Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
BKN lead NYK lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
NYK 2P — 3P —
BKN 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 175 attempts

NYK NYK Shot-making Δ

Towns 14/20 +9.9
Brunson Hard 10/19 +5.7
Clarkson 6/12 -1.5
Bridges 6/11 +2.1
McBride Hard 4/10 -1.3
Hart 3/8 -1.8
Kolek 1/4 -2.1
Yabusele 1/2 +0.7
Dadiet Hard 0/1 -0.9
Evbuomwan Hard 0/1 -0.9

BKN BKN Shot-making Δ

Clowney Hard 9/17 +8.3
Porter Jr. Hard 6/15 -2.1
Dëmin Hard 4/11 -1.8
Powell Hard 5/10 +2.1
Martin Hard 1/8 -3.7
Claxton Open 2/8 -5.0
Wilson Hard 2/7 -2.0
Mann Open 2/5 -1.0
Sharpe Open 2/4 -0.9
Etienne 0/2 -2.3
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
NYK
BKN
45/88 Field Goals 33/87
51.1% Field Goal % 37.9%
12/35 3-Pointers 14/48
34.3% 3-Point % 29.2%
11/14 Free Throws 20/28
78.6% Free Throw % 71.4%
60.0% True Shooting % 50.3%
51 Total Rebounds 59
9 Offensive 13
34 Defensive 31
28 Assists 19
3.50 Assist/TO Ratio 1.90
8 Turnovers 10
6 Steals 5
6 Blocks 1
21 Fouls 14
52 Points in Paint 28
10 Fast Break Pts 11
14 Points off TOs 10
11 Second Chance Pts 20
17 Bench Points 30
19 Largest Lead 5
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Karl-Anthony Towns
37 PTS · 12 REB · 3 AST · 33.0 MIN
+40.1
2
Jalen Brunson
27 PTS · 3 REB · 3 AST · 32.7 MIN
+24.41
3
Noah Clowney
31 PTS · 4 REB · 3 AST · 39.1 MIN
+22.24
4
Mikal Bridges
16 PTS · 4 REB · 4 AST · 33.5 MIN
+17.27
5
Josh Hart
7 PTS · 12 REB · 7 AST · 37.7 MIN
+13.13
6
Drake Powell
15 PTS · 2 REB · 4 AST · 23.9 MIN
+12.88
7
Terance Mann
6 PTS · 6 REB · 2 AST · 18.9 MIN
+7.23
8
Miles McBride
9 PTS · 2 REB · 3 AST · 29.6 MIN
+6.04
9
Tyrese Martin
4 PTS · 7 REB · 5 AST · 26.8 MIN
+5.53
10
Day'Ron Sharpe
5 PTS · 8 REB · 1 AST · 21.7 MIN
+5.27
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:02 P. Dadiet REBOUND (Off:0 Def:1) 113–100
Q4 0:02 MISS J. Wilson 28' pullup 3PT 113–100
Q4 0:06 J. Wilson REBOUND (Off:0 Def:2) 113–100
Q4 0:08 MISS T. Evbuomwan 6' fadeaway Shot 113–100
Q4 0:34 E. Dëmin running Layup (9 PTS) 113–100
Q4 0:39 J. Wilson REBOUND (Off:0 Def:1) 113–98
Q4 0:41 MISS T. Kolek 6' driving floating bank Shot 113–98
Q4 0:53 T. Evbuomwan REBOUND (Off:0 Def:1) 113–98
Q4 0:56 MISS E. Dëmin 26' step back 3PT 113–98
Q4 1:08 D. Sharpe REBOUND (Off:2 Def:6) 113–98
Q4 1:12 MISS T. Kolek 26' 3PT 113–98
Q4 1:19 M. Diawara REBOUND (Off:0 Def:1) 113–98
Q4 1:22 MISS D. Sharpe Free Throw 2 of 2 113–98
Q4 1:22 D. Sharpe Free Throw 1 of 2 (5 PTS) 113–98
Q4 1:22 T. Jemison III shooting personal FOUL (2 PF) (Sharpe 2 FT) 113–97

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

BKN Brooklyn Nets
S Noah Clowney 39.1m
31
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
+20.1

Stretched the floor to its absolute breaking point with lethal pick-and-pop execution. His unexpected perimeter barrage completely neutralized the opponent's drop coverage scheme.

Shooting
FG 9/17 (52.9%)
3PT 7/13 (53.8%)
FT 6/6 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 78.9%
USG% 25.6%
Net Rtg +1.3
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.1m
Scoring +25.1
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +7.6
Hustle +1.2
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 25
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S Egor Dëmin 27.9m
9
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
-0.7

Fantastic defensive activity and passing lane disruption were entirely undone by a frigid shooting night. Opponents sagged off him completely, ruining the team's half-court spacing.

Shooting
FG 4/11 (36.4%)
3PT 1/8 (12.5%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 39.3%
USG% 18.2%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.9m
Scoring +3.1
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +1.8
Defense +1.8
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
16
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
+3.5

Shot selection was highly questionable, repeatedly forcing contested jumpers early in the clock. The sheer volume of perimeter misses fueled opponent fast breaks and cratered his overall impact.

Shooting
FG 6/15 (40.0%)
3PT 1/9 (11.1%)
FT 3/5 (60.0%)
Advanced
TS% 46.5%
USG% 30.6%
Net Rtg -40.4
+/- -21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.5m
Scoring +8.2
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +5.1
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S Nic Claxton 26.3m
8
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-3.5

Defensive anchoring and rim deterrence were solid, but he was an offensive liability in the paint. Missed multiple point-blank bunnies that stalled out half-court possessions.

Shooting
FG 2/8 (25.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 4/6 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 37.6%
USG% 18.3%
Net Rtg -34.0
+/- -17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.3m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +1.9
Shot Making +0.7
Hustle +3.1
Defense -2.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 53.3%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
S Terance Mann 18.9m
6
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
+1.9

Provided steady point-of-attack defense that disrupted the opposing backcourt's rhythm. A lack of offensive aggression kept his overall impact hovering right around neutral.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 55.1%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg -55.6
+/- -20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.9m
Scoring +4.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.3
Hustle +7.6
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
4
pts
7
reb
5
ast
Impact
-0.8

Brought great energy to the glass and fought hard over screens defensively. However, his inability to convert highly catchable passes into points severely limited his usefulness.

Shooting
FG 1/8 (12.5%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 22.5%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg +6.2
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.8m
Scoring -1.3
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +8.9
Defense -0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Drake Powell 23.9m
15
pts
2
reb
4
ast
Impact
+5.5

Capitalized on defensive breakdowns with sharp off-ball cutting. His timely weak-side gravity and decisive drives punished closeouts effectively.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 63.8%
USG% 23.2%
Net Rtg -37.1
+/- -20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.9m
Scoring +10.7
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +2.5
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 87.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Jalen Wilson 22.8m
6
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-9.8

Settled for heavily contested looks late in the shot clock, killing offensive momentum. Struggled to stay in front of quicker wings, compounding his negative value on both ends.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 40.3%
USG% 16.1%
Net Rtg -5.4
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.8m
Scoring +2.2
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
5
pts
8
reb
1
ast
Impact
-4.1

Controlled the painted area defensively with physical box-outs and verticality. Unfortunately, his heavy feet in pick-and-roll coverage allowed guards to turn the corner too easily.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.2%
USG% 11.5%
Net Rtg +14.3
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.7m
Scoring +2.5
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +6.3
Defense -0.8
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.2

Flew around the court to generate deflections and disrupt the opponent's offensive flow. His hyper-aggressive ball pressure created a slight positive swing despite no offensive production.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 22.2%
Net Rtg +83.3
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.5m
Scoring -1.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.7

Maintained structural integrity on defense during a very brief stint. Made one crucial closeout that prevented a clean corner look.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +83.3
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.5m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
NYK New York Knicks
S Josh Hart 37.7m
7
pts
12
reb
7
ast
Impact
+8.6

Absolute menace on the margins, generating immense value through loose ball recoveries and weak-side rotations. His relentless motor and transition push completely overshadowed a quiet scoring night.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 41.5%
USG% 10.7%
Net Rtg +21.9
+/- +17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.7m
Scoring +3.2
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +10.4
Defense +3.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 1
S Mikal Bridges 33.5m
16
pts
4
reb
4
ast
Impact
+9.7

Elite perimeter containment against opposing guards drove his positive defensive impact. Capitalized on defensive breakdowns by attacking closeouts decisively, leading to highly efficient scoring.

Shooting
FG 6/11 (54.5%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 67.3%
USG% 17.8%
Net Rtg +30.8
+/- +19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.5m
Scoring +12.2
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +3.4
Hustle +2.2
Defense +1.5
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 1
37
pts
12
reb
3
ast
Impact
+48.8

Utterly dominated the interior matchup, leveraging incredible offensive efficiency to warp the opposing defense. His rim protection was surprisingly stout, deterring drives and anchoring a massive positive swing.

Shooting
FG 14/20 (70.0%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 6/6 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 81.7%
USG% 31.9%
Net Rtg +38.5
+/- +25
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.0m
Scoring +33.0
Creation +2.3
Shot Making +7.9
Hustle +15.2
Defense +1.2
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 30.0%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 1
S Jalen Brunson 32.7m
27
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
+26.2

Dictated the offensive tempo with surgical pick-and-roll navigation. Kept the defense off-balance with timely paint touches, maximizing his on-court value through pure shot creation.

Shooting
FG 10/19 (52.6%)
3PT 4/9 (44.4%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 66.4%
USG% 27.0%
Net Rtg +12.3
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.7m
Scoring +20.5
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +7.1
Hustle +3.8
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
S Miles McBride 29.6m
9
pts
2
reb
3
ast
Impact
-1.4

Perimeter shot selection dragged down his overall effectiveness despite a scoring bump. Struggled to navigate screens defensively, allowing too much dribble penetration during his rotation minutes.

Shooting
FG 4/10 (40.0%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 45.0%
USG% 15.2%
Net Rtg -10.3
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.6m
Scoring +4.4
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 58.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
12
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-12.7

Brutal perimeter efficiency completely tanked his offensive value. Compounded the bricked threes with lazy transition defense, bleeding points on the other end.

Shooting
FG 6/12 (50.0%)
3PT 0/6 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 37.2%
Net Rtg +25.6
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.1m
Scoring +7.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +0.0
Defense -5.3
Turnovers -7.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 4
Tyler Kolek 17.0m
2
pts
3
reb
5
ast
Impact
-8.7

Generated solid hustle metrics by diving for loose balls and disrupting passing lanes. Unfortunately, his inability to finish at the rim negated those extra possessions.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 25.0%
USG% 10.8%
Net Rtg +14.0
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.0m
Scoring -0.5
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.7
Hustle +0.9
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.8

Offered virtually zero offensive gravity, allowing the defense to completely ignore him in the half-court. A few decent rim contests couldn't salvage his negative offensive footprint.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 3.4%
Net Rtg -33.5
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.5m
Scoring -1.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +4.1
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
-10.2

Failed to establish a physical presence inside during his brief stint. Defensive rotations were a step slow, bleeding value on the interior.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 8.3%
Net Rtg +27.4
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.6m
Scoring +1.9
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +0.0
Defense -2.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-12.0

Looked lost on defensive switches during a brief cameo. Gave up too much space to shooters, resulting in a quick negative impact.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +31.8
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.8m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-13.6

Burned repeatedly in drop coverage during his short run. Failed to secure defensive positioning, leading to easy second-chance opportunities for the opponent.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -83.3
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.5m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.4

Rushed his perimeter looks instead of letting the offense flow. Lack of defensive awareness on back-cuts further dragged down his brief appearance.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -83.3
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.5m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.2

Barely registered an impact in garbage time minutes. A missed rotation on the baseline highlighted a forgettable stint.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -83.3
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.5m
Scoring -0.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0