Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
HOU lead NYK lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
NYK 2P — 3P —
HOU 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 163 attempts

NYK NYK Shot-making Δ

Towns 7/17 -0.7
Brunson 5/14 -3.0
Hart Hard 5/12 -1.6
Anunoby Hard 3/9 -1.5
McBride Hard 1/9 -5.6
Alvarado Hard 5/6 +6.3
Clarkson 4/6 +2.4
Bridges Hard 3/4 +3.1
Robinson Open 2/4 -1.4
Sochan 1/2 -0.3

HOU HOU Shot-making Δ

Durant Hard 10/18 +7.1
Thompson 8/14 +1.4
Sheppard Hard 8/12 +8.5
Eason 6/10 +3.5
Smith Jr. Hard 5/10 +3.1
Sengun 4/5 +3.8
Tate 1/4 -2.3
Holiday Hard 0/2 -1.8
Green Hard 0/2 -1.8
Capela Hard 0/1 -0.9
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
NYK
HOU
36/85 Field Goals 42/78
42.4% Field Goal % 53.8%
10/34 3-Pointers 15/35
29.4% 3-Point % 42.9%
12/16 Free Throws 12/16
75.0% Free Throw % 75.0%
51.1% True Shooting % 65.3%
51 Total Rebounds 42
12 Offensive 6
29 Defensive 32
22 Assists 35
2.00 Assist/TO Ratio 3.50
11 Turnovers 8
5 Steals 6
2 Blocks 6
16 Fouls 17
38 Points in Paint 42
17 Fast Break Pts 15
16 Points off TOs 18
23 Second Chance Pts 4
32 Bench Points 22
1 Largest Lead 21
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Kevin Durant
27 PTS · 6 REB · 8 AST · 34.5 MIN
+22.41
2
Tari Eason
17 PTS · 8 REB · 3 AST · 30.4 MIN
+21.92
3
Reed Sheppard
20 PTS · 5 REB · 2 AST · 27.5 MIN
+18.44
4
Amen Thompson
17 PTS · 4 REB · 8 AST · 38.8 MIN
+18.09
5
Karl-Anthony Towns
22 PTS · 8 REB · 3 AST · 34.2 MIN
+15.86
6
Jabari Smith Jr.
15 PTS · 6 REB · 2 AST · 39.1 MIN
+12.46
7
Alperen Sengun
13 PTS · 5 REB · 10 AST · 29.9 MIN
+12.24
8
Jose Alvarado
12 PTS · 1 REB · 2 AST · 11.7 MIN
+11.02
9
Mikal Bridges
7 PTS · 3 REB · 4 AST · 33.7 MIN
+10.55
10
OG Anunoby
8 PTS · 6 REB · 0 AST · 38.2 MIN
+10.27
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:15 HOU shot clock Team TURNOVER 94–111
Q4 0:39 J. Sochan alley-oop DUNK (2 PTS) (T. Kolek 1 AST) 94–111
Q4 0:44 A. Hukporti REBOUND (Off:2 Def:0) 92–111
Q4 0:45 MISS P. Dadiet 29' pullup bank 3PT 92–111
Q4 0:53 P. Dadiet REBOUND (Off:0 Def:1) 92–111
Q4 0:54 MISS J. Green 27' 3PT 92–111
Q4 1:18 J. Green REBOUND (Off:0 Def:1) 92–111
Q4 1:19 MISS A. Hukporti 8' putback Layup 92–111
Q4 1:21 A. Hukporti REBOUND (Off:1 Def:0) 92–111
Q4 1:22 MISS J. Sochan 28' 3PT 92–111
Q4 1:32 T. Kolek REBOUND (Off:0 Def:1) 92–111
Q4 1:33 MISS J. Green 26' 3PT 92–111
Q4 1:47 J. Brunson take personal FOUL (2 PF) 92–111
Q4 1:55 K. Towns putback Layup (22 PTS) 92–111
Q4 1:56 K. Towns REBOUND (Off:2 Def:6) 90–111

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

HOU Houston Rockets
15
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
+7.9

Undermined his perimeter spacing with catastrophic off-ball lapses and poorly timed fouls that gifted the opponent easy points. Struggled mightily to navigate screens, consistently leaving shooters open on the perimeter during critical fourth-quarter possessions. The defensive breakdowns completely erased the value of his offensive contributions.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 68.9%
USG% 14.8%
Net Rtg +22.1
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.1m
Scoring +11.3
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +1.8
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 54.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Amen Thompson 38.9m
17
pts
4
reb
8
ast
Impact
+12.2

Broke down the primary point of attack at will, consistently collapsing the defense to generate high-value interior looks. His elite lateral quickness smothered opposing guards, though a few out-of-control drives into traffic resulted in costly transition opportunities the other way. A dominant downhill performance slightly marred by youthful over-aggression in the first quarter.

Shooting
FG 8/14 (57.1%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 57.1%
USG% 20.3%
Net Rtg +30.9
+/- +19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.9m
Scoring +12.6
Creation +1.7
Shot Making +2.2
Hustle +4.1
Defense +1.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 21.4%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 1
S Kevin Durant 34.5m
27
pts
6
reb
8
ast
Impact
+21.9

Picked apart the defense with surgical precision from the mid-post, consistently generating high-quality looks over smaller defenders. His gravity warped the opposing scheme, creating wide-open driving lanes for his teammates while he simultaneously operated as a weak-side rim deterrent. A masterclass in offensive efficiency and timely defensive rotations during a dominant third-quarter run.

Shooting
FG 10/18 (55.6%)
3PT 4/7 (57.1%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 68.3%
USG% 32.4%
Net Rtg +44.6
+/- +28
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.5m
Scoring +20.6
Creation +2.9
Shot Making +6.5
Hustle +1.8
Defense +0.7
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 11.1%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 2
S Tari Eason 30.4m
17
pts
8
reb
3
ast
Impact
+22.3

Wreaked absolute havoc in the passing lanes, turning deflections directly into run-out dunks. His relentless rim pressure and willingness to crash the offensive glass punished a lazy opposing frontcourt all night. Played with an infectious, high-revving motor that dictated the physicality of the entire game.

Shooting
FG 6/10 (60.0%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 78.1%
USG% 18.0%
Net Rtg +36.8
+/- +21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.4m
Scoring +13.9
Creation +1.9
Shot Making +4.0
Hustle +10.2
Defense +1.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 0
S Alperen Sengun 29.9m
13
pts
5
reb
10
ast
Impact
+6.2

Functioned as an elite offensive hub, dissecting double teams with brilliant skip passes and high-post reads. Sacrificed his own scoring volume to spoon-feed cutters, though a handful of sloppy live-ball turnovers slightly dampened his overall efficiency. Controlled the tempo beautifully during the second half whenever the half-court offense threatened to stagnate.

Shooting
FG 4/5 (80.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 4/6 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 85.1%
USG% 14.8%
Net Rtg +21.2
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.9m
Scoring +11.2
Creation +2.4
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +5.4
Defense -2.6
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 53.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
20
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
+12.6

Torched drop coverages with decisive pull-up shooting and impeccable decision-making in the pick-and-roll. Navigated defensive pressure like a veteran, avoiding live-ball mistakes while actively disrupting passing lanes on the other end. His elite shot selection and floor balance anchored a massive positive swing for the second unit in the second quarter.

Shooting
FG 8/12 (66.7%)
3PT 4/7 (57.1%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 83.3%
USG% 25.9%
Net Rtg +19.2
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.5m
Scoring +17.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +5.5
Hustle +1.5
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 2
Clint Capela 12.1m
0
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-9.5

Looked completely disconnected from the offensive flow, failing to establish deep post position or convert as a lob threat. His inability to finish through contact allowed the defense to ignore him and aggressively trap the ball-handlers. Bled value by clogging the paint without providing any vertical spacing during his first-half rotation.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 4.3%
Net Rtg +53.2
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.1m
Scoring -0.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.0

Struggled to find any rhythm offensively, repeatedly forcing awkward drives into a crowded paint. His inability to space the floor allowed his defender to freely roam and blow up adjacent actions. Compounded his offensive woes with undisciplined closeouts that surrendered easy blow-by drives during the third quarter.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 25.0%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -64.6
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.6m
Scoring -0.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +1.3
Defense -0.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 71.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-9.7

Made his living entirely in the margins, generating extra possessions through sheer grit and timely offensive rebounding. Refused to force bad shots, instead focusing completely on locking down the perimeter and diving for loose balls. A perfect example of a low-usage player positively impacting the game without needing the ball during a gritty fourth-quarter stretch.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +6.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.1m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.2

Stalled the offense by dribbling the air out of the ball and settling for heavily contested perimeter jumpers. Failed to organize the second unit, leading to disjointed sets and late-clock desperation heaves. His lack of penetration and poor shot quality quickly earned him a spot back on the bench after a rough first-half stint.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg -110.0
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.4m
Scoring -1.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Jeff Green 1.8m
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.9

Bricked a pair of quick, ill-advised jumpers that immediately killed the offensive momentum during his brief appearance. Offered zero resistance on the glass, allowing opponents to secure critical second-chance points. A highly detrimental stint characterized by poor shot selection and low energy against the opposing reserves.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 66.7%
Net Rtg -66.7
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.8m
Scoring -1.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
JD Davison 1.8m
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.8

Wandered through garbage time without making a single tangible contribution to the overall flow. A blown defensive assignment on a backdoor cut accounted for his negative overall impact. Simply killed the clock without attempting to assert himself against the end-of-bench unit.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -66.7
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.8m
Scoring +1.4
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +0.6
Defense -0.7
Turnovers -0.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
NYK New York Knicks
S OG Anunoby 38.2m
8
pts
6
reb
0
ast
Impact
+6.2

Elite point-of-attack defense and relentless hustle metrics were completely undone by offensive stagnation. He settled for contested perimeter looks instead of attacking the paint, dragging down his overall efficiency. A string of ill-advised passes in traffic ultimately pushed his net impact into the red.

Shooting
FG 3/9 (33.3%)
3PT 2/8 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 44.4%
USG% 10.7%
Net Rtg -26.6
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.2m
Scoring +3.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +3.7
Defense +4.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 0
S Jalen Brunson 37.0m
12
pts
6
reb
8
ast
Impact
-1.2

Bogged down the offense by pounding the rock against set defenses and forcing heavily contested floaters. Opponents successfully blitzed his pick-and-rolls, baiting him into live-ball turnovers that fueled transition points the other way. Even his usual foul-drawing craftiness couldn't salvage a highly inefficient isolation performance.

Shooting
FG 5/14 (35.7%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 40.3%
USG% 21.2%
Net Rtg -38.0
+/- -26
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.0m
Scoring +5.0
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +3.3
Hustle +2.8
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 54.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
22
pts
8
reb
3
ast
Impact
+18.4

Commanded massive defensive attention that opened up driving lanes for teammates, anchoring the half-court offense despite a streaky shooting night. His activity on the glass and timely weak-side rotations drove a massive positive defensive impact. Punished switches mercilessly in the post during a crucial third-quarter stretch.

Shooting
FG 7/17 (41.2%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 6/8 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 53.6%
USG% 30.6%
Net Rtg -19.2
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.2m
Scoring +14.2
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +4.0
Hustle +9.2
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 46.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Mikal Bridges 33.7m
7
pts
3
reb
4
ast
Impact
+5.6

Faded completely into the background offensively, showing bizarre passivity by attempting very few shots in heavy minutes. His perimeter defense remained solid, but his reluctance to attack closeouts stalled multiple possessions. The lack of offensive aggression severely limited his overall value despite clean shooting mechanics.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 87.5%
USG% 7.0%
Net Rtg -19.3
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.7m
Scoring +6.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +3.8
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 53.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Josh Hart 28.5m
13
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
+1.9

Brutal floor-spacing and a heavy diet of clanked above-the-break threes crippled the offensive flow. While he still generated typical transition opportunities, his inability to convert open catch-and-shoot looks allowed the defense to pack the paint. He bled value by forcing drives into multiple defenders when his jumper abandoned him.

Shooting
FG 5/12 (41.7%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.5%
USG% 25.4%
Net Rtg -43.3
+/- -22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.5m
Scoring +7.7
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +5.4
Defense -0.9
Turnovers -5.9
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 80.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
10
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
+0.2

Provided a crucial scoring punch off the bench by decisively attacking the rim rather than settling for jumpers. Navigated drop coverage beautifully, finding his spots in the mid-range without disrupting the broader offensive rhythm. Kept his mistakes to a minimum, ensuring his scoring bursts translated directly to positive impact.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 72.7%
USG% 15.2%
Net Rtg -1.0
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.2m
Scoring +8.7
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +2.5
Defense -3.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
5
pts
5
reb
0
ast
Impact
+0.6

Anchored the paint effectively but saw his impact capped by a lack of offensive touches and minor foul trouble. Created crucial second-chance opportunities by keeping possessions alive on the offensive glass. Stayed disciplined on pump fakes during a key second-quarter stretch, though his overall footprint on the game remained mostly muted.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.2%
USG% 12.2%
Net Rtg -51.9
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.9m
Scoring +2.5
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +6.3
Defense -1.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-19.0

Shot selection was a disaster, repeatedly firing early-clock jumpers that short-circuited offensive sets. His inability to penetrate the defense or create separation resulted in a string of empty possessions. The sheer volume of wasted opportunities cratered his value during a disastrous second-quarter stint.

Shooting
FG 1/9 (11.1%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 16.7%
USG% 35.3%
Net Rtg -36.2
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.6m
Scoring -2.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -7.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 3
12
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
+5.8

Injected massive energy into the second unit with hyper-efficient scoring and chaotic backcourt pressure. Punished sleepy defenders with opportunistic cuts and perfectly timed corner threes. His relentless motor and mistake-free offensive execution completely flipped the momentum of the game.

Shooting
FG 5/6 (83.3%)
3PT 2/2 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 26.1%
Net Rtg +45.0
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.7m
Scoring +11.3
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +3.4
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.4

Barely broke a sweat in garbage-time duty, failing to generate any measurable production during his brief stint. Looked lost on a blown defensive switch against a baseline cutter, slightly dragging down his net rating. Simply didn't have the runway to leave any meaningful imprint on the game.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +66.7
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.9m
Scoring +2.5
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +0.8
Defense -0.8
Turnovers -1.1
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.8

Leveraged his size immediately upon entering, altering a shot at the rim and securing crucial rebounds to end possessions. Avoided defensive mistakes and executed his drop coverage assignments flawlessly in his brief appearance. Proved highly effective in his specific role despite failing to attempt a quality shot.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg +66.7
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.8m
Scoring -0.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +2.5
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.1

Rushed his lone offensive opportunity, forcing a bad shot early in the clock during mop-up duty. Failed to generate any secondary hustle plays to offset the empty possession. A completely forgettable stint defined by a lack of rhythm and poor shot selection.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg +66.7
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.8m
Scoring -0.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.3

Made a quick cameo at the end of the rotation, managing to squeeze out a positive impact through sheer activity. Secured a tough loose ball and converted a quick bucket in traffic to maximize his limited seconds. Stayed engaged defensively against isolation sets despite the microscopic playing time.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 40.0%
Net Rtg +66.7
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.8m
Scoring +1.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-8.9

Operated strictly as a ball-mover during his late-game minutes, opting for safe passes over aggressive creation. Kept the offense organized but failed to pressure the defense or generate any distinct advantages in the half-court. A perfectly neutral performance that neither helped nor hurt the bottom line.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +66.7
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.8m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0