Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
UTA lead MIL lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
MIL 2P — 3P —
UTA 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 167 attempts

MIL MIL Shot-making Δ

Portis Hard 4/12 -1.8
Thomas 5/11 +0.2
Rollins Hard 5/10 +2.7
Dieng Hard 5/7 +5.8
Kuzma Open 3/7 -2.6
Prince Hard 2/5 +0.4
Trent Jr. Hard 1/5 -2.4
Ryan Hard 1/4 -1.3
Green Hard 0/4 -4.1
Harris Hard 2/3 +2.9

UTA UTA Shot-making Δ

Bailey Hard 13/27 +7.1
Williams 10/16 +5.5
Harkless Hard 7/14 +3.9
Filipowski 6/10 +2.1
Hinson Hard 5/9 +4.8
Garcia 3/6 -0.6
Mbeng Hard 1/4 -0.7
Tshiebwe Open 3/3 +2.0
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
MIL
UTA
32/78 Field Goals 48/89
41.0% Field Goal % 53.9%
15/44 3-Pointers 18/48
34.1% 3-Point % 37.5%
17/23 Free Throws 14/20
73.9% Free Throw % 70.0%
54.5% True Shooting % 65.4%
41 Total Rebounds 58
8 Offensive 12
27 Defensive 35
20 Assists 34
1.00 Assist/TO Ratio 2.00
20 Turnovers 13
9 Steals 10
2 Blocks 2
18 Fouls 18
30 Points in Paint 48
14 Fast Break Pts 26
20 Points off TOs 28
6 Second Chance Pts 19
54 Bench Points 26
4 Largest Lead 37
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Ace Bailey
33 PTS · 9 REB · 4 AST · 34.1 MIN
+25.56
2
Cody Williams
23 PTS · 3 REB · 5 AST · 27.1 MIN
+19.96
3
Elijah Harkless
23 PTS · 2 REB · 10 AST · 34.5 MIN
+18.87
4
Andersson Garcia
7 PTS · 11 REB · 6 AST · 48.0 MIN
+14.57
5
Ousmane Dieng
13 PTS · 1 REB · 1 AST · 24.6 MIN
+12.24
6
Oscar Tshiebwe
7 PTS · 6 REB · 1 AST · 15.5 MIN
+12.19
7
Blake Hinson
14 PTS · 3 REB · 1 AST · 20.4 MIN
+9.96
8
Bobby Portis
11 PTS · 6 REB · 1 AST · 23.6 MIN
+9.61
9
Kyle Filipowski
16 PTS · 8 REB · 1 AST · 25.0 MIN
+8.62
10
Ryan Rollins
15 PTS · 3 REB · 5 AST · 23.1 MIN
+6.98
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:05 B. Hinson REBOUND (Off:1 Def:2) 96–128
Q4 0:08 MISS A. Jackson Jr. driving finger roll Layup 96–128
Q4 0:18 UTA shot clock Team TURNOVER 96–128
Q4 0:43 G. Harris 25' 3PT pullup (6 PTS) (T. Antetokounmpo 1 AST) 96–128
Q4 1:03 B. Mbeng bad pass out-of-bounds TURNOVER (3 TO) 93–128
Q4 1:09 A. Jackson Jr. running Layup (2 PTS) 93–128
Q4 1:14 G. Harris STEAL (1 STL) 91–128
Q4 1:14 A. Garcia lost ball TURNOVER (1 TO) 91–128
Q4 1:28 A. Garcia STEAL (3 STL) 91–128
Q4 1:28 G. Harris bad pass TURNOVER (2 TO) 91–128
Q4 1:38 B. Hinson driving Layup (14 PTS) (A. Garcia 6 AST) 91–128
Q4 1:43 B. Hinson REBOUND (Off:1 Def:1) 91–126
Q4 1:45 MISS A. Garcia Free Throw 1 of 1 91–126
Q4 1:45 G. Harris shooting personal FOUL (2 PF) (Garcia 1 FT) 91–126
Q4 1:45 A. Garcia driving Layup (7 PTS) (E. Harkless 10 AST) 91–126

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

UTA Utah Jazz
7
pts
11
reb
6
ast
Impact
+11.2

Incredible rebounding and defensive activity were completely offset by a disastrous string of unforced passing errors. Failing to secure the ball against aggressive traps turned what should have been a dominant performance into a net negative.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 1/3 (33.3%)
Advanced
TS% 47.8%
USG% 6.9%
Net Rtg +32.0
+/- +32
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 48.0m
Scoring +3.4
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +14.0
Defense +3.4
Turnovers -2.4
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 1
S Elijah Harkless 34.5m
23
pts
2
reb
10
ast
Impact
+14.2

Dictated the entire pace of the game through elite playmaking and relentless loose-ball recoveries. Consistently breaking down the primary defender to find shooters in the weak-side corners drove a massive positive impact.

Shooting
FG 7/14 (50.0%)
3PT 4/10 (40.0%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 69.1%
USG% 21.7%
Net Rtg +46.3
+/- +33
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.5m
Scoring +17.2
Creation +2.6
Shot Making +5.3
Hustle +0.6
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Ace Bailey 34.1m
33
pts
9
reb
4
ast
Impact
+28.0

Total offensive takeover fueled by an unrelenting barrage of pull-up jumpers against drop coverage. Pairing this scoring explosion with suffocating perimeter defense completely locked down his primary matchup on the other end.

Shooting
FG 13/27 (48.1%)
3PT 7/19 (36.8%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 61.1%
USG% 36.6%
Net Rtg +20.8
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.1m
Scoring +22.4
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +9.4
Hustle +11.4
Defense +1.4
Turnovers -7.1
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 3
S Cody Williams 27.1m
23
pts
3
reb
5
ast
Impact
+14.1

Slicing through the defense with decisive off-ball cuts generated a highly efficient scoring output. The ability to finish through contact at the rim consistently punished the opponent's undersized frontcourt.

Shooting
FG 10/16 (62.5%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 64.8%
USG% 27.7%
Net Rtg +10.9
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.1m
Scoring +18.1
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +4.6
Hustle +0.9
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Kyle Filipowski 25.0m
16
pts
8
reb
1
ast
Impact
+6.5

Thrived as a release valve in the pick-and-pop, forcing the opposing bigs to step out of the paint. Disciplined verticality at the rim altered several key shots during a crucial third-quarter run.

Shooting
FG 6/10 (60.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 68.0%
USG% 27.6%
Net Rtg +4.3
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.0m
Scoring +12.6
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +3.0
Hustle +8.2
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -9.5
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 4
Bez Mbeng 35.4m
5
pts
5
reb
6
ast
Impact
-7.2

Suffocating point-of-attack defense was entirely ruined by erratic decision-making with the ball in his hands. A devastating sequence of live-ball turnovers in the fourth quarter directly fueled the opponent's transition attack.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.2%
USG% 9.2%
Net Rtg +46.6
+/- +34
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.4m
Scoring +2.6
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +2.5
Defense +1.1
Turnovers -7.1
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 3
Blake Hinson 20.4m
14
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
+6.6

Lethal spot-up shooting stretched the floor beautifully, but heavy feet on the defensive end bled points. Opponents relentlessly targeted him in isolation during the second half, nearly erasing his offensive contributions.

Shooting
FG 5/9 (55.6%)
3PT 4/7 (57.1%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 77.8%
USG% 17.3%
Net Rtg +55.2
+/- +24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.4m
Scoring +10.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +4.2
Hustle +2.8
Defense -2.5
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
7
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
+5.8

Absolutely bullied his way around the paint, generating extra possessions through sheer physical dominance. Flawless execution as a roll man created a highly efficient offensive stint that overwhelmed the backup bigs.

Shooting
FG 3/3 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 101.7%
USG% 7.9%
Net Rtg +58.8
+/- +18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.5m
Scoring +7.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +6.7
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
MIL Milwaukee Bucks
S Ousmane Dieng 24.6m
13
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
+4.3

Elite shot selection and active hands in the passing lanes drove a highly efficient two-way performance. Consistently punishing closeouts with decisive drives made him a nightmare matchup for slower forwards on the perimeter.

Shooting
FG 5/7 (71.4%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 92.9%
USG% 15.3%
Net Rtg -54.1
+/- -27
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.6m
Scoring +11.6
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +0.3
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -4.7
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 2
S Ryan Rollins 23.1m
15
pts
3
reb
5
ast
Impact
+0.9

Scoring volume heavily masked a disastrous defensive stint where he was repeatedly targeted on switches. Live-ball turnovers in transition completely erased the value of his offensive production.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 68.9%
USG% 24.6%
Net Rtg -26.9
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.1m
Scoring +11.0
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +3.9
Hustle +3.8
Defense -3.1
Turnovers -7.8
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
S Kyle Kuzma 19.3m
11
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
-1.9

Solid defensive rotations and weak-side help buoyed his underlying metrics, but careless ball security dragged his overall impact into the red. Forcing contested mid-range looks against switching schemes negated the value of his defensive stops.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 57.1%
USG% 26.5%
Net Rtg -48.0
+/- -19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.3m
Scoring +7.0
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +1.2
Hustle +3.4
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -7.8
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
S Myles Turner 18.4m
3
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-15.4

Completely neutralized by physical interior defense, resulting in a severe negative impact across the board. A brutal stretch of moving screens and offensive fouls in the third quarter entirely derailed his rhythm.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 15.9%
Net Rtg -32.4
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.4m
Scoring +1.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.9
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -9.5
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 4
S AJ Green 11.8m
0
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.3

Blanking on perimeter attempts severely damaged his offensive gravity and overall value. Because opponents essentially ignored him in the half-court, the paint became clogged, stalling the team's offensive flow during his minutes.

Shooting
FG 0/4 (0.0%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 13.8%
Net Rtg -53.1
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.8m
Scoring -3.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +3.8
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Bobby Portis 23.6m
11
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
+4.6

Overcame a highly inefficient shooting night by dominating the glass and generating crucial second-chance opportunities. Relentless energy on defensive rotations during the fourth quarter salvaged his overall rating.

Shooting
FG 4/12 (33.3%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 41.3%
USG% 23.6%
Net Rtg -39.3
+/- -17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.6m
Scoring +5.2
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +2.7
Hustle +1.8
Defense +2.9
Turnovers +0.0
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
Cam Thomas 22.7m
14
pts
2
reb
4
ast
Impact
-1.4

Severe tunnel vision and forced isolation attempts against set defenses cratered his offensive value. Even though he showed surprising engagement fighting over screens defensively, the empty offensive possessions heavily outweighed the stops.

Shooting
FG 5/11 (45.5%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 3/5 (60.0%)
Advanced
TS% 53.0%
USG% 34.6%
Net Rtg -44.5
+/- -20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.7m
Scoring +8.8
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +0.6
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -9.3
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 5
Jericho Sims 17.6m
2
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.4

A string of illegal screens and poorly timed fouls completely undermined his otherwise solid positional defense. Struggling to anchor the drop coverage against the pick-and-roll allowed opposing guards to dictate the tempo.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 2.6%
Net Rtg -25.7
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.6m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +1.9
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
4
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-8.8

Bricking open spot-up looks allowed the defense to heavily stunt toward the primary ball-handlers. While he showed flashes of active hands in the passing lanes, an inability to punish defensive rotations made him a severe liability.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 34.0%
USG% 15.0%
Net Rtg -6.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.1m
Scoring +0.3
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
6
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-1.1

Perimeter defensive lapses and poor closeout angles allowed opponents to generate easy looks, tanking his net impact. Despite hitting a couple of timely corner threes, his inability to stay in front of quicker guards proved costly.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 60.0%
USG% 12.8%
Net Rtg -18.4
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.9m
Scoring +3.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +2.5
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Pete Nance 13.0m
0
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-10.1

Hesitancy to shoot when left open completely derailed the offensive spacing during the second quarter. Consistently a step slow on defensive closeouts, he yielded high-value corner attempts to the opposition.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 6.7%
Net Rtg -47.0
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.0m
Scoring -1.9
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.7

Failed to make any tangible impact in his limited run, floating on the perimeter without cutting with purpose. A pair of costly transition fouls quickly ended his stint and dragged his net score into the red.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 10.5%
Net Rtg -22.2
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.9m
Scoring +1.3
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +1.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
5
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-4.8

Rushed perimeter attempts early in the shot clock negatively impacted the team's offensive efficiency. Struggling to contain dribble penetration frequently required help defenders to clean up his initial point-of-attack mistakes.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 47.0%
USG% 29.4%
Net Rtg -13.3
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.7m
Scoring +2.1
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.5
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
4
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-5.2

Provided a brief spark of chaotic energy that slightly tipped the scales in a positive direction. A crucial momentum-shifting block at the rim defined his short but effective stint on the floor.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 69.4%
USG% 23.5%
Net Rtg -13.3
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.7m
Scoring +3.1
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +1.9
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
6
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-5.9

Played fundamentally sound basketball, capitalizing on defensive breakdowns without forcing his own offense. Textbook navigation of off-ball screens kept the opposing guards from finding any rhythm.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 29.4%
Net Rtg -13.3
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.6m
Scoring +5.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -4.7
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2