Utah
Jazz

This midseason stretch was defined by sheer, brute-force adaptability. When his usually reliable three-point stroke vanished, Markkanen simply battered opponents inside and hit the glass to maintain a massive positive influence on the floor. Look at his performance on 02/01 vs TOR. He clanked his way to an ugly 9-for-23 shooting night, yet still posted a staggering +34.4 Impact score because he relentlessly attacked the boards for 11 rebounds and created immense non-scoring value through sheer hustle. Even when his scoring volume plummeted on 02/09 vs MIA, he turned a quiet 17 points into a +9.3 Impact by securing eight vital rebounds and executing the dirty work in the paint. He applied that same interior aggression during a brutal 1-for-10 perimeter shooting slump on 02/23 vs HOU, salvaging an +18.6 Impact by hunting high-percentage twos to finish with 29 points. He stopped relying entirely on finesse, instead forcing his will on the game through physical grit.

This midseason stretch was defined by Jaren Jackson Jr. morphing into a two-way wrecking ball who learned to dominate the margins. Look no further than his 01/30 vs NOP performance, where he bricked his way to 16 points on a brutal 6-for-19 from the floor. He still generated a massive +11.0 Impact score in that contest because his relentless defensive rotations and nine crucial rebounds entirely controlled the paint. Conversely, the 01/22 vs ATL outing reveals the hidden costs of passive play. Despite scoring an efficient 17 points on 6-for-12 shooting, Jackson posted a dismal -6.5 Impact score due to sluggish rim protection and empty-calorie offensive production. When everything clicked, he was terrifying. During the 02/02 vs MIN matchup, Jackson erupted for 30 points and six boards, earning a staggering +18.9 Impact score by bullying defenders inside and hitting timely threes.

This midseason stretch defined Keyonte George not as a traditional point guard, but as an unapologetic, high-octane scoring engine. His aggressive mentality peaked on 01/21 vs MIN, where he poured in 43 points on 28 shots. He generated a massive +19.9 Impact score in that contest simply by overwhelming the defense with sheer volume and relentless attacking. However, that same green-light freedom occasionally poisoned his value when his jumper vanished. During the 01/25 vs MIA matchup, George managed a respectable 19 points but dragged his team down to a -2.3 Impact because of stubborn shot selection and a disastrous 0-for-8 showing from beyond the arc. He is at his absolute best when pairing that scoring aggression with actual shot discipline. On 03/02 vs DEN, he carved up the defense for 36 points on a tidy 14-of-22 from the floor, resulting in a staggering +26.9 Impact score. When George stops forcing contested triples and scores efficiently, he transforms from a chaotic chucker into a lethal offensive centerpiece.

Jusuf Nurkić’s midseason stretch was defined by a wild pendulum swing from an unstoppable two-way force to an exhausted, inefficient anchor. He opened the new year playing utterly dominant basketball, registering a massive +22.9 Impact on 01/06 vs POR by bullying his way to 21 points and 12 rebounds on highly efficient 9-for-12 shooting. Even when his shot volume dropped, his sheer physical presence dictated the terms of engagement. On 01/13 vs CLE, Nurkić scored just 11 points but still generated a stellar +19.4 Impact because he relentlessly vacuumed up 17 rebounds and deterred everything at the rim. Later in January, his role morphed into a bizarre point-center experiment that yielded rapidly diminishing returns. Despite racking up 17 points and 14 assists on 01/23 vs SAS, his overall influence plummeted to a meager +0.4 Impact because his brutal 7-for-19 shot selection actively bailed out the defense. By February, the heavy workload had clearly taken its toll on his massive frame. He finished the stint looking sluggish and settling for bad angles, dragging his team down with a string of negative-impact performances.

This late-season stretch marked a complete role overhaul for Kyle Filipowski, as he graduated from a fringe bench option into a full-time, highly productive starter. The promotion unlocked his terrifying versatility. Look at the 03/04 vs PHI matchup; he managed a meager 6 points on just three shot attempts, yet still posted a +5.8 Impact score because he ruthlessly cleaned the glass for 11 rebounds and kept the offensive flow moving with smart passes. Conversely, when he forced the issue, his overall value plummeted. During the 03/23 vs TOR game, he clanked his way to a dismal 2-for-10 shooting night, and those ill-advised perimeter looks dragged him down to a brutal -14.2 Impact score. Fortunately, he quickly learned to calibrate his aggression and punish mismatches inside. By the 03/29 vs PHX contest, Filipowski was a lethal weapon, pouring in 26 points on hyper-efficient 10-for-14 shooting to generate a staggering +28.4 Impact score. When he avoids chucking bad threes and leans into his physical tools, he completely transforms the geometry of the floor.

John Konchar's late-season stretch was defined by a bizarre transformation from an offensive ghost into an absolutely essential, rebounding-obsessed glue guy. This run was a stark contrast to his brutal early March slump, highlighted by a dismal -10.9 Impact on 03/04 vs PHI where his total refusal to attack yielded zero points and stalled the entire offense. He quickly realized he could swing games without scoring. Konchar generated a +3.6 Impact on 03/09 vs GSW despite logging just two points, finding massive non-scoring value through relentless hustle and ten crucial rebounds. When he actually looked for his shot, the results were devastatingly efficient. He scorched the nets for 16 points on 8-of-10 shooting to post a +15.8 Impact on 03/28 vs DEN. By April, Konchar had morphed into a wildly unconventional weapon, ignoring his own scoring column to terrorize opponents with brilliant passing and sheer effort on the glass.

Oscar Tshiebwe’s late-season stretch was defined by a rocky transition to the starting lineup that ultimately exploded into sheer interior dominance. When first thrust into heavier minutes, his overall effectiveness tanked, highlighted by a rough outing on 04/07 vs NOP where his -3.4 impact score betrayed a respectable 12-point scoring night. While he hit six of his ten shots, a complete lack of playmaking and costly defensive lapses bled value whenever he was on the floor. The switch flipped three days later during an absolute rebounding clinic on 04/10 vs MEM. He hauled in a staggering 22 boards and generated a +25.8 impact score by overwhelming Memphis with relentless hustle and suffocating interior defense. He then bullied his way to a massive double-double on 04/12 vs LAL, pouring in 29 points and grabbing 17 rebounds in 32 minutes. That performance yielded an elite +30.4 impact score, reflecting a big man who finally figured out how to translate his brute physical force into highly efficient, game-altering production.

This late-season stretch was defined by Brice Sensabaugh's volatile evolution from a bench gunner into a high-volume starter. When his jumper was falling, he was an absolute flamethrower. He erupted for a massive +25.0 Impact score on 03/18 vs MIN by torching the nets for 41 points on 31 shot attempts. Yet, his aggressive shot profile frequently backfired and actively harmed the team even when his point totals looked respectable. Look at his performance on 03/23 vs TOR, where he tallied 24 points but registered a -3.9 Impact score because he forced awful looks and bricked eight of his nine three-pointers. Similarly, during his start on 04/07 vs NOP, a dismal 6-for-17 shooting night resulted in a brutal -14.0 Impact score, exposing the hidden costs of his tunnel vision. He is a pure bucket-getter, but his reluctance to defer when his shot goes cold remains a glaring flaw.

This stretch of Ace Bailey's season was defined by extreme volatility, swinging wildly between unstoppable perimeter barrages and momentum-killing shooting slumps. On 03/23 vs TOR, Bailey erupted for 37 points while draining seven triples, generating a massive +26.4 Impact score as his scorching shot-making completely overwhelmed the defense. Contrast that with 02/23 vs HOU. He managed a miserable 4 points on 2-of-9 shooting, yet salvaged a +1.1 Impact score by crashing the glass for eight rebounds and grinding out stops defensively. The dark side of his ultimate green light emerged later in the spring. Despite a decent 15-point scoring output on 04/12 vs LAL, Bailey tanked his value to a brutal -13.7 Impact score. His abysmal 7-of-21 shooting and reckless shot selection acted as a hidden cost that stalled the offense and completely erased his point total. He is a lethal weapon when his jumper connects, but his refusal to dial back his volume on cold nights remains a glaring flaw.

Moving from an overmatched starter to a lethal bench shooter completely salvaged this stretch of Mykhailiuk's season. When forced to run with the opening unit in January, his production often came with steep hidden costs. Take the 01/13 vs CLE matchup, where his 11 points masked a dismal -8.2 impact score because he dragged the lineup down with poor defensive rotations and empty box-score stats. The starting experiment crashed completely on 01/28 vs GSW. He managed just two points on 1-for-5 shooting that night, hemorrhaging value to the tune of a catastrophic -20.8 impact score. Relegated to the second unit just a few days later, Svi finally found his comfort zone as a pure, unburdened specialist. This microwave role peaked brilliantly on 03/29 vs PHX, where he erupted for 14 points and four triples in a mere nine minutes, generating a massive +10.4 impact score through sheer offensive efficiency.

Kyle Anderson’s mid-spring stretch was defined by a brutal, invisible slump off the bench that only briefly vanished when he was thrust into the starting lineup. Operating as a reserve, his complete lack of scoring gravity frequently stalled the offense. This passive play bottomed out on 03/30 vs DAL, where he posted a disastrous -11.4 impact after failing to score a single point, bleeding value as defenders simply ignored his 0-for-2 shooting. He occasionally managed to salvage his minutes through sheer rebounding and dirty work, posting a +5.4 impact on 04/02 vs DET despite scoring just 2 points. A sudden promotion changed everything. Given the keys to operate as a primary offensive hub on 04/10 vs HOU, Anderson racked up 17 points, 6 rebounds, and 9 assists. He generated a massive +11.8 impact in that start by picking apart the defense with surgical passing and efficient 7-of-12 shooting.

Kevin Love’s midseason stretch was defined by extreme volatility, operating as a pure boom-or-bust floor spacer off the bench. When his jumper was actually falling, he looked like a lethal weapon. He erupted for a +13.0 Impact score on 03/09 vs GSW by drilling all three of his attempts from deep to tally 12 points in just 15 minutes. But when the touch vanished, his value plummeted. On 03/18 vs MIN, his inability to connect dragged him to a brutal -8.1 Impact score as he forced up an ugly 1-for-5 night from beyond the arc. He did manage to occasionally salvage his rough shooting nights by leaning on his veteran instincts. Despite scoring just 5 points and bricking five of his six three-pointers on 02/23 vs HOU, Love still posted a +4.6 Impact score because he relentlessly crashed the glass for 9 rebounds and kept the offense humming with 5 assists. At this stage in his career, Love is a specialized luxury who either shoots you into a massive advantage or shoots himself right off the floor.

Isaiah Collier spent the middle of his season oscillating wildly between brilliant floor general and chaotic volume shooter, constantly bouncing in and out of the starting lineup. Look no further than his exhausting 48-minute marathon on 02/03 vs IND, where he racked up an eye-popping 17 points and 22 assists but managed a barely-positive +0.5 impact. Despite those gaudy counting stats, his actual value was heavily muted by a rough 6-for-16 shooting night and the hidden costs of reckless turnovers that gave possessions right back to the opponent. The downside of his aggressive style reared its head again on 02/26 vs NOP, where a seemingly respectable 11 points and 7 assists masked a dreadful -10.7 impact ruined by defensive breakdowns and sloppy half-court execution. Yet, when he actually reined in his shot selection, the results were devastating. During a start on 03/05 vs WAS, Collier carved up the defense for 27 points and 11 assists on an efficient 11-of-18 from the floor, generating a dominant +12.2 impact. He clearly possesses elite playmaking vision, but he must learn to trim the fat from his game to become a truly reliable offensive engine.

Cody Williams spent the final months of the season riding a maddening, whiplash-inducing rollercoaster of inconsistency. When fully engaged, he looked like an absolute offensive force. He erupted for 34 points and seven assists on 03/15 vs SAC, earning a massive +21.1 impact score through ruthless, efficient shot creation. Even when his jumper abandoned him, he occasionally found ways to tilt the floor through sheer grit. On 03/07 vs MIL, he managed just 13 points on 4-of-12 shooting, but his relentless work on the glass netted 11 rebounds and drove a stellar +15.2 impact score. Yet, his aggressive approach too often actively harmed the offense. Take the 04/07 vs NOP matchup, where he tallied 19 points but posted a dismal -10.0 impact score because of forced, empty volume that included missing all five of his three-point attempts. Williams clearly possesses the raw talent to dominate, but until he stops oscillating between brilliant two-way engine and inefficient chucker, his true value remains an unsolved puzzle.

Elijah Harkless spent this eight-game stretch trapped in a grueling offensive slump, battling his own erratic shot selection while logging heavy starter minutes. His lone spark of brilliance ignited on 03/19 vs MIL, where crisp playmaking and confident perimeter shooting yielded 23 points, 10 assists, and a massive +14.2 impact score. However, that offensive rhythm completely vanished during a brutal marathon shift on 03/28 vs DEN. Despite logging 41 minutes, his disastrous 4-for-16 shooting from the floor dragged his impact down to a dismal -6.6. He did manage to salvage some sneaky value earlier on 03/21 vs PHI, generating a robust +8.8 impact with a modest 15 points by locking down his assignment and keeping the ball moving. Ultimately, when his jumper abandons him, Harkless becomes a glaring liability on the floor.

This stretch was a volatile rollercoaster defined by an awkward transition from hyper-efficient bench sparkplug to an overwhelmed starter. Operating as a reserve early on, he torched second units with ruthless shot-making, highlighted by a +16.3 Impact on 03/07 vs LAC where he dropped 18 points on nearly perfect 7-for-8 shooting. Even when his jumper completely abandoned him, he occasionally found ways to tilt the floor. During the 03/18 vs DEN matchup, Hendricks bricked his way to a brutal 1-for-10 mark from deep, yet still generated a +6.0 Impact because his relentless defensive rotations and loose-ball hustle kept the rotation afloat. However, his late-March promotion to the starting lineup exposed glaring offensive limitations. On 03/25 vs SAS, his inability to hit open looks resulted in a dismal -16.8 Impact, as he managed just two points on 1-for-7 shooting while actively hurting the team's half-court spacing. He clearly possesses the raw athletic tools to survive in the league, but his wildly inconsistent offensive diet makes him a frustrating puzzle to solve.

This mid-season stretch was defined by erratic shooting and a desperate struggle to consistently generate positive value off the bench. Look at the 01/27 vs HOU matchup. Vince Williams Jr. hoisted a dismal 3-for-15 from the field. Yet, he scraped together a relatively mild -2.2 Impact score because he crashed the glass for 8 rebounds and kept the offense moving with 5 assists. Conversely, on 01/30 vs NOP, he dropped 13 points but registered a -5.1 Impact. The hidden costs of his game—poor defensive rotations and empty possession metrics—dragged down his overall value despite the double-digit scoring effort. He briefly found his rhythm on 02/02 vs MIN, drilling four three-pointers en route to 16 points and a stellar +7.1 Impact score. Unfortunately, that sharp perimeter shooting vanished almost immediately.

Walter Clayton Jr.'s late-season stretch was defined by chronic shooting slumps and an inability to translate raw counting stats into actual winning basketball. Even when his scoring totals looked respectable, hidden costs dragged him down. He dropped 16 points on 03/23 vs ATL, but his shot selection was atrocious; he chucked up 12 three-point attempts and shot 4-for-13 overall, bleeding value to post a -3.9 Impact score. Conversely, he found ways to stay afloat when he leaned into pure facilitation rather than forcing his jumper. During a spot start on 03/01 vs IND, Clayton managed just 7 points but eked out a +0.3 Impact score by shifting his focus to distribution, dishing out a massive 14 assists to keep the offense humming. Too often, though, his offensive misfires completely derailed his minutes. His absolute nadir arrived on 03/07 vs LAC, where an empty stat line and a miserable 1-for-5 shooting display culminated in a catastrophic -22.5 Impact score.