Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
LAL lead HOU lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click a shooter to isolate their shots on the court
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 161 attempts

HOU HOU Shot-making Δ

Sengun 9/20 -1.9
Smith Jr. 7/16 +0.6
Eason 4/14 -6.2
Durant Hard 7/12 +4.4
Thompson 6/10 +2.0
Okogie 3/6 -0.3
Sheppard Hard 0/4 -3.0
Holiday Hard 0/3 -2.9
Capela Open 0/3 -3.7
Tate Hard 0/1 -1.1

LAL LAL Shot-making Δ

James 8/20 -2.5
Smart Hard 8/13 +7.7
Kennard Hard 8/13 +6.6
Hachimura Hard 5/10 +2.4
Ayton Open 3/8 -3.4
Vanderbilt 0/3 -3.4
Hayes 1/2 -0.1
LaRavia 0/2 -2.2
James Hard 0/1 -0.9
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
HOU
LAL
36/89 Field Goals 33/72
40.4% Field Goal % 45.8%
7/29 3-Pointers 13/28
24.1% 3-Point % 46.4%
15/19 Free Throws 22/28
78.9% Free Throw % 78.6%
48.3% True Shooting % 59.9%
54 Total Rebounds 48
17 Offensive 9
25 Defensive 28
23 Assists 21
1.53 Assist/TO Ratio 1.40
15 Turnovers 12
8 Steals 11
6 Blocks 5
22 Fouls 20
54 Points in Paint 34
20 Fast Break Pts 17
15 Points off TOs 16
21 Second Chance Pts 17
10 Bench Points 6
4 Largest Lead 15
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Marcus Smart
25 PTS · 2 REB · 7 AST · 35.5 MIN
+29.26
2
Alperen Sengun
20 PTS · 11 REB · 5 AST · 35.2 MIN
+26.96
3
Luke Kennard
23 PTS · 6 REB · 2 AST · 42.0 MIN
+24.82
4
LeBron James
28 PTS · 8 REB · 7 AST · 39.2 MIN
+15.39
5
Amen Thompson
16 PTS · 5 REB · 9 AST · 42.2 MIN
+12.19
6
Jaxson Hayes
6 PTS · 4 REB · 1 AST · 21.4 MIN
+10.35
7
Jabari Smith Jr.
18 PTS · 6 REB · 1 AST · 39.1 MIN
+10.3
8
Rui Hachimura
13 PTS · 5 REB · 2 AST · 42.6 MIN
+10.02
9
Tari Eason
10 PTS · 8 REB · 1 AST · 27.0 MIN
+6.97
10
Kevin Durant
23 PTS · 6 REB · 4 AST · 41.0 MIN
+6.19
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:08 R. Hachimura REBOUND (Off:1 Def:4) 94–101
Q4 0:12 MISS J. Smith Jr. 33' pullup 3PT 94–101
Q4 0:14 L. Kennard Free Throw 2 of 2 (23 PTS) 94–101
Q4 0:14 L. Kennard Free Throw 1 of 2 (22 PTS) 94–100
Q4 0:14 A. Thompson take personal FOUL (4 PF) (Kennard 2 FT) 94–99
Q4 0:21 TEAM offensive REBOUND 94–99
Q4 0:22 MISS R. Hachimura 24' 3PT 94–99
Q4 0:46 A. Sengun reverse Layup (20 PTS) (A. Thompson 9 AST) 94–99
Q4 0:55 L. James cutting DUNK (28 PTS) (M. Smart 7 AST) 92–99
Q4 1:08 M. Smart STEAL (5 STL) 92–97
Q4 1:08 K. Durant bad pass TURNOVER (9 TO) 92–97
Q4 1:17 A. Sengun REBOUND (Off:5 Def:6) 92–97
Q4 1:19 MISS L. James 15' turnaround fadeaway bank Shot 92–97
Q4 1:41 A. Sengun DUNK (18 PTS) 92–97
Q4 1:56 M. Smart Free Throw 2 of 2 (25 PTS) 90–97

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

LAL Los Angeles Lakers
S Rui Hachimura 42.6m
13
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
+3.7

Hachimura provided an efficient perimeter spark, knocking down 3-of-6 from deep to drive a +9.0 Scoring credit. Despite smothering his direct matchups into a 5-of-16 shooting clip, his overall defensive metrics slipped (-3.4 Defense) over his massive 42-minute workload.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 65.0%
USG% 11.2%
Net Rtg -2.9
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 42.6m
Scoring +9.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +4.4
Defense -3.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 31.2%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Luke Kennard 42.0m
23
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
+26.3

Kennard transcended his typical spot-up role, pouring in 23 points on highly efficient 8-of-13 shooting to generate a +19.3 Scoring credit. He surprisingly paired this perimeter shot-making (+5.4 ShotMaking) with immense defensive activity, logging 3 steals and 5 deflections to drive a +7.6 Hustle credit.

Shooting
FG 8/13 (61.5%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 77.9%
USG% 19.1%
Net Rtg +1.1
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 42.0m
Scoring +19.3
Creation +1.7
Shot Making +5.4
Hustle +7.6
Defense +5.5
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 47.1%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 2
S LeBron James 39.2m
28
pts
8
reb
7
ast
Impact
+13.8

James relentlessly attacked to generate a +17.7 Scoring credit, living at the foul line (10-of-14 FT) to compensate for a 40% shooting night from the floor. He completely erased his direct assignments (0-of-4 shooting), though his playmaking (+4.5 Creation) was somewhat dampened by a -5.9 Turnovers penalty.

Shooting
FG 8/20 (40.0%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 10/14 (71.4%)
Advanced
TS% 53.5%
USG% 34.5%
Net Rtg +6.7
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.2m
Scoring +17.7
Creation +4.5
Shot Making +3.7
Hustle +3.4
Defense +0.2
Turnovers -5.9
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
S Marcus Smart 35.5m
25
pts
2
reb
7
ast
Impact
+27.2

Smart delivered a spectacular two-way masterclass, erupting for 25 points on scorching 5-of-7 perimeter shooting to fuel a +6.3 ShotMaking credit. He was equally devastating on the other end (+11.4 Defense), racking up 5 steals and 6 deflections to completely disrupt the opponent's offensive flow.

Shooting
FG 8/13 (61.5%)
3PT 5/7 (71.4%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 82.2%
USG% 23.7%
Net Rtg +4.3
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.5m
Scoring +20.9
Creation +2.9
Shot Making +6.3
Hustle +2.5
Defense +11.4
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 5
BLK 1
TO 3
S Deandre Ayton 26.6m
6
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
-7.8

Ayton's typical interior dominance vanished, as he managed just 6 points on 3-of-8 shooting for a meager +1.6 Scoring credit. While he remained active contesting shots (11 contests), his direct matchups found success against him (7-of-16), and his offensive passivity severely limited his overall impact.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 37.5%
USG% 16.4%
Net Rtg -10.0
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.6m
Scoring +1.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +3.4
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 43.8%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
Jaxson Hayes 21.4m
6
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
+3.9

Hayes anchored the interior with relentless energy, contesting 9 shots and swatting 2 to generate a +5.1 Hustle credit. His defensive presence (+2.8 Defense) was stifling, as he completely erased his direct matchups, holding them to a dismal 2-of-9 shooting mark.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 71.4%
USG% 8.0%
Net Rtg +24.0
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.4m
Scoring +4.7
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +0.2
Hustle +5.1
Defense +2.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 22.2%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 0
Jake LaRavia 15.8m
0
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-17.4

LaRavia was an offensive zero during his 15 minutes, failing to score while bleeding value through a -5.4 Turnovers penalty. His struggles carried over to the defensive end (-3.2 Defense), where his direct matchups comfortably shot 6-of-13 against him.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 11.1%
Net Rtg +31.9
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.8m
Scoring -1.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +2.5
Defense -3.2
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 46.2%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
0
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.6

Vanderbilt's offensive limitations were glaringly apparent, as he missed all three of his shots to incur a -3.0 Scoring penalty. However, he salvaged his rotation minutes through sheer effort, grabbing 5 rebounds to drive a +4.4 Hustle credit while holding his matchups to 2-of-7 shooting.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 9.4%
Net Rtg +36.5
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.7m
Scoring -3.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +4.4
Defense +1.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-12.8

James barely saw the floor, logging just three minutes of mop-up duty. He failed to register a point and gave the ball away once, resulting in a -2.4 Turnovers penalty during his brief cameo.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 28.6%
Net Rtg +16.7
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.3m
Scoring -0.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
HOU Houston Rockets
S Amen Thompson 42.2m
16
pts
5
reb
9
ast
Impact
+6.4

Thompson orchestrated the offense effectively with 9 assists, driving a +13.0 Scoring credit through high-percentage finishing (6-of-10 FG). Despite his strong playmaking and defensive stifling (matchups shot just 5-of-14), his value was undercut by decision-making lapses that led to a -7.1 Turnovers penalty.

Shooting
FG 6/10 (60.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 65.6%
USG% 15.2%
Net Rtg +1.3
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 42.2m
Scoring +13.0
Creation +2.7
Shot Making +2.3
Hustle +5.4
Defense -0.1
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 35.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
S Kevin Durant 41.0m
23
pts
6
reb
4
ast
Impact
-1.6

Durant scored efficiently (7-of-12 FG) to generate a +19.2 Scoring credit, but his ball security completely collapsed. Surrendering 9 turnovers (well above his 3.1 average) resulted in a massive -21.3 Turnovers penalty that erased his offensive contributions.

Shooting
FG 7/12 (58.3%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 8/9 (88.9%)
Advanced
TS% 72.1%
USG% 26.0%
Net Rtg -2.6
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 41.0m
Scoring +19.2
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +4.3
Hustle +7.6
Defense -3.4
Turnovers -21.3
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 9
18
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
+2.8

Smith Jr. provided a solid offensive punch, blending perimeter volume (3-of-7 from deep) with tough shot conversion (+4.0 ShotMaking). However, his defensive impact waned (-2.6 Defense), as his primary matchups found comfortable rhythm, shooting 6-of-13 when he was the nearest defender.

Shooting
FG 7/16 (43.8%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 53.3%
USG% 19.1%
Net Rtg -15.1
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.1m
Scoring +10.5
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +4.0
Hustle +2.8
Defense -2.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 46.2%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
S Alperen Sengun 35.2m
20
pts
11
reb
5
ast
Impact
+26.2

Sengun completely dictated the game through sheer activity, racking up 6 deflections and 4 steals to fuel a massive +13.0 Hustle credit. He paired this defensive disruption (+6.7 Defense) with steady interior production, posting a double-double while holding his matchups to 4-of-8 shooting.

Shooting
FG 9/20 (45.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 46.9%
USG% 24.7%
Net Rtg -3.3
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.2m
Scoring +11.6
Creation +2.6
Shot Making +3.2
Hustle +13.0
Defense +6.7
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 4
BLK 2
TO 1
S Josh Okogie 24.1m
7
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-3.0

Earning a bump in playing time (24 minutes), Okogie capitalized offensively with a +4.6 Scoring credit on efficient 3-of-6 shooting. While he remained active in the passing lanes with 3 deflections, his overall defensive impact slipped (-2.2 Defense) despite holding his direct matchups to 2-of-5 shooting.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 58.3%
USG% 11.5%
Net Rtg -6.2
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.1m
Scoring +4.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +2.5
Defense -2.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Tari Eason 27.0m
10
pts
8
reb
1
ast
Impact
+3.7

Eason's relentless motor salvaged an otherwise brutal shooting night (4-of-14 FG), as he crashed the glass for 8 rebounds to generate a +10.2 Hustle credit. He also locked down his assignments on the perimeter, smothering opponents into a dismal 3-of-11 shooting mark when serving as the primary defender.

Shooting
FG 4/14 (28.6%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 35.7%
USG% 23.1%
Net Rtg -7.8
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.0m
Scoring +2.6
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +10.2
Defense +0.2
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 27.3%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
3
ast
Impact
-10.4

Sheppard endured a frigid shooting night, missing all four of his attempts from the field to incur a -3.0 Scoring penalty. He managed to salvage some value on the other end (+2.4 Defense) by logging 2 deflections, though his direct assignments still shot 3-of-4 against him.

Shooting
FG 0/4 (0.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 12.9%
Net Rtg +4.5
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.6m
Scoring -3.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +2.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.2

Tate was a virtual non-factor during his nine minutes of action, failing to register a single point or peripheral stat outside of one rebound. His lack of offensive gravity resulted in a -0.8 Scoring credit, and he offered little resistance defensively (-0.9 Defense).

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 5.0%
Net Rtg -23.5
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.9m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.3
Defense -0.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.4

Holiday failed to find any offensive rhythm during his brief rotation stint, missing all three of his shots to post a -2.2 Scoring credit. He did offer a silver lining on the less glamorous end (+2.4 Defense), holding his primary matchup to 1-of-2 shooting while grabbing a steal.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 17.6%
Net Rtg -30.8
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.3m
Scoring -2.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +2.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.2

Capela's brief four-minute cameo was defined by total offensive invisibility, missing all three of his shot attempts for a -2.4 Scoring penalty. He managed to secure a +2.5 Hustle credit through a deflection and a contest, but his direct matchups converted both of their attempts against him.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 23.1%
Net Rtg -90.3
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.7m
Scoring -2.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +2.5
Defense +0.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0