GAME ANALYSIS

GET THIS IN YOUR INBOX

Every breakdown for your team — free, the morning after the game.

Follow your team — free

Already have an account? Log in

Why this game is worth arguing about
game swinger
Karl-Anthony Towns actually won the night
20 points, 10 boards, 10 assists was the line. The lift came from scoring (+15.5), hustle (+12.7), and creation (+4.8), pushing Net Impact to +24.4.
Scoring +15.5
Points, shot value, and miss penalties.
Hustle +12.7
Rebounding and extra-possession work.
Creation +4.8
Assist credit weighted by shot quality created.
Check the tape
box score lie
The box score sold Nickeil Alexander-Walker too hard
15 points, 4 boards, 1 assist was already a rough line. The real damage was turnovers (-15.6) and defense (-1.9), pulling Net Impact down to -5.9.
Turnovers -15.6
Possessions destroyed by giveaways.
Defense -1.9
Steals, blocks, fouls, and defensive events.
Hustle +3.1
Rebounding and extra-possession work.
Check the tape
box score lie
The box score sold Jalen Brunson too hard
19 points, 0 boards, 3 assists was already a rough line. The real damage was turnovers (-14.2), pulling Net Impact down to -1.5.
Turnovers -14.2
Possessions destroyed by giveaways.
Defense +0.5
Steals, blocks, fouls, and defensive events.
Creation +1.2
Assist credit weighted by shot quality created.
Check the tape
hidden value
Onyeka Okongwu's value was hiding in plain sight
12 points, 6 boards, 1 assist undersells it. scoring (+8.9), defense (+5.8), and hustle (+1.8) pushed his Net Impact to +10.1.
Scoring +8.9
Points, shot value, and miss penalties.
Defense +5.8
Steals, blocks, fouls, and defensive events.
Hustle +1.8
Rebounding and extra-possession work.
Check the tape

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

ATL Atlanta Hawks
S Jalen Johnson 34.8m
14
pts
3
reb
5
ast
Impact
+3.4

Johnson struggled to find his rhythm from the floor (4-of-12 shooting), relying heavily on perfect free-throw shooting to salvage a +9.2 Offense credit. His rebounding plummeted well below his season average (3 boards vs 8.7 avg), and his defensive impact was slightly negative (-0.4) despite contesting 7 shots.

Shooting
FG 4/12 (33.3%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 5/5 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 49.3%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -26.4
+/- -19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.8m
Scoring +8.3
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +2.2
Hustle +1.9
Defense -2.5
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 45.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
15
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-5.9

Alexander-Walker's lethal perimeter shooting (5-of-10 from deep) was completely undone by a disastrous 6 turnovers, cratering his Offense credit to just +1.2. His defensive execution was equally problematic (-2.4 Defense credit), as he allowed his primary matchup to shoot a blistering 8-of-9 from the field.

Shooting
FG 5/11 (45.5%)
3PT 5/10 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 68.2%
USG% 21.5%
Net Rtg -23.2
+/- -17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.8m
Scoring +10.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +4.8
Hustle +3.1
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -15.6
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 88.9%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 6
S CJ McCollum 32.0m
17
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
+1.5

McCollum's surprisingly stout defensive effort defined his night, as he tallied 9 contests, 4 deflections, and 2 blocks to earn a +5.6 Defense credit. However, his offensive value was severely muted (+3.5 Offense) by 4 turnovers and a frigid 0-of-4 showing from beyond the arc.

Shooting
FG 8/15 (53.3%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 1/3 (33.3%)
Advanced
TS% 52.1%
USG% 26.7%
Net Rtg -26.6
+/- -17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.0m
Scoring +10.8
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +4.3
Hustle +0.3
Defense +1.8
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 18
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 38.9%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 4
S Dyson Daniels 29.9m
6
pts
9
reb
6
ast
Impact
+5.3

Daniels compensated for a quiet scoring night with elite perimeter disruption, racking up 6 deflections to drive a +6.3 Defense credit. He completely smothered his primary matchup (4-of-12 shooting) while operating as a vital connective playmaker (+5.9 Offense) with 6 assists and 9 rebounds.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 42.9%
USG% 13.6%
Net Rtg -9.6
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.9m
Scoring +2.8
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +1.2
Hustle +6.6
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
S Onyeka Okongwu 28.4m
12
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
+10.1

Okongwu was an absolute terror in the passing lanes, generating 4 steals and 6 deflections to post a massive +8.7 Defense credit. While his primary matchup scorched him (9-of-11 shooting), his highly efficient offensive role (+8.5 Offense) and chaotic defensive playmaking kept him highly impactful.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 68.5%
USG% 15.4%
Net Rtg -14.9
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.4m
Scoring +8.9
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +1.7
Hustle +1.8
Defense +5.8
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 81.8%
STL 4
BLK 0
TO 1
10
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.0

A brutal perimeter shooting slump (0-of-6 from deep) derailed Kuminga's offensive rhythm, dragging his Offense credit down to a meager +1.4. He managed to salvage some value through defensive activity, logging 3 deflections and 5 contests, but his overall inefficiency severely limited his impact.

Shooting
FG 3/10 (30.0%)
3PT 0/6 (0.0%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 41.0%
USG% 23.3%
Net Rtg -16.3
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.4m
Scoring +4.2
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +2.5
Defense -2.2
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
Gabe Vincent 13.7m
10
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
+0.7

Vincent provided a sudden and much-needed scoring burst off the bench, doubling his season average to notch 10 points on crisp 50% shooting. His +6.2 Offense credit reflects his efficient perimeter stroke (2-of-4 from deep), though he offered virtually nothing else across the box score.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 68.3%
USG% 24.2%
Net Rtg -48.3
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.7m
Scoring +7.4
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +2.3
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.2
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
0
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.2

Gueye was entirely invisible on offense, failing to score a single point, but he found ways to contribute through sheer effort. He drew a charge and grabbed 4 rebounds to generate a solid +3.1 Hustle credit in his 11 minutes of action.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 3.7%
Net Rtg -62.9
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.0m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +4.1
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-7.6

Kispert endured a miserable shooting night, clanking 6 of his 7 attempts to finish with just 3 points and a minimal +1.6 Offense credit. His struggles extended to the defensive end, where he allowed his matchup to shoot 75% when guarded.

Shooting
FG 1/7 (14.3%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 20.2%
USG% 23.3%
Net Rtg +26.3
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.8m
Scoring -1.7
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +2.5
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
4
pts
5
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.9

Bradley maximized his brief seven-minute stint, converting his only shot and dominating the glass with 5 rebounds to post a +5.7 Offense credit. He was equally effective defensively (+2.2 Defense), completely blanking his primary matchup on four shot attempts.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 106.4%
USG% 8.7%
Net Rtg +38.5
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.5m
Scoring +4.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +2.5
Defense -1.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
Asa Newell 3.9m
2
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-3.5

Newell packed an impressive amount of defensive activity into just four minutes, tallying a steal, a block, and a deflection to earn a +3.2 Defense credit. His offensive involvement was limited to a single made basket (+1.7 Offense), but his energy was palpable.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 15.4%
Net Rtg +71.4
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.9m
Scoring +0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +0.0
Defense +2.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
3
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-3.6

Risacher saw minimal action, hitting one three-pointer to generate a +3.4 Offense credit in just under four minutes. He grabbed a couple of rebounds but otherwise left no significant footprint on the game.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 15.4%
Net Rtg +71.4
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.9m
Scoring +2.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +1.6
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.2

Wallace struggled to make an impact in his four minutes, missing both of his field goal attempts to finish with a negligible +0.8 Offense credit. His only points came at the free-throw line in a largely empty performance.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 34.7%
USG% 23.1%
Net Rtg +71.4
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.9m
Scoring +0.6
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
NYK New York Knicks
S OG Anunoby 39.8m
22
pts
10
reb
1
ast
Impact
+19.4

Anunoby delivered a dominant two-way performance, anchoring the perimeter defense while serving as a highly efficient scoring engine. His stifling defensive presence (+5.9 Defense credit) was highlighted by 11 contests and holding his primary matchup to a frigid 5-of-13 shooting. Meanwhile, his +17.1 Offense credit reflects his crisp shot-making (9-of-16 overall, 3-of-6 from deep) and strong work on the glass (10 rebounds).

Shooting
FG 9/16 (56.2%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 65.2%
USG% 19.6%
Net Rtg +24.1
+/- +19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.8m
Scoring +15.5
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +4.2
Hustle +7.8
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 38.5%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
S Jalen Brunson 33.9m
19
pts
0
reb
3
ast
Impact
-1.5

Severe turnover issues derailed Brunson's offensive rhythm, as his 6 giveaways (double his 2.8 average) dragged his Offense credit down to a meager +0.9. While he managed to hit 3-of-7 from beyond the arc, his overall inefficiency (7-of-18 shooting) and sloppy decision-making overshadowed a respectable defensive effort featuring 3 deflections.

Shooting
FG 7/18 (38.9%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.3%
USG% 32.9%
Net Rtg +19.7
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.9m
Scoring +11.5
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +5.2
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -14.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 63.6%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 6
S Josh Hart 31.0m
10
pts
9
reb
3
ast
Impact
+2.4

Hart's relentless motor drove his value, generating 5 deflections to fuel a stout +6.8 Defense credit despite his primary matchup shooting 70% when guarded. His offensive impact was muted (+2.0 Offense) by a continued perimeter slump (1-of-5 from deep), but his typical rebounding aggression (9 boards) and hustle plays kept him heavily involved.

Shooting
FG 4/10 (40.0%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 46.0%
USG% 18.6%
Net Rtg +30.4
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.0m
Scoring +5.2
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +2.7
Defense +2.3
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 70.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
20
pts
10
reb
10
ast
Impact
+24.4

Towns operated as a flawless offensive hub, leveraging his passing vision to notch 10 assists (well above his 4.0 average) and drive a massive +21.9 Offense credit. He complemented his elite playmaking with ruthless scoring efficiency (6-of-10 from the field, 7-of-9 at the line) while chipping in 4 deflections to bolster his defensive footprint.

Shooting
FG 6/10 (60.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 7/9 (77.8%)
Advanced
TS% 71.6%
USG% 24.6%
Net Rtg +33.3
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.3m
Scoring +15.5
Creation +4.8
Shot Making +3.0
Hustle +12.7
Defense +1.3
Turnovers -6.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 46.7%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
S Mikal Bridges 19.3m
8
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
+2.9

Bridges settled into a highly efficient but extremely low-volume offensive role, taking just four shots to generate his +8.2 Offense credit. His passivity limited his overall footprint in just 19 minutes of action, though he played mistake-free basketball with zero turnovers.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 82.0%
USG% 11.1%
Net Rtg +2.6
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.3m
Scoring +7.2
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +0.6
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
11
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
+2.5

McBride provided a crucial scoring punch off the bench, burying 3-of-6 from deep to easily surpass his recent scoring average and post a +9.2 Offense credit. However, his value was entirely one-sided, as he offered zero peripheral stats and leaked value on the other end with a -2.4 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 78.6%
USG% 12.7%
Net Rtg +30.3
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.8m
Scoring +8.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +3.6
Hustle +0.0
Defense -2.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
7
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.5

Clarkson played a strictly one-dimensional role, providing a modest scoring lift (+6.0 Offense credit) while failing to register a single rebound or assist. His defensive engagement was passable, holding his matchup to 3-of-8 shooting, but his overall footprint remained exceptionally narrow.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 65.8%
USG% 10.6%
Net Rtg +27.1
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.6m
Scoring +5.5
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
6
pts
8
reb
1
ast
Impact
+9.7

Robinson operated as a highly efficient interior presence, converting his limited touches (2-of-3 shooting) to generate a robust +12.0 Offense credit. He dominated his space on the glass with 8 rebounds and provided steady rim deterrence, limiting his primary matchup to just 40% shooting.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 69.4%
USG% 11.1%
Net Rtg +30.2
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.1m
Scoring +4.5
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +10.2
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
6
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
+1.2

Alvarado was a disruptive menace on the perimeter, racking up 3 steals and 4 deflections to anchor a stellar +7.2 Defense credit. He didn't demand the ball much offensively, but his timely perimeter shooting (2-of-3 from deep) ensured his defensive havoc translated into winning basketball.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 60.0%
USG% 18.2%
Net Rtg +31.8
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.8m
Scoring +3.8
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +5.2
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.9

Hukporti provided a brief burst of interior activity in his limited minutes, grabbing 3 rebounds and swatting a shot to earn a +1.6 Defense credit. However, his offensive impact was non-existent, failing to score while committing a turnover.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 22.2%
Net Rtg -83.3
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.6m
Scoring -0.9
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +2.8
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
3
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.6

Shamet made his only shot attempt from beyond the arc, yielding a minor +1.1 Offense credit in just three minutes of action. He recorded no other statistics, operating purely as a fleeting floor-spacer.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 150.0%
USG% 22.2%
Net Rtg -83.3
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.6m
Scoring +3.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
2
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.8

Kolek was a non-factor in his brief three-minute cameo, managing just a single made basket for a +2.0 Offense credit. He offered no playmaking or rebounding, serving strictly as garbage-time cardio.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 11.1%
Net Rtg -83.3
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.6m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-11.0

Diawara completely misfired during his brief stint, missing all three of his shot attempts to post a negative Offense credit (-1.6). He did manage to completely shut down his matchup (0-for-4 shooting), but his inability to contribute offensively rendered his minutes empty.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg -83.3
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.6m
Scoring -1.9
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0