March 12, 2026
EXPLORE THE GAME
Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.
PHI
2P —
3P —
DET
2P —
3P —
PHI
DET
PHI
PLAYER PERFORMANCE
Detroit Pistons
Elite playmaking and strong defensive metrics (+7.0) were surprisingly offset, resulting in a slightly negative total impact. While his passing generated significant value, a lack of personal scoring aggression and likely live-ball turnovers dragged down his net score. The contrast between his high assist volume and negative overall rating suggests sloppy ball security defined his floor game.
Elite floor spacing and lethal perimeter efficiency drove a massive positive impact. His ability to punish defensive rotations from deep was complemented by surprisingly solid defensive metrics (+4.0). The sheer gravity of his outside shooting and excellent shot selection defined his highly influential performance.
Poor shot selection and a barrage of missed attempts severely damaged his overall impact. Despite minor positive contributions in hustle (+1.2) and defense (+1.6), the offensive inefficiency created too many empty possessions. The inability to find an offensive rhythm from the perimeter was the primary driver of his heavily negative score.
Steady, efficient offensive execution anchored a solidly positive net rating. He supplemented his scoring with timely hustle plays (+3.0) and reliable defensive positioning (+2.6). A methodical, mistake-free approach on both ends of the floor was the hallmark of his outing.
Total dominance in the painted area drove an overwhelmingly positive impact score. His hyper-efficient interior finishing punished the opposition, even in a slightly reduced scoring role compared to his recent tear. Controlling the restricted area with near-perfect shot selection defined his highly effective minutes.
High-level defensive activity (+6.4) and relentless hustle (+5.0) drove a positive impact despite significant shooting struggles. His ability to generate value through extra effort plays completely offset the damage from a high volume of missed jumpers. Finding ways to impact the game positively when his outside shot wasn't falling defined his resilient performance.
Despite a significant scoring surge, underlying inefficiencies pulled his total impact deep into the negative. Missed perimeter shots and likely hidden costs like turnovers or defensive breakdowns negated his offensive production. The inability to translate scoring volume into actual positive value via poor shot quality was the defining theme of his performance.
Perfect shooting execution and physical interior play anchored a solidly positive impact. His flawless offensive efficiency was supported by steady hustle (+2.2) and reliable defensive anchoring (+2.3). Capitalizing on every offensive touch without forcing bad shots defined his highly effective outing.
A sharp drop in offensive involvement and likely hidden negative plays resulted in a heavily negative impact score. While his shooting was efficient, the lack of overall production compared to his recent high-scoring stretch left a void on the floor. An inability to assert himself offensively and generate quality looks defined a highly ineffective outing.
Blistering perimeter efficiency and disruptive defense (+6.5) fueled a massive positive impact. His ability to punish defensive rotations from deep while simultaneously blowing up opponent actions defined his stellar performance. The combination of high-end shot-making and relentless defensive intensity made him highly influential.
Efficient interior finishing and solid defensive positioning (+2.2) resulted in a modestly positive impact. Maintaining his streak of high-percentage shooting helped stabilize his minutes, even with a reduced scoring volume. A reliable, mistake-free approach to his role in the paint defined his effective short stint.
A completely empty offensive showing and poor shot selection tanked his impact score in limited minutes. Missing all of his attempts from the field created a string of wasted possessions that the team couldn't overcome. The inability to find any offensive rhythm and forcing bad looks defined his brief, highly negative appearance.
Philadelphia 76ers
A heavy reliance on misfiring three-pointers severely damaged his overall impact score. Despite generating positive value through hustle plays (+4.2) and solid defensive reads (+4.8), the wasted offensive possessions from deep were too costly. Stubborn perimeter shot selection was the primary culprit behind the negative net rating.
A massive surge in scoring aggression fueled a highly positive overall impact. His relentless hustle (+3.9) and disruptive defensive activity (+9.5) created extra possessions and broke the opponent's rhythm. The combination of unexpected offensive punch and high-energy point-of-attack defense defined his standout performance.
Severe offensive struggles cratered his net impact, driven by poor shot selection and a barrage of missed perimeter jumpers. While his defensive effort (+6.9) remained commendable, the sheer volume of empty offensive possessions was too much to overcome. The inability to convert from the outside ultimately defined a frustrating performance.
Consistent interior finishing kept his offensive impact afloat, but the overall net score hovered near neutral due to a lack of secondary playmaking. Strong hustle (+4.0) and solid defensive reads (+4.8) provided underlying value. Maintaining a streak of highly efficient shot selection in the paint was the defining element of his minutes.
Impact was dragged down by a sharp decline in offensive aggression compared to his recent norms, creating empty possessions. His defensive positioning and rotations (+5.0 Def) were a bright spot, but couldn't overcome the lack of scoring gravity. A passive offensive approach ultimately defined an otherwise quiet outing.
A significant scoring outburst was surprisingly undermined by hidden negative factors, resulting in a slightly negative total impact. Missed perimeter shots and likely defensive lapses or turnovers dragged down his overall value despite strong box score metrics. The disconnect between his scoring volume and actual net rating highlighted how empty possessions defined his minutes.
Even with an uptick in scoring efficiency, underlying negative factors pulled his total impact into the red. His defensive contributions (+2.5) and hustle (+2.0) were solid, but likely offset by hidden costs like missed rotations or poor spacing not fully captured in the box score. A lack of high-leverage plays prevented him from turning efficient touches into a positive net rating.
Timely perimeter shooting and a significant scoring boost drove a positive net impact. His ability to generate extra value through hustle plays (+4.4) helped compensate for a relatively quiet defensive showing (+1.4). The sudden offensive spark and confident shot-making provided a much-needed lift during his minutes on the floor.
Flawless shooting execution fueled a massive box score impact and a highly positive overall rating. His perfect night from the field completely overshadowed minor defensive lapses (-0.6). Capitalizing on every single offensive opportunity with elite shot selection was the undeniable defining factor of his performance.
Highly efficient two-way play in limited minutes drove a surprisingly strong positive impact. His defensive activity (+3.9) and perfect shooting execution maximized his brief time on the court. Making the absolute most of a short rotation stint with high-energy play defined his highly effective performance.
A brief and entirely empty stint on the floor resulted in a negative impact score. He failed to register any positive contributions across hustle or defensive metrics during his short run, simply taking up space. The lack of physical engagement or statistical footprint defined this short appearance.
