Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
ATL lead NYK lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
NYK 2P — 3P —
ATL 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 167 attempts

NYK NYK Shot-making Δ

Anunoby 11/14 +10.0
Bridges 10/12 +9.0
Brunson 6/12 +0.1
Hart Open 6/10 +1.3
Shamet Hard 2/5 0.0
Kolek 2/5 -1.7
Dadiet Hard 2/4 +0.5
Clarkson 2/4 -0.2
Diawara 1/4 -2.7
Towns Open 1/4 -3.3

ATL ATL Shot-making Δ

Johnson 7/15 -0.3
McCollum 4/13 -4.9
Risacher 4/9 -2.3
Alexander-Walker 3/8 -1.6
Kuminga Hard 3/7 -0.2
Kispert Hard 1/7 -3.0
Okongwu 2/6 -3.0
Wallace 2/5 -1.3
Daniels 1/4 -1.7
Gueye 1/3 -1.6
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
NYK
ATL
50/85 Field Goals 31/82
58.8% Field Goal % 37.8%
13/36 3-Pointers 9/35
36.1% 3-Point % 25.7%
27/34 Free Throws 18/23
79.4% Free Throw % 78.3%
70.0% True Shooting % 48.3%
56 Total Rebounds 43
9 Offensive 11
37 Defensive 24
33 Assists 22
3.30 Assist/TO Ratio 1.16
9 Turnovers 19
16 Steals 5
6 Blocks 4
22 Fouls 22
66 Points in Paint 38
35 Fast Break Pts 8
26 Points off TOs 8
17 Second Chance Pts 14
44 Bench Points 39
61 Largest Lead 4
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
OG Anunoby
29 PTS · 7 REB · 2 AST · 27.2 MIN
+37.67
2
Mikal Bridges
24 PTS · 5 REB · 3 AST · 26.7 MIN
+25.8
3
Karl-Anthony Towns
12 PTS · 11 REB · 10 AST · 27.5 MIN
+21.41
4
Jalen Brunson
17 PTS · 2 REB · 8 AST · 28.8 MIN
+19.55
5
Jalen Johnson
21 PTS · 8 REB · 6 AST · 32.0 MIN
+15.34
6
Mitchell Robinson
6 PTS · 3 REB · 0 AST · 8.6 MIN
+9.88
7
Josh Hart
14 PTS · 5 REB · 2 AST · 27.2 MIN
+7.53
8
Tony Bradley
5 PTS · 3 REB · 1 AST · 7.7 MIN
+7.3
9
Jose Alvarado
3 PTS · 1 REB · 2 AST · 7.2 MIN
+7.28
10
Jordan Clarkson
7 PTS · 0 REB · 1 AST · 11.4 MIN
+7.14
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:17 M. Diawara REBOUND (Off:1 Def:3) 140–89
Q4 0:20 MISS Z. Risacher 24' step back 3PT 140–89
Q4 0:24 C. Kispert REBOUND (Off:1 Def:1) 140–89
Q4 0:27 MISS C. Kispert 3PT 140–89
Q4 0:32 T. Bradley REBOUND (Off:0 Def:3) 140–89
Q4 0:36 T. Bradley BLOCK (1 BLK) 140–89
Q4 0:36 MISS T. Kolek driving reverse Layup - blocked 140–89
Q4 0:50 T. Bradley 3PT (5 PTS) (K. Wallace 2 AST) 140–89
Q4 1:09 T. Kolek Free Throw 2 of 2 (6 PTS) 140–86
Q4 1:09 T. Kolek Free Throw 1 of 2 (5 PTS) 139–86
Q4 1:09 C. Kispert shooting personal FOUL (2 PF) (Kolek 2 FT) 138–86
Q4 1:15 A. Hukporti REBOUND (Off:1 Def:3) 138–86
Q4 1:17 A. Hukporti BLOCK (1 BLK) 138–86
Q4 1:17 MISS K. Wallace driving Layup - blocked 138–86
Q4 1:31 P. Dadiet running Layup (5 PTS) (T. Kolek 3 AST) 138–86

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

ATL Atlanta Hawks
S Jalen Johnson 32.0m
21
pts
8
reb
6
ast
Impact
+13.4

Johnson operated as the primary offensive engine, blending aggressive scoring (21 points) with solid playmaking (6 assists) to drive a +15.5 Offense credit. He lived at the foul line (5-of-5 FT) to maintain his efficiency, though his defensive disruption was lacking as he failed to record a steal (↓ his 0.7 average). Despite a few turnovers, his versatile offensive workload kept the team afloat.

Shooting
FG 7/15 (46.7%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 5/5 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 61.0%
USG% 25.6%
Net Rtg -64.6
+/- -43
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.0m
Scoring +15.1
Creation +2.3
Shot Making +4.2
Hustle +9.2
Defense -2.9
Turnovers -7.1
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 3
S Onyeka Okongwu 31.8m
4
pts
6
reb
5
ast
Impact
-7.5

Okongwu's usual scoring touch completely abandoned him (4 points, ↓ his 12.9 average), but he pivoted into an effective playmaking hub to salvage his offensive value. His 5 assists (↑ his 2.2 average) kept the ball moving, while his 3 deflections and 4 contests highlighted his defensive engagement. It was a gritty, unselfish performance that generated positive value (+2.4 Offense) despite the shooting slump.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 10.4%
Net Rtg -55.1
+/- -38
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.8m
Scoring +0.8
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +3.7
Defense -1.8
Turnovers -4.7
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
11
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-10.7

Alexander-Walker's offensive aggression backfired, as his 5 live-ball turnovers (↑ his 2.3 average) completely derailed his team's momentum. This sloppy decision-making, combined with a muted scoring output (11 points, ↓ his 19.9 average), resulted in a damaging -2.3 Offense credit. While he remained active defensively, his inability to protect the basketball defined his brutal shift.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 4/6 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 51.7%
USG% 20.3%
Net Rtg -50.5
+/- -29
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.1m
Scoring +6.4
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -11.8
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 5
S CJ McCollum 23.6m
11
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.6

McCollum endured a brutal shooting night, needing 13 attempts just to scratch out 11 points (↓ his 19.4 average). His tunnel vision was equally damaging, as he failed to record a single assist (↓ his 3.6 average) while committing 2 turnovers. This complete lack of playmaking and inefficient volume severely capped his offensive ceiling and dragged down his overall impact.

Shooting
FG 4/13 (30.8%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 39.6%
USG% 27.1%
Net Rtg -47.1
+/- -24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.6m
Scoring +4.7
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +2.2
Hustle +3.8
Defense -0.9
Turnovers -4.7
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S Dyson Daniels 14.9m
3
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.0

Daniels was completely neutralized across the board, posting a disastrous offensive line that included zero assists (↓ his 5.3 average) and 2 turnovers. His inability to generate offense or clean the glass (0 rebounds, ↓ his 7.5 average) severely tanked his value, leading to a -3.1 Offense credit. It was a shockingly passive performance from a normally reliable connective piece.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 37.5%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -114.2
+/- -36
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.9m
Scoring +0.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +1.8
Turnovers -4.7
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
11
pts
2
reb
3
ast
Impact
+1.4

Kuminga offset a quiet rebounding night (2 boards, ↓ his 3.7 average) by embracing a playmaking role, dishing out 3 assists (↑ average) to drive a +7.8 Offense credit. He struggled to find efficiency from the floor (3-of-7 shooting) but managed to salvage his scoring by attacking the rim and drawing fouls (4-of-6 FT). His defensive impact was muted, as he failed to record a steal and offered little resistance on the perimeter.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 4/6 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 57.1%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -91.3
+/- -44
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.8m
Scoring +7.1
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +1.7
Hustle +2.5
Defense -1.4
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
8
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
+1.2

Risacher found success attacking inside the arc (4-of-9 shooting) to drive a +5.1 Offense credit, even as his perimeter jumper completely failed him (0-of-3 from deep). He was a non-factor as a distributor (0 assists) and struggled on the glass, pulling down just 3 rebounds (↓ his 3.5 average). His 5 contests showed defensive effort, but the lack of peripheral stats limited his overall impact.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 44.4%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg -2.7
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.3m
Scoring +4.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +2.8
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
4
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-13.1

Kispert endured a brutal shooting slump, bricking 6 of his 7 field goal attempts to completely tank his offensive value. This icy perimeter showing (1-of-5 from deep), compounded by 2 turnovers, resulted in a damaging -3.8 Offense credit. With zero steals and negative defensive metrics, his inability to space the floor rendered him a massive net negative.

Shooting
FG 1/7 (14.3%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 25.4%
USG% 26.3%
Net Rtg +13.2
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.0m
Scoring -0.7
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +1.6
Defense -3.1
Turnovers -4.7
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
Gabe Vincent 12.8m
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.3

Vincent was an absolute ghost offensively, failing to record a point, rebound, or assist during his nearly 13 minutes of action. This complete lack of production resulted in a -1.7 Offense credit, though he managed to salvage some value on the other end. His 5 contests and a steal (↑ his 0.6 average) provided a minor defensive boost to an otherwise empty shift.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 6.5%
Net Rtg -100.0
+/- -27
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.8m
Scoring -1.5
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.5
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
4
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-0.8

Wallace made the most of his limited minutes by stuffing the stat sheet across the board, posting above-average marks in points, rebounds, assists, and steals. His defensive engagement yielded a steal (↑ his 0.4 average) and a +3.2 Defense credit, proving his worth at the point of attack. This well-rounded, mistake-free shift provided a steadying presence for the second unit.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 40.0%
USG% 23.8%
Net Rtg +16.1
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.7m
Scoring +1.9
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +0.9
Defense +2.4
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
5
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.8

Hield operated as a pure, low-volume specialist, converting both of his field goal attempts—including his lone three-pointer—to generate a +3.0 Offense credit. Outside of his perfect shooting and a pair of rebounds (↑ his 1.2 average), he was largely invisible, failing to record an assist or steal. It was a highly efficient but extremely limited cameo.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 125.0%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg -52.6
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.9m
Scoring +5.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.2
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
2
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-7.5

Gueye struggled to make a dent in the scoring column, missing both of his three-point attempts in a quiet offensive showing. He did manage to flash some connective passing with 2 assists (↑ his 0.8 average), keeping his Offense credit slightly positive (+0.9). Defensively, his 2 loose-ball recoveries highlighted a gritty effort, even if the box score production was minimal.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 18.2%
Net Rtg -83.3
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.5m
Scoring +0.4
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +2.5
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
5
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
+0.5

Bradley delivered a flawless offensive cameo, converting his only field goal attempt from beyond the arc and hitting both free throws to drive a +6.2 Offense credit. He complemented this hyper-efficient scoring with solid rim protection, swatting a shot (↑ his 0.4 average) to anchor a +2.1 Defense score. It was a perfectly executed, low-volume shift that maximized every second he was on the floor.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 133.0%
USG% 11.8%
Net Rtg +14.3
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.7m
Scoring +5.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +0.9
Defense +0.5
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
Asa Newell 6.8m
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.6

Newell was a complete non-factor during his brief stint, failing to record a single point, rebound, or assist. He didn't even attempt a shot, resulting in a completely neutral Offense credit (+0.0) while bleeding value on the other end (-0.4 Defense). It was the definition of empty cardio, offering absolutely nothing to the box score or the flow of the game.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +30.8
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.8m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
NYK New York Knicks
S Jalen Brunson 28.8m
17
pts
2
reb
8
ast
Impact
+14.3

Brunson leaned heavily into his role as a floor general, prioritizing distribution over his own scoring to generate a +16.7 Offense credit. Though his perimeter jumper struggled to connect (1-of-6 from deep), his flawless decision-making yielded 8 assists without a single turnover. He also chipped in defensively with 2 steals (↑ his 0.9 average), ensuring he remained a strong net positive despite the muted scoring output.

Shooting
FG 6/12 (50.0%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 61.8%
USG% 20.9%
Net Rtg +68.6
+/- +41
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.8m
Scoring +12.4
Creation +2.4
Shot Making +3.2
Hustle +0.6
Defense +2.9
Turnovers +0.0
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
12
pts
11
reb
10
ast
Impact
+14.3

Towns operated as a pure playmaking hub in this one, dishing out 10 assists (↑ his 4.2 average) to drive a robust +16.9 Offense credit despite attempting just four field goals. He compensated for the lack of shooting volume by living at the foul line (10-of-10 FT) and anchoring the defense. His 3 steals (↑ average) and strong rebounding presence fueled a +8.7 Defense score, proving he can dominate without a heavy scoring load.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 10/10 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 71.4%
USG% 17.2%
Net Rtg +63.3
+/- +35
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.6m
Scoring +10.1
Creation +3.6
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +11.1
Defense +4.2
Turnovers -7.8
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 3
S OG Anunoby 27.2m
29
pts
7
reb
2
ast
Impact
+38.5

Anunoby completely dismantled his matchup with a terrifying two-way performance, generating massive value on both ends. His elite shot-making (+26.6 Offense) was fueled by hyper-efficient scoring (11-of-14 shooting), but his defensive disruption was just as impactful. He racked up 7 deflections and 4 steals (↑ his 1.3 average), translating to a stellar +12.8 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 11/14 (78.6%)
3PT 4/6 (66.7%)
FT 3/5 (60.0%)
Advanced
TS% 89.5%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg +73.8
+/- +42
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.2m
Scoring +26.1
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +6.7
Hustle +2.1
Defense +10.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 4
BLK 1
TO 0
S Josh Hart 27.2m
14
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
+1.6

Hart delivered a solid scoring punch (6-of-10 shooting) to drive his +7.0 Offense credit, but his usual rebounding edge was noticeably absent. He pulled down just 5 boards (↓ his 7.2 average) and failed to record a single steal, limiting his overall defensive and hustle impact. Still, his ability to convert efficiently from the perimeter (2-of-4 from deep) provided a necessary offensive spark.

Shooting
FG 6/10 (60.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 67.0%
USG% 18.8%
Net Rtg +60.3
+/- +35
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.2m
Scoring +10.3
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +3.3
Hustle +1.5
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -4.7
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S Mikal Bridges 26.7m
24
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
+26.0

Bridges broke out of his recent slump with a lethal display of shot-making, converting a blistering 10-of-12 from the floor. This hyper-efficient scoring explosion drove a massive +25.6 Offense credit, completely overshadowing a quiet defensive night where he failed to record a steal. His flawless perimeter execution (2-of-2 from deep) and perfect ball security (zero turnovers) made him an unblemished offensive weapon.

Shooting
FG 10/12 (83.3%)
3PT 2/2 (100.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 93.2%
USG% 21.0%
Net Rtg +73.0
+/- +40
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.7m
Scoring +22.8
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +4.9
Hustle +4.4
Defense -0.1
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
5
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.7

Shamet operated purely as a floor-spacer, managing 5 points but offering virtually zero peripheral production. His inability to generate playmaking (0 assists) or defensive disruption (0 steals) resulted in a negative Defense credit (-0.8). Ultimately, his shift was defined by empty cardio outside of a couple of made field goals.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 15.2%
Net Rtg -17.7
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.8m
Scoring +2.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.9
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.6

Hukporti failed to attempt a single field goal, relying entirely on a spotty trip to the foul line (3-of-6) for his scoring. His offensive utility was further hampered by 2 turnovers (↑ his 0.9 average), dragging his Offense credit into the negative (-0.7). While he chipped in with 4 rebounds and a block, his overall impact was swallowed by his offensive limitations.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 3/6 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 56.8%
USG% 17.2%
Net Rtg -24.7
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.2m
Scoring +1.5
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +4.1
Defense -1.4
Turnovers -4.2
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
2
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
-4.1

Diawara struggled mightily to find the bottom of the net, missing both of his three-point attempts to drag down his Offense credit (-0.2). However, he salvaged his shift with surprising activity on the glass and the perimeter, grabbing 4 rebounds (↑ his 1.4 average) and a steal. This defensive engagement translated to a solid +3.9 Defense score, keeping him afloat despite the shooting woes.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 25.0%
USG% 18.5%
Net Rtg -12.9
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.0m
Scoring -0.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +3.1
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Tyler Kolek 12.0m
6
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
-5.1

Kolek provided a brief playmaking spark, dishing out 3 assists (↑ his 2.1 average) to drive a positive +3.5 Offense credit. His perimeter shot failed him (0-of-2 from deep), but he managed to find his way to the foul line to pad his scoring. Defensively, he was a non-factor, failing to record a steal or block while posting a slightly negative Defense score.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.0%
USG% 25.9%
Net Rtg -12.9
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.0m
Scoring +3.5
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
7
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
+1.8

Clarkson provided a modest scoring punch off the bench, using his 3-of-4 marksmanship at the charity stripe to generate a +5.7 Offense credit. He failed to grab a single rebound (↓ his 2.0 average), but his clean ball security (zero turnovers) kept him from bleeding value. It was a low-volume, mistake-free shift that gave the second unit a stable offensive floor.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 60.8%
USG% 21.4%
Net Rtg +90.3
+/- +22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.4m
Scoring +5.0
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +0.0
Defense +2.4
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.3

McBride struggled to find his offensive rhythm in limited minutes, managing just 3 points on three shot attempts. However, he made his presence felt on the other end, grabbing 2 steals (↑ his 0.8 average) to generate a +2.2 Defense credit. His inability to create for others (0 assists) kept his overall offensive impact muted.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 12.5%
Net Rtg +68.8
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.8m
Scoring +1.5
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +2.3
Turnovers +0.0
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
6
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
+3.8

Robinson operated as a flawless low-usage finisher, converting all three of his field goal attempts to buoy a +9.1 Offense credit. While his glass-cleaning numbers were unusually low (3 rebounds, ↓ his 7.0 average), he remained a deterrent in the paint. His 2 blocks (↑ average) and pair of screen assists highlighted his gritty, dirty-work utility in a brief rotation stint.

Shooting
FG 3/3 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 12.5%
Net Rtg +157.6
+/- +29
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.6m
Scoring +6.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +3.8
Defense +0.4
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 0
5
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-3.9

Dadiet managed to find the scoring column with a pair of field goals, driving a modest +3.2 Offense credit in limited action. Beyond that, his shift was defined by empty minutes, as he failed to record an assist, steal, or block. It was a low-impact performance where he simply blended into the background.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 62.5%
USG% 23.5%
Net Rtg -14.3
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.7m
Scoring +3.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.3
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-0.4

Alvarado's offensive volume was nearly non-existent (3 points), but he wreaked his usual havoc at the point of attack. He racked up 3 deflections and 2 steals (↑ his 0.9 average), fueling a strong +4.5 Defense credit in just seven minutes of action. His flawless ball security and disruptive energy perfectly encapsulated his role as a chaotic defensive sparkplug.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 11.1%
Net Rtg +84.6
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.2m
Scoring +2.2
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +3.2
Turnovers +0.0
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
4
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.8

Sochan was practically invisible on the glass, failing to grab a single rebound (↓ his 2.9 average) during his brief cameo. However, he made the most of his limited offensive touches, converting 2-of-3 from the floor to generate a +3.1 Offense credit. A lone steal (↑ average) helped prop up his defensive value, but his overall peripheral production was nonexistent.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 66.7%
USG% 21.4%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.8m
Scoring +3.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0