NYK

2025-26 Season

LANDRY SHAMET

New York Knicks | Guard | 6-5
Landry Shamet
8.5PPG
1.6RPG
1.2APG
21.0MPG
-1.5 Impact

Shamet produces at an below average rate for a 21-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-1.5
Scoring +7.6
Points Scored 8.5 PPG = +8.5
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -3.1
Shot Making above expected FG% = +2.2
Creation +0.3
Assists & Self-Creation 1.2 AST/g + self-creation = +0.3
Turnovers -1.3
Turnovers 0.6/g (live + dead blend) = -1.3
Defense -0.1
Steals 0.5/g = +1.1
Blocks 0.1/g = +0.1
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -1.3
Hustle & Effort +1.1
Rebounds 1.6 RPG (OREB + DREB) = -0.5
Contested Shots 2.9/g = +0.6
Deflections 1.1/g = +0.7
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.1
Loose Balls 0.1/g = +0.1
Screen Assists 0.3/g = +0.1
Raw Impact +7.6
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.1
Net Impact
-1.5
52th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 246 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 47th
9.0 PPG
Efficiency 77th
57.8% TS
Playmaking 17th
1.3 APG
Rebounding 9th
1.7 RPG
Defense 24th
+5.2/g
Hustle 15th
+5.4/g
Creation 21th
+1.78/g
Shot Making 66th
+7.68/g
TO Discipline 92th
0.03/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Landry Shamet’s opening stretch of the 2025-26 campaign was defined by maddening inconsistency and a wildly fluctuating spot in the rotation. He occasionally looked like an elite microwave scorer, peaking on 11/15 vs MIA when he erupted for 36 points off the bench to post a staggering +22.8 Impact score. That massive positive rating was fueled entirely by his blistering perimeter shot selection, hitting six threes on twelve attempts to single-handedly carry the offense. Yet, when rewarded with a starting nod just three days later on 11/18 vs MIA, his value cratered to a -4.6 Impact. Despite logging 39 minutes and handing out four assists, his horrific 2-of-11 chucking from the floor actively bled away possessions and crippled the starting unit's rhythm. Earlier in the season, a similar shooting freeze occurred on 10/26 vs MIA. In that matchup, a scoreless night featuring four bricked triples resulted in a brutal -14.8 Impact because his empty offensive possessions completely stalled the second unit. When his jumper abandons him, Shamet simply does not generate enough secondary playmaking to justify his minutes.

Landry Shamet's midseason stretch was defined by violent swings in perimeter variance, operating as the ultimate boom-or-bust rotation piece. On 01/22 vs BKN, he caught absolute fire, draining all six of his three-point attempts in just 15 minutes to post a staggering +23.0 Impact score. That perfect shooting night single-handedly warped the opponent's defensive shell, creating massive offensive value purely through gravity and floor spacing. However, his one-dimensional profile often betrayed him, perfectly illustrated on 02/22 vs CHI where he scored a respectable 16 points but still logged a -3.0 Impact score. Despite hitting four threes in that contest, his complete lack of playmaking and porous perimeter defense bled points on the other end, entirely nullifying his scoring punch. When the jumper completely abandoned him, the floor fell out. He managed just two points on 02/24 vs CLE, suffering a brutal -12.4 Impact score due to forced shots and zero secondary hustle contributions to salvage his minutes.

A brutal shooting slump and erratic shot selection defined Landry Shamet's mid-season stretch. During the 03/09 vs LAC matchup, his trigger-happy approach yielded a disastrous -15.0 Impact score as he bricked nine of his twelve three-point attempts, actively shooting his team out of possessions. Even when he managed to reach double figures, his inefficient chucking harmed the offense. Despite scoring 10 points on 03/15 vs GSW, his poor perimeter shot selection and wasted offensive sets resulted in a -6.8 Impact. He did briefly find ways to contribute without the long ball, posting a +3.2 Impact on 03/04 vs OKC by attacking inside the arc for a highly efficient 14 points. However, a brief promotion to the starting lineup in mid-March failed to fix his broken jumper. By the 04/18 vs ATL game, his confidence looked entirely shot, managing just 3 points on 1-of-6 shooting to record a dismal -12.4 Impact.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Shamet's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~7 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 46% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive impact is minimal for a 21-minute player. Not generating enough contests, rim protection, or forced turnovers to move the needle.

Small downward trend. First-half impact: -0.1, second-half: -3.0. Not alarming yet, but trending the wrong direction.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 3 games. Longest cold streak: 8 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 47 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

N. Powell 66.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 57.1%
PPP 0.23
PTS 15
A. Nesmith 40.8 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 3
T. Maxey 37.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 7
J. Murray 32.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
Q. Jackson 29.9 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 5
A. Nembhard 28.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 3
K. Thompson 26.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 3
J. Morant 26.0 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 7
B. Sheppard 25.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 3
J. Jaquez Jr. 25.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

A. Nesmith 52.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 11
N. Powell 40.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 37.5%
PPP 0.42
PTS 17
T. Maxey 40.3 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 14
A. Nembhard 35.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
T. Hardaway Jr. 35.6 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 4
S. Fontecchio 32.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.15
PTS 5
J. Murray 29.7 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 8
K. Thompson 26.5 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 5
J. Jaquez Jr. 25.2 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 6
A. Wiggins 25.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

61
Games
8.5
PPG
1.6
RPG
1.2
APG
0.5
SPG
0.1
BPG
43.8
FG%
39.5
3P%
71.2
FT%
21.0
MPG

GAME LOG

61 games played