February 03, 2026
EXPLORE THE GAME
Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.
UTA
2P —
3P —
IND
2P —
3P —
UTA
IND
UTA
PLAYER PERFORMANCE
Indiana Pacers
A significant uptick in scoring confidence was overshadowed by defensive breakdowns and costly turnovers in traffic. While the playmaking vision was evident, forcing passes into tight windows fueled opponent fast breaks. The negative impact score indicates his offensive creation came at too high a cost in transition defense.
A massive scoring surge was hollowed out by abysmal three-point shot selection and defensive breakdowns in transition. Forcing the issue from the perimeter disrupted the offensive flow and consistently sparked opponent fast breaks. The sheer volume of empty possessions completely cratered his net impact despite the elevated scoring totals.
Errant perimeter shooting and defensive lapses off the ball dragged down what appeared to be a solid connective performance. While he kept the ball moving and crashed the glass effectively (+4.6 Hustle), giving up straight-line drives negated his offensive contributions. The negative overall impact reflects a player who was targeted successfully in the half-court.
A disastrous net rating stemmed from passive offensive involvement and an inability to navigate screens defensively. He routinely died on picks, forcing the defense into constant rotation and yielding wide-open looks. The lack of secondary playmaking or rebounding meant he offered zero resistance when his perimeter shot wasn't falling.
Effective pick-and-pop execution was offset by an inability to anchor the paint defensively (+0.5 Def). He was consistently out-leveraged by more physical bigs on the interior, allowing deep post position and easy finishes. The resulting defensive bleed neutralized his highly efficient offensive output.
Poor shot selection and an inability to finish through contact severely hampered offensive possessions. Despite bringing solid energy and disruptive hands (+4.0 Hustle), his offensive limitations allowed defenders to sag off and clog the driving lanes for others. The resulting spacing issues bogged down the entire unit during his shifts.
Exceptional vertical spacing and elite rim deterrence (+9.3 Def) completely altered the geometry of the game. He maintained his streak of hyper-efficient finishing by strictly operating within his role as a lob threat and put-back specialist. The defensive anchoring and disciplined shot profile drove a highly positive overall impact.
Perimeter shot-making provided a brief offensive spark, but a complete lack of rebounding engagement and defensive resistance (-0.7 Def) proved costly. He was routinely beaten off the dribble, collapsing the defensive shell and forcing teammates into foul trouble. The inability to secure loose balls or finish possessions defensively kept his impact slightly negative.
An absolute masterclass in offensive efficiency and point-of-attack disruption (+7.4 Def) resulted in a staggering net impact. He relentlessly attacked the rim with perfectly timed cuts and decisive drives, never settling for low-percentage looks. His defensive pressure created utter chaos, translating directly into high-value transition opportunities.
Utah Jazz
A staggering playmaking volume was completely undermined by poor shooting efficiency and likely crippling live-ball turnovers. Forcing action in the half-court led to empty trips and transition opportunities going the other way. Despite active point-of-attack defense (+7.7 Def), the sheer number of wasted offensive possessions dragged his overall impact into the negative.
High-efficiency finishing and strong defensive rotations (+8.6 Def) elevated his overall floor game despite lower usage. His selective shot profile kept the offense flowing smoothly, avoiding the empty possessions that often plague young wings. The positive impact was anchored by disciplined closeouts and timely weak-side help.
Elite shot selection and disruptive perimeter defense (+10.1 Def) fueled a highly productive two-way performance. He completely eliminated the long, contested mid-range jumpers from his diet, opting instead for high-percentage attacks and rhythm catch-and-shoot looks. Active hands in passing lanes (+4.2 Hustle) routinely sparked transition opportunities.
Dominant rim protection and elite rebounding positioning (+12.3 Def) anchored the interior defense. He extended his streak of highly efficient outings by making quick, correct reads out of the high post rather than forcing contested looks. His relentless activity on the glass (+6.0 Hustle) consistently generated extra possessions.
Relentless mismatch hunting inside the arc compensated for a cold shooting night from deep. He consistently punished switches with decisive post-ups and face-up drives, generating high-value scoring opportunities. The resulting offensive gravity (+18.1 Box) opened up the floor, keeping the defense constantly in rotation.
Sizzling perimeter shot-making masked significant defensive liabilities (-0.8 Def) and a lack of rebounding engagement. He was routinely targeted on switches, giving back almost everything he created on the offensive end. The scoring punch was undeniable, but the one-dimensional nature of his game kept his overall net impact completely flat.
Instant offensive combustion off the bench was driven by flawless floor spacing and rapid-fire decision making. He capitalized on every defensive breakdown, punishing late closeouts with lethal efficiency while holding his own within the team's defensive scheme (+4.1 Def). The sheer gravity of his shooting completely tilted the floor during his minutes.
