Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
NYK lead SAS lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
SAS 2P — 3P —
NYK 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 164 attempts

SAS SAS Shot-making Δ

Wembanyama 9/25 -8.0
Fox Hard 6/16 -0.5
Harper 8/12 +5.6
Vassell Hard 6/9 +7.8
Champagnie Hard 2/9 -5.2
Castle Hard 2/7 -2.2
Johnson Open 1/5 -4.5
Bryant Open 2/3 +1.1

NYK NYK Shot-making Δ

Brunson Hard 12/25 +2.9
Anunoby Hard 10/15 +10.5
Bridges Hard 3/9 -2.0
Towns Open 4/5 +3.1
Robinson Open 1/5 -5.0
Alvarado 3/4 +3.3
Hart 2/4 +0.2
McBride Hard 0/4 -4.1
Clarkson 1/3 -1.4
Shamet Hard 0/3 -3.1
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
SAS
NYK
36/86 Field Goals 36/78
41.9% Field Goal % 46.2%
17/43 3-Pointers 15/32
39.5% 3-Point % 46.9%
17/20 Free Throws 20/28
85.0% Free Throw % 71.4%
55.9% True Shooting % 59.2%
50 Total Rebounds 53
12 Offensive 8
30 Defensive 31
24 Assists 23
2.00 Assist/TO Ratio 1.53
11 Turnovers 13
10 Steals 6
4 Blocks 4
21 Fouls 21
28 Points in Paint 34
12 Fast Break Pts 13
24 Points off TOs 11
10 Second Chance Pts 14
28 Bench Points 12
29 Largest Lead 1
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Jalen Brunson
36 PTS · 5 REB · 7 AST · 44.5 MIN
+29.8
2
OG Anunoby
33 PTS · 4 REB · 1 AST · 41.5 MIN
+28.6
3
Victor Wembanyama
24 PTS · 13 REB · 1 AST · 43.9 MIN
+26.1
4
Devin Vassell
18 PTS · 5 REB · 4 AST · 40.4 MIN
+15.9
5
Karl-Anthony Towns
13 PTS · 10 REB · 2 AST · 25.7 MIN
+8.1
6
De'Aaron Fox
18 PTS · 5 REB · 7 AST · 37.4 MIN
+7.1
7
Dylan Harper
21 PTS · 4 REB · 3 AST · 32.3 MIN
+6.0
8
Julian Champagnie
5 PTS · 5 REB · 3 AST · 33.0 MIN
+1.5
9
Pacôme Dadiet
0 PTS · 0 REB · 0 AST · 0.0 MIN
0.0
10
Mohamed Diawara
0 PTS · 0 REB · 0 AST · 0.0 MIN
0.0
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:02 O. Anunoby tip Layup (33 PTS) 106–107
Q4 0:02 O. Anunoby REBOUND (Off:1 Def:3) 106–105
Q4 0:04 MISS J. Brunson 30' pullup 3PT 106–105
Q4 0:05 D. Fox personal FOUL (3 PF) 106–105
Q4 0:10 J. Alvarado REBOUND (Off:0 Def:2) 106–105
Q4 0:11 O. Anunoby BLOCK (1 BLK) 106–105
Q4 0:11 MISS D. Fox Layup - blocked 106–105
Q4 0:13 D. Fox REBOUND (Off:2 Def:3) 106–105
Q4 0:16 MISS J. Brunson driving floating bank Shot 106–105
Q4 0:30 S. Castle Free Throw 2 of 2 (13 PTS) 106–105
Q4 0:30 S. Castle Free Throw 1 of 2 (12 PTS) 105–105
Q4 0:30 J. Hart shooting personal FOUL (3 PF) (Castle 2 FT) 104–105
Q4 0:30 S. Castle REBOUND (Off:2 Def:3) 104–105
Q4 0:32 MISS D. Fox 18' pullup Shot 104–105
Q4 0:38 NYK shot clock Team TURNOVER 104–105

GAME ANALYSIS

GET THIS IN YOUR INBOX

Every breakdown for your team — free, the morning after the game.

Follow your team — free

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

NYK New York Knicks
S Jalen Brunson 44.5m
36
pts
5
reb
7
ast
Impact
+29.8

A masterful two-way performance was driven by his dual-threat attack, carrying the offense with 36 points and 7 assists while also disrupting on the other end. His 3 steals, well above his 1.2 average, were a key part of his +8.0 defensive impact rating.

Shooting
FG 12/25 (48.0%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 9/11 (81.8%)
Advanced
TS% 60.3%
USG% 33.0%
Net Rtg +12.6
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 44.5m
Scoring +25.7
Creation +3.9
Shot Making +7.0
Hustle +1.5
Defense +6.8
Turnovers -7.1
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 3
S OG Anunoby 41.5m
33
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
+28.6

A masterful offensive explosion drove his performance, as he torched the defense for 33 points on just 15 shots. His near-perfect shooting from deep (7-of-9) and the free-throw line (6-of-6) fueled a massive +30.0 offensive impact.

Shooting
FG 10/15 (66.7%)
3PT 7/9 (77.8%)
FT 6/6 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 93.5%
USG% 20.4%
Net Rtg -1.2
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 41.5m
Scoring +29.0
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +7.8
Hustle +2.2
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
S Josh Hart 32.8m
6
pts
8
reb
6
ast
Impact
-0.2

His value came from everything but scoring, as he contributed well above his average with 6 assists while grabbing 8 rebounds. This quintessential glue-guy performance was anchored by his defensive effort, which generated a +5.5 impact rating.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 1/3 (33.3%)
Advanced
TS% 56.4%
USG% 9.3%
Net Rtg +19.6
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.8m
Scoring +3.3
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +1.3
Hustle +6.3
Defense +1.3
Turnovers -4.7
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
S Mikal Bridges 28.1m
7
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-3.1

An uncharacteristically quiet and inefficient offensive game defined this outing, as he scored just 7 points, less than half his 14.7 point average. While he took care of the ball with 0 turnovers, his 3-for-9 shooting continued a recent dip in his offensive impact.

Shooting
FG 3/9 (33.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 38.9%
USG% 13.6%
Net Rtg -3.4
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.1m
Scoring +2.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
13
pts
10
reb
2
ast
Impact
+8.1

Hyper-efficient, low-volume offense defined his night, as he scored 13 points on a perfect 5-for-5 from the field and free throw line combined. Despite 3 turnovers, his efficient scoring and 10 rebounds helped him post a game-high +17 plus-minus in just 26 minutes.

Shooting
FG 4/5 (80.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 96.2%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg +34.0
+/- +17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.8m
Scoring +12.2
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +12.7
Defense -3.4
Turnovers -7.8
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
0
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-11.9

He was a complete non-factor on offense, failing to score a single point on 0-of-3 shooting despite playing 20 minutes. This offensive invisibility was the primary driver behind his -13 plus-minus.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 6.4%
Net Rtg -28.6
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.5m
Scoring -2.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense -0.6
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
8
pts
2
reb
3
ast
Impact
-5.1

An efficient offensive spark off the bench defined his contribution, scoring 8 points on just 4 shots in 16 minutes. This production, fueled by 2-of-3 shooting from deep, generated a +6.7 offensive impact, though it was paired with 5 personal fouls.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 15.2%
Net Rtg +31.9
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.6m
Scoring +7.3
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +2.2
Hustle +0.6
Defense -2.8
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
2
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.8

His performance was defined by offensive struggles in limited minutes, as he shot just 1-of-5 from the field and missed all 4 of his free throws. While he added 2 blocks, his offensive inefficiency contributed to a team-worst -14 plus-minus in his 13 minutes on the court.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/4 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 14.8%
USG% 27.6%
Net Rtg -33.3
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.0m
Scoring -4.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +6.3
Defense +0.7
Turnovers -1.1
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-12.9

An ice-cold shooting spell defined his brief 7-minute appearance, as he missed all 4 of his three-point attempts. This lack of production contributed heavily to his team-low -14 plus-minus during his time on the court.

Shooting
FG 0/4 (0.0%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 23.5%
Net Rtg -105.7
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.2m
Scoring -3.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-15.7

His brief 5-minute cameo was chaotic and counterproductive, defined more by his mistakes than his production. He committed 2 turnovers and 3 personal fouls while scoring just 2 points.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 45.5%
Net Rtg +20.0
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.7m
Scoring +0.5
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.9
Turnovers -4.7
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.4

In a very brief stint of just over 3 minutes, his impact was confined to the defensive end. He registered 1 block and 4 shot contests without attempting a field goal.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +57.1
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.5m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.2
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.3

He saw just under 3 minutes of action, missing his only field goal attempt and having no significant statistical impact.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 12.5%
Net Rtg -100.0
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.0m
Scoring -0.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
SAS San Antonio Spurs
24
pts
13
reb
1
ast
Impact
+26.1

Despite an inefficient scoring night on high volume (9/25 FG), he anchored the team with elite rim protection (3 blocks, 10 contests) and flawless ball security. His 0 turnovers, a significant improvement on his 2.6 average, helped offset the poor shooting.

Shooting
FG 9/25 (36.0%)
3PT 2/8 (25.0%)
FT 4/7 (57.1%)
Advanced
TS% 42.7%
USG% 26.7%
Net Rtg -0.2
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 43.9m
Scoring +10.1
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +4.6
Hustle +14.6
Defense +1.2
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 3
TO 0
S Devin Vassell 40.4m
18
pts
5
reb
4
ast
Impact
+15.9

Scorching hot shooting defined his performance, as he poured in 18 points on just 9 field goal attempts. His 5-of-8 shooting from three-point range was the primary driver of his massive +17.5 offensive impact.

Shooting
FG 6/9 (66.7%)
3PT 5/8 (62.5%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 95.3%
USG% 10.9%
Net Rtg -11.5
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.4m
Scoring +15.6
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +5.2
Hustle +5.4
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S De'Aaron Fox 37.4m
18
pts
5
reb
7
ast
Impact
+7.1

A strong all-around game was defined by his perimeter impact on both ends, knocking down 4-of-9 threes and generating 6 deflections. While his scoring and creation were both above average, the performance was marred by 4 turnovers, well above his 2.2 average.

Shooting
FG 6/16 (37.5%)
3PT 4/9 (44.4%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 53.3%
USG% 23.9%
Net Rtg +2.8
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.4m
Scoring +10.6
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +5.0
Hustle +6.3
Defense +1.8
Turnovers -9.5
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 4
5
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
+1.5

A disastrous shooting night (2/9 FG, 1/7 3P) tanked his offensive production, but he salvaged value through defensive disruption. His 4 steals were well above his 1.4 average and drove a +10.2 defensive impact rating.

Shooting
FG 2/9 (22.2%)
3PT 1/7 (14.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 27.8%
USG% 11.3%
Net Rtg -4.2
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.0m
Scoring -0.6
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +1.5
Defense +7.9
Turnovers +0.0
STL 4
BLK 0
TO 0
S Stephon Castle 25.9m
13
pts
5
reb
5
ast
Impact
-2.2

He struggled to score efficiently from the field (2-of-7), but salvaged his offensive night by aggressively drawing fouls and converting at the line. His perfect 8-for-8 free-throw shooting was the main source of his production and drove a +9.8 offensive impact score.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 8/8 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 61.8%
USG% 22.6%
Net Rtg -20.4
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.9m
Scoring +9.3
Creation +2.5
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +3.4
Defense -3.7
Turnovers -6.6
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
Dylan Harper 32.3m
21
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
+6.0

An explosive and highly efficient scoring punch defined his night, as he poured in 21 points on just 12 shots (8/12 FG). This offensive outburst, well above his 13.6 point average, was the clear driver of his performance, though it was slightly dampened by 3 turnovers.

Shooting
FG 8/12 (66.7%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 81.5%
USG% 22.2%
Net Rtg +14.1
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.3m
Scoring +17.9
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +5.2
Hustle +1.2
Defense -2.2
Turnovers -7.1
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
2
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-7.2

He was a complete non-factor on offense, scoring just 2 points on 1-of-5 shooting in 18 minutes of action. While he contributed positively on the defensive end (+3.1 Defense), his lack of scoring punch was a significant departure from his 8.6 point average.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 20.0%
USG% 11.4%
Net Rtg -6.1
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.0m
Scoring -1.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +4.1
Defense -1.1
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
5
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.9

He provided an efficient scoring burst in his brief 5-minute appearance on the floor. Hitting 2-of-3 shots, including a three-pointer, he generated a notable +4.2 offensive impact in limited action.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 83.3%
USG% 27.3%
Net Rtg +63.6
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 5.0m
Scoring +4.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.0

In just 4 minutes of action, he made little statistical impact beyond grabbing a steal and a deflection. He did not attempt a shot and was a non-factor in the outcome.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -23.5
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.1m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +1.5
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0