Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
SAS lead NYK lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
NYK 2P — 3P —
SAS 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 173 attempts

NYK NYK Shot-making Δ

Brunson 14/27 +5.7
Hart 4/11 -1.1
Anunoby 3/11 -6.3
Bridges Hard 5/10 +3.1
Shamet 2/7 -2.8
Towns 1/7 -6.2
Clarkson 1/5 -3.1
Alvarado 0/5 -5.5
Robinson Open 1/2 -0.8
McBride Hard 0/2 -2.0

SAS SAS Shot-making Δ

Harper 10/19 +0.7
Wembanyama 7/19 -6.5
Fox Hard 3/15 -7.7
Castle 1/10 -8.4
Champagnie Hard 5/9 +4.0
Vassell Hard 5/8 +3.6
Johnson Hard 2/5 +0.7
Kornet Open 0/1 -1.2
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
NYK
SAS
31/87 Field Goals 33/86
35.6% Field Goal % 38.4%
12/37 3-Pointers 12/37
32.4% 3-Point % 32.4%
20/28 Free Throws 12/19
71.4% Free Throw % 63.2%
47.3% True Shooting % 47.7%
66 Total Rebounds 59
13 Offensive 14
35 Defensive 33
14 Assists 18
1.00 Assist/TO Ratio 1.38
10 Turnovers 12
8 Steals 6
4 Blocks 7
21 Fouls 22
30 Points in Paint 38
13 Fast Break Pts 13
18 Points off TOs 21
14 Second Chance Pts 17
9 Bench Points 32
4 Largest Lead 16
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Jalen Brunson
45 PTS · 3 REB · 3 AST · 41.1 MIN
+40.5
2
Victor Wembanyama
19 PTS · 14 REB · 2 AST · 37.9 MIN
+19.1
3
Dylan Harper
25 PTS · 5 REB · 4 AST · 31.1 MIN
+18.1
4
Josh Hart
13 PTS · 11 REB · 2 AST · 39.2 MIN
+11.9
5
Devin Vassell
12 PTS · 7 REB · 2 AST · 39.2 MIN
+11.7
6
Mikal Bridges
14 PTS · 2 REB · 4 AST · 38.6 MIN
+7.0
7
Mitchell Robinson
2 PTS · 10 REB · 2 AST · 20.0 MIN
+5.1
8
Julian Champagnie
14 PTS · 7 REB · 1 AST · 30.7 MIN
+4.0
9
Keldon Johnson
7 PTS · 5 REB · 0 AST · 16.1 MIN
+2.6
10
OG Anunoby
11 PTS · 8 REB · 0 AST · 32.8 MIN
+2.3
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:02 O. Anunoby REBOUND (Off:0 Def:8) 94–90
Q4 0:02 MISS V. Wembanyama 25' 3PT 94–90
Q4 0:07 O. Anunoby Free Throw 2 of 2 (11 PTS) 94–90
Q4 0:07 TEAM offensive REBOUND 93–90
Q4 0:07 MISS O. Anunoby Free Throw 1 of 2 93–90
Q4 0:07 D. Harper take personal FOUL (5 PF) (Anunoby 2 FT) 93–90
Q4 0:08 O. Anunoby REBOUND (Off:0 Def:7) 93–90
Q4 0:08 MISS D. Harper Free Throw 2 of 2 93–90
Q4 0:08 TEAM offensive REBOUND 93–90
Q4 0:08 MISS D. Harper Free Throw 1 of 2 93–90
Q4 0:08 L. Shamet take personal FOUL (2 PF) (Harper 2 FT) 93–90
Q4 0:08 M. Bridges Free Throw 2 of 2 (14 PTS) 93–90
Q4 0:08 TEAM offensive REBOUND 92–90
Q4 0:08 MISS M. Bridges Free Throw 1 of 2 92–90
Q4 0:08 D. Harper personal FOUL (4 PF) (Bridges 2 FT) 92–90

GAME ANALYSIS

GET THIS IN YOUR INBOX

Every breakdown for your team — free, the morning after the game.

Follow your team — free

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

SAS San Antonio Spurs
S Devin Vassell 39.2m
12
pts
7
reb
2
ast
Impact
+11.7

A stellar two-way performance was driven by high efficiency and defensive activity, resulting in a +10.4 Offense and +6.8 Defense component. He scored 12.0 points on just 8 shots while adding 2.0 steals and committing 0.0 turnovers.

Shooting
FG 5/8 (62.5%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 9.5%
Net Rtg -10.5
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.2m
Scoring +9.6
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +3.3
Hustle +2.1
Defense +3.7
Turnovers +0.0
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 0
19
pts
14
reb
2
ast
Impact
+19.1

Elite rim protection and rebounding drove his performance, as he recorded 5.0 blocks and grabbed 14.0 rebounds. This defensive dominance (+4.7 Defense) and control of the glass helped offset an inefficient scoring night where he shot just 7/19 from the field.

Shooting
FG 7/19 (36.8%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 44.8%
USG% 27.4%
Net Rtg -1.2
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.9m
Scoring +9.4
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +15.8
Defense +0.3
Turnovers -4.7
STL 0
BLK 5
TO 2
S De'Aaron Fox 36.8m
7
pts
0
reb
5
ast
Impact
-4.7

An ice-cold shooting night defined his offensive struggles, as he shot just 3/15 from the field for 7.0 points, leading to a -2.5 Offense component. His positive contribution came on the other end, where he posted a +3.1 Defense component and added 2.0 steals.

Shooting
FG 3/15 (20.0%)
3PT 1/8 (12.5%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 23.3%
USG% 19.8%
Net Rtg +1.4
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.8m
Scoring -1.9
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +2.1
Hustle +0.0
Defense +4.1
Turnovers -2.4
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
S Stephon Castle 32.1m
6
pts
5
reb
4
ast
Impact
-12.5

A brutal shooting performance defined his game, as he connected on just 1 of 10 field goal attempts for 6.0 points. This inefficiency led to a -4.6 Offense component, completely negating any value from his 4.0 assists.

Shooting
FG 1/10 (10.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 4/6 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 23.7%
USG% 21.1%
Net Rtg +3.0
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.1m
Scoring -1.7
Creation +2.1
Shot Making +0.2
Hustle +2.5
Defense +0.2
Turnovers -7.8
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
14
pts
7
reb
1
ast
Impact
+4.0

Hot perimeter shooting was the main driver of his offense, as he knocked down 4 of his 8 three-point attempts for 14.0 points. However, this positive contribution (+5.7 Offense) was significantly undermined by 4.0 turnovers.

Shooting
FG 5/9 (55.6%)
3PT 4/8 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 77.8%
USG% 18.1%
Net Rtg -18.4
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.7m
Scoring +10.7
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +4.2
Hustle +7.9
Defense -0.8
Turnovers -10.2
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 4
Dylan Harper 31.1m
25
pts
5
reb
4
ast
Impact
+18.1

A potent and efficient scoring attack drove his value, leading to a +20.6 Offense component. He poured in 25.0 points on 10/19 shooting and added 4.0 assists while protecting the ball with 0.0 turnovers.

Shooting
FG 10/19 (52.6%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 3/6 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 57.8%
USG% 28.9%
Net Rtg -14.8
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.1m
Scoring +16.3
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +5.5
Hustle +6.3
Defense -2.3
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
7
pts
5
reb
0
ast
Impact
+2.6

Efficient shooting in a limited bench role drove his positive contribution, as he scored 7.0 points on just 5 shots in 16:09 minutes. Hitting 2 of 3 from deep fueled a +6.5 Offense component, providing a spark despite minimal playing time.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 59.5%
USG% 17.1%
Net Rtg +63.7
+/- +17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.1m
Scoring +4.3
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +5.4
Defense -0.6
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Luke Kornet 10.2m
0
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-11.4

He was largely invisible in his 10:15 of court time, failing to score and posting negative values on both ends of the floor. His -1.5 Offense and -1.2 Defense components reflect a performance with no positive impact.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 6.9%
Net Rtg -13.0
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.2m
Scoring -1.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.6
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-12.2

A brief and scoreless appearance was marked by a negative offensive contribution in just 5:56 of action. He did not attempt a shot but committed 1.0 turnover, resulting in a -1.9 Offense component.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
USG% 5.9%
Net Rtg +10.6
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 5.9m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
NYK New York Knicks
S Jalen Brunson 41.1m
45
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
+40.5

A massive scoring outburst defined his night, as he erupted for 45.0 points on efficient 14/27 shooting from the field. This individual creation is reflected in his +32.8 Offense component, as he shouldered the offensive load while his assists were below average (3.0).

Shooting
FG 14/27 (51.9%)
3PT 4/7 (57.1%)
FT 13/15 (86.7%)
Advanced
TS% 67.0%
USG% 36.0%
Net Rtg +11.6
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 41.1m
Scoring +34.7
Creation +3.6
Shot Making +8.7
Hustle +3.8
Defense +4.7
Turnovers -7.8
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 3
S Josh Hart 39.2m
13
pts
11
reb
2
ast
Impact
+11.9

Josh Hart's value came from exceeding his regular production on the glass and from deep, grabbing 11.0 rebounds and hitting 3 of 6 three-pointers. His +9.7 Offense component highlights this contribution, which was bolstered by a low turnover night with just 1.0 giveaway.

Shooting
FG 4/11 (36.4%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 52.8%
USG% 13.4%
Net Rtg +18.3
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.2m
Scoring +7.0
Creation +1.7
Shot Making +3.2
Hustle +14.0
Defense -3.4
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Mikal Bridges 38.6m
14
pts
2
reb
4
ast
Impact
+7.0

Efficient, low-mistake offense drove his performance, resulting in a +11.2 Offense component. He scored 14.0 points on just 10 shots (5/10 FG) and protected the ball perfectly with 0.0 turnovers, a marked improvement on his 0.8 season average.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 64.3%
USG% 12.1%
Net Rtg +6.8
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.6m
Scoring +9.8
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +4.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.2
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
S OG Anunoby 32.8m
11
pts
8
reb
0
ast
Impact
+2.3

A defensive-led performance defined his night, as reflected by a +6.5 Defense component and 3.0 steals. His offense, however, completely vanished as he shot an inefficient 3/11 from the field for 11.0 points, well below his 20.9 average.

Shooting
FG 3/11 (27.3%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 4/6 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 40.3%
USG% 19.2%
Net Rtg +4.6
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.8m
Scoring +3.4
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +2.4
Defense +4.8
Turnovers -2.4
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 1
2
pts
10
reb
1
ast
Impact
-7.4

An offensive disaster defined his game, as he scored just 2.0 points on 1/7 shooting and committed 5.0 turnovers, contributing to a -10.9 Offense component. Although his rebounding (10.0) and defense (+6.0) were solid, he fouled out in just 22:44 minutes.

Shooting
FG 1/7 (14.3%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 14.3%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg -3.2
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.7m
Scoring -2.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.7
Hustle +12.7
Defense +2.3
Turnovers -12.6
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 5
2
pts
10
reb
2
ast
Impact
+5.1

Dominant rebounding defined his minutes, as he grabbed 10.0 boards, nearly double his 5.2 season average. Despite scoring just 2.0 points, his presence on the glass generated second-chance opportunities, contributing to a strong +8.2 Offense component.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 34.7%
USG% 5.9%
Net Rtg +12.8
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.0m
Scoring +0.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +12.7
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
5
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.7

A quiet and inefficient bench performance was defined by his inability to make a positive mark on either end of the floor. He scored just 5.0 points on 2/7 shooting and posted a -1.2 Defense component in his 13:13 minutes of action.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 35.7%
USG% 20.6%
Net Rtg -50.0
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.2m
Scoring +1.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.6
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-12.3

He was a complete non-factor off the bench, going scoreless on 0/2 shooting in 12:53 of play. This offensive void resulted in a -1.2 Offense component, offering no production during his court time.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 6.5%
Net Rtg +16.0
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.9m
Scoring -1.9
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-13.6

Total offensive invisibility defined his 11:25 on the court, as he went scoreless on 0/5 shooting from the field. This lack of production generated a -4.1 Offense component, offering nothing to the team's efforts.

Shooting
FG 0/5 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -55.0
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.4m
Scoring -4.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.6

Inefficient volume shooting in a short stint defined his game, as he attempted 5 shots in just 6:07 minutes but only converted 1. This failed attempt to provide a scoring spark resulted in a negligible -0.1 Offense component.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 20.0%
USG% 27.8%
Net Rtg +15.9
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.1m
Scoring -0.9
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +1.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-7.1

Ariel Hukporti did not see the floor in this game, resulting in no statistical output. This is in line with his recent deep-bench role, where he has struggled to make a positive mark, averaging a -5.1 impact in limited minutes over his last 10 games.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +80.0
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.9m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.3
Defense +0.5
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.0

His performance was limited to a 9-second appearance at the end of the game, providing no statistical footprint.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +50.0
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 0.1m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0