2025-26 Season
BRICE SENSABAUGH
2025-26 Season
BRICE SENSABAUGH
Sensabaugh produces at an below average rate for a 23-minute workload.
About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works
TEAM COMPARISON
of 18 teammates (10+ games, 10+ min)
SKILL DNA
Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games
THE SEASON SO FAR
A chaotic pendulum swing of microwave scoring bursts and catastrophic shot selection defined Brice Sensabaugh's first 20 games of the season. Even when the ball went through the hoop, hidden costs often dragged down his overall value. This was perfectly illustrated on 11/28 vs SAC, where he poured in 20 points but posted a flat -0.1 impact score because glaring defensive lapses completely erased his efficient mid-range execution. When his jumper abandoned him, the results were downright toxic. On 11/07 vs MIN, brutal shot selection and a refusal to stop forcing contested jumpers led to a 2-for-12 shooting night, resulting in just 5 points and a dismal -8.8 impact score. Yet, Sensabaugh remains a tantalizing bench weapon when he actually commits to playing a two-way game. During his 10/22 vs LAC outing, he aggressively attacked closeouts to tally 20 points while providing surprisingly stout defensive resistance, driving a massive +7.3 impact score. To survive in a modern rotation, he must abandon the contested isolation attempts and learn to consistently anchor his minutes with actual defensive effort.
Brice Sensabaugh’s midseason stretch was a chaotic pendulum swing between hollow scoring volume and absolute offensive mastery. Even when his jump shot was falling, the underlying value of his minutes was often suspect. He poured in 26 points on 01/10 vs CHA, but his sheer tunnel vision and zero assists dragged his overall impact to a -1.9. Conversely, he occasionally found ways to drive winning basketball without a hot hand. On 12/22 vs DEN, a rough 5-for-12 shooting night was completely salvaged by high-motor hustle plays, generating a +3.5 hustle score that lifted his overall impact to +3.4. A merciful return to a bench role finally unlocked his true ceiling as an elite microwave scorer. He erupted for 43 points on 01/14 vs CHI, hunting mismatches and hitting 15 of his 22 shots to post a spectacular +21.2 impact score.
A maddening blend of hollow scoring and defensive lapses defined this frustrating stretch for Sensabaugh. Even when his jump shot was falling, hidden costs often ruined his value. During the 02/05 vs ATL matchup, he poured in 18 points but posted a dismal -7.3 impact score because opponents mercilessly hunted him on defensive switches. Selfish shot selection also created massive problems. He completely tanked his offensive rhythm on 03/04 vs PHI, chucking contested perimeter looks to finish with just 7 points and a brutal -9.6 impact rating. Yet, his ceiling remains undeniable when he plays within the flow of the offense. He erupted for 26 points on 02/23 vs HOU, generating a +4.2 impact score by punishing defenses with elite three-level shot-making instead of forcing bad isolation attempts. Sensabaugh is a tantalizing talent who desperately needs to realize that getting buckets means nothing if you bleed value everywhere else.
IMPACT TIMELINE
Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.
Boom-or-bust player. Sensabaugh's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~9 points per game.
Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 62% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.
Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Sensabaugh locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.
Slight upward trend. First-half impact: -2.7, second-half: -0.0. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.
Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 6 games. Longest cold streak: 8 games.
MATCHUP HISTORY
Based on 71 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.
ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM
His shooting stats against each primary defender this season
ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED
How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.
SEASON STATS
GAME LOG
72 games played