2025-26 Season
JUSUF NURKIĆ
2025-26 Season
JUSUF NURKIĆ
Nurkić produces at an above average rate for a 26-minute workload.
Nurkić produces at an above average rate for a 26-minute workload.
PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology
TEAM COMPARISON
of 19 teammates (10+ games, 10+ min)
Similar Players
Same position, closest production profile this season.
SKILL DNA
Percentile rank vs 93 Centers with 10+ games
THE SEASON SO FAR
Jusuf Nurkić’s opening stretch to the 2025-26 season was defined by a stark role change, morphing from a limited bench piece into a starting lineup rebounding hub. He completely abandoned his scoring touch to become a sheer force of gravity on the glass, best seen during the 11/06 vs DET matchup. Despite tallying just 6 points on brutal 2-for-8 shooting, he generated a massive +13.7 Impact score because his monstrous 17 rebounds and 4 assists swallowed up misses and kept the offense flowing. Scoring was actually his enemy. During the 10/30 vs POR contest, he posted a season-high 13 points but suffered a dismal -6.4 Impact score, as his inefficient 4-for-10 chucking actively disrupted the offensive flow. By the time he logged 38 grueling minutes in the 11/17 vs CHI game, his transformation was complete. He managed a mere 5 points but ripped down 14 boards and dished 5 assists, earning a +7.7 Impact score by embracing the gritty, unglamorous dirty work his team desperately needed.
This fourteen-game stretch was defined by a maddening Jekyll-and-Hyde routine, where Jusuf Nurkić alternated between brilliant playmaking hub and defensive liability. When the big man locked in on the glass, he was an absolute wrecking ball. He peaked on 12/13 vs MEM, racking up 13 points, 17 boards, and seven assists to generate a massive +13.0 impact score through sheer physical dominance and unselfish distribution. He echoed that elite effort on 12/23 vs DEN, posting a +16.2 impact by bullying his way to 17 points and 14 rebounds. Yet, his raw scoring totals often masked severe hidden costs. Take the 12/02 vs HOU matchup, where he poured in a stretch-high 18 points but dragged the lineup down to a -0.8 impact due to poor defensive rotations and inefficient volume shooting. Nurkić remains a tantalizing but frustrating puzzle.
Jusuf Nurkić’s midseason stretch was defined by a wild pendulum swing from an unstoppable two-way force to an exhausted, inefficient anchor. He opened the new year playing utterly dominant basketball, registering a massive +22.9 Impact on 01/06 vs POR by bullying his way to 21 points and 12 rebounds on highly efficient 9-for-12 shooting. Even when his shot volume dropped, his sheer physical presence dictated the terms of engagement. On 01/13 vs CLE, Nurkić scored just 11 points but still generated a stellar +19.4 Impact because he relentlessly vacuumed up 17 rebounds and deterred everything at the rim. Later in January, his role morphed into a bizarre point-center experiment that yielded rapidly diminishing returns. Despite racking up 17 points and 14 assists on 01/23 vs SAS, his overall influence plummeted to a meager +0.4 Impact because his brutal 7-for-19 shot selection actively bailed out the defense. By February, the heavy workload had clearly taken its toll on his massive frame. He finished the stint looking sluggish and settling for bad angles, dragging his team down with a string of negative-impact performances.
IMPACT TIMELINE
Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.
Volatile for his role. Nurkić has noticeable ups and downs, with scoring moving ~6 points between games.
Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 55% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.
Defensive difference-maker. Nurkić consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.
Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: +0.9, second-half: +6.0. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.
Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 8 games. Longest cold streak: 3 games.
MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago
Based on 48 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.
ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM
His shooting stats against each primary defender this season
ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED
How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.
SEASON STATS
GAME LOG
41 games played