Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
HOU lead LAL lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click a shooter to isolate their shots on the court
LAL 2P — 3P —
HOU 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 155 attempts

LAL LAL Shot-making Δ

Ayton Open 9/12 +4.7
Hachimura 6/10 +2.7
James 2/9 -4.9
Kennard Hard 3/8 -1.8
Smart 3/8 -2.3
Vanderbilt 4/6 +1.2
James Hard 2/5 -0.1
Smith Jr. Hard 2/5 -0.1
LaRavia Open 2/5 -1.9
Knecht Hard 2/3 +3.1

HOU HOU Shot-making Δ

Thompson 10/16 +3.0
Smith Jr. Hard 4/15 -5.8
Sheppard Hard 6/12 +4.8
Sengun 6/12 -1.1
Eason 7/10 +3.5
Holiday 3/8 -0.1
Okogie 2/5 -0.6
Finney-Smith Hard 0/2 -1.9
Tate Open 1/1 +0.6
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
LAL
HOU
37/74 Field Goals 39/81
50.0% Field Goal % 48.1%
5/22 3-Pointers 12/30
22.7% 3-Point % 40.0%
17/21 Free Throws 25/31
81.0% Free Throw % 80.6%
57.7% True Shooting % 60.8%
47 Total Rebounds 43
10 Offensive 11
27 Defensive 24
23 Assists 19
0.96 Assist/TO Ratio 1.46
23 Turnovers 13
6 Steals 17
7 Blocks 4
20 Fouls 22
54 Points in Paint 46
18 Fast Break Pts 23
19 Points off TOs 30
13 Second Chance Pts 20
38 Bench Points 20
5 Largest Lead 28
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Tari Eason
20 PTS · 8 REB · 2 AST · 30.4 MIN
+27.24
2
Amen Thompson
23 PTS · 4 REB · 7 AST · 40.6 MIN
+17.92
3
Reed Sheppard
17 PTS · 1 REB · 3 AST · 28.6 MIN
+17.28
4
Deandre Ayton
19 PTS · 10 REB · 0 AST · 25.4 MIN
+15.43
5
Jabari Smith Jr.
16 PTS · 8 REB · 3 AST · 41.5 MIN
+14.22
6
Josh Okogie
5 PTS · 4 REB · 1 AST · 18.7 MIN
+11.8
7
Alperen Sengun
19 PTS · 6 REB · 2 AST · 33.0 MIN
+11.04
8
Rui Hachimura
13 PTS · 3 REB · 1 AST · 29.6 MIN
+10.92
9
Marcus Smart
9 PTS · 2 REB · 5 AST · 30.6 MIN
+9.26
10
Jarred Vanderbilt
8 PTS · 4 REB · 0 AST · 13.9 MIN
+8.82
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:03 J. Davison REBOUND (Off:0 Def:2) 96–115
Q4 0:06 MISS N. Smith Jr. 26' step back 3PT 96–115
Q4 0:17 B. James REBOUND (Off:2 Def:0) 96–115
Q4 0:20 MISS D. Knecht 26' pullup 3PT 96–115
Q4 0:32 J. Davison Free Throw 2 of 2 (2 PTS) 96–115
Q4 0:32 J. Davison Free Throw 1 of 2 (1 PTS) 96–114
Q4 0:32 M. Kleber shooting personal FOUL (1 PF) (Davison 2 FT) 96–113
Q4 0:49 B. James driving Layup (5 PTS) 96–113
Q4 0:57 J. Davison backcourt TURNOVER (2 TO) 94–113
Q4 1:11 Ejection A. Holiday 94–113
Q4 1:11 Ejection A. Thiero 94–113
Q4 1:11 A. Thiero double technical FOUL (1 Tech) 94–113
Q4 1:11 A. Holiday double technical FOUL (1 Tech) 94–113
Q4 1:11 D. Knecht 25' 3PT (8 PTS) (M. Kleber 2 AST) 94–113
Q4 1:12 M. Kleber REBOUND (Off:1 Def:0) 91–113

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

HOU Houston Rockets
16
pts
8
reb
3
ast
Impact
+11.6

A brutal perimeter shooting slump sabotaged his offensive efficiency, forcing him to rely entirely on his defensive motor to stay afloat. He clanked his way to 2-of-10 from beyond the arc, though his +8.8 offensive credit suggests he still found ways to contribute via free throws and creation. His 3 steals and 5 contests anchored a strong +8.7 defensive score, proving he can impact winning even when his jumper betrays him.

Shooting
FG 4/15 (26.7%)
3PT 2/10 (20.0%)
FT 6/6 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 45.4%
USG% 20.4%
Net Rtg +29.3
+/- +24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 41.5m
Scoring +7.7
Creation +2.1
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +3.4
Defense +5.0
Turnovers -1.1
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 1
S Amen Thompson 40.5m
23
pts
4
reb
7
ast
Impact
+10.2

Unstoppable rim pressure and elite playmaking drove a masterclass in offensive orchestration. He carved up the defense for 23 points on a clinical 10-of-16 from the floor, powering a massive +17.2 offensive credit. While 4 turnovers showed slight recklessness, his 7 assists and 3 loose-ball recoveries highlighted a relentless, high-motor engine.

Shooting
FG 10/16 (62.5%)
3PT 0/0
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 66.4%
USG% 23.3%
Net Rtg +27.3
+/- +21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.5m
Scoring +18.3
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +5.0
Hustle +3.1
Defense -0.8
Turnovers -9.5
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 4
S Alperen Sengun 33.0m
19
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
+11.6

Relentless interior physicality and foul-drawing defined a highly productive offensive shift. He generated a massive +13.6 offensive credit by living at the line (13 free throw attempts) and converting efficiently from the floor (6-of-12). His 5 screen assists further showcased his value as a bruising offensive hub who constantly creates angles for his teammates.

Shooting
FG 6/12 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 7/13 (53.8%)
Advanced
TS% 53.6%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg +10.4
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.0m
Scoring +11.8
Creation +1.9
Shot Making +2.2
Hustle +7.6
Defense +0.7
Turnovers -4.7
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
S Tari Eason 30.4m
20
pts
8
reb
2
ast
Impact
+22.8

Absolute two-way terrorization defined his night, as he wreaked havoc in every conceivable facet of the game. He racked up 5 steals and 7 deflections to fuel a staggering +13.7 defensive credit, completely suffocating his matchups. On the other end, his hyper-efficient 20 points (7-of-10 shooting) drove a massive +16.6 offensive score, cementing a dominant performance.

Shooting
FG 7/10 (70.0%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 85.0%
USG% 21.2%
Net Rtg +48.9
+/- +31
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.4m
Scoring +17.6
Creation +2.2
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +3.4
Defense +10.2
Turnovers -5.4
STL 5
BLK 1
TO 2
S Reed Sheppard 28.6m
17
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
+13.7

Lethal perimeter shot-making and highly disruptive perimeter defense fueled a brilliant two-way showcase. He torched the nets from deep (4-of-7 on threes) to anchor a stellar +12.5 offensive credit. Defensively, his 5 deflections and 3 steals translated into a +6.0 defensive score, proving he can swing a game entirely through anticipation and spacing.

Shooting
FG 6/12 (50.0%)
3PT 4/7 (57.1%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 68.3%
USG% 19.1%
Net Rtg +36.3
+/- +22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.6m
Scoring +13.0
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +4.9
Hustle +0.3
Defense +5.2
Turnovers -2.4
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 1
2
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.3

A complete lack of offensive gravity rendered him an afterthought during his 19 minutes on the floor. He failed to hit a single field goal, managing just a +0.8 offensive credit while offering minimal resistance on the other end (-0.7 defense score). His inability to stretch the floor or secure the glass severely capped his utility.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 34.7%
USG% 7.5%
Net Rtg -36.1
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.3m
Scoring +0.6
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.7
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
9
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-0.7

Timely perimeter sniping provided a crucial offensive lift during his rotation minutes. He drilled 3-of-5 from beyond the arc to secure a +3.8 offensive credit, perfectly executing his role as a floor-spacer. He also chipped in a solid +3.2 defensive score, making for a well-rounded and highly effective cameo.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 56.3%
USG% 22.0%
Net Rtg -2.8
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.8m
Scoring +4.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +0.0
Defense +2.6
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
Josh Okogie 18.7m
5
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
+5.7

Relentless defensive activity completely defined his high-energy bench shift. He racked up 3 steals and 4 deflections, generating a robust +5.0 defensive credit and a +3.4 hustle score that totally disrupted the opponent's flow. His modest 5 points were secondary to the sheer chaos he created on the less glamorous end of the floor.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 10.6%
Net Rtg +54.9
+/- +20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.7m
Scoring +2.7
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +1.3
Hustle +5.1
Defense +3.7
Turnovers +0.0
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.0

A fleeting garbage-time appearance yielded minimal impact on the game's outcome. He managed to hit his only shot for a +3.3 offensive credit but bled value on the other end with a -1.2 defensive score. He simply burned three minutes of cardio without altering the game's trajectory.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 12.5%
Net Rtg -85.7
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.1m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +1.3
Defense -1.9
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
JD Davison 3.1m
2
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.4

Careless ball security sabotaged a very brief stint at the end of the rotation. He committed 2 turnovers in just three minutes, driving a negative offensive credit (-1.5) despite hitting a pair of free throws. His inability to protect the basketball made him an immediate liability.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 113.6%
USG% 37.5%
Net Rtg -85.7
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.1m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -3.5
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
Jeff Green 3.0m
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
+0.2

A completely invisible offensive shift saw him fail to register a single point, rebound, or assist. He managed to contest 3 shots to scrape together a +1.1 defensive credit, but his total lack of production on the other end (+0.0 offense score) highlighted a purely empty-calorie cameo.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -76.2
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.0m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
LAL Los Angeles Lakers
S LeBron James 33.2m
10
pts
4
reb
9
ast
Impact
-19.7

A disastrous offensive showing defined his night, as uncharacteristic carelessness completely derailed his value. He coughed up 8 turnovers (avg 3.4) while struggling to find any scoring rhythm (2-of-9 shooting), leading to a dismal -5.3 offensive component score. His playmaking (9 assists) couldn't salvage a performance where he clearly lacked his usual burst.

Shooting
FG 2/9 (22.2%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 6/6 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 43.0%
USG% 27.0%
Net Rtg -23.6
+/- -18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.2m
Scoring +5.1
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +1.2
Hustle +1.2
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -19.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 8
S Luke Kennard 32.2m
7
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-11.1

A frigid perimeter shooting night neutralized his primary weapon and rendered him largely ineffective. Missing all three of his attempts from deep, he managed just a +0.6 offensive credit while failing to provide his usual spacing gravity. Without his jumper falling, his lack of secondary creation left him stranded as a passenger in the half-court.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 41.5%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg -22.2
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.2m
Scoring +3.4
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +0.9
Defense -4.7
Turnovers -4.7
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S Marcus Smart 30.6m
9
pts
2
reb
5
ast
Impact
+2.2

Relentless defensive havoc entirely offset his offensive struggles, turning him into a massive disruptor. He racked up 3 steals and 3 blocks (both well above his season averages), fueling a stellar +9.1 defensive credit and +6.7 hustle score. Even with 4 turnovers limiting his offensive value, his 7 contests and 3 deflections completely altered the opponent's rhythm.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 48.3%
USG% 18.3%
Net Rtg -31.7
+/- -20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.6m
Scoring +5.4
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +2.5
Defense +6.7
Turnovers -8.2
STL 3
BLK 3
TO 4
S Rui Hachimura 29.6m
13
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
+5.2

Efficient shot-making and sturdy defensive execution drove a highly productive two-way shift. He generated a +9.0 offensive credit by ruthlessly converting his looks (6-of-10 shooting) without forcing the issue. Adding a +4.8 defensive component, he proved highly effective as a reliable two-way connector.

Shooting
FG 6/10 (60.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 65.0%
USG% 16.9%
Net Rtg -31.0
+/- -18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.6m
Scoring +10.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +3.6
Hustle +0.9
Defense +1.0
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
S Deandre Ayton 25.4m
19
pts
10
reb
0
ast
Impact
+16.7

Hyper-efficient interior finishing anchored his massive +15.8 offensive credit. He bullied his way to 19 points on a clinical 9-of-12 from the floor, dominating the paint while securing 10 rebounds. His ability to convert high-percentage looks without demanding heavy playmaking duties gave the offense a reliable focal point.

Shooting
FG 9/12 (75.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 76.4%
USG% 24.6%
Net Rtg -35.4
+/- -19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.4m
Scoring +16.9
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +4.2
Hustle +9.8
Defense -2.2
Turnovers -4.7
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
Jake LaRavia 16.3m
6
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-3.3

A quiet but fundamentally sound bench shift saw him chip in effectively across multiple categories. He offered steady two-way value, highlighted by 2 deflections and a +2.1 defensive credit that kept the second unit afloat. While the scoring volume was low, his disciplined execution prevented any major leaks during his 16 minutes.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.0%
USG% 20.5%
Net Rtg -37.6
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.3m
Scoring +3.8
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +0.7
Hustle +3.8
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -4.7
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
Bronny James 15.4m
5
pts
2
reb
4
ast
Impact
-4.6

Solid playmaking instincts drove a positive offensive stint, even as his perimeter shot refused to fall. He dished out 4 assists (well above his 1.2 average) to anchor a +5.0 offensive credit, showing real growth as a secondary creator. However, defensive lapses (-1.5 defense credit) slightly dampened his overall impact.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 17.1%
Net Rtg -3.6
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.4m
Scoring +2.8
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +2.5
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Jaxson Hayes 15.2m
2
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-12.1

Complete offensive invisibility doomed his minutes as he failed to establish any interior presence. He managed just 2 points (a sharp 78% drop from his average) and registered a negative offensive credit (-0.3) while battling foul trouble. His inability to generate rim pressure or secure the glass made him a non-factor.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 34.7%
USG% 8.8%
Net Rtg -9.7
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.2m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +0.6
Defense -4.8
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
8
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
+3.3

Opportunistic interior finishing fueled a surprisingly potent offensive shift (+6.4 offense credit) that perfectly complemented his usual defensive energy. He converted efficiently around the rim (4-of-6 shooting) while remaining active off the ball. His +3.6 defensive score highlights a balanced, highly effective 13-minute cameo.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 62.1%
USG% 21.2%
Net Rtg -3.8
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.9m
Scoring +5.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +4.1
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
8
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
+2.6

Lethal perimeter shot-making defined a highly efficient sparkplug shift off the bench. He drilled 2-of-3 from deep, powering a robust +7.9 offensive credit in just seven minutes of action. His ability to instantly stretch the floor provided a crucial jolt of spacing for the second unit.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 103.1%
USG% 23.5%
Net Rtg +28.6
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.4m
Scoring +7.3
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +0.9
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
5
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.8

Surprisingly stout defensive execution highlighted a brief rotation stint where his shot was only lukewarm. He earned a +2.5 defensive credit while adding a block, making his primary mark on the less glamorous end of the floor. Offensively, he settled for a modest +0.5 credit as he struggled to find a consistent rhythm.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 35.3%
Net Rtg +28.6
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.4m
Scoring +2.9
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.2
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
1
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-5.1

A completely passive scoring approach was offset by smart connective passing and solid defensive positioning. He didn't attempt a single field goal but still generated a +3.0 offensive credit by keeping the ball moving with 2 assists. His +1.9 defensive score reflects a veteran who knows exactly where to be, even when his shot volume vanishes.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 56.8%
USG% 6.7%
Net Rtg +17.9
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.8m
Scoring +0.5
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.3
Defense +0.5
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.6

A brief, low-leverage cameo yielded minimal production during his six minutes on the floor. He knocked down his only shot attempt to secure a +1.3 offensive credit but failed to register a single rebound, assist, or defensive stat. He simply occupied space without tilting the game in either direction.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 104.2%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg +33.3
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.5m
Scoring +3.0
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +0.0
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1