Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
OKC lead MIL lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
MIL 2P — 3P —
OKC 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 178 attempts

MIL MIL Shot-making Δ

Porter Jr. 6/15 -3.4
Kuzma 5/15 -5.3
Green Hard 6/14 +3.1
Thomas 5/13 -2.9
Dieng Hard 7/12 +5.6
Portis Hard 6/11 +3.6
Nance Hard 4/6 +4.5
Sims Open 4/5 +1.5
Trent Jr. Hard 0/3 -2.8
Jackson Jr. Open 1/1 +0.6

OKC OKC Shot-making Δ

Holmgren 5/12 -3.5
Dort 4/12 -4.4
Joe Hard 5/11 +3.0
McCain Hard 3/9 -1.6
Williams 3/8 -0.3
Wallace Hard 1/7 -4.8
Caruso Hard 3/6 +2.7
Wiggins Open 2/6 -2.6
Williams Hard 3/5 +2.0
Topić Hard 1/3 -0.6
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
MIL
OKC
44/95 Field Goals 31/83
46.3% Field Goal % 37.3%
17/42 3-Pointers 15/45
40.5% 3-Point % 33.3%
5/7 Free Throws 16/20
71.4% Free Throw % 80.0%
56.1% True Shooting % 50.7%
58 Total Rebounds 52
15 Offensive 14
34 Defensive 33
25 Assists 22
2.27 Assist/TO Ratio 1.38
10 Turnovers 16
9 Steals 3
6 Blocks 6
17 Fouls 8
44 Points in Paint 28
7 Fast Break Pts 10
19 Points off TOs 15
19 Second Chance Pts 12
40 Bench Points 39
24 Largest Lead 3
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Bobby Portis
15 PTS · 12 REB · 3 AST · 29.0 MIN
+25.52
2
Ousmane Dieng
19 PTS · 11 REB · 6 AST · 36.5 MIN
+22.97
3
Chet Holmgren
16 PTS · 13 REB · 4 AST · 27.5 MIN
+22.67
4
AJ Green
17 PTS · 2 REB · 3 AST · 38.0 MIN
+14.8
5
Isaiah Joe
17 PTS · 4 REB · 2 AST · 28.9 MIN
+14.26
6
Kevin Porter Jr.
12 PTS · 3 REB · 7 AST · 31.6 MIN
+12.23
7
Pete Nance
11 PTS · 7 REB · 2 AST · 24.0 MIN
+10.02
8
Kyle Kuzma
14 PTS · 4 REB · 2 AST · 28.7 MIN
+8.43
9
Alex Caruso
9 PTS · 3 REB · 1 AST · 19.6 MIN
+6.36
10
Kenrich Williams
9 PTS · 8 REB · 1 AST · 22.7 MIN
+5.79
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:02 MIL shot clock Team TURNOVER 110–93
Q4 0:16 A. Jackson Jr. REBOUND (Off:2 Def:1) 110–93
Q4 0:20 MISS G. Trent Jr. 25' 3PT 110–93
Q4 0:41 J. McCain Free Throw 2 of 2 (13 PTS) 110–93
Q4 0:41 J. McCain Free Throw 1 of 2 (12 PTS) 110–92
Q4 0:41 A. Jackson Jr. shooting personal FOUL (1 PF) (McCain 2 FT) 110–91
Q4 0:45 J. McCain REBOUND (Off:1 Def:2) 110–91
Q4 0:47 MISS G. Trent Jr. 8' driving floating Shot 110–91
Q4 1:00 T. Antetokounmpo REBOUND (Off:0 Def:1) 110–91
Q4 1:02 MISS B. Boeheim running pullup 3PT 110–91
Q4 1:05 B. Barnhizer REBOUND (Off:0 Def:5) 110–91
Q4 1:07 MISS O. Dieng 10' turnaround fadeaway Shot 110–91
Q4 1:24 TEAM defensive REBOUND 110–91
Q4 1:25 MISS B. Barnhizer 26' 3PT 110–91
Q4 1:40 B. Barnhizer REBOUND (Off:0 Def:4) 110–91

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

OKC Oklahoma City Thunder
S Isaiah Joe 28.9m
17
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
+8.5

Lethal off-ball movement and quick-trigger perimeter shooting warped the opposing defense's entire scheme. His ability to punish late closeouts created a steady stream of high-value possessions that kept his overall impact firmly positive.

Shooting
FG 5/11 (45.5%)
3PT 4/9 (44.4%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 69.0%
USG% 18.2%
Net Rtg -24.1
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.9m
Scoring +12.3
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +4.3
Hustle +2.2
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Luguentz Dort 28.5m
9
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.9

Bricklaying from beyond the arc severely punished the offense, completely negating his typically strong hustle metrics (+4.7). Opponents sagged off him entirely, clogging the paint and stalling out half-court sets.

Shooting
FG 4/12 (33.3%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 37.5%
USG% 21.5%
Net Rtg -25.0
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.5m
Scoring +2.4
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +2.1
Hustle +1.6
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
S Cason Wallace 28.4m
3
pts
2
reb
3
ast
Impact
-7.4

Phenomenal point-of-attack harassment (+5.7) and elite hustle metrics were tragically wasted by an abysmal offensive showing. Continually short-circuiting possessions with clunky finishes at the rim ultimately sank his overall value.

Shooting
FG 1/7 (14.3%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 19.0%
USG% 12.3%
Net Rtg -3.2
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.4m
Scoring -1.6
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +0.6
Defense +1.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 30.0%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 0
S Chet Holmgren 27.5m
16
pts
13
reb
4
ast
Impact
+23.6

Elite rim deterrence (+8.9) and phenomenal defensive rebounding completely overshadowed a cold night from the perimeter. He dictated the terms of engagement in the paint, erasing opponent drives and instantly igniting transition opportunities.

Shooting
FG 5/12 (41.7%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 6/6 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 54.6%
USG% 21.9%
Net Rtg -14.8
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.5m
Scoring +10.7
Creation +1.9
Shot Making +2.1
Hustle +14.6
Defense +1.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 58.3%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 0
9
pts
8
reb
1
ast
Impact
+5.3

Despite providing a noticeable spark on the offensive glass, his struggles to finish through contact inside dragged his rating down. The gritty defensive effort wasn't quite enough to overcome the empty possessions he generated in the paint.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.7%
USG% 20.4%
Net Rtg -22.7
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.7m
Scoring +4.9
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +2.3
Hustle +10.2
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
Jared McCain 24.1m
13
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-1.4

Bleeding points on the defensive end (-0.4) and forcing heavily contested looks completely tanked his overall impact. The rookie's shot selection was highly questionable, repeatedly bailing out the defense early in the shot clock.

Shooting
FG 3/9 (33.3%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 55.8%
USG% 26.9%
Net Rtg -6.8
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.1m
Scoring +7.9
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +2.2
Hustle +2.8
Defense -2.2
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
5
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
-9.0

Stagnant offensive positioning and a failure to capitalize on driving lanes resulted in a surprisingly deep negative rating (-6.4). While his perimeter defense remained solid, his inability to bend the defense on the other end stalled out multiple lineup combinations.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 41.7%
USG% 20.4%
Net Rtg -20.0
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.2m
Scoring +1.6
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +3.1
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -8.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 4
Alex Caruso 19.6m
9
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-0.6

Wreaking absolute havoc in the passing lanes fueled a superb two-way performance. Pairing elite defensive disruption (+5.2) with timely spot-up shooting perfectly maximized his value as a low-usage connector.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 17.4%
Net Rtg -23.8
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.6m
Scoring +7.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +0.9
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 46.2%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
7
pts
2
reb
3
ast
Impact
-5.0

A massive infusion of energy and elite hustle (+6.8) defined this highly productive reserve stint. Drawing charges and keeping the ball moving offensively created a highly efficient environment whenever he stepped on the hardwood.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 64.3%
USG% 16.2%
Net Rtg -59.4
+/- -19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.8m
Scoring +4.9
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +1.6
Defense -2.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 45.5%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
2
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-13.4

Looking entirely overwhelmed by the speed of the game, his brief stint resulted in a catastrophic rating plunge (-10.0). Hesitant decision-making and an inability to generate dribble penetration crippled the second unit's offensive flow.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 22.2%
Net Rtg -29.0
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.4m
Scoring +0.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -5.9
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
0
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
-8.2

Finding ways to contribute without scoring, his aggressive rebounding and stout defensive positioning (+3.3) kept his head above water. He embraced a pure dirty-work role to salvage a positive impact during his short run.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 12.5%
Net Rtg +14.3
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.3m
Scoring -1.4
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.5
Defense +0.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
3
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.0

An incredibly hyperactive four-minute cameo yielded massive hustle metrics (+4.0) that dramatically spiked his impact score. Sprinting through screens and providing instant spacing completely energized the lineup during his brief deployment.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 18.2%
Net Rtg +25.6
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.6m
Scoring +1.9
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
MIL Milwaukee Bucks
S AJ Green 38.0m
17
pts
2
reb
3
ast
Impact
+9.5

Relentless perimeter gravity opened up driving lanes for teammates, keeping his overall impact positive despite overall shooting inconsistencies. His willingness to hunt catch-and-shoot opportunities from deep stretched the opposing defense past its breaking point.

Shooting
FG 6/14 (42.9%)
3PT 5/11 (45.5%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 60.7%
USG% 15.7%
Net Rtg +23.0
+/- +17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.0m
Scoring +11.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +5.4
Hustle +1.6
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 23.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
S Ousmane Dieng 36.5m
19
pts
11
reb
6
ast
Impact
+19.6

Elite defensive metrics (+9.8) and highly efficient perimeter scoring drove a massive positive swing for the young forward. Breaking out of his recent shooting slump, his ability to space the floor while anchoring the defensive glass created constant mismatch advantages.

Shooting
FG 7/12 (58.3%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 69.0%
USG% 16.1%
Net Rtg +20.6
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.5m
Scoring +14.3
Creation +1.7
Shot Making +5.2
Hustle +9.1
Defense -1.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 19
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 42.1%
STL 1
BLK 4
TO 0
12
pts
3
reb
7
ast
Impact
+2.9

Strong point-of-attack defensive metrics (+7.9) were entirely neutralized by erratic offensive decision-making. Clunky isolation attempts and missed mid-range looks prevented him from capitalizing on his high-effort defensive possessions.

Shooting
FG 6/15 (40.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 40.0%
USG% 24.3%
Net Rtg +15.7
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.6m
Scoring +5.4
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.7
Hustle +2.8
Defense +7.1
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 3
S Kyle Kuzma 28.7m
14
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
+1.5

A high volume of empty possessions and forced jumpers dragged his overall impact into the red (-0.9) despite decent base production. His tendency to settle for contested looks derailed offensive momentum during crucial stretches.

Shooting
FG 5/15 (33.3%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 44.1%
USG% 24.2%
Net Rtg +18.4
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.7m
Scoring +6.3
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +3.0
Hustle +4.1
Defense -3.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 30.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Jericho Sims 19.9m
8
pts
5
reb
0
ast
Impact
-3.7

Complete invisibility on the margins tanked his overall rating despite efficient finishing around the rim. Failing to generate meaningful hustle plays or defensive disruptions allowed opponents to exploit his minutes on the floor.

Shooting
FG 4/5 (80.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 80.0%
USG% 17.8%
Net Rtg +8.3
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.9m
Scoring +7.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +6.3
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -9.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 3
Bobby Portis 29.1m
15
pts
12
reb
3
ast
Impact
+27.8

Dominant interior positioning and elite defensive anchoring (+13.2) resulted in a massive overall rating. He completely controlled the painted area, pairing physical rim protection with timely floor-spacing to overwhelm his matchups.

Shooting
FG 6/11 (54.5%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 68.2%
USG% 17.1%
Net Rtg +33.9
+/- +19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.1m
Scoring +11.2
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +4.6
Hustle +15.2
Defense +7.9
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 4
BLK 0
TO 1
Pete Nance 24.0m
11
pts
7
reb
2
ast
Impact
+2.4

Capitalizing on limited touches, his highly efficient perimeter stroke provided a crucial offensive spark. Solid rotational awareness on the defensive end (+4.5) ensured his minutes were a net positive for the second unit.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 91.7%
USG% 12.5%
Net Rtg +8.5
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.0m
Scoring +9.4
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +3.2
Hustle +4.0
Defense -2.6
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
Cam Thomas 20.0m
12
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-2.4

A severe lack of secondary contributions cratered his value, as he offered virtually zero defensive resistance or hustle (+0.2). Forcing contested perimeter looks rather than moving the ball compounded the damage during his stint.

Shooting
FG 5/13 (38.5%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 44.6%
USG% 30.4%
Net Rtg +39.5
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.0m
Scoring +6.0
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
2
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.2

Brief rotational minutes yielded a slightly positive rating due to mistake-free execution. He stayed within his role, securing a few loose balls without forcing the issue offensively.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 12.5%
Net Rtg -10.9
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.0m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +0.2
Hustle +3.8
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.5

Brought in strictly for energy, his frantic closeouts generated a minor hustle bump but disrupted the team's defensive shell. The lack of offensive involvement kept his overall impact slightly in the red.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -71.4
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.2m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-12.5

An abysmal three-minute stint featured multiple forced, out-of-rhythm jumpers that instantly killed offensive flow. Producing zero defensive or hustle stats further highlighted a completely hollow cameo appearance.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 37.5%
Net Rtg -71.4
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.2m
Scoring -2.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0