Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
BOS lead PHI lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
PHI 2P — 3P —
BOS 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 175 attempts

PHI PHI Shot-making Δ

Embiid 12/26 -0.1
Maxey 11/18 +6.0
Edgecombe 8/17 +2.0
George Hard 5/10 +2.8
Oubre Jr. 2/6 -3.4
Grimes 1/4 -2.6
Edwards Hard 0/1 -0.9

BOS BOS Shot-making Δ

Brown 12/27 +0.1
White Hard 9/26 -1.7
Pritchard 5/13 -2.0
Queta Open 7/8 +4.2
Hauser Hard 4/7 +3.3
Scheierman Hard 0/4 -4.2
González Hard 0/3 -3.2
Garza Hard 0/2 -2.0
Walsh Hard 0/2 -2.2
Harper Jr. Hard 0/1 -1.1
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
PHI
BOS
39/82 Field Goals 37/93
47.6% Field Goal % 39.8%
11/28 3-Pointers 13/49
39.3% 3-Point % 26.5%
20/23 Free Throws 13/16
87.0% Free Throw % 81.2%
59.2% True Shooting % 50.0%
56 Total Rebounds 49
3 Offensive 10
41 Defensive 34
25 Assists 19
2.78 Assist/TO Ratio 3.80
9 Turnovers 5
0 Steals 4
1 Blocks 7
19 Fouls 23
42 Points in Paint 40
9 Fast Break Pts 11
7 Points off TOs 7
13 Second Chance Pts 9
3 Bench Points 41
18 Largest Lead 1
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Joel Embiid
34 PTS · 12 REB · 6 AST · 39.1 MIN
+26.73
2
Tyrese Maxey
30 PTS · 11 REB · 7 AST · 45.2 MIN
+26.18
3
Jaylen Brown
33 PTS · 9 REB · 4 AST · 40.0 MIN
+20.96
4
Derrick White
26 PTS · 6 REB · 4 AST · 45.4 MIN
+16.86
5
Neemias Queta
17 PTS · 12 REB · 1 AST · 32.6 MIN
+15.58
6
Payton Pritchard
13 PTS · 5 REB · 7 AST · 39.4 MIN
+14.76
7
VJ Edgecombe
23 PTS · 6 REB · 4 AST · 43.7 MIN
+12.82
8
Sam Hauser
11 PTS · 3 REB · 1 AST · 29.8 MIN
+9.24
9
Ron Harper Jr.
0 PTS · 0 REB · 0 AST · 4.0 MIN
+3.73
10
Quentin Grimes
3 PTS · 6 REB · 4 AST · 26.1 MIN
+3.36
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:04 T. Maxey REBOUND (Off:0 Def:11) 109–100
Q4 0:04 MISS P. Pritchard 24' step back 3PT 109–100
Q4 0:08 V. Edgecombe Free Throw 2 of 2 (23 PTS) 109–100
Q4 0:08 V. Edgecombe Free Throw 1 of 2 (22 PTS) 108–100
Q4 0:08 S. Hauser take personal FOUL (2 PF) (Edgecombe 2 FT) 107–100
Q4 0:10 P. Pritchard driving Layup (13 PTS) 107–100
Q4 0:15 T. Maxey Free Throw 2 of 2 (30 PTS) 107–98
Q4 0:15 T. Maxey Free Throw 1 of 2 (29 PTS) 106–98
Q4 0:15 B. Scheierman take personal FOUL (2 PF) (Maxey 2 FT) 105–98
Q4 0:16 T. Maxey REBOUND (Off:0 Def:10) 105–98
Q4 0:18 MISS S. Hauser 26' turnaround 3PT 105–98
Q4 0:20 T. Maxey Free Throw 2 of 2 (28 PTS) 105–98
Q4 0:20 T. Maxey Free Throw 1 of 2 (27 PTS) 104–98
Q4 0:20 P. Pritchard take personal FOUL (1 PF) (Maxey 2 FT) 103–98
Q4 0:20 T. Maxey REBOUND (Off:0 Def:9) 103–98

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

BOS Boston Celtics
S Derrick White 45.4m
26
pts
6
reb
4
ast
Impact
+16.8

Extreme offensive volume drove his 26.0-point eruption, though it required a grueling 26 shot attempts (9-of-26 FG) to get there. He supplemented that +16.3 offensive credit with a masterclass in hustle, generating 4 deflections, 3.0 blocks, and a massive +7.5 hustle credit to impact winning on the margins.

Shooting
FG 9/26 (34.6%)
3PT 5/16 (31.2%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 46.8%
USG% 27.7%
Net Rtg -6.7
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 45.4m
Scoring +13.2
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +6.9
Hustle +6.7
Defense -0.7
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 20
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 45.0%
STL 0
BLK 3
TO 0
S Jaylen Brown 40.0m
33
pts
9
reb
4
ast
Impact
+18.3

A relentless two-way workload defined his night, headlined by a high-volume 33.0-point scoring output that fueled a +19.7 offensive credit. He was equally dominant defensively, racking up 12 contests, 3.0 blocks, and a +9.4 defensive credit while holding his matchups to just 40% shooting (6-of-15).

Shooting
FG 12/27 (44.4%)
3PT 3/9 (33.3%)
FT 6/6 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 55.7%
USG% 34.4%
Net Rtg -19.5
+/- -16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.0m
Scoring +21.7
Creation +2.4
Shot Making +7.5
Hustle +3.7
Defense -0.7
Turnovers -5.9
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 3
TO 3
0
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
-4.8

An ice-cold shooting night (0-of-4 FG) completely erased his scoring value, dropping him to 0.0 points. Despite the offensive vanishing act, he salvaged some utility on the margins by crashing the glass for 6.0 rebounds (well above his 2.7 average) and chipping in a +2.0 defensive credit.

Shooting
FG 0/4 (0.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 7.5%
Net Rtg -21.2
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.4m
Scoring -2.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +6.7
Defense +1.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
S Luka Garza 8.6m
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-14.8

Offensive invisibility plagued his brief shift, as he missed both of his shot attempts and posted a dismal -3.4 offensive credit. While he failed to grab a single rebound, he did show some resistance inside by logging 4 contests and holding opponents to 2-of-7 shooting (29%) when targeted.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 13.0%
Net Rtg -77.1
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.6m
Scoring -1.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.5

Despite failing to score in his four minutes of action, he made a chaotic impact on the defensive end with 2.0 steals and a +5.3 defensive credit. His point-of-attack defense was highly volatile, however, as opponents converted a perfect 3-of-3 against him when he was the primary contest.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 10.0%
Net Rtg -70.0
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.0m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +4.7
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
13
pts
5
reb
7
ast
Impact
+8.9

Connective playmaking (+12.5 offense credit) kept him valuable even as his individual scoring dipped below average to 13.0 points on inefficient 5-of-13 shooting. He compensated for the cold jumper by dishing out 7.0 assists and grabbing an above-average 5.0 rebounds to keep the offense flowing.

Shooting
FG 5/13 (38.5%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 48.4%
USG% 15.5%
Net Rtg -2.7
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.4m
Scoring +6.9
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +3.4
Hustle +5.4
Defense +2.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
17
pts
12
reb
1
ast
Impact
+11.8

Flawless interior finishing (7-of-8 FG) allowed him to pour in 17.0 points and anchor a massive +18.5 offensive credit. He paired that hyper-efficient scoring with relentless dirty work, vacuuming up 12.0 rebounds and setting 6 screen assists to dominate the paint.

Shooting
FG 7/8 (87.5%)
3PT 0/0
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 91.2%
USG% 14.9%
Net Rtg +14.8
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.5m
Scoring +16.4
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +2.1
Hustle +8.4
Defense -2.5
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 61.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Sam Hauser 29.8m
11
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
+2.8

Blistering perimeter efficiency defined his role, as he knocked down 3-of-6 from deep to generate a +10.7 offensive credit. He operated strictly as a floor-spacing specialist, adding 11.0 points while holding his own defensively (opponents shot 3-of-7 against him).

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 78.6%
USG% 10.8%
Net Rtg -5.2
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.8m
Scoring +8.9
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +3.2
Hustle +2.8
Defense -1.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-14.6

A brutal perimeter freeze (0-of-3 from deep) completely erased his offensive utility, resulting in a -2.9 offensive credit. He tried to compensate by grabbing 3.0 rebounds and logging 4 contests, but his overall impact remained deeply negative across 13 minutes of action.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 14.8%
Net Rtg +18.1
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.9m
Scoring -3.5
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.9
Defense -2.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-12.1

A completely invisible offensive shift (-1.8 offense credit) saw him miss both of his three-point attempts and fail to record a single counting stat. His brief five minutes of action offered almost no resistance, as he failed to log a single contest while his lone matchup converted their only shot.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 18.2%
Net Rtg +9.1
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.8m
Scoring -1.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
PHI Philadelphia 76ers
S Tyrese Maxey 45.2m
30
pts
11
reb
7
ast
Impact
+20.7

Elite two-way execution defined his marathon 45-minute shift, highlighted by a hyper-efficient 30.0-point outburst (11-of-18 FG) that generated a +27.2 offensive credit. He complemented that scoring engine with surprisingly stout defense, logging 10 contests and locking down his matchups to a mere 29% conversion rate (5-of-17).

Shooting
FG 11/18 (61.1%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 6/6 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 72.7%
USG% 22.2%
Net Rtg +7.7
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 45.2m
Scoring +24.7
Creation +2.8
Shot Making +6.8
Hustle +3.3
Defense -3.4
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 29.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S VJ Edgecombe 43.7m
23
pts
6
reb
4
ast
Impact
+9.3

A blistering perimeter display (5-of-11 from deep) fueled a +13.3 offensive credit and pushed his scoring well above his season average to 23.0 points. He was equally relentless on the other end, logging 12 contests and stifling his matchups to 32% shooting (7-of-22) to anchor the perimeter defense.

Shooting
FG 8/17 (47.1%)
3PT 5/11 (45.5%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 64.3%
USG% 21.6%
Net Rtg +21.6
+/- +19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 43.7m
Scoring +16.3
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +5.8
Hustle +4.7
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -6.6
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 22
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 31.8%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
S Paul George 41.8m
13
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-7.8

Smothering point-of-attack defense defined his night, as opponents shot a dismal 24% (4-of-17) when he was the primary defender. While his offensive volume was unusually low (13.0 points) and marred by 3 live-ball turnovers, his +3.8 hustle credit and 3 deflections kept him highly impactful on the margins.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 65.0%
USG% 14.4%
Net Rtg +13.6
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 41.8m
Scoring +9.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +3.6
Hustle +0.9
Defense -3.4
Turnovers -7.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 23.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
S Joel Embiid 39.1m
34
pts
12
reb
6
ast
Impact
+30.1

Brute-force offensive dominance (+27.9 offense credit) drove his massive 34.0-point, 12.0-rebound performance. He paired that high-usage scoring with elite rim protection, holding his matchups to just 38% shooting (8-of-21) to generate a +6.2 defensive credit.

Shooting
FG 12/26 (46.2%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 9/11 (81.8%)
Advanced
TS% 55.1%
USG% 37.6%
Net Rtg +14.3
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.1m
Scoring +23.4
Creation +3.7
Shot Making +6.1
Hustle +11.4
Defense -1.7
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 21
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 38.1%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
S Kelly Oubre Jr. 31.1m
6
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
-11.1

A cold shooting night (2-of-6 FG, 0-of-3 3P) highlighted his ongoing perimeter struggles, dropping his scoring well below average (6.0 points). His defensive impact (+1.0 defense credit) was muted as his primary matchups shot a blistering 67% (6-of-9) against him, though he did manage to chip in 2 deflections and +2.7 hustle credit.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 43.6%
USG% 12.3%
Net Rtg +11.1
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.1m
Scoring +2.5
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.2
Hustle +1.5
Defense -2.2
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
3
pts
6
reb
4
ast
Impact
-7.6

A stark lack of scoring aggression (1-of-4 FG) left him well below his season average with just 3.0 points. He managed to salvage some value through connective playmaking (+3.7 offense credit) and above-average rebounding (6.0 boards), but his overall impact was severely limited by his offensive passivity.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 30.7%
USG% 8.9%
Net Rtg +4.5
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.1m
Scoring +0.4
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +1.8
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-12.0

Complete invisibility across just 8 minutes of action rendered him a non-factor, failing to attempt a single shot or grab more than 1.0 rebound. His brief stint was actively harmful on the other end, yielding a -1.2 defensive credit as opponents converted both of their attempts against him.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -13.3
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.5m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-11.4

A brief two-minute cameo provided nothing but empty cardio, as he failed to record a single point, rebound, or assist. His defensive presence was entirely ineffective, allowing a perfect 3-of-3 shooting from his matchups to drag down his defensive credit (-0.8).

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -160.0
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.3m
Scoring -0.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
+0.1

Deployed for just two minutes, he operated purely as a defensive placeholder without touching the box score. He did manage to log 2 contests and a +0.8 defensive credit, though his offensive impact was completely nonexistent.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +25.0
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.1m
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0