GAME ANALYSIS

GET THIS IN YOUR INBOX

Every breakdown for your team — free, the morning after the game.

Follow your team — free

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

NYK New York Knicks
S Jalen Brunson 34.7m
39
pts
3
reb
8
ast
Impact
+35.5

Brunson put on an absolute masterclass in scoring and facilitation, torching the defense for 39 points on 65% shooting to drive a staggering +35.9 offensive credit. He was equally locked in on the other end, holding his matchups to a 40% conversion rate while orchestrating the offense with 8 assists and just a single turnover.

Shooting
FG 15/23 (65.2%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 6/8 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 73.5%
USG% 37.0%
Net Rtg +32.7
+/- +23
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.7m
Scoring +32.5
Creation +3.4
Shot Making +8.1
Hustle +3.8
Defense -2.2
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S OG Anunoby 34.6m
17
pts
10
reb
1
ast
Impact
+21.3

Anunoby was an absolute terror on both ends, pairing a highly efficient 17 points (5-of-8 FG) with a dominant +9.9 defensive credit. His relentless activity on the glass (10 rebounds) and disruptive hands (4 deflections) showcased his elite two-way versatility.

Shooting
FG 5/8 (62.5%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 5/5 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 83.3%
USG% 12.8%
Net Rtg +27.5
+/- +19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.6m
Scoring +14.9
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +2.6
Hustle +6.9
Defense +3.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 0
16
pts
14
reb
6
ast
Impact
+22.4

Towns dominated the interior, gobbling up 14 rebounds and anchoring the defense with 2 blocks and 7 contests to earn a +9.8 defensive credit. He was equally effective as a hub on the other end, dishing out 6 assists and scoring efficiently (5-of-7 FG) to generate a +15.1 offensive score.

Shooting
FG 5/7 (71.4%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 83.0%
USG% 16.4%
Net Rtg +19.7
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.1m
Scoring +13.9
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +16.8
Defense +2.6
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 53.8%
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 3
S Josh Hart 30.2m
9
pts
5
reb
4
ast
Impact
-0.3

Hart's offensive output was modest, but he completely suffocated his matchups, holding opponents to a dismal 3-of-11 shooting. His relentless motor was on full display with 6 contests and 4 deflections, driving a massive +6.5 hustle credit.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.7%
USG% 15.4%
Net Rtg +23.6
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.2m
Scoring +4.9
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +1.7
Hustle +4.4
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 27.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Mikal Bridges 27.5m
7
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-2.9

Bridges was a complete non-factor offensively, attempting just six shots and settling for a meager +3.3 offensive credit. He did manage to salvage some value with his defensive activity, racking up 4 deflections and 5 contests to boost his +3.6 hustle score.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 58.3%
USG% 12.1%
Net Rtg +23.1
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.5m
Scoring +4.7
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.2
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-11.9

McBride endured a brutal offensive showing, missing all four of his shot attempts to post a -3.5 offensive credit. His struggles extended to the defensive end, where opponents easily bypassed him to shoot 4-of-6 when he was the primary defender.

Shooting
FG 0/4 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 10.4%
Net Rtg +42.9
+/- +19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.0m
Scoring -2.7
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.9
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
9
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.1

Clarkson provided a modest scoring punch off the bench, tallying 9 points to generate a +5.0 offensive credit. However, his defensive limitations were glaring, as he allowed his matchups to shoot 57% and bled value with a -1.9 defensive score.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 54.1%
USG% 22.5%
Net Rtg +43.8
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.2m
Scoring +5.7
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
7
pts
6
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.2

Robinson operated as a highly efficient interior presence, converting all three of his field goal attempts to secure a +4.7 offensive credit. He also did the dirty work offensively, freeing up shooters with 4 screen assists while maintaining his usual presence on the glass.

Shooting
FG 3/3 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/4 (25.0%)
Advanced
TS% 73.5%
USG% 17.5%
Net Rtg +55.6
+/- +19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.6m
Scoring +5.5
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +5.7
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
12
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
+2.6

Alvarado delivered a hyper-efficient scoring burst, hitting 4-of-7 from the field to secure a +8.6 offensive credit. Despite his offensive success, he was completely targeted on the other end, with opponents shooting a perfect 4-of-4 when he was the nearest defender.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 76.1%
USG% 31.0%
Net Rtg +25.0
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.6m
Scoring +9.7
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +0.6
Defense -0.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-9.6

Shamet was practically invisible during his brief four-minute cameo. He failed to score and generated almost zero impact across the board, continuing his late-season trend of deep-bench irrelevance.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 9.1%
Net Rtg +22.2
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.7m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.4

Hukporti maximized his three minutes of action by operating as a disruptive interior force, tallying a steal and a block to drive a +3.5 defensive credit. He didn't attempt a shot, but his energetic rim protection provided a brief, positive spark.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 11.1%
Net Rtg +25.0
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.5m
Scoring -1.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +2.5
Defense +2.9
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
10
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
+3.0

Sochan erupted for a flawless offensive cameo, converting all four of his field goal attempts to generate a massive +9.4 offensive credit in just over three minutes. His hyper-efficient burst provided a shocking scoring jolt at the end of the bench.

Shooting
FG 4/4 (100.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 102.5%
USG% 55.6%
Net Rtg +25.0
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.5m
Scoring +9.5
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-10.2

Kolek made the most of his brief garbage-time minutes by dishing out 2 assists and playing clean point-of-attack defense. He held his matchups scoreless on two attempts, though his own offensive output remained non-existent.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 11.1%
Net Rtg +25.0
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.5m
Scoring -0.7
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.2

Dadiet logged less than two minutes of garbage time, failing to record any traditional box score stats. He did manage to contest a look, holding his matchups to 1-of-4 shooting during his brief stint.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +50.0
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.4m
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
ATL Atlanta Hawks
S Jalen Johnson 34.6m
18
pts
10
reb
6
ast
Impact
+15.0

Johnson operated as a versatile two-way connector, pairing strong rebounding (10 boards) with active hands that produced 4 deflections and a +4.0 hustle credit. While his perimeter stroke remained shaky (1-of-5 from deep), his +10.7 offensive component shows he still found ways to facilitate and score inside the arc.

Shooting
FG 7/15 (46.7%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 55.1%
USG% 26.0%
Net Rtg -28.9
+/- -18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.6m
Scoring +12.1
Creation +3.7
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +7.8
Defense +2.3
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 3
S Onyeka Okongwu 34.1m
16
pts
5
reb
4
ast
Impact
+15.6

Okongwu's ability to stretch the floor (2-of-4 from deep) and finish efficiently (60% FG) drove a massive +18.2 offensive credit. He paired this scoring punch with relentless activity, racking up 6 deflections and 5 contests to secure a +4.9 hustle score.

Shooting
FG 6/10 (60.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 73.5%
USG% 15.3%
Net Rtg -17.2
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.1m
Scoring +13.1
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +6.3
Defense +0.7
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
16
pts
0
reb
3
ast
Impact
+5.8

Alexander-Walker provided his usual perimeter spark by knocking down 4-of-9 from beyond the arc, fueling a solid +11.1 offensive credit. However, his overall impact was muted by a passive night on the glass (zero rebounds) and permissive defense, allowing his matchups to shoot 58%.

Shooting
FG 6/11 (54.5%)
3PT 4/9 (44.4%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 69.9%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -20.6
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.7m
Scoring +11.5
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +4.5
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.8
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 58.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S CJ McCollum 32.4m
6
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-13.3

A brutal shooting slump (3-of-10) and sloppy decision-making (4 turnovers) completely tanked McCollum's value, resulting in a bleak -7.8 offensive credit. He did manage to stifle his matchups on the other end, holding opponents to 4-of-13 shooting, but it wasn't enough to salvage his disastrous scoring output.

Shooting
FG 3/10 (30.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/3 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 26.5%
USG% 21.7%
Net Rtg -20.2
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.4m
Scoring -0.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.7
Hustle +1.9
Defense +0.7
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 30.8%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 4
S Dyson Daniels 25.4m
17
pts
2
reb
5
ast
Impact
+14.0

Daniels delivered a highly efficient offensive outing, generating a +16.9 offensive credit by hitting 64% of his shots and avoiding a single turnover. However, his point-of-attack defense faltered significantly. Opponents torched him for 10-of-13 shooting (77%) when he was the primary defender, mitigating his scoring punch.

Shooting
FG 7/11 (63.6%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 71.5%
USG% 21.8%
Net Rtg -34.7
+/- -17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.4m
Scoring +13.5
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +4.3
Hustle +2.5
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 76.9%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Gabe Vincent 23.9m
6
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-7.5

Vincent's offensive contribution was entirely reliant on the three-ball, and his 2-of-7 shooting yielded a meager +2.1 offensive credit. He managed to salvage some value with active hands on the perimeter, recording 3 deflections to boost his hustle metrics.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 42.9%
USG% 13.2%
Net Rtg -43.5
+/- -20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.9m
Scoring +2.2
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +0.0
Defense -3.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
13
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-0.6

Kuminga struggled to find his rhythm offensively, settling for a 1-of-5 mark from the perimeter that capped his offensive credit at +7.7. His defensive rotations were equally sluggish, as opponents converted 4-of-6 attempts when he was the nearest defender.

Shooting
FG 4/10 (40.0%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 55.3%
USG% 31.7%
Net Rtg -29.7
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.4m
Scoring +8.4
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +1.2
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-11.8

Kispert's trademark perimeter stroke completely abandoned him, as he bricked all three of his attempts from deep to post a -2.4 offensive credit. He did put in the work defensively, contesting 3 shots and holding his matchups to a 43% conversion rate, but his scoring goose egg was tough to overcome.

Shooting
FG 0/4 (0.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 12.5%
Net Rtg -19.5
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.4m
Scoring -3.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Tony Bradley 13.5m
0
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-10.8

Bradley was a complete non-factor offensively, failing to attempt a single field goal across 13 minutes of action. His stint was defined by foul trouble (5 fouls) rather than rim protection, rendering him practically invisible on both ends.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 3.2%
Net Rtg -58.6
+/- -17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.5m
Scoring -1.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.8

Gueye logged just under five minutes of pure cardio, failing to record a single point, rebound, or assist. His brief cameo was entirely devoid of positive production, resulting in negative credits across both offense and defense.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 9.1%
Net Rtg -56.4
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.5m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
5
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.3

Hield provided a fleeting offensive spark in his four minutes of action, hitting both of his shots including a three-pointer to earn a +2.3 offensive credit. Despite the perfect shooting, his lack of peripheral stats and a quick turnover kept his overall impact muted.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 83.3%
USG% 44.4%
Net Rtg -55.6
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.2m
Scoring +4.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-11.0

Wallace barely broke a sweat in under two minutes of garbage time. He missed his only shot attempt and allowed his matchups to convert both of their looks, bleeding minor value during his brief stint.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -56.7
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.8m
Scoring -0.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0