Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
MIL lead MEM lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
MEM 2P — 3P —
MIL 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 175 attempts

MEM MEM Shot-making Δ

Rupert 9/19 -0.6
Whitehead Hard 6/19 -4.0
Okani 4/12 -3.0
Clayton Jr. Hard 6/11 +6.3
Prosper 5/10 -0.6
Williamson Hard 2/9 -4.4
Bal 3/7 +0.4
Hendricks Hard 3/4 +5.2
Gibson Hard 0/1 -0.9

MIL MIL Shot-making Δ

Rollins Hard 10/16 +8.7
Dieng 6/15 -4.3
Turner 6/13 -1.7
Prince Hard 7/8 +10.8
Ryan 7/8 +7.6
Sims Open 6/7 +2.7
Green Hard 2/7 -1.7
Nance 2/4 -0.6
Kuzma Open 2/3 0.0
Antetokounmpo Hard 1/1 +1.2
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
MEM
MIL
38/92 Field Goals 50/83
41.3% Field Goal % 60.2%
17/46 3-Pointers 16/32
37.0% 3-Point % 50.0%
22/28 Free Throws 15/24
78.6% Free Throw % 62.5%
55.1% True Shooting % 70.0%
46 Total Rebounds 56
15 Offensive 11
23 Defensive 33
25 Assists 30
1.79 Assist/TO Ratio 1.50
14 Turnovers 20
13 Steals 11
1 Blocks 5
21 Fouls 19
36 Points in Paint 58
15 Fast Break Pts 7
22 Points off TOs 15
26 Second Chance Pts 23
29 Bench Points 61
6 Largest Lead 19
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Rayan Rupert
33 PTS · 10 REB · 10 AST · 39.0 MIN
+34.67
2
Cormac Ryan
21 PTS · 4 REB · 3 AST · 29.4 MIN
+30.64
3
Myles Turner
19 PTS · 11 REB · 0 AST · 21.9 MIN
+23.55
4
Ryan Rollins
24 PTS · 4 REB · 3 AST · 32.4 MIN
+20.34
5
Taylor Hendricks
11 PTS · 4 REB · 0 AST · 12.5 MIN
+19.99
6
Taurean Prince
19 PTS · 3 REB · 3 AST · 23.8 MIN
+15.57
7
Walter Clayton Jr.
20 PTS · 3 REB · 4 AST · 25.4 MIN
+14.88
8
Ousmane Dieng
17 PTS · 9 REB · 6 AST · 31.3 MIN
+10.4
9
Olivier-Maxence Prosper
13 PTS · 3 REB · 2 AST · 14.3 MIN
+7.13
10
Dariq Whitehead
16 PTS · 3 REB · 2 AST · 38.6 MIN
+6.68
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:14 R. Rupert technical Free Throw 1 of 1 (33 PTS) 115–131
Q4 0:14 T. Antetokounmpo rim-hanging technical FOUL (1 Tech) 114–131
Q4 0:14 T. Antetokounmpo alley-oop DUNK (2 PTS) (A. Antetokounmpo 1 AST) 114–131
Q4 0:23 R. Rupert driving Layup (32 PTS) 114–129
Q4 0:29 A. Antetokounmpo 13' pullup Jump Shot (2 PTS) (C. Ryan 3 AST) 112–129
Q4 0:46 W. Clayton Jr. 27' 3PT (20 PTS) (R. Rupert 10 AST) 112–127
Q4 0:55 TEAM defensive REBOUND 109–127
Q4 0:57 MISS T. Antetokounmpo Free Throw 2 of 2 109–127
Q4 0:57 TEAM offensive REBOUND 109–127
Q4 0:57 MISS T. Antetokounmpo Free Throw 1 of 2 109–127
Q4 0:57 T. Okani shooting personal FOUL (4 PF) (Antetokounmpo 2 FT) 109–127
Q4 1:04 T. Antetokounmpo STEAL (1 STL) 109–127
Q4 1:04 R. Rupert bad pass TURNOVER (4 TO) 109–127
Q4 1:06 J. Sims personal FOUL (5 PF) 109–127
Q4 1:10 P. Nance cutting DUNK (5 PTS) (C. Ryan 2 AST) 109–127

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

MIL Milwaukee Bucks
S Ryan Rollins 32.4m
24
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
+18.1

Slicing through the defense with exceptional shot selection, he consistently found high-quality looks to maintain his hot scoring streak. Active hands in the passing lanes (+4.2 defense) supplemented his offensive clinic, making him a steady two-way contributor.

Shooting
FG 10/16 (62.5%)
3PT 4/7 (57.1%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 24.3%
Net Rtg +5.1
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.4m
Scoring +19.8
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +7.1
Hustle +5.1
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -4.7
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
S Ousmane Dieng 31.3m
17
pts
9
reb
6
ast
Impact
+1.6

Counting stats masked a highly inefficient outing where forced drives into traffic resulted in empty possessions. While he rebounded well for his position, his inability to finish through contact at the rim dragged down his overall effectiveness.

Shooting
FG 6/15 (40.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 4/7 (57.1%)
Advanced
TS% 47.0%
USG% 25.3%
Net Rtg +14.8
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.3m
Scoring +7.9
Creation +2.6
Shot Making +3.0
Hustle +4.6
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -4.7
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S AJ Green 26.5m
6
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-20.2

A disastrous shooting night from beyond the arc punished the offense, as opponents aggressively stunted off him to crowd the paint. Failing to provide his usual floor-spacing gravity rendered his minutes highly detrimental to the unit's flow.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 42.9%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.5m
Scoring +1.9
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +0.3
Defense -2.6
Turnovers -9.5
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 4
S Kyle Kuzma 22.4m
4
pts
4
reb
6
ast
Impact
-11.5

Uncharacteristic passivity defined this outing, as he completely vanished as a scoring threat and allowed the defense to sag off him. He provided solid weak-side help defense, but his refusal to look at the basket crippled the team's half-court spacing.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 66.7%
USG% 12.3%
Net Rtg -3.8
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.4m
Scoring +3.2
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +5.1
Defense +1.8
Turnovers -10.2
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 4
S Myles Turner 21.9m
19
pts
11
reb
0
ast
Impact
+20.1

Completely controlled the paint with menacing drop coverage that deterred drives and spiked his defensive rating (+7.0). Breaking out of a recent slump, his relentless rim-running and offensive rebounding exhausted the opposing frontcourt.

Shooting
FG 6/13 (46.2%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 6/7 (85.7%)
Advanced
TS% 59.1%
USG% 28.1%
Net Rtg -6.0
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.9m
Scoring +13.5
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +3.0
Hustle +12.0
Defense +1.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 0
Cormac Ryan 29.4m
21
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
+24.9

An absolute terror on the perimeter, his point-of-attack defense (+13.1) completely short-circuited the opponent's primary actions. He paired this suffocating pressure with lethal offensive efficiency, capitalizing on transition leak-outs to post a dominant overall score.

Shooting
FG 7/8 (87.5%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 107.6%
USG% 17.4%
Net Rtg +29.3
+/- +19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.4m
Scoring +20.1
Creation +2.3
Shot Making +4.3
Hustle +3.1
Defense +10.3
Turnovers -3.5
STL 5
BLK 0
TO 2
Jericho Sims 26.1m
12
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
-7.3

Flawless finishing around the basket was completely undone by poor rim protection and slow pick-and-roll coverages. Opposing guards relentlessly targeted his drop coverage, turning his highly efficient offensive night into a net negative.

Shooting
FG 6/7 (85.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 76.1%
USG% 17.5%
Net Rtg +41.8
+/- +19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.1m
Scoring +10.2
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +4.1
Defense -5.3
Turnovers -4.7
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
19
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
+7.6

Delivered an absolute masterclass in spot-up shooting, punishing every late rotation by going perfect from beyond the arc. Despite the scoring clinic, his overall impact was muted by occasional blown assignments in transition defense.

Shooting
FG 7/8 (87.5%)
3PT 5/5 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 118.8%
USG% 20.8%
Net Rtg +40.0
+/- +20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.8m
Scoring +18.2
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +5.8
Hustle +0.9
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -7.1
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
Pete Nance 23.3m
5
pts
4
reb
4
ast
Impact
-11.4

Struggled to leave a footprint on the game, passing up open looks and stalling the offensive machinery. His inability to anchor the paint defensively allowed opponents to score easily inside, severely dragging down his net rating.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.2%
USG% 11.3%
Net Rtg +48.9
+/- +23
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.3m
Scoring +2.7
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +1.2
Defense -3.1
Turnovers -3.1
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
2
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.5

Maximized a garbage-time cameo by immediately injecting chaotic energy into the defensive front. A quick bucket and hyper-aggressive ball denial in just under two minutes yielded a surprisingly positive net score.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 53.2%
USG% 50.0%
Net Rtg +30.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.9m
Scoring +1.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +0.0
Defense +2.1
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-8.5

Made the most of a fleeting final-minute appearance by executing perfectly on his only offensive touch. Setting up a teammate and finishing a quick play ensured his brief stint ended in the green.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg -66.7
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 0.9m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
MEM Memphis Grizzlies
S Toby Okani 41.2m
9
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.2

Heavy minutes amplified the damage of poor shot selection and a complete lack of playmaking creation. While he provided marginal hustle value, clanking momentum-killing jumpers early in the shot clock tanked his overall impact rating.

Shooting
FG 4/12 (33.3%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 34.9%
USG% 13.3%
Net Rtg -13.8
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 41.2m
Scoring +2.3
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +2.8
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -3.1
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Rayan Rupert 39.0m
33
pts
10
reb
10
ast
Impact
+28.9

An absolute two-way masterclass defined this breakout performance, with elite hustle and defensive metrics (+10.8 each) anchoring his massive impact score. He broke out of a severe scoring slump by aggressively attacking the rim, but it was his relentless ball pressure that truly dismantled the opponent.

Shooting
FG 9/19 (47.4%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 13/16 (81.2%)
Advanced
TS% 63.4%
USG% 29.9%
Net Rtg -11.0
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.0m
Scoring +23.4
Creation +4.0
Shot Making +5.1
Hustle +12.7
Defense +6.5
Turnovers -9.5
STL 4
BLK 1
TO 4
20
pts
3
reb
4
ast
Impact
+6.4

Blistering perimeter efficiency fueled a strong offensive rating, breaking him out of a recent scoring slump. However, his modest overall impact suggests he gave much of that value back by getting caught on screens during defensive rotations.

Shooting
FG 6/11 (54.5%)
3PT 4/6 (66.7%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 78.4%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg -30.4
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.4m
Scoring +16.5
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +5.0
Hustle +3.8
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -7.1
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
13
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-2.5

Continued his streak of efficient interior finishing, but a negative defensive rating (-0.9) neutralized his offensive contributions. Poor closeouts on the perimeter allowed easy looks, keeping his overall impact barely above water despite the steady scoring.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 57.4%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg -22.6
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.3m
Scoring +8.5
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +1.9
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
11
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
+12.3

Maximized a brief rotation stint by pairing flawless perimeter shot selection with suffocating weak-side rim protection (+8.6 defensive impact). His ability to instantly disrupt passing lanes upon checking in sparked a massive swing in just 12 minutes of action.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 112.7%
USG% 15.6%
Net Rtg -19.5
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.5m
Scoring +10.2
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +4.1
Defense +7.6
Turnovers +0.0
STL 4
BLK 0
TO 0
16
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-1.4

A brutal diet of contested perimeter jumpers completely derailed his offensive value, as 13 empty trips down the floor fueled opponent transition opportunities. Even with respectable hustle numbers, forcing the issue as a primary creator proved highly detrimental to the team's rhythm.

Shooting
FG 6/19 (31.6%)
3PT 3/10 (30.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 41.2%
USG% 20.4%
Net Rtg -13.7
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.6m
Scoring +6.0
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +4.0
Hustle +0.9
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
5
pts
4
reb
4
ast
Impact
-15.7

Offensive invisibility and bricked spot-up looks severely handicapped the floor spacing during his heavy minutes. He chased loose balls admirably to generate some hustle value, but failing to punish defensive closeouts made him a massive liability overall.

Shooting
FG 2/9 (22.2%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 27.8%
USG% 13.2%
Net Rtg -17.3
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.4m
Scoring -0.3
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.2
Hustle +4.1
Defense -2.3
Turnovers -7.1
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
Adama Bal 25.2m
8
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-6.0

Despite decent shooting splits and positive individual hustle metrics, his presence on the floor coincided with disastrous team runs. Getting repeatedly targeted in pick-and-roll switches compromised the defensive shell, dragging his net score firmly into the red.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 57.1%
USG% 13.1%
Net Rtg -26.9
+/- -18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.2m
Scoring +4.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.2
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.4
Turnovers -2.4
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
Taj Gibson 7.3m
0
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
-5.8

Made his brief rotation cameo entirely about doing the dirty work, completely eschewing scoring to focus on glass-cleaning. Securing critical defensive rebounds in traffic stabilized the second unit and kept his net impact in the green.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 4.5%
Net Rtg +23.5
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.3m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +6.7
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0