June 08, 2026
EXPLORE THE GAME
Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.
SAS
2P —
3P —
NYK
2P —
3P —
SAS
NYK
SAS
PLAYER PERFORMANCE
New York Knicks
While his scoring was well below his average, he drove his value through defensive disruption and hustle. He generated 5 deflections, 3 steals, and 2 blocks, which powered a +8.4 defensive component and a +5.7 hustle score.
Hyper-efficient scoring defined his dominant performance, as he poured in 28 points on just 13 shots (9/13 FG). His offensive explosion, which generated a +23.0 component score, was paired with solid defensive work including 11 contests and 2 blocks.
A high-volume scoring night was significantly undermined by costly turnovers. While he poured in 32 points, his 5 turnovers—nearly double his 2.7 average—erased much of the value from his +18.3 offensive component score.
A hot shooting night from three-point range fueled his strong all-around performance. He connected on 4 of 7 three-pointers on his way to 16 points, complementing his usual high-energy contributions of 9 rebounds and 5 assists.
A complete lack of offensive production defined his quiet night, as he scored just 2 points on 1/5 shooting in 29 minutes. This offensive disappearance, a stark drop from his 14.3 point average, resulted in a significant negative contribution to the team.
His performance was defined by a cold shooting night, as he struggled to find his rhythm going 1-for-8 from the field and 1-for-7 from three. This inefficiency over 23 minutes negated his positive hustle plays, leading to a -10.3 play-by-play impact sum.
He delivered a potent dose of instant offense off the bench, scoring 10 points in just 13 minutes. His efficient 4/7 shooting, including a perfect 2/2 from deep, provided a crucial scoring punch for the second unit despite committing 2 turnovers.
He provided steady, mistake-free minutes as a reserve guard, contributing across the board without hurting the team. In 12 minutes, he added 4 points and 3 rebounds while committing 0 turnovers.
He was unable to make an impact in his limited court time, failing to score on two attempts in 9 minutes. A turnover on one of his possessions contributed to his negative offensive value for the short stint.
He provided a highly efficient burst of energy in a very limited 7-minute stint. His production of 5 points and 4 rebounds on 2/3 shooting generated a strong +9.0 offensive component score, maximizing his brief time on the floor.
Logged only 10 seconds of game time and did not record any statistics.
San Antonio Spurs
A dominant offensive performance was driven by elite scoring and creation, as he poured in 32 points on efficient 11/18 shooting. He paired his scoring with 6 assists (double his 3.1 avg) and protected the ball with only 1 turnover, leading to a massive +31.4 offensive contribution.
Extreme passivity defined his night, as he attempted only 4 shots in 38 minutes of play. While he was perfectly efficient on those looks (3/4 3P), the complete lack of creation (0 assists vs 2.7 avg) and low usage resulted in a significant negative value despite the +8.1 offensive component.
Efficient scoring drove his performance, as he posted 23 points on just 14 shots (8/14 FG). He balanced his scoring with solid ball control, committing just 2 turnovers against his 3.6 average, which fueled a +18.9 offensive component score.
With his shot not falling (4/14 FG, 0/5 3P), he shifted his focus to playmaking and defense to provide value. His 8 assists were well above his 5.7 average, and his effort on the other end, including 10 contests, contributed to a +6.9 defensive score.
His value came from floor spacing and some secondary creation, hitting 3 of 7 from deep and dishing 3 assists (↑). Despite a positive offensive component score (+8.7), his overall contribution was limited by a significant drop in rebounding with just 1.0 for the game (avg 5.9).
His shooting was a major drag on his efficiency, converting just 5 of 18 attempts and going 1/8 from deep. He salvaged his night by crashing the glass for 9 rebounds (well above his 6.3 avg) and playing mistake-free basketball with 0 turnovers.
In limited minutes off the bench, his impact was undermined by costly mistakes and missed opportunities. He committed 2 turnovers in just 17 minutes and went 1/4 from the free-throw line, negating his efficient 3/5 shooting from the field.
He made a positive impact in just 9 minutes by focusing on hustle plays and creating for others. His value was driven by 4 screen assists and pulling down 5 rebounds, contributing to a +7.7 offensive component score despite not making a field goal.
He provided a brief offensive spark in limited garbage-time minutes. In just under 4 minutes of play, he was perfect from the field, hitting his lone three-point attempt for 3 points.
