Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
ATL lead NYK lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click a shooter to isolate their shots on the court
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 179 attempts

NYK NYK Shot-making Δ

Brunson 11/23 -2.9
Anunoby 9/16 +2.4
McBride Hard 5/14 +0.1
Towns Open 7/12 -0.8
Clarkson Open 4/11 -5.2
Hart 1/9 -8.6
Alvarado Open 2/3 +0.3
Bridges Hard 0/3 -3.1
Robinson Open 1/2 -0.8

ATL ATL Shot-making Δ

McCollum Hard 8/19 +0.6
Johnson 8/19 -4.9
Kuminga 9/14 +4.5
Alexander-Walker 4/12 -3.1
Okongwu 4/7 +0.4
Daniels 3/7 -0.9
Gueye Hard 2/4 +0.5
Vincent Hard 1/3 -0.3
Kispert Open 0/1 -1.2
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
NYK
ATL
40/93 Field Goals 39/86
43.0% Field Goal % 45.3%
10/35 3-Pointers 13/33
28.6% 3-Point % 39.4%
18/20 Free Throws 18/26
90.0% Free Throw % 69.2%
53.0% True Shooting % 55.9%
55 Total Rebounds 56
14 Offensive 13
32 Defensive 32
19 Assists 19
1.06 Assist/TO Ratio 1.19
15 Turnovers 16
10 Steals 10
5 Blocks 8
17 Fouls 17
56 Points in Paint 40
15 Fast Break Pts 20
18 Points off TOs 21
21 Second Chance Pts 17
30 Bench Points 31
3 Largest Lead 18
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
OG Anunoby
29 PTS · 9 REB · 1 AST · 36.6 MIN
+32.96
2
Karl-Anthony Towns
21 PTS · 17 REB · 4 AST · 34.1 MIN
+26.91
3
Jalen Johnson
24 PTS · 10 REB · 8 AST · 38.5 MIN
+18.33
4
Jonathan Kuminga
21 PTS · 4 REB · 0 AST · 28.4 MIN
+18.03
5
Jalen Brunson
26 PTS · 3 REB · 4 AST · 40.3 MIN
+14.54
6
CJ McCollum
23 PTS · 5 REB · 1 AST · 35.2 MIN
+13.44
7
Dyson Daniels
8 PTS · 13 REB · 6 AST · 33.4 MIN
+10.87
8
Onyeka Okongwu
9 PTS · 7 REB · 1 AST · 37.1 MIN
+10.81
9
Nickeil Alexander-Walker
14 PTS · 3 REB · 0 AST · 37.5 MIN
+6.82
10
Miles McBride
15 PTS · 1 REB · 1 AST · 31.2 MIN
+6.74
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:01 J. Kuminga STEAL (1 STL) 108–109
Q4 0:01 J. Brunson bad pass TURNOVER (3 TO) 108–109
Q4 0:12 C. McCollum 15' fadeaway Jump Shot (23 PTS) (J. Johnson 8 AST) 108–109
Q4 0:16 NYK shot clock Team TURNOVER 108–107
Q4 0:16 TEAM offensive REBOUND 108–107
Q4 0:16 MISS J. Brunson 18' pullup Shot 108–107
Q4 0:29 O. Anunoby REBOUND (Off:4 Def:5) 108–107
Q4 0:31 MISS J. Hart 3PT 108–107
Q4 0:52 J. Johnson putback Layup (24 PTS) 108–107
Q4 0:52 J. Johnson REBOUND (Off:1 Def:9) 108–105
Q4 0:54 K. Towns BLOCK (2 BLK) 108–105
Q4 0:54 MISS J. Johnson driving DUNK - blocked 108–105
Q4 1:03 J. Brunson Free Throw 1 of 1 (26 PTS) 108–105
Q4 1:03 C. McCollum shooting personal FOUL (3 PF) (Brunson 1 FT) 107–105
Q4 1:03 J. Brunson 6' driving floating Jump Shot (25 PTS) 107–105

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

ATL Atlanta Hawks
S Jalen Johnson 38.5m
24
pts
10
reb
8
ast
Impact
+10.7

Operating as a dynamic point forward, he stuffed the stat sheet with 24 points, 10 rebounds, and 8 assists to drive a +14.6 offensive credit. His two-way versatility was equally impressive, generating 10 contests and 3 deflections to fuel a strong +7.7 defensive mark.

Shooting
FG 8/19 (42.1%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 6/10 (60.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.3%
USG% 28.6%
Net Rtg +1.2
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.5m
Scoring +13.2
Creation +2.4
Shot Making +4.3
Hustle +4.0
Defense +1.8
Turnovers -3.5
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 2
14
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.2

A significant dip in scoring volume and efficiency (4-of-12 shooting) limited his offensive credit to +4.1, well below his usual flamethrower standards. He completely abandoned his playmaking duties with zero assists (avg 3.7), though his 6 contests and 2 deflections provided some baseline defensive utility (+4.3).

Shooting
FG 4/12 (33.3%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 52.6%
USG% 17.0%
Net Rtg -14.1
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.5m
Scoring +7.9
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +3.1
Hustle +0.9
Defense +1.3
Turnovers -4.7
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
S Onyeka Okongwu 37.1m
9
pts
7
reb
1
ast
Impact
+4.8

Efficient interior finishing and rim protection drove his value, as he converted 4-of-7 shots while swatting two attempts (avg 0.9). His 9 contests and 4 deflections highlighted a highly active defensive shift (+4.8), even as his overall scoring volume (9 points) dipped below his season average.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 64.3%
USG% 8.7%
Net Rtg -6.3
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.1m
Scoring +6.5
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +1.7
Hustle +7.9
Defense +1.2
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 1
S CJ McCollum 35.2m
23
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
+10.0

High-volume scoring drove his +10.2 offensive credit, as he poured in 23 points despite a somewhat inefficient 8-of-19 shooting night. Interestingly, his playmaking vanished entirely (1 assist, avg 4.8), but he compensated with surprising defensive activity, logging 2 steals and 2 blocks to boost his +6.2 defensive value.

Shooting
FG 8/19 (42.1%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 5/7 (71.4%)
Advanced
TS% 52.1%
USG% 29.9%
Net Rtg -6.7
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.2m
Scoring +14.3
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +5.4
Hustle +5.4
Defense +2.3
Turnovers -7.0
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 4
S Dyson Daniels 33.4m
8
pts
13
reb
6
ast
Impact
+3.9

Elite defensive disruption and rebounding defined his performance, as he racked up 13 boards and 3 steals to anchor a massive +12.7 defensive credit. While his scoring was muted (8 points) and he struggled with ball security (5 turnovers), his 10 contests and 4 deflections showcased his relentless two-way motor.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.8%
USG% 15.5%
Net Rtg +5.6
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.4m
Scoring +4.6
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +12.6
Defense +6.0
Turnovers -10.6
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 5
21
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
+11.6

A hyper-efficient scoring explosion defined his night, as he torched the defense for 21 points on 9-of-14 shooting to generate a massive +16.9 offensive credit. He operated with pure tunnel vision, failing to record a single assist, but his aggressive downhill finishing made him a highly effective offensive weapon.

Shooting
FG 9/14 (64.3%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 70.6%
USG% 22.2%
Net Rtg +1.3
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.4m
Scoring +16.8
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +4.9
Hustle +5.1
Defense -1.8
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
Gabe Vincent 13.7m
5
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-8.5

Operating in a limited 13-minute reserve role, he offered a minor offensive spark by hitting a three-pointer and a pair of free throws for a +3.5 offensive credit. However, his overall footprint remained minimal, generating little defensive resistance (+0.2) or playmaking value.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 64.4%
USG% 14.7%
Net Rtg +33.8
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.7m
Scoring +3.4
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +1.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -3.1
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
5
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.8

He maximized his brief 10-minute stint by scoring efficiently (2-of-4 from the floor) to post a solid +5.3 offensive credit. However, his lack of rebounding (1 board) and zero defensive tracking stats (no contests or deflections) kept his overall impact muted.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 62.5%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg +29.9
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.9m
Scoring +3.4
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +1.3
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-13.4

A completely invisible five-minute cameo yielded zero points on just one shot attempt. He failed to generate any positive momentum, offering no defensive resistance (-0.5 defense) or floor-spacing value during his brief time on the court.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 8.3%
Net Rtg +6.8
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 5.2m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
NYK New York Knicks
S Jalen Brunson 40.3m
26
pts
3
reb
4
ast
Impact
+7.6

Relentless interior and mid-range scoring drove his +12.7 offensive credit, overcoming a completely frozen perimeter jumper (0-of-5 from deep). While his playmaking volume dipped to just 4 assists (avg 8.0), his 6 contests and 3 deflections showed a willingness to compete on the defensive end (+4.7).

Shooting
FG 11/23 (47.8%)
3PT 0/5 (0.0%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.6%
USG% 26.5%
Net Rtg -0.1
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.3m
Scoring +17.0
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +5.5
Hustle +0.9
Defense +1.3
Turnovers -7.1
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 3
S Josh Hart 40.0m
2
pts
9
reb
6
ast
Impact
-8.6

A brutal shooting night (1-of-9 from the floor) completely neutralized his scoring threat, leading to a negative offensive credit (-3.0). Despite the scoring drought, he remained a connective force through his rebounding (9 boards) and playmaking (6 assists), while 8 contests and 4 deflections fueled his +5.8 defensive value.

Shooting
FG 1/9 (11.1%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 11.1%
USG% 10.9%
Net Rtg +4.7
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.0m
Scoring -4.5
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +0.2
Hustle +8.5
Defense +2.6
Turnovers -4.7
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
S OG Anunoby 36.6m
29
pts
9
reb
1
ast
Impact
+28.5

Elite shot-making and offensive volume drove his massive +30.2 offensive credit, as he poured in 29 points on highly efficient 9-of-16 shooting. He paired this scoring outburst with disruptive rim protection, swatting three shots (avg 0.7) to anchor a +5.9 defensive mark.

Shooting
FG 9/16 (56.2%)
3PT 4/8 (50.0%)
FT 7/7 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 76.0%
USG% 20.9%
Net Rtg -3.7
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.6m
Scoring +23.0
Creation +2.8
Shot Making +5.2
Hustle +8.5
Defense +0.4
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 3
TO 0
21
pts
17
reb
4
ast
Impact
+25.4

Absolute dominance on the glass defined his performance, as he vacuumed up 17 rebounds (well above his 11.0 average) to control the interior. His +19.7 offensive credit was fueled by highly efficient scoring (7-of-12 shooting), while two steals and two blocks highlighted a stout +9.7 defensive showing.

Shooting
FG 7/12 (58.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 6/6 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 71.7%
USG% 20.9%
Net Rtg +29.3
+/- +22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.1m
Scoring +16.4
Creation +3.0
Shot Making +3.3
Hustle +18.7
Defense +2.6
Turnovers -7.1
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 3
S Mikal Bridges 20.5m
0
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-23.6

A complete offensive vanishing act tanked his value, as he went scoreless on just three attempts while bleeding possessions via 4 turnovers (avg 0.8). This passive, error-prone outing resulted in a disastrous -9.3 offensive credit, rendering him a massive net negative in his 20 minutes of action.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 13.5%
Net Rtg -55.3
+/- -26
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.5m
Scoring -2.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -8.2
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 4
15
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-1.4

A lethal perimeter barrage defined his night, as he drilled 5 three-pointers to generate 15 points (+161% vs his season average). However, his heavy reliance on the deep ball and lack of playmaking (just 1 assist) capped his offensive credit at +4.1, though his 6 contests and 3 deflections added solid two-way value (+2.6 defense).

Shooting
FG 5/14 (35.7%)
3PT 5/10 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 53.6%
USG% 19.5%
Net Rtg +21.3
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.2m
Scoring +8.5
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +4.7
Hustle +0.3
Defense +1.3
Turnovers -4.7
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
8
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.0

Inefficient volume scoring capped his effectiveness, as he needed 11 shots to generate just 8 points off the bench. His +3.2 offensive credit reflects a player struggling to find his rhythm, offering little secondary value with just 2 rebounds and 1 assist in 16 minutes.

Shooting
FG 4/11 (36.4%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 35.0%
USG% 26.1%
Net Rtg -4.6
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.9m
Scoring +2.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +2.5
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -1.1
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
2
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-3.6

Operating in a strictly limited role, his value was derived almost entirely from his defensive presence (+4.2) rather than his typical glass-cleaning dominance. With just 4 rebounds (avg 9.1) and 2 points in 11 minutes, he served as a low-usage interior deterrent rather than a game-changing force.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 6.9%
Net Rtg -78.0
+/- -18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.4m
Scoring +1.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +4.1
Defense +2.4
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
5
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.0

A brief, five-minute cameo limited his ability to leave a significant footprint on the game. He managed to score efficiently (2-of-3 from the floor) to post a +4.3 offensive credit, but his trademark disruptive defense was entirely absent, yielding zero deflections or steals.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 72.7%
USG% 18.8%
Net Rtg +8.3
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 5.9m
Scoring +4.2
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.7
Hustle +0.0
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.5

Relegated to just three minutes of floor time, he was a complete ghost in the rotation. He failed to record a single counting stat, offering zero measurable impact on either end of the floor.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -28.6
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.1m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0