UTA

2025-26 Season

BLAKE HINSON

Utah Jazz | Forward | 6-8
Blake Hinson
10.6 PPG
2.2 RPG
0.8 APG
19.4 MPG
-0.4 Impact

Hinson produces at an average rate for a 19-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-0.4
Scoring +7.4
Points 10.6 PPG × +1.00 = +10.6
Missed 2PT 0.8/g × -0.78 = -0.6
Missed 3PT 2.5/g × -0.87 = -2.2
Missed FT 0.4/g × -1.00 = -0.4
Creation +1.0
Assists 0.8/g × +0.50 = +0.4
Off. Rebounds 0.5/g × +1.26 = +0.6
Turnovers -0.4
Turnovers 0.2/g × -1.95 = -0.4
Defense -1.0
Steals 0.1/g × +2.30 = +0.2
Blocks 0.2/g × +0.90 = +0.2
Def. Rebounds 1.6/g × +0.30 = +0.5
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +1.4
Contested Shots 2.5/g × +0.20 = +0.5
Deflections 0.4/g × +0.65 = +0.3
Loose Balls 0.1/g × +0.60 = +0.1
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.2/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.5
Raw Impact +8.4
Baseline (game-average expected) −8.8
Net Impact
-0.4
45th pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 61th
10.6 PPG
Efficiency 98th
70.6% TS
Playmaking 13th
0.8 APG
Rebounding 7th
2.2 RPG
Rim Protection 0th
0.03/min
Hustle 4th
0.07/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 99th
0.01/min

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Hinson's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~5 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 60% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: -2.7, second-half: +1.4. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 14 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

V. Krejčí 20.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 2
J. Sims 18.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Walker 13.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 3
A. Gill 12.5 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.72
PTS 9
Z. Williamson 12.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
G. Santos 12.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Reese 11.0 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.64
PTS 7
J. Fears 9.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
W. Riley 8.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Queen 8.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

V. Krejčí 16.1 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 5
J. Reese 16.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 2
J. Sims 15.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.39
PTS 6
G. Santos 14.6 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 3
S. Bey 14.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 5
J. Walker 11.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
B. McGowens 10.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
B. Portis 10.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
P. Nance 9.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Gill 8.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

11
Games
10.6
PPG
2.2
RPG
0.8
APG
0.1
SPG
0.2
BPG
51.9
FG%
50.9
3P%
66.7
FT%
19.4
MPG