October 31, 2025
EXPLORE THE GAME
Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.
BOS
2P —
3P —
PHI
2P —
3P —
BOS
PHI
BOS
PLAYER PERFORMANCE
Philadelphia 76ers
An absolute masterclass in two-way playmaking, combining elite offensive creation with suffocating point-of-attack defense (+9.2 Def). He consistently collapsed the defense with his burst before spraying out high-value passes to shooters. His relentless motor (+3.9 Hustle) defined the game, particularly during a third-quarter run where he generated multiple transition scores off deflections.
A bizarre statistical profile where excellent defensive metrics (+8.1 Def) were completely undone by poor offensive flow and likely high-leverage mistakes. He frequently stalled out possessions by holding the ball too long against set defenses, allowing the opposition to recover. His aggressive on-ball defense was commendable, but the offensive stagnation proved fatal to his overall impact.
Phenomenal offensive efficiency (+18.0 Box) was almost entirely offset by a lack of defensive resistance. He was repeatedly targeted in pick-and-roll actions, struggling to navigate screens and stay in front of his man. The scoring punch kept the team afloat, but he gave back nearly every point on the other end.
Commanded massive defensive attention, which opened up the perimeter for his teammates and drove a solid positive impact. He was highly effective operating from the nail, drawing fouls and dictating the tempo of the half-court offense. His rim deterrence (+3.0 Def) altered several drives, even when he wasn't credited with a block.
Faded into the background during his minutes, failing to leave a mark on the glass or in the scoring column. He missed several critical box-out assignments that granted second-chance opportunities to the opposition. The lack of assertiveness on either end resulted in a quiet but negative shift.
Suffered a massive negative impact (-8.1) due to ill-advised shot selection early in the shot clock and poor spacing discipline. While he competed hard on the defensive end (+2.5 Def), his offensive possessions frequently ended in contested, low-percentage looks. The inability to play within the flow of the offense allowed the opponent to ignite their transition game.
A rough outing characterized by rushed perimeter shots and an inability to find an offensive rhythm. He was frequently caught ball-watching on defense, leading to easy back-door cuts for his matchup. The combination of bricked jumpers and defensive lapses resulted in a heavily negative swing during his minutes.
Dominated the physical real estate in the paint, using his massive frame to deter drives and secure the defensive glass (+3.0 Def). He surprisingly stretched the floor with a rare perimeter make, forcing the opposing big to step out of the paint. His sheer size and rebounding gravity provided a steadying presence for the second unit.
Completely ineffective as a connective piece, struggling to generate any advantage against a set defense. He was hesitant to attack closeouts, which bogged down the offensive flow and led to late-clock grenades. The lack of offensive threat allowed his defender to freely roam and disrupt passing lanes.
Brought a jolt of physicality to the paint, altering shots with his impressive leaping ability (+3.6 Def). However, his offensive limitations and tendency to clog the driving lanes resulted in a neutral overall impact. He struggled to process defensive rotations quickly, occasionally leaving shooters open on the weak side.
Boston Celtics
A surprisingly negative overall rating (-4.7) stemmed from stagnant offensive stretches where he settled for contested late-clock jumpers. His defensive metrics remained elite (+5.6 Def) due to excellent weak-side rim protection and screen navigation. However, the lack of downhill pressure allowed the defense to reset too easily and stifled the team's momentum.
Despite a brutal shooting night from deep, relentless point-of-attack pressure (+6.5 Def) kept his overall impact firmly in the green. He compensated for the bricked jumpers by chasing down loose balls and disrupting passing lanes. His constant motion wore down opposing guards during crucial second-half transition sequences.
Elite shot-making efficiency carried his massive positive impact (+9.3), as he consistently punished mismatches on the perimeter. His ability to score at all three levels without forcing bad looks kept the offense in a high gear. He generated high-value possessions down the stretch by attacking closeouts with decisive, downhill drives.
Tremendous energy and off-ball activity (+4.1 Hustle) couldn't salvage a severely negative overall impact caused by offensive zero-gravity. Opponents completely ignored him on the perimeter, clogging the paint and ruining spacing for his teammates. His defensive rotations were sharp, but the inability to convert open looks derailed multiple half-court sets.
Anchored the interior effectively during his stint, using his size to alter shots at the rim (+4.1 Def). He played strictly within his role, setting bruising screens and rolling hard to create gravity without demanding touches. This disciplined approach maximized his minutes and yielded a steady positive impact.
High-volume inefficiency dragged down his overall rating, as he repeatedly forced contested mid-range pull-ups against set defenses. He showed surprising defensive engagement (+4.1 Def) by fighting through off-ball actions to stay attached to shooters. Still, the sheer number of empty offensive trips negated the value of his scoring bursts.
Cold perimeter shooting neutralized his spacing value, dragging his total impact into the negative. He worked hard to fight over screens and maintain defensive integrity (+3.8 Def), preventing his matchup from getting clean looks. Ultimately, his inability to punish defensive collapses proved costly to the offensive flow.
Capitalized on every offensive touch with superb touch around the basket and a perfectly timed pop to the perimeter. His defensive limitations were masked by a scheme that kept him in drop coverage, avoiding isolation mismatches. The sheer offensive efficiency in limited minutes provided a massive spark off the bench.
Provided a highly efficient two-way spark by making quick decisions and attacking closeouts with purpose. He generated extra possessions through active hands in the passing lanes and timely weak-side crashes (+1.9 Hustle). His disciplined shot selection ensured he was a net positive whenever he stepped on the floor.
Mastered the dirty work inside, utilizing his strong frame to seal off rebounders and disrupt post-ups (+2.8 Def). He kept the offense flowing with quick swing passes and even stretched the floor with a timely corner make. His physical presence during the second-quarter rotation stabilized the frontcourt defense.
A brief, disjointed stint featured a rushed perimeter attempt that led directly to a transition opportunity for the opponent. He struggled to get up to the speed of the game, looking a step slow on defensive rotations. The short leash was justified by the immediate negative swing in momentum.
