason stretch was defined by extreme volatility, oscillating wildly between game-changing interior presence and unplayable defensive liability. When his motor ran hot, he was a massive disruptor off the bench. Take the 01/20 vs PHX matchup, where he bullied his way to 11 points and 10 rebounds, generating a massive +7.2 impact through elite rim protection and hyper-efficient finishing. Even when he barely scored, his sheer physical exertion could swing momentum. On 01/14 vs CLE, he tallied just 6 points in 11 minutes but still posted a stellar +5.6 impact by maximizing his floor time with constant hustle and relentless energy. Yet, when his defensive discipline evaporated, the hidden costs were disastrous. During the 01/05 vs DEN game, he managed an efficient 8 points but dragged the team down with a brutal -6.0 impact because his interior defense completely collapsed, resulting in a staggering -6.7 defensive score. Ultimately, his effectiveness hinged entirely on his willingness to do the gritty defensive work rather than merely hunting easy dump-off passes.

A volatile tug-of-war between terrifying rim deterrence and maddening positional lapses defined Adem Bona's mid-season transition into a starting role. He was an absolute wrecking ball on 02/03 vs GSW, generating a massive +14.2 impact score in just 16 minutes by pairing 11 points with violent paint protection that completely flipped the game's energy. That physical dominance often vanished. Despite missing only one of his three shots for 7 points on 02/09 vs POR, he bled out a brutal -6.7 impact because severe defensive bleeding and blown coverages entirely erased his clean interior finishing. He eventually learned to dictate games without needing offensive touches. During a heavy 33-minute assignment on 03/14 vs BKN, Bona managed only 9 points but secured 10 rebounds and a +6.0 impact simply by anchoring the paint with terrifying verticality. When he embraces disciplined positioning, he alters the geometry of the court, but his tendency to rack up quick fouls still keeps his nightly value on a razor's edge.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Bona's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~4 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 67% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Bona consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Flat trajectory all season — first-half impact +1.1, second-half +1.2. No major shifts, which fits with the overall steadiness.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 5 games. Longest cold streak: 6 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 69 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

E. Mobley 68.2 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 10
K. Towns 54.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.04
PTS 2
O. Ighodaro 43.7 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 4
C. Murray-Boyles 41.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
M. Robinson 40.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 3
N. Claxton 40.4 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
K. Filipowski 39.7 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 9
D. Wolf 38.6 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 7
R. Kalkbrenner 38.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.03
PTS 1
O. Okongwu 38.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

E. Mobley 71.8 poss
FG% 58.8%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 24
K. Towns 49.1 poss
FG% 63.6%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.41
PTS 20
K. Filipowski 46.7 poss
FG% 12.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 6
N. Claxton 41.2 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 8
O. Ighodaro 40.7 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 8
C. Murray-Boyles 39.5 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
M. Robinson 39.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 5
R. Kalkbrenner 36.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 4
I. Hartenstein 36.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 4
M. Bagley III 35.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2

SEASON STATS

67
Games
4.9
PPG
4.4
RPG
0.4
APG
0.4
SPG
1.2
BPG
59.1
FG%
33.3
3P%
70.6
FT%
17.3
MPG

GAME LOG

67 games played