Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
ATL lead HOU lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
HOU 2P — 3P —
ATL 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 185 attempts

HOU HOU Shot-making Δ

Durant Hard 12/22 +5.5
Sheppard Hard 5/14 -1.6
Sengun Open 3/14 -9.6
Smith Jr. 5/12 -0.9
Thompson Open 4/9 -2.7
Okogie Hard 3/6 +2.3
Tate 2/6 -2.2
Capela Open 4/4 +2.4
Holiday 1/4 -1.6
Green Hard 0/1 -1.1

ATL ATL Shot-making Δ

McCollum Hard 9/19 +3.7
Alexander-Walker 6/16 -2.9
Kispert 7/13 +1.3
Daniels 2/12 -9.7
Newell 2/8 -4.5
Gueye Open 1/8 -8.1
Krejčí 4/7 +1.6
Koloko 3/7 -2.2
Kennard 0/3 -3.1
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
HOU
ATL
39/92 Field Goals 34/93
42.4% Field Goal % 36.6%
12/31 3-Pointers 12/39
38.7% 3-Point % 30.8%
14/20 Free Throws 6/7
70.0% Free Throw % 85.7%
51.6% True Shooting % 44.8%
68 Total Rebounds 51
22 Offensive 14
37 Defensive 32
23 Assists 19
1.92 Assist/TO Ratio 1.58
11 Turnovers 12
8 Steals 7
14 Blocks 5
11 Fouls 16
44 Points in Paint 40
17 Fast Break Pts 19
23 Points off TOs 14
24 Second Chance Pts 26
31 Bench Points 30
22 Largest Lead 7
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Kevin Durant
31 PTS · 5 REB · 4 AST · 34.4 MIN
+19.82
2
Jabari Smith Jr.
14 PTS · 8 REB · 3 AST · 31.6 MIN
+19.53
3
Clint Capela
10 PTS · 7 REB · 2 AST · 17.9 MIN
+18.16
4
Amen Thompson
9 PTS · 7 REB · 5 AST · 35.0 MIN
+15.16
5
Josh Okogie
10 PTS · 10 REB · 1 AST · 33.8 MIN
+14.92
6
CJ McCollum
23 PTS · 5 REB · 2 AST · 30.6 MIN
+12.45
7
Corey Kispert
17 PTS · 2 REB · 2 AST · 31.0 MIN
+11.93
8
Alperen Sengun
9 PTS · 13 REB · 4 AST · 27.9 MIN
+8.57
9
Dyson Daniels
4 PTS · 6 REB · 7 AST · 31.5 MIN
+8.5
10
Reed Sheppard
13 PTS · 4 REB · 4 AST · 25.8 MIN
+8.38
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:15 A. Holiday REBOUND (Off:0 Def:2) 104–86
Q4 0:18 MISS A. Newell 8' driving Hook 104–86
Q4 0:35 A. Newell REBOUND (Off:3 Def:4) 104–86
Q4 0:38 MISS J. Green 24' 3PT 104–86
Q4 0:58 V. Krejčí 11' driving floating bank Jump Shot (9 PTS) (K. Wallace 1 AST) 104–86
Q4 1:08 A. Holiday personal FOUL (2 PF) 104–84
Q4 1:23 V. Krejčí REBOUND (Off:0 Def:4) 104–84
Q4 1:26 MISS A. Holiday driving Layup 104–84
Q4 1:45 C. Kispert 11' driving floating Jump Shot (17 PTS) (M. Gueye 2 AST) 104–84
Q4 1:51 A. Newell REBOUND (Off:3 Def:3) 104–82
Q4 1:56 MISS J. Tate 24' 3PT 104–82
Q4 2:09 C. Koloko take personal FOUL (4 PF) 104–82
Q4 2:15 J. Okogie REBOUND (Off:7 Def:3) 104–82
Q4 2:18 MISS D. Daniels 7' driving Hook 104–82
Q4 2:39 K. Durant 24' 3PT (31 PTS) (R. Sheppard 4 AST) 104–82

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

ATL Atlanta Hawks
20
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
-0.9

High-volume inefficiency and forced offensive actions cratered his net impact despite decent raw scoring totals. He repeatedly hijacked the offense with contested, off-the-dribble jumpers that fueled opponent transition attacks.

Shooting
FG 6/16 (37.5%)
3PT 3/8 (37.5%)
FT 5/5 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 54.9%
USG% 25.6%
Net Rtg -38.8
+/- -26
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.9m
Scoring +12.1
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +4.4
Hustle +1.5
Defense -3.1
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
S Dyson Daniels 31.5m
4
pts
6
reb
7
ast
Impact
-3.9

Horrific offensive execution was miraculously offset by absolute terrorization on the defensive end and relentless hustle. He blew up multiple dribble hand-offs and secured critical long rebounds to keep possessions alive.

Shooting
FG 2/12 (16.7%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 16.7%
USG% 18.8%
Net Rtg +3.4
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.5m
Scoring -4.4
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +6.7
Defense +4.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 23
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 30.4%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 1
S Corey Kispert 31.0m
17
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
+2.9

A massive scoring surge completely masked how much he gave back on the other end, resulting in a negative net score. He was repeatedly hunted in isolation matchups, bleeding points faster than he could score them.

Shooting
FG 7/13 (53.8%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 61.2%
USG% 22.9%
Net Rtg -25.8
+/- -17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.0m
Scoring +11.4
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +4.3
Hustle +0.6
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 41.7%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
S Vít Krejčí 27.0m
9
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-2.6

Despite efficient spot-up shooting, his overall impact bled into the red due to poor defensive rotations. Opposing wings consistently targeted his closeouts, blowing past him to collapse the defense.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 64.3%
USG% 13.8%
Net Rtg +6.4
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.0m
Scoring +6.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +1.2
Defense +1.0
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
6
pts
7
reb
2
ast
Impact
+1.1

Vertical spacing and disciplined rim protection drove a positive impact despite minimal offensive usage. He deterred multiple drives during a crucial third-quarter stretch simply by maintaining verticality in the paint.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 42.9%
USG% 13.8%
Net Rtg -26.0
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.7m
Scoring +2.6
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +7.9
Defense +1.7
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 26.7%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
CJ McCollum 30.6m
23
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
+11.0

Perimeter scoring volume hid a negative overall impact, largely driven by defensive exploitation. He struggled to stay in front of quicker guards, forcing the back-line defense into constant rotation.

Shooting
FG 9/19 (47.4%)
3PT 5/11 (45.5%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 60.5%
USG% 29.3%
Net Rtg -31.4
+/- -20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.6m
Scoring +15.6
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +7.0
Hustle +5.4
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -5.9
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 64.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
2
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-15.1

Brutal interior finishing completely derailed his stint, dragging his net score deep into the negative. He generated decent looks through offensive rebounding but failed to convert the second-chance opportunities through contact.

Shooting
FG 1/8 (12.5%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 12.5%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -10.5
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.5m
Scoring -4.6
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +1.9
Defense -1.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
Asa Newell 20.3m
5
pts
7
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.2

Rushed shots in the paint and defensive lapses resulted in a heavy negative impact during his rotation minutes. He struggled with the physicality of the interior matchups, getting pushed off his spots on both ends.

Shooting
FG 2/8 (25.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 31.3%
USG% 18.4%
Net Rtg -28.2
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.3m
Scoring -0.1
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.3
Hustle +8.9
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
Luke Kennard 16.4m
0
pts
7
reb
1
ast
Impact
-3.3

A complete offensive ghost whose inability to space the floor severely cramped the team's half-court offense. Defenders aggressively top-sided him, completely denying him the ball and rendering him a non-factor.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 7.1%
Net Rtg -18.3
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.4m
Scoring -2.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +8.9
Defense +0.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-10.6

A fleeting appearance that yielded a single extra pass before returning to the bench. He barely had time to break a sweat in this brief rotational bridge.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +133.3
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.1m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
HOU Houston Rockets
S Amen Thompson 35.0m
9
pts
7
reb
5
ast
Impact
+12.6

Defensive disruption was the undeniable catalyst here, masking a sharp dip in his usual offensive volume. He consistently jumped passing lanes and denied entry passes, turning defense into transition opportunities.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/4 (25.0%)
Advanced
TS% 41.8%
USG% 12.4%
Net Rtg +19.4
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.0m
Scoring +3.1
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +8.9
Defense +5.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 58.3%
STL 2
BLK 3
TO 0
S Kevin Durant 34.4m
31
pts
5
reb
4
ast
Impact
+22.6

Raw offensive production was heavily undercut by defensive lapses and likely live-ball turnovers, dropping his net impact far below his box score value. He settled for heavily contested mid-range pull-ups late in the clock rather than moving the ball against double teams.

Shooting
FG 12/22 (54.5%)
3PT 3/8 (37.5%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 65.2%
USG% 31.4%
Net Rtg +18.2
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.4m
Scoring +23.5
Creation +1.7
Shot Making +7.6
Hustle +5.4
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 54.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
S Josh Okogie 33.8m
10
pts
10
reb
1
ast
Impact
+7.9

Hyper-efficient perimeter execution and timely cuts to the basket fueled a highly positive stint. He capitalized perfectly on defensive breakdowns, punishing closeouts without forcing bad looks.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 72.7%
USG% 9.2%
Net Rtg +21.5
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.8m
Scoring +7.2
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +12.7
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 30.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
14
pts
8
reb
3
ast
Impact
+17.2

Elite weak-side rim rotations and switchability drove a massive defensive score, completely salvaging a rough shooting night. His ability to blow up pick-and-roll actions at the point of attack defined his high overall impact.

Shooting
FG 5/12 (41.7%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 54.3%
USG% 19.5%
Net Rtg +26.0
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.6m
Scoring +8.9
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +10.2
Defense +9.6
Turnovers -5.9
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 26.7%
STL 3
BLK 5
TO 3
S Alperen Sengun 27.9m
9
pts
13
reb
4
ast
Impact
+3.9

A severe offensive regression and brutal interior finishing nearly erased his positive defensive contributions. Opponents successfully crowded his post touches, forcing him into rushed, off-balance hooks that killed possessions.

Shooting
FG 3/14 (21.4%)
3PT 0/0
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 28.6%
USG% 24.0%
Net Rtg +9.3
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.9m
Scoring +0.3
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +15.5
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 3
TO 2
13
pts
4
reb
4
ast
Impact
+1.9

High-volume perimeter bricking neutralized his excellent hustle and off-ball activity. He generated extra possessions via loose ball recoveries but immediately gave the value back by forcing contested jumpers early in the clock.

Shooting
FG 5/14 (35.7%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 46.4%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg +40.8
+/- +20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.8m
Scoring +6.7
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +3.9
Hustle +1.2
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 36.4%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
4
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.2

Poor shot selection and clunky finishing around the rim dragged his overall impact into the negative despite solid defensive metrics. He repeatedly drove into traffic without an exit plan, stalling the half-court offense.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 15.6%
Net Rtg +13.2
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.2m
Scoring +0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +2.8
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Clint Capela 17.9m
10
pts
7
reb
2
ast
Impact
+8.5

Absolute perfection in his role as a rim-runner and drop-coverage anchor yielded a massive net impact in limited action. He sealed off the paint completely during the second quarter, converting every lob and putback opportunity he saw.

Shooting
FG 4/4 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 102.5%
USG% 12.8%
Net Rtg +55.1
+/- +17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.9m
Scoring +10.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +5.0
Defense +3.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 26.7%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 0
4
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.5

A lack of offensive rhythm and poor perimeter containment resulted in a decisively negative shift. He struggled to navigate screens at the point of attack, allowing straight-line drives that compromised the defensive shell.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 41.0%
USG% 29.4%
Net Rtg +6.3
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.0m
Scoring +0.9
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +0.6
Defense -0.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Jeff Green 2.1m
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-11.4

A brief, ineffective garbage-time cameo defined by a rushed perimeter miss. He failed to establish any rhythm during his short stint on the floor.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg -133.3
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.1m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
JD Davison 2.1m
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.8

Logged empty minutes at the end of the rotation without registering a single meaningful statistical event. His stint was purely rotational filler to close out the clock.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -133.3
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.1m
Scoring +1.4
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +0.6
Defense -0.7
Turnovers -0.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.2

Burned two minutes of clock in a completely neutral appearance. He simply occupied space on the floor during the final sequences.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -133.3
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.1m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0