MIL

2025-26 Season

KYLE KUZMA

Milwaukee Bucks | Forward | 6-8
Kyle Kuzma
13.2 PPG
4.6 RPG
2.6 APG
26.3 MPG
-1.8 Impact

Kuzma produces at an below average rate for a 26-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-1.8
Scoring +8.1
Points 13.2 PPG × +1.00 = +13.2
Missed 2PT 2.9/g × -0.78 = -2.3
Missed 3PT 2.3/g × -0.87 = -2.0
Missed FT 0.8/g × -1.00 = -0.8
Creation +2.7
Assists 2.6/g × +0.50 = +1.3
Off. Rebounds 1.1/g × +1.26 = +1.4
Turnovers -3.1
Turnovers 1.6/g × -1.95 = -3.1
Defense +1.1
Steals 0.7/g × +2.30 = +1.6
Blocks 0.4/g × +0.90 = +0.4
Def. Rebounds 3.4/g × +0.30 = +1.0
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +1.7
Contested Shots 3.6/g × +0.20 = +0.7
Deflections 0.8/g × +0.65 = +0.5
Loose Balls 0.2/g × +0.60 = +0.1
Screen Assists 0.5/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.1/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.3
Raw Impact +10.5
Baseline (game-average expected) −12.3
Net Impact
-1.8
23th pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 69th
13.2 PPG
Efficiency 60th
57.9% TS
Playmaking 76th
2.6 APG
Rebounding 57th
4.6 RPG
Rim Protection 26th
0.11/min
Hustle 8th
0.07/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 24th
0.06/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

A volatile tug-of-war between passive observation and brilliant two-way execution defined Kyle Kuzma's start to the season. On 11/14 vs CHA, he delivered an absolute masterclass with 29 points and 10 rebounds, generating a massive +12.5 impact score through decisive shot-making and suffocating defense. Yet that same aggression often mutated into a detriment. During his 11/04 vs TOR outing, Kuzma dropped 18 points but posted a -6.0 impact because his empty-calorie production was heavily offset by momentum-killing mistakes. Conversely, he found ways to win on the margins even when his scoring volume dipped. On 10/22 vs WAS, he managed only 12 points but still engineered a stellar +8.5 impact by anchoring the frontcourt and contesting everything in his vicinity. This maddening inconsistency reveals a forward who can completely dictate a game, provided he stops settling for forced isolation jumpers against set defenses.

This twenty-game stretch was defined by maddening passivity and erratic decision-making that routinely sabotaged his team's offensive rhythm. Kyle Kuzma often found ways to hurt the lineup even when his traditional box score looked respectable. Look no further than the 12/21 vs MIN matchup, where he posted 12 points and 10 rebounds but generated a brutal -9.4 impact score because extreme passivity kept him from even looking at the rim. A similar story unfolded during the 12/06 vs DET contest. His 15 points were completely undone by a string of live-ball turnovers and empty possessions that dragged his impact down to an abysmal -8.8. He occasionally found a spark, like the 01/15 vs SAS game where his high-volume perimeter shooting stretched the defense to its breaking point for a +6.1 impact score. Ultimately, those fleeting moments of value were buried under a mountain of contested midrange jumpers and offensive disappearing acts.

A maddening pendulum of brilliant isolation scoring and baffling inefficiency defined this stretch for Kyle Kuzma. When fully engaged, he looked unstoppable. He peaked on 02/03 vs CHI, dropping 31 points and generating a massive +14.2 impact score by ruthlessly hunting mismatches in the mid-post. Yet, he routinely sabotaged his own value with poor decision-making. During the 02/11 vs ORL matchup, Kuzma scored a respectable 15 points but posted a dismal -9.5 impact because his perimeter inefficiency and forced shots late in the clock actively killed offensive momentum. He found other ways to hurt the team even when prioritizing playmaking, as seen in his 02/04 vs NOP performance. In that game, he handed the opposition easy transition points through forced passes and sloppy ball-handling, dragging his impact down to an ugly -8.5 despite dishing out 9 assists. He remains a tantalizing talent who simply refuses to eliminate the hidden costs from his game.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Kuzma's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~7 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 55% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Kuzma consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 3 games. Longest cold streak: 8 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 68 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

P. George 59.6 poss
FG% 36.4%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 10
A. Wiggins 48.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.29
PTS 14
C. McCollum 46.0 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.24
PTS 11
C. Flagg 41.7 poss
FG% 30.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 9
M. Bridges 38.0 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 5
P. Larsson 37.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 4
D. White 37.0 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 11
I. Okoro 36.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.28
PTS 10
J. Brown 36.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.28
PTS 10
C. Cunningham 35.8 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 6

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

P. George 67.4 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 45.5%
PPP 0.24
PTS 16
J. Brown 64.7 poss
FG% 71.4%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 16
K. Middleton 55.7 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 4
A. Wiggins 49.8 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 5
M. Bridges 49.6 poss
FG% 35.7%
3P% 27.3%
PPP 0.3
PTS 15
K. Knueppel 49.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.3
PTS 15
K. Towns 44.3 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 9
Z. Williamson 39.2 poss
FG% 30.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 8
P. Siakam 38.6 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 5
J. Brunson 37.9 poss
FG% 12.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2

SEASON STATS

67
Games
13.2
PPG
4.6
RPG
2.6
APG
0.7
SPG
0.4
BPG
49.0
FG%
34.5
3P%
72.4
FT%
26.3
MPG

GAME LOG

67 games played