LAL

2025-26 Season

DALTON KNECHT

Los Angeles Lakers | Forward | 6-6
Dalton Knecht
4.0 PPG
1.4 RPG
0.3 APG
10.3 MPG
-1.9 Impact

Knecht produces at an below average rate for a 10-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-1.9
Scoring +2.3
Points 4.0 PPG × +1.00 = +4.0
Missed 2PT 0.5/g × -0.78 = -0.4
Missed 3PT 1.4/g × -0.87 = -1.2
Missed FT 0.1/g × -1.00 = -0.1
Creation +0.5
Assists 0.3/g × +0.50 = +0.1
Off. Rebounds 0.3/g × +1.26 = +0.4
Turnovers -0.8
Turnovers 0.4/g × -1.95 = -0.8
Defense -0.9
Steals 0.2/g × +2.30 = +0.5
Blocks 0.2/g × +0.90 = +0.2
Def. Rebounds 1.0/g × +0.30 = +0.3
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +0.7
Contested Shots 1.5/g × +0.20 = +0.3
Deflections 0.3/g × +0.65 = +0.2
Loose Balls 0.1/g × +0.60 = +0.1
Screen Assists 0.2/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Raw Impact +1.8
Baseline (game-average expected) −3.7
Net Impact
-1.9
21st pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 22th
5.7 PPG
Efficiency 6th
44.9% TS
Playmaking 3th
0.5 APG
Rebounding 6th
2.0 RPG
Rim Protection 17th
0.10/min
Hustle 5th
0.07/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 67th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Dalton Knecht's early campaign was defined by violent swings between looking utterly overwhelmed and flashing sudden, lethal off-ball gravity. Even when he managed to fill the box score, his underlying metrics often painted a grim picture. Look at his 15-point effort on 10/29 vs MIN, where a -1.9 impact score revealed the hidden cost of his poor spacing value as he clanked four of his five attempts from deep. Yet, he occasionally found ways to tilt the floor without hunting his own shot. Despite scoring just 9 points on 11/15 vs MIL, Knecht generated a solid +2.4 impact score because his stifling perimeter defense completely locked down opposing guards. When his jumper actually connected, the offensive ceiling was undeniable. During his 11/12 vs OKC outing, Knecht posted a massive +6.2 impact score by using brilliant off-ball movement to punish defenders in transition, pouring in 16 points on near-perfect 6-of-7 shooting.

A crippling perimeter slump and erratic bench usage defined this brutal mid-season stretch for Dalton Knecht. He occasionally flashed his pure scoring ceiling, like when he poured in 10 points in just four minutes on 12/30 vs DET, generating a massive +8.8 impact score through flawless shot-making. However, those fleeting sparks were buried under a mountain of forced jumpers and defensive lapses. Look no further than his disastrous 19 minutes on 01/07 vs SAS, where he bricked all five of his three-point attempts to tank his offensive value and post a brutal -10.0 impact score. Even when he managed to put the ball in the basket on 02/10 vs SAS, scoring 9 points in 16 minutes, his overall impact remained deep in the red at -3.6. That negative rating stemmed directly from a complete lack of secondary playmaking and an inability to hit from deep, allowing defenders to sag off and clog the lane. Until he stops hijacking possessions to shoot his way out of funks, his minutes will continue to bleed value.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Below-average consistency. Knecht is negative impact in 68% of games, with scoring moving ~4 points game-to-game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 41% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Average defender. Knecht doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

Flat trajectory all season — first-half impact -1.9, second-half -1.9. No major shifts, which fits with the overall steadiness.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 3 games. Longest cold streak: 7 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 76 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

K. Johnson 27.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
G. Trent Jr. 26.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
C. Spencer 22.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 3
I. Joe 20.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.49
PTS 10
T. Shannon Jr. 18.6 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 4
J. Grant 17.7 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 2
D. DiVincenzo 17.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
S. Sharpe 16.4 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.3
PTS 5
M. Conley 15.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 4
V. Krejčí 14.7 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 2

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

G. Trent Jr. 29.2 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
T. Camara 19.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.25
PTS 5
M. Peavy 18.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Green 18.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 6
S. Sharpe 17.8 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 5
K. Johnson 17.2 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 5
G. Jackson 17.1 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 2
I. Joe 15.4 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.32
PTS 5
J. Champagnie 14.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 3
J. Grant 14.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.7
PTS 10

SEASON STATS

50
Games
4.0
PPG
1.4
RPG
0.3
APG
0.2
SPG
0.2
BPG
44.6
FG%
30.4
3P%
70.0
FT%
10.3
MPG

GAME LOG

50 games played