UTA

2025-26 Season

JOHN KONCHAR

Utah Jazz | Guard | 6-5
John Konchar
4.1 PPG
3.9 RPG
1.8 APG
19.0 MPG
+0.4 Impact

Konchar produces at an average rate for a 19-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+0.4
Scoring +2.5
Points 4.1 PPG × +1.00 = +4.1
Missed 2PT 0.5/g × -0.78 = -0.4
Missed 3PT 1.2/g × -0.87 = -1.0
Missed FT 0.2/g × -1.00 = -0.2
Creation +2.2
Assists 1.8/g × +0.50 = +0.9
Off. Rebounds 1.0/g × +1.26 = +1.3
Turnovers -1.0
Turnovers 0.5/g × -1.95 = -1.0
Defense +2.5
Steals 1.3/g × +2.30 = +3.0
Blocks 0.6/g × +0.90 = +0.5
Def. Rebounds 2.9/g × +0.30 = +0.9
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +2.8
Contested Shots 2.8/g × +0.20 = +0.6
Deflections 2.4/g × +0.65 = +1.6
Loose Balls 0.6/g × +0.60 = +0.4
Screen Assists 0.5/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.0/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.1
Raw Impact +9.0
Baseline (game-average expected) −8.6
Net Impact
+0.4
73th pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 7th
4.2 PPG
Efficiency 25th
50.2% TS
Playmaking 31th
1.9 APG
Rebounding 76th
4.0 RPG
Rim Protection 99th
0.23/min
Hustle 87th
0.14/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 92th
0.03/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

John Konchar’s opening twenty games were defined by a polarizing tightrope walk between acting as an essential, high-IQ glue guy and fading into a completely invisible cardio participant. When he engaged physically, his value skyrocketed regardless of his meager shot volume. Look no further than 10/25 vs IND, where he scored just 9 points but generated a staggering +15.0 impact score by doing the dirty work and racking up a +7.7 hustle metric. Conversely, his extreme passivity often rendered him a severe liability on the floor. During 10/27 vs GSW, his offensive ineptitude and clanked perimeter looks dragged him down to a brutal -7.7 impact score. He simply cannot afford to let defenders sag off and clog the driving lanes for his teammates. However, when he finally paired his elite connective instincts with decisive shooting on 12/02 vs SAS, he delivered a +6.1 impact score behind a flawless 13-point performance.

John Konchar’s midseason stretch was a masterclass in the razor-thin margin for error when a rotation player refuses to shoot the basketball. Look no further than 01/30 vs NOP, where he scored a stretch-high 9 points but posted a -3.8 impact because he bled points as a frequent target in pick-and-roll switches. Conversely, his flawless execution of role-player duties on 01/28 vs CHA yielded a massive +11.2 impact despite taking just three shots. He created immense value entirely in the margins that night, using relentless energy and fundamentally sound defensive positioning to tilt the floor without demanding the ball. However, his offensive invisibility often ruined his overall value. During a disastrous showing on 01/23 vs NOP, Konchar completely removed himself from the offense, allowing his defender to freely roam and saddling him with a brutal -9.4 impact score. When a wing operates as a total zero on the perimeter, even the grittiest hustle plays cannot always save them from dragging down the lineup.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Konchar's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~4 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 57% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Konchar consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 6 games. Longest cold streak: 6 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 64 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

R. Sheppard 51.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
S. Bey 33.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
P. Banchero 31.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Fears 30.1 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 4
Z. Williamson 28.7 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.1
PTS 3
A. Gill 28.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
J. Reese 27.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
H. Jones 26.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
L. Black 24.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
K. Durant 21.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

R. Sheppard 35.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 11
J. Reese 32.2 poss
FG% 83.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.34
PTS 11
J. Fears 32.2 poss
FG% 38.5%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.34
PTS 11
N. Jokić 26.2 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 8
L. Black 25.2 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 5
M. Monk 25.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Harden 23.4 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
H. Jones 22.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
J. Johnson 21.7 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
K. Matković 21.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 4

SEASON STATS

52
Games
4.1
PPG
3.9
RPG
1.8
APG
1.3
SPG
0.6
BPG
47.1
FG%
27.8
3P%
69.4
FT%
19.0
MPG

GAME LOG

52 games played