GAME ANALYSIS

GET THIS IN YOUR INBOX

Every breakdown for your team — free, the morning after the game.

Follow your team — free

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

SAS San Antonio Spurs
29
pts
9
reb
2
ast
Impact
+25.2

Game-wrecking defensive activity powered his dominant performance, as he tallied 4 blocks, 2 steals, and 14 shot contests. This two-way forcefulness, which also included 29 points, resulted in a massive +12.2 Defense component.

Shooting
FG 11/21 (52.4%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 5/8 (62.5%)
Advanced
TS% 59.1%
USG% 30.8%
Net Rtg +3.4
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.3m
Scoring +19.4
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +4.8
Hustle +8.5
Defense +6.4
Turnovers -8.9
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 20
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 4
TO 4
S Devin Vassell 38.0m
14
pts
9
reb
5
ast
Impact
+7.4

His performance was driven by well-rounded contributions beyond scoring, as he pulled down 9 rebounds and dished out 5 assists, both well above his season averages. This playmaking and work on the glass fueled his +12.9 Offense component, showing value even on a modest scoring night.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 67.8%
USG% 10.1%
Net Rtg +2.1
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.0m
Scoring +9.9
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +3.2
Hustle +2.7
Defense -1.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 53.3%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
8
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-1.7

High-end effort on the defensive end defined his game, as he logged 9 contests and 3 deflections. While his scoring was muted at 8 points, his positive Offense component (+6.0) suggests he was making sound plays within the flow of the game.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 58.1%
USG% 8.6%
Net Rtg -10.8
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.0m
Scoring +5.2
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +1.2
Defense -1.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 72.7%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
S De'Aaron Fox 33.8m
20
pts
3
reb
5
ast
Impact
+9.4

Elite two-way efficiency was the theme of his night, scoring 20 points on a blistering 8/12 from the field while simultaneously locking down his matchups. His defensive prowess was on full display, holding opponents to 2/12 (17%) shooting and recording 7 deflections.

Shooting
FG 8/12 (66.7%)
3PT 2/2 (100.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 77.6%
USG% 21.9%
Net Rtg +4.3
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.8m
Scoring +16.9
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +4.6
Hustle +0.9
Defense +2.3
Turnovers -8.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 16.7%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 4
S Stephon Castle 27.7m
14
pts
4
reb
4
ast
Impact
-8.4

An inefficient, high-turnover night limited his impact, as he scored 14 points on 14 shots and committed 4 turnovers. This struggle to generate quality looks is reflected in his meager +0.8 Offense component.

Shooting
FG 5/14 (35.7%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 44.4%
USG% 32.8%
Net Rtg -8.9
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.7m
Scoring +6.8
Creation +1.9
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +1.2
Defense -2.6
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 35.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 4
Dylan Harper 32.3m
15
pts
6
reb
3
ast
Impact
+3.6

A steady, efficient performance inside the arc drove his production, as he scored 15 points on 6/12 shooting despite going 0/3 from deep. He added strong positional defense, holding his matchups to just 2/7 (29%) shooting.

Shooting
FG 6/12 (50.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 54.5%
USG% 20.8%
Net Rtg +15.8
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.3m
Scoring +9.5
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +2.1
Hustle +3.7
Defense +1.8
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
3
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
-4.5

A quiet offensive night in his 16-minute bench role defined his game, scoring just 3 points (↓) on 1/4 shooting. While he contributed on the glass (4 rebounds) and on defense (+3.1), his scoring punch was absent.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 30.7%
USG% 17.6%
Net Rtg -12.7
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.7m
Scoring +0.1
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +4.1
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
1
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.3

He provided a defensively sound but quiet stint in his 8 minutes of action, grabbing 3 rebounds and contributing to a +2.0 Defense component. Without a single field goal attempt, his offensive impact was negligible.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 56.8%
USG% 5.0%
Net Rtg -33.0
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.8m
Scoring +0.5
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.9
Defense +1.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.8

The veteran was a non-factor in his 5 minutes on the court, failing to record any stats beyond a single deflection. He had no meaningful impact on the game in his short run.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -41.7
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.8m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-14.4

His brief three-minute appearance was a net negative, committing a turnover and 2 fouls. This resulted in negative ratings for both his Offense (-1.7) and Defense (-1.5) components.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg +22.2
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.5m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
NYK New York Knicks
S Mikal Bridges 40.9m
20
pts
6
reb
6
ast
Impact
+13.8

Lockdown defense was the story of his game, as he held his matchups to just 1/10 (10%) shooting, fueling a +6.1 Defense component. He paired this defensive masterclass with efficient scoring, adding 20 points on 8/13 shooting to round out a stellar two-way effort.

Shooting
FG 8/13 (61.5%)
3PT 4/6 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 76.9%
USG% 14.4%
Net Rtg +11.0
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.9m
Scoring +16.4
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +5.9
Hustle +1.8
Defense -0.8
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 10.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Jalen Brunson 37.7m
20
pts
5
reb
6
ast
Impact
+8.7

He overcame a rough shooting night (7/25 FG) by manufacturing value on the defensive end, racking up 5 steals (↑) and drawing a charge. This effort generated a significant +11.7 Defense component and +5.7 for Hustle, salvaging his impact despite the offensive struggles.

Shooting
FG 7/25 (28.0%)
3PT 2/8 (25.0%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 36.8%
USG% 35.2%
Net Rtg -9.9
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.7m
Scoring +5.2
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +4.2
Hustle +4.4
Defense +10.0
Turnovers -8.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 81.8%
STL 5
BLK 0
TO 4
S OG Anunoby 36.8m
17
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
+11.1

An efficient and clean two-way performance drove his value, pairing 17 points on 5/10 shooting with zero turnovers. His positive contributions were balanced across the board, generating a +15.4 Offense component and a +6.8 Defense component.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 5/5 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 69.7%
USG% 14.1%
Net Rtg -6.1
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.8m
Scoring +12.8
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +1.2
Defense +2.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 0
21
pts
13
reb
4
ast
Impact
+17.9

Hyper-efficient scoring and dominance on the glass powered his performance, as he posted 21 points on just 12 shots and grabbed 13 rebounds (↑). This offensive explosion, which included going 3/5 from deep, fueled a massive +20.6 Offense component.

Shooting
FG 8/12 (66.7%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 81.5%
USG% 18.8%
Net Rtg +15.5
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.9m
Scoring +17.9
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +4.7
Hustle +9.7
Defense -0.9
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
S Josh Hart 18.2m
0
pts
6
reb
4
ast
Impact
-13.8

A complete offensive disappearing act defined his night, as he went scoreless on 0/4 shooting for a -4.8 Offense component. While he provided some defensive value by holding opponents to 2/6 shooting, his lack of any scoring punch was a major departure from his norm.

Shooting
FG 0/4 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 14.0%
Net Rtg +2.1
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.2m
Scoring -3.3
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.8
Defense -1.2
Turnovers -2.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
13
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
+2.4

A strong two-way performance in extended minutes defined his game, as he scored 13 points (↑) while also locking down his assignments. His defensive effort was particularly notable, holding opponents to just 2/10 (20%) shooting when he was the nearest defender.

Shooting
FG 5/12 (41.7%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 54.2%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg +18.2
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.1m
Scoring +7.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +3.4
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
5
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-9.2

Turnovers and defensive struggles marred his brief appearance, as he committed 2 turnovers against a 0.3 season average. Opponents shot a blistering 4/5 (80%) when he was the nearest defender, undermining his other contributions.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 35.7%
USG% 19.1%
Net Rtg +3.1
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.3m
Scoring +1.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +2.5
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 80.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
7
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-3.9

Perfect efficiency in limited minutes was his calling card, scoring 7 points on just 2/2 from the field in his 14-minute stint. This flawless finishing contributed to a positive +4.6 Offense component, making the most of his opportunities.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 3/6 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 75.4%
USG% 17.1%
Net Rtg -20.3
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.1m
Scoring +5.5
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +1.9
Defense -0.9
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
2
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-9.6

He managed to generate a positive offensive impact (+1.9) despite not making a single field goal (0/4 FG), primarily by distributing (2 assists) and protecting the ball (0 turnovers). However, a complete lack of hustle stats (0s across the board) limited his overall effectiveness in 10 minutes of play.

Shooting
FG 0/4 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 18.8%
USG% 19.2%
Net Rtg +57.9
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.1m
Scoring -1.4
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +2.8
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0