Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
CLE lead NYK lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
NYK 2P — 3P —
CLE 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 161 attempts

NYK NYK Shot-making Δ

Brunson 10/19 +1.4
Bridges 11/15 +5.2
Hart Hard 5/12 0.0
Anunoby Hard 6/10 +5.0
Towns 4/9 -0.3
Shamet Hard 4/5 +7.0
McBride Hard 1/3 -0.1
Alvarado 1/3 -1.6
Robinson Open 1/1 +0.6

CLE CLE Shot-making Δ

Mitchell 9/21 -0.8
Mobley 10/18 +1.1
Harden 8/15 +0.3
Strus Hard 4/12 -1.0
Allen Open 7/9 +2.5
Merrill Hard 2/5 +0.8
Tyson 1/2 -0.3
Schröder Hard 1/1 +1.9
Wade Hard 0/1 -1.1
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
NYK
CLE
43/77 Field Goals 42/84
55.8% Field Goal % 50.0%
11/28 3-Pointers 12/41
39.3% 3-Point % 29.3%
24/27 Free Throws 12/19
88.9% Free Throw % 63.2%
68.1% True Shooting % 58.5%
41 Total Rebounds 45
8 Offensive 9
29 Defensive 25
27 Assists 22
1.80 Assist/TO Ratio 1.22
14 Turnovers 17
11 Steals 7
4 Blocks 1
19 Fouls 22
42 Points in Paint 46
17 Fast Break Pts 4
19 Points off TOs 19
10 Second Chance Pts 14
23 Bench Points 25
17 Largest Lead 0
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Mikal Bridges
22 PTS · 6 REB · 2 AST · 39.3 MIN
+27.34
2
Karl-Anthony Towns
13 PTS · 8 REB · 7 AST · 36.2 MIN
+22.49
3
OG Anunoby
21 PTS · 7 REB · 4 AST · 30.6 MIN
+20.35
4
Jarrett Allen
17 PTS · 7 REB · 0 AST · 35.9 MIN
+18.89
5
Jalen Brunson
30 PTS · 3 REB · 6 AST · 41.1 MIN
+17.48
6
Max Strus
13 PTS · 7 REB · 6 AST · 31.0 MIN
+13.6
7
Josh Hart
12 PTS · 9 REB · 5 AST · 34.7 MIN
+12.13
8
Evan Mobley
24 PTS · 6 REB · 2 AST · 35.6 MIN
+9.69
9
Landry Shamet
14 PTS · 1 REB · 3 AST · 27.6 MIN
+7.78
10
Donovan Mitchell
23 PTS · 1 REB · 4 AST · 38.3 MIN
+5.41
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:17 O. Anunoby REBOUND (Off:2 Def:5) 121–108
Q4 0:19 MISS D. Mitchell 25' 3PT 121–108
Q4 0:25 J. Brunson Free Throw 2 of 2 (30 PTS) 121–108
Q4 0:25 J. Brunson Free Throw 1 of 2 (29 PTS) 120–108
Q4 0:25 S. Merrill personal FOUL (4 PF) (Brunson 2 FT) 119–108
Q4 0:30 E. Mobley driving Layup (24 PTS) (M. Strus 6 AST) 119–108
Q4 0:35 J. Brunson Free Throw 2 of 2 (28 PTS) 119–106
Q4 0:35 TEAM offensive REBOUND 118–106
Q4 0:35 MISS J. Brunson Free Throw 1 of 2 118–106
Q4 0:35 M. Strus personal FOUL (5 PF) (Brunson 2 FT) 118–106
Q4 0:38 O. Anunoby REBOUND (Off:2 Def:4) 118–106
Q4 0:41 MISS J. Hart 32' 3PT 118–106
Q4 0:57 J. Hart REBOUND (Off:1 Def:8) 118–106
Q4 0:59 MISS E. Mobley 8' driving floating Shot 118–106
Q4 1:03 M. Bridges bad pass out-of-bounds TURNOVER (2 TO) 118–106

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

CLE Cleveland Cavaliers
S James Harden 40.9m
19
pts
5
reb
5
ast
Impact
-5.6

His performance was crippled by turnovers, as he committed 6 giveaways against just 5 assists. While he scored efficiently on 2-pointers, the constant possessions lost to turnovers were the defining, negative feature of his night.

Shooting
FG 8/15 (53.3%)
3PT 1/7 (14.3%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 58.2%
USG% 22.9%
Net Rtg -10.9
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.9m
Scoring +13.3
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +4.1
Hustle +1.5
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -14.9
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 6
23
pts
1
reb
4
ast
Impact
-0.9

An inefficient, high-volume night defined his game, as he needed 21 shots to score 23 points and struggled from the free-throw line (2-for-6). His 5 turnovers were particularly damaging, contributing to a low `+2.8` Offense component for a primary option.

Shooting
FG 9/21 (42.9%)
3PT 3/10 (30.0%)
FT 2/6 (33.3%)
Advanced
TS% 48.6%
USG% 33.7%
Net Rtg -28.2
+/- -22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.3m
Scoring +12.2
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +6.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +3.4
Turnovers -11.8
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 5
S Jarrett Allen 35.9m
17
pts
7
reb
0
ast
Impact
+13.7

His value was driven by hyper-efficient finishing around the rim, where he scored 17 points on an economical 7-of-9 shooting. This performance as a roll man, supplemented by 5 screen assists, fueled a massive `+21.9` Offense credit.

Shooting
FG 7/9 (77.8%)
3PT 0/0
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 79.0%
USG% 13.4%
Net Rtg -20.9
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.9m
Scoring +15.1
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +8.9
Defense -1.9
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Evan Mobley 35.6m
24
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
+7.1

His offensive output was a mixed bag, as his efficient 24-point scoring night was significantly undermined by 5 costly turnovers. The high turnover count, well above his 2.1 season average, negated much of the positive value he created as a scorer.

Shooting
FG 10/18 (55.6%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 60.7%
USG% 31.6%
Net Rtg -30.5
+/- -21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.6m
Scoring +17.4
Creation +3.4
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +7.6
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -12.6
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 5
S Dean Wade 16.8m
0
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-10.9

His performance was defined by a complete lack of offensive involvement, as he failed to score a single point in nearly 17 minutes of play. While he provided some minor value reflected in a `+2.5` Defense credit, his offensive invisibility was the main feature of his night.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 2.5%
Net Rtg -6.3
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.8m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Max Strus 31.0m
13
pts
7
reb
6
ast
Impact
+8.2

A surprising surge in playmaking drove his performance, as he dished out 6 assists against 0 turnovers, well above his 2.4 season average. This, combined with hitting four 3-pointers, powered a strong `+14.4` Offense component and showcased his value beyond just shooting.

Shooting
FG 4/12 (33.3%)
3PT 4/11 (36.4%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 52.3%
USG% 16.2%
Net Rtg -10.2
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.0m
Scoring +6.3
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +8.9
Defense -0.4
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Sam Merrill 23.5m
6
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-5.5

He fulfilled his role as a floor-spacer in 24 minutes, with his entire scoring output coming from hitting 2-of-4 three-point attempts. Beyond that specific contribution, which generated a `+4.0` Offense credit, his impact was limited across the rest of the stat sheet.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 60.0%
USG% 8.6%
Net Rtg -4.5
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.5m
Scoring +3.8
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +0.9
Defense -1.4
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
-9.1

He provided a steady, mistake-free performance in his 9 minutes off the bench. He hit his only shot, a three-pointer, and distributed 2 assists without committing a turnover, fulfilling his backup guard duties efficiently.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 150.0%
USG% 5.0%
Net Rtg +4.6
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.4m
Scoring +3.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-11.6

In a brief 8-minute run, he had a minimal impact, contributing 3 points and 3 rebounds. He didn't play enough to establish a rhythm or significantly influence the game in his limited bench role.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 61.5%
USG% 15.0%
Net Rtg +23.5
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.5m
Scoring +2.2
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +0.9
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
NYK New York Knicks
S Jalen Brunson 41.1m
30
pts
3
reb
6
ast
Impact
+12.6

His performance was a testament to his relentless downhill attacking, as he generated 30 points despite going 0-for-4 from three. He lived at the free-throw line, attempting 12 free throws to power a `+20.4` Offense component, though this was partially offset by 4 turnovers.

Shooting
FG 10/19 (52.6%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 10/12 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 61.8%
USG% 30.9%
Net Rtg +17.6
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 41.1m
Scoring +22.7
Creation +3.8
Shot Making +4.8
Hustle +0.9
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -8.9
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 4
S Mikal Bridges 39.3m
22
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
+23.3

A dominant two-way performance was driven by hyper-efficient scoring inside the arc (11/15 FG) and disruptive defensive activity. His effort stats were off the charts, with 6 deflections and 5 loose-ball recoveries fueling both his `+7.9` Hustle and `+10.9` Defense credits.

Shooting
FG 11/15 (73.3%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 73.3%
USG% 19.1%
Net Rtg +21.9
+/- +19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.3m
Scoring +19.2
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +4.7
Hustle +7.6
Defense +8.1
Turnovers -4.7
STL 3
BLK 2
TO 2
13
pts
8
reb
7
ast
Impact
+15.0

While his scoring was down, his value was driven by elite playmaking and disciplined ball-handling from the center position. He dished out 7 assists (↑) and committed 0 turnovers (↑), contributing heavily to his `+17.4` Offense component despite taking only 9 shots.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 60.4%
USG% 13.9%
Net Rtg +30.1
+/- +23
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.2m
Scoring +9.1
Creation +2.1
Shot Making +2.3
Hustle +9.2
Defense +3.9
Turnovers +0.0
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 0
S Josh Hart 34.7m
12
pts
9
reb
5
ast
Impact
+3.7

Defensive disruption drove his performance, as he tallied 4 steals and 5 deflections, both well above his averages. This activity was the primary source of his value, reflected in a `+12.2` Defense component, which helped offset 4 turnovers on the offensive end.

Shooting
FG 5/12 (41.7%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 20.8%
Net Rtg +7.3
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.7m
Scoring +6.6
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +3.2
Hustle +5.6
Defense +7.6
Turnovers -8.2
STL 4
BLK 0
TO 4
S OG Anunoby 30.6m
21
pts
7
reb
4
ast
Impact
+14.7

Hyper-efficient scoring defined his night, as he poured in 21 points on just 10 field goal attempts while adding 4 assists (↑). This offensive explosion, which included going 3-for-4 from three and 6-for-6 from the line, drove a massive `+21.7` Offense credit.

Shooting
FG 6/10 (60.0%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 6/6 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 83.1%
USG% 19.4%
Net Rtg +16.4
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.6m
Scoring +18.0
Creation +1.7
Shot Making +4.1
Hustle +7.9
Defense -3.1
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
14
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
-1.2

A blistering shooting display off the bench defined his performance, as he poured in 14 points on just 5 field goal attempts. His 4-for-5 shooting from deep provided a massive offensive lift and was the primary driver of his `+10.4` Offense component.

Shooting
FG 4/5 (80.0%)
3PT 4/5 (80.0%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 110.8%
USG% 13.3%
Net Rtg +15.9
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.6m
Scoring +12.7
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +0.3
Defense -2.2
Turnovers -4.7
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
5
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.7

In just over 14 minutes of action, his impact was minimal, providing a brief offensive spark by hitting his only three-point attempt. He didn't record a rebound or assist, leading to a quiet night where his contributions were largely confined to his `+3.8` Offense credit.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 64.4%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg +18.1
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.3m
Scoring +3.5
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.1
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
2
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-12.2

Foul trouble limited him to just 9 minutes of court time, rendering him a non-factor in the game. He picked up 3 personal fouls in his brief stint, preventing him from establishing any rhythm or making his usual impact on the glass.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 4.8%
Net Rtg -21.1
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.4m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +1.9
Defense -4.7
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-13.6

His 4-minute stint was brief and ineffective, marked by a turnover and two missed three-pointers. He failed to record any hustle or defensive stats, resulting in a quick hook after a negative shift on the floor.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 50.0%
Net Rtg -37.5
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.0m
Scoring +0.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.2
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.9

He saw just under 3 minutes of action in a minimal role, failing to record a single box score statistic. His appearance was too brief to generate any meaningful impact on the game.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -106.7
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.8m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0