Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
NYK lead PHI lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
PHI 2P — 3P —
NYK 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 157 attempts

PHI PHI Shot-making Δ

George Hard 6/11 +5.2
Edgecombe 5/11 +0.1
Embiid 3/11 -4.6
Maxey 3/9 -4.4
Oubre Jr. Open 5/8 +1.2
Edwards Hard 2/4 +1.9
Terry Hard 1/4 -0.7
Grimes 1/4 -1.7
Watford Open 1/4 -2.8
Barlow Open 3/3 +2.4

NYK NYK Shot-making Δ

Brunson Hard 12/18 +9.7
Towns 7/11 +3.4
Bridges 7/10 +5.0
Anunoby 7/8 +6.6
Hart Open 3/7 -1.7
McBride Hard 3/6 +1.9
Kolek 3/5 +2.4
Alvarado 2/4 +0.4
Shamet Hard 1/4 -1.1
Diawara Hard 2/3 +2.1
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
PHI
NYK
30/73 Field Goals 53/84
41.1% Field Goal % 63.1%
11/30 3-Pointers 19/37
36.7% 3-Point % 51.4%
27/34 Free Throws 12/17
79.4% Free Throw % 70.6%
55.7% True Shooting % 74.9%
38 Total Rebounds 48
8 Offensive 8
20 Defensive 31
15 Assists 34
0.79 Assist/TO Ratio 2.27
19 Turnovers 14
6 Steals 10
1 Blocks 6
24 Fouls 25
32 Points in Paint 58
3 Fast Break Pts 16
13 Points off TOs 25
12 Second Chance Pts 17
30 Bench Points 42
3 Largest Lead 40
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Jalen Brunson
35 PTS · 1 REB · 3 AST · 30.7 MIN
+34.48
2
Mikal Bridges
17 PTS · 2 REB · 5 AST · 26.6 MIN
+19.33
3
Josh Hart
8 PTS · 8 REB · 6 AST · 25.7 MIN
+15.24
4
OG Anunoby
18 PTS · 3 REB · 1 AST · 30.4 MIN
+13.37
5
Karl-Anthony Towns
17 PTS · 6 REB · 6 AST · 20.4 MIN
+13.36
6
Paul George
17 PTS · 3 REB · 3 AST · 26.4 MIN
+12.6
7
Kelly Oubre Jr.
12 PTS · 5 REB · 1 AST · 26.8 MIN
+12.04
8
Dominick Barlow
7 PTS · 3 REB · 0 AST · 12.8 MIN
+10.16
9
Pacôme Dadiet
4 PTS · 1 REB · 2 AST · 8.7 MIN
+7.69
10
Ariel Hukporti
5 PTS · 9 REB · 0 AST · 17.4 MIN
+7.44
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:12 NYK shot clock Team TURNOVER 98–137
Q4 0:35 L. Shamet STEAL (1 STL) 98–137
Q4 0:35 T. Watford lost ball TURNOVER (2 TO) 98–137
Q4 0:48 A. Hukporti DUNK (5 PTS) (P. Dadiet 2 AST) 98–137
Q4 0:49 P. Dadiet REBOUND (Off:1 Def:0) 98–135
Q4 0:52 MISS L. Shamet 24' step back 3PT 98–135
Q4 1:11 J. Walker offensive goaltending TURNOVER (1 TO) 98–135
Q4 1:32 T. Watford REBOUND (Off:0 Def:1) 98–135
Q4 1:35 MISS L. Shamet 25' 3PT 98–135
Q4 1:43 A. Hukporti REBOUND (Off:3 Def:6) 98–135
Q4 1:46 MISS J. Broome 26' 3PT 98–135
Q4 1:56 L. Shamet step out-of-bounds TURNOVER (1 TO) 98–135
Q4 2:18 J. Edwards 25' 3PT (8 PTS) (T. Watford 1 AST) 98–135
Q4 2:39 L. Shamet 25' 3PT (3 PTS) (T. Kolek 4 AST) 95–135
Q4 2:49 T. Watford driving floating bank Jump Shot (5 PTS) 95–132

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

NYK New York Knicks
S Jalen Brunson 30.7m
35
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
+36.8

Brunson was an absolute offensive supernova, torching the defense with 35 points on pristine 12-of-18 shooting to rack up a staggering +31.8 offensive credit. His aggressive downhill attacks yielded a perfect 8-of-8 from the stripe, punishing defenders while keeping his turnovers well below his season average.

Shooting
FG 12/18 (66.7%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 8/8 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 81.3%
USG% 32.8%
Net Rtg +43.5
+/- +27
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.7m
Scoring +30.5
Creation +3.4
Shot Making +7.8
Hustle +0.3
Defense +4.7
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 53.8%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
S OG Anunoby 30.4m
18
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
+11.2

Elite offensive efficiency drove Anunoby's night, as he converted a blistering 7-of-8 from the floor to generate a massive +14.6 offensive credit. While his defensive matchup leaked some points (opponents shot 7-of-12), his flawless perimeter stroke (2-of-2 from deep) ensured his scoring impact more than covered the difference.

Shooting
FG 7/8 (87.5%)
3PT 2/2 (100.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 101.4%
USG% 15.9%
Net Rtg +30.9
+/- +22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.4m
Scoring +17.4
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +4.0
Hustle +0.9
Defense -0.4
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 58.3%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
S Mikal Bridges 26.6m
17
pts
2
reb
5
ast
Impact
+13.1

Flawless decision-making and lockdown defense highlighted Bridges's stellar outing. He smothered his primary assignments, holding them to a stifling 1-of-6 shooting, while his hyper-efficient 70% from the floor and zero turnovers yielded a towering +18.2 offensive credit.

Shooting
FG 7/10 (70.0%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 85.0%
USG% 17.2%
Net Rtg +35.8
+/- +19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.6m
Scoring +14.4
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +3.9
Hustle +1.6
Defense +0.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 16.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
S Josh Hart 25.7m
8
pts
8
reb
6
ast
Impact
+11.2

A disruptive defensive presence defined Hart's performance, generating a massive +9.6 defense credit despite his primary matchup shooting well. He supplemented his usual rebounding (8 boards) with active hands, tallying 3 steals (above his 1.3 average) to fuel transition opportunities.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.8%
USG% 16.4%
Net Rtg +47.1
+/- +24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.7m
Scoring +4.3
Creation +2.9
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +6.3
Defense +6.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 1
17
pts
6
reb
6
ast
Impact
+5.4

Towns operated as a highly efficient offensive hub, leveraging his perimeter touch (3-of-5 from deep) to post a +14.0 offensive credit. He also anchored the interior effectively on the other end, contesting 6 shots and holding his matchups to 8-of-17 shooting to round out a strong two-way showing.

Shooting
FG 7/11 (63.6%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 77.3%
USG% 31.1%
Net Rtg +26.8
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.4m
Scoring +13.8
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +4.1
Hustle +5.7
Defense -4.0
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 47.1%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 3
5
pts
9
reb
0
ast
Impact
+2.4

Hukporti maximized his 17 minutes by dominating the dirty work, setting 6 screen assists and grabbing 9 boards (well above his 3.8 average) to anchor the second unit. His perfect 2-of-2 shooting and rim protection (2 blocks) fueled a robust +9.1 offensive credit and a +3.9 defense score.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 102.5%
USG% 6.8%
Net Rtg +60.3
+/- +22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.4m
Scoring +5.0
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +9.5
Defense -2.7
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 1
8
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
+0.3

McBride provided a steady, mistake-free spark off the pine, knocking down a pair of triples to generate a +6.4 offensive credit. He also brought noticeable energy to the margins, drawing a charge and securing a +3.8 hustle credit to solidify a strong two-way cameo.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 66.7%
USG% 15.4%
Net Rtg +41.2
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.1m
Scoring +5.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-14.6

Careless ball security completely derailed Clarkson's stint off the bench, as his 4 turnovers (well above his 0.4 average) tanked his value. This sloppy playmaking directly resulted in a brutal -6.4 offensive credit, neutralizing any minor defensive contributions he offered.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 18.2%
Net Rtg +36.7
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.6m
Scoring +1.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.2
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 4
3
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
-6.5

A cold shooting night (1-of-4 from the field) kept Shamet from finding any offensive rhythm, resulting in a slight -0.5 offensive credit. However, he managed to salvage his brief 12-minute stint by playing tight perimeter defense, holding his matchups to just 1-of-5 shooting.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 37.5%
USG% 17.2%
Net Rtg +35.1
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.1m
Scoring +0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
2
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-11.3

Robinson struggled to make his usual interior mark, seeing his minutes dip to 11:38 while failing to record a single block. His inability to convert at the charity stripe (0-of-4) severely limited his scoring value, resulting in a muted +0.3 offensive credit.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/4 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 36.2%
USG% 12.5%
Net Rtg +25.0
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.6m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +1.2
Defense -5.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Tyler Kolek 10.2m
8
pts
0
reb
4
ast
Impact
-0.4

Kolek delivered a highly efficient playmaking punch off the bench, dishing out 4 assists (above his 2.1 average) while drilling both of his three-point attempts. This crisp offensive execution drove a strong +6.5 offensive credit, proving his value as a reliable reserve floor general.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 2/2 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 80.0%
USG% 24.0%
Net Rtg +40.3
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.2m
Scoring +6.7
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +2.2
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
4
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
+0.8

Dadiet made the most of his limited run, combining efficient finishing (2-of-3 shooting) with mistake-free ball handling to secure a +5.4 offensive credit. He also held his own defensively, contributing to a +3.8 defense score during his brief 8-minute appearance.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 66.7%
USG% 15.0%
Net Rtg +43.3
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.7m
Scoring +3.2
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +1.3
Defense +2.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
5
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-0.2

Alvarado injected his trademark defensive nuisance into a brief 8-minute shift, completely blanking his primary matchup (0-of-1) to earn a +3.0 defense credit. He also capitalized on his limited offensive touches, scoring efficiently without turning the ball over to post a +3.8 offensive mark.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 62.5%
USG% 19.0%
Net Rtg +32.7
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.6m
Scoring +3.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.2
Hustle +0.3
Defense +2.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
5
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-1.7

Diawara provided a quick, efficient scoring burst in his 7 minutes of action, knocking down 2 of his 3 shots to generate a +4.6 offensive credit. He also completely shut down his defensive assignments, holding them scoreless on two attempts to round out a solid cameo.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 83.3%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg +56.3
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.8m
Scoring +4.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +0.6
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
PHI Philadelphia 76ers
S VJ Edgecombe 28.2m
12
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
+1.8

Edgecombe struggled to make a significant dent across the board, posting below-average rebounding and playmaking numbers while yielding a modest +5.8 offensive credit. His defensive impact was similarly muted, as his matchups converted half of their attempts against him.

Shooting
FG 5/11 (45.5%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.5%
USG% 21.0%
Net Rtg -27.3
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.2m
Scoring +6.6
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +3.0
Hustle +1.3
Defense +0.2
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Kelly Oubre Jr. 26.8m
12
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
+5.6

Oubre's active hands and defensive energy were on full display, as he tallied 4 deflections and 6 contests to earn a +3.8 hustle credit. Despite his primary matchups finding success (8-of-13 shooting), his efficient 5-of-8 mark from the floor provided a solid +8.9 offensive boost.

Shooting
FG 5/8 (62.5%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 71.1%
USG% 16.1%
Net Rtg -44.6
+/- -25
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.8m
Scoring +9.6
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +3.4
Defense +2.6
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 61.5%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
S Tyrese Maxey 26.6m
13
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-2.1

A severe lack of playmaking and ball security doomed Maxey's performance, as he coughed up 4 turnovers (well above his 2.0 average) while dishing out just 2 assists. Though he managed a perfect 7-of-7 from the foul line, his poor 3-of-9 shooting limited him to a meager +4.0 offensive credit.

Shooting
FG 3/9 (33.3%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 7/7 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 53.8%
USG% 27.1%
Net Rtg -51.9
+/- -28
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.6m
Scoring +8.5
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +3.8
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 4
S Paul George 26.4m
17
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
+10.5

George's lethal perimeter stroke kept the offense afloat, as he drilled 4-of-6 from deep to generate a +12.7 offensive credit. However, he struggled to contain his defensive assignments, allowing them to shoot a blistering 71% when he was the primary defender.

Shooting
FG 6/11 (54.5%)
3PT 4/6 (66.7%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 74.3%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -45.4
+/- -26
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.4m
Scoring +13.6
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +5.1
Hustle +0.9
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 71.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Joel Embiid 24.5m
14
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
+2.3

Embiid endured a brutal shooting night (3-of-11 from the floor), but salvaged his +9.1 offensive credit by relentlessly attacking the rim to draw fouls (8-of-9 FT). Defensively, he was uncharacteristically porous, allowing opponents to shoot a staggering 10-of-14 when he was the nearest defender.

Shooting
FG 3/11 (27.3%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 8/9 (88.9%)
Advanced
TS% 46.8%
USG% 29.6%
Net Rtg -54.4
+/- -24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.5m
Scoring +7.7
Creation +2.5
Shot Making +1.3
Hustle +1.2
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 71.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
5
pts
1
reb
4
ast
Impact
-3.1

Grimes operated more as a facilitator than a scorer, handing out 4 assists (above his 1.8 average) to salvage a +4.9 offensive credit despite shooting just 1-of-4. His defensive resistance was virtually non-existent, allowing his primary matchups to torch him for 4-of-5 shooting.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.2%
USG% 9.1%
Net Rtg -44.3
+/- -24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.3m
Scoring +2.6
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 80.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
8
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.6

Edwards provided a minor scoring bump with two made triples, but his complete lack of peripheral stats (zero rebounds or assists) resulted in a tepid +1.2 offensive credit. He was actively exploited on the other end, giving up 5-of-8 shooting to his matchups to saddle him with a -3.0 defense score.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 69.4%
USG% 20.5%
Net Rtg -30.2
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.5m
Scoring +5.5
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +0.0
Defense -5.3
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
5
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.4

Watford struggled to find the bottom of the net, shooting just 1-of-4 to post a negative -1.0 offensive credit. His defensive assignment proved overwhelming, as opponents shot a blistering 80% against him, though he still managed to scrape together a +3.9 defense score through team concepts.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 43.4%
USG% 24.2%
Net Rtg -44.3
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.9m
Scoring +2.2
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +0.3
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 80.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
7
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
+6.8

Barlow maximized his touches with perfect 3-of-3 shooting, driving a highly efficient +8.1 offensive credit in just 12 minutes. He also proved disciplined on the defensive end, blanking his lone matchup to secure a +3.2 defense score.

Shooting
FG 3/3 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 90.2%
USG% 12.9%
Net Rtg -32.8
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.8m
Scoring +6.5
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +3.8
Defense +2.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Dalen Terry 12.0m
3
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-3.4

Terry made his mark entirely through perimeter disruption, racking up 4 deflections to earn a +3.2 hustle credit. This relentless energy translated into lockdown defense, as he smothered his matchups into 1-of-5 shooting to post a matching +3.2 defense score.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 37.5%
USG% 13.8%
Net Rtg -39.7
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.0m
Scoring +0.9
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +0.0
Defense +2.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.1

Walker was entirely ineffective from the floor, missing both of his shot attempts to scrape by with a minimal +0.2 offensive credit via free throws. He was actively targeted on defense, surrendering a perfect 3-of-3 shooting to his matchups to finish with a -0.6 defense score.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 34.7%
USG% 16.0%
Net Rtg -40.3
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.5m
Scoring +0.2
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +2.5
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.8

Drummond was completely neutralized on the interior, failing to score a single point while grabbing just 3 rebounds (well below his 7.1 average). His offensive invisibility, compounded by 2 turnovers, resulted in a damaging -2.9 offensive credit during his brief 9-minute shift.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 13.6%
Net Rtg -15.8
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.1m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +3.8
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.2

Broome was a complete non-factor in his 4 minutes of garbage time, missing his only shot attempt and grabbing a single rebound. His minimal involvement resulted in a negligible +0.7 offensive credit.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 10.0%
Net Rtg -12.5
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.5m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Adem Bona 3.8m
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-17.1

Bona endured a disastrous 3-minute cameo, bleeding value through 3 turnovers that tanked his offensive credit to -5.8. His defensive stint was equally rough, as he allowed a perfect 2-of-2 shooting to his matchups, resulting in a -3.1 defense score.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 30.0%
Net Rtg -59.7
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.8m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -9.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3