UTA

2025-26 Season

KEVIN LOVE

Utah Jazz | Forward-Center | 6-10
Kevin Love
6.7PPG
5.8RPG
1.8APG
16.6MPG
-2.1 Impact

Love produces at an below average rate for a 17-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-2.1
Scoring +5.8
Points Scored 6.7 PPG = +6.7
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -2.6
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.7
Creation +0.6
Assists & Self-Creation 1.8 AST/g + self-creation = +0.6
Turnovers -1.9
Turnovers 0.8/g (live + dead blend) = -1.9
Defense -0.6
Steals 0.4/g = +0.9
Blocks 0.2/g = +0.2
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -1.7
Hustle & Effort +4.9
Rebounds 5.8 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +3.2
Contested Shots 2.0/g = +0.4
Deflections 0.8/g = +0.5
Charges Drawn 0.1/g = +0.2
Loose Balls 0.5/g = +0.3
Screen Assists 1.2/g = +0.3
Raw Impact +8.8
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.9
Net Impact
-2.1
40th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 32th
6.9 PPG
Efficiency 53th
56.8% TS
Playmaking 59th
1.9 APG
Rebounding 82th
5.9 RPG
Defense 3th
+2.4/g
Hustle 90th
+18.4/g
Creation 27th
+1.81/g
Shot Making 44th
+5.41/g
TO Discipline 45th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Father Time is finally collecting his dues from Kevin Love, reducing the veteran spacer to a choppy, low-impact bench role where his jumper frequently betrays him. During a brutal 11/14 vs ATL outing, Love managed just three points on 1-of-3 shooting, resulting in a staggering -14.4 Impact score because his four assists couldn't offset the hidden costs of his glaring defensive limitations. A few nights later on 11/19 vs LAL, he went completely scoreless and missed both of his shots, yielding a dismal -11.8 Impact since he offered zero rim protection or offensive gravity. When the outside shot vanishes, Love simply cannot stay in front of younger athletes to justify his minutes. He occasionally turns back the clock, however, like he did on 11/29 vs SAC. Love posted nine points and grabbed seven rebounds in 17 minutes that night, earning a +7.0 Impact score because his smart positional rebounding and efficient 3-of-5 shooting created crucial non-scoring value for the second unit. Yet those vintage bursts are becoming rare anomalies in a grueling stretch defined by cold streaks and tired legs.

Extreme volatility and an uneasy transition between the starting lineup and the bench defined this mid-season stretch for Kevin Love. He turned back the clock on 12/21 vs ORL, posting a monstrous +19.8 impact score by swallowing up 16 rebounds and splashing four threes in 32 grueling minutes. But that momentum vanished the moment he was promoted to the starting group on 12/24 vs MEM. Forced to play 29 minutes, Love chucked his way to a dismal -14.2 impact score, bricking seven of his nine three-point attempts and failing to generate enough offense to justify his heavy usage. Later in the month, he found ways to be useful even when his shot abandoned him. During the 01/19 vs SAS matchup, Love managed a +3.6 impact score despite scoring just six points on 1-for-6 shooting because he dominated the glass with 11 critical rebounds. Conversely, efficient shooting did not always guarantee positive value; his 11-point outing on 01/13 vs CLE resulted in a -3.6 impact because he grabbed a measly three boards and offered little resistance on the other end of the floor.

Kevin Love’s midseason stretch was defined by extreme volatility, operating as a pure boom-or-bust floor spacer off the bench. When his jumper was actually falling, he looked like a lethal weapon. He erupted for a +13.0 Impact score on 03/09 vs GSW by drilling all three of his attempts from deep to tally 12 points in just 15 minutes. But when the touch vanished, his value plummeted. On 03/18 vs MIN, his inability to connect dragged him to a brutal -8.1 Impact score as he forced up an ugly 1-for-5 night from beyond the arc. He did manage to occasionally salvage his rough shooting nights by leaning on his veteran instincts. Despite scoring just 5 points and bricking five of his six three-pointers on 02/23 vs HOU, Love still posted a +4.6 Impact score because he relentlessly crashed the glass for 9 rebounds and kept the offense humming with 5 assists. At this stage in his career, Love is a specialized luxury who either shoots you into a massive advantage or shoots himself right off the floor.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Love's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~5 points per game.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 30% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Love locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: -2.9, second-half: -1.3. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 2 games. Longest cold streak: 6 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 64 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

M. Diabaté 38.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
W. Carter Jr. 33.5 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 9
J. Jackson Jr. 25.3 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.2
PTS 5
J. Landale 25.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 7
C. Capela 24.7 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
Q. Post 23.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 3
S. Mamukelashvili 19.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 2
J. Duren 19.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 5
M. Kleber 19.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 2
I. Stewart 18.9 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.16
PTS 3

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

M. Diabaté 46.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 4
S. Aldama 34.9 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.37
PTS 13
W. Carter Jr. 31.6 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 7
D. Gafford 28.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Landale 26.6 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 5
M. Smart 26.0 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.42
PTS 11
Q. Post 25.6 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
A. Sengun 22.9 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 6
M. Robinson 22.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
I. Stewart 21.0 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 2

SEASON STATS

37
Games
6.7
PPG
5.8
RPG
1.8
APG
0.4
SPG
0.2
BPG
39.7
FG%
37.3
3P%
84.1
FT%
16.6
MPG

GAME LOG

37 games played