UTA

2025-26 Season

ELIJAH HARKLESS

Utah Jazz | Guard | 6-3
Elijah Harkless
6.8 PPG
2.0 RPG
2.9 APG
21.0 MPG
-1.4 Impact

Harkless produces at an below average rate for a 21-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-1.4
Scoring +2.7
Points 6.8 PPG × +1.00 = +6.8
Missed 2PT 1.5/g × -0.78 = -1.2
Missed 3PT 2.6/g × -0.87 = -2.3
Missed FT 0.6/g × -1.00 = -0.6
Creation +2.0
Assists 2.9/g × +0.50 = +1.4
Off. Rebounds 0.5/g × +1.26 = +0.6
Turnovers -1.9
Turnovers 1.0/g × -1.95 = -1.9
Defense +1.6
Steals 1.2/g × +2.30 = +2.8
Blocks 0.2/g × +0.90 = +0.2
Def. Rebounds 1.5/g × +0.30 = +0.5
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +4.4
Contested Shots 2.7/g × +0.20 = +0.5
Deflections 2.5/g × +0.65 = +1.6
Charges Drawn 0.1/g × +2.70 = +0.3
Loose Balls 0.2/g × +0.60 = +0.1
Screen Assists 0.4/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.7/g uncredited × +2.70 = +1.8
Raw Impact +8.8
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.2
Net Impact
-1.4
49th pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 33th
7.2 PPG
Efficiency 13th
46.1% TS
Playmaking 59th
3.1 APG
Rebounding 27th
2.2 RPG
Rim Protection 81th
0.16/min
Hustle 100th
0.20/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 63th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Elijah Harkless’s first twenty games of the 2025-26 season were defined by a chaotic tug-of-war between game-wrecking defensive hustle and lineup-killing offensive ineptitude. He frequently found ways to swing momentum without making shots, relying strictly on grit and positioning to keep his team afloat. On 10/29 vs POR, for example, he managed just a single point but posted a +2.1 impact score by acting as an absolute terror on the defensive end. His relentless energy peaked offensively on 02/28 vs NOP, when he racked up 14 points and 5 assists to earn a stellar +7.7 impact score through a masterclass of two-way activity. Yet, when Harkless tried to shoulder too much of the scoring burden, his value plummeted. Look no further than his 16-point outing on 03/09 vs GSW, where a -1.3 impact score revealed how reckless decisions in traffic erased his dynamic playmaking flashes. That erratic shot selection mutated into a full-blown slump on 03/11 vs NYK, as a string of forced, out-of-rhythm perimeter shots derailed the offense and generated a catastrophic -11.4 impact score.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Harkless's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~6 points per game.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 24% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Defensive difference-maker. Harkless consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Performance has dropped off. First-half impact: +0.6, second-half: -3.4. Worth watching whether it's fatigue, injury, or opponents adjusting.

In a rough stretch — 4 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 9 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 40 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

J. Murray 37.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
R. Rollins 31.9 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 5
B. Carrington 23.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
V. Edgecombe 23.2 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 3
J. Fears 21.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
D. DeRozan 21.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Clarkson 21.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
T. Maxey 21.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
N. Jokić 20.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.15
PTS 3
D. Plowden 16.9 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.47
PTS 8

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

N. Jokić 71.1 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.44
PTS 31
V. Edgecombe 32.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 4
R. Rollins 25.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 3
J. Fears 23.9 poss
FG% 14.3%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 3
B. Carrington 22.5 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 3
D. DeRozan 21.5 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.47
PTS 10
J. Murray 19.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.62
PTS 12
J. Brown 19.5 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.36
PTS 7
D. Booker 19.0 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.47
PTS 9
Q. Grimes 17.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.46
PTS 8

SEASON STATS

26
Games
6.8
PPG
2.0
RPG
2.9
APG
1.2
SPG
0.2
BPG
33.5
FG%
23.9
3P%
76.6
FT%
21.0
MPG

GAME LOG

26 games played