UTA

2025-26 Season

LAURI MARKKANEN

Utah Jazz | Forward-Center | 7-1
Lauri Markkanen
26.7 PPG
6.9 RPG
2.1 APG
34.4 MPG
+6.3 Impact

Markkanen produces at an elite rate for a 34-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+6.3
Scoring +17.7
Points 26.7 PPG × +1.00 = +26.7
Missed 2PT 5.0/g × -0.78 = -3.9
Missed 3PT 5.0/g × -0.87 = -4.4
Missed FT 0.7/g × -1.00 = -0.7
Creation +3.2
Assists 2.1/g × +0.50 = +1.1
Off. Rebounds 1.7/g × +1.26 = +2.1
Turnovers -2.9
Turnovers 1.5/g × -1.95 = -2.9
Defense +2.4
Steals 1.0/g × +2.30 = +2.3
Blocks 0.5/g × +0.90 = +0.5
Def. Rebounds 5.2/g × +0.30 = +1.5
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +3.0
Contested Shots 6.0/g × +0.20 = +1.2
Deflections 1.7/g × +0.65 = +1.1
Loose Balls 0.4/g × +0.60 = +0.2
Screen Assists 1.2/g × +0.30 = +0.4
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.0/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.1
Raw Impact +23.4
Baseline (game-average expected) −17.1
Net Impact
+6.3
96th pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 98th
26.7 PPG
Efficiency 81th
61.2% TS
Playmaking 65th
2.1 APG
Rebounding 88th
6.9 RPG
Rim Protection 40th
0.13/min
Hustle 17th
0.08/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 58th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

A wildly volatile but undeniable scoring binge defined the opening chapter of Lauri Markkanen's season, revealing a player whose nightly value lived and died by the jumper. When his stroke was pure, he was a terrifying offensive force, peaking on 10/27 vs PHX with a 51-point, 14-rebound explosion that generated a massive +21.4 impact score by breaking the defense with an overwhelming workload. Yet, his absolute green light occasionally became a glaring detriment, perfectly illustrated on 11/28 vs SAC. Despite tallying 28 points in that contest, his stubborn insistence on settling for contested looks resulted in an ugly 2-for-13 mark from beyond the arc, dragging his impact down to a -1.2 as the sheer inefficiency neutralized his raw scoring volume. He did occasionally find ways to contribute when the perimeter well ran dry. On 11/07 vs MIN, Markkanen managed a meager 12 points on abysmal 4-of-14 shooting, but an unexpectedly dominant defensive effort salvaged the night and secured a +2.3 impact. He remains an elite offensive engine. However, his true value hinges entirely on whether he leverages his gravity to create or stubbornly settles for heavily contested threes.

A wild tug-of-war between erratic shot selection and brilliant off-ball utility defined this volatile stretch of Markkanen's season. High scoring totals frequently masked underlying issues, perfectly illustrated on 12/22 vs DEN. Despite pouring in 27 points, a brutal 2-for-9 night from beyond the arc and a sluggish defensive showing (-5.0 def) dragged his overall impact down to an abysmal -8.7. Conversely, he could quietly tilt the floor without dominating the box score. During a modest 18-point outing on 02/05 vs ATL, Markkanen still posted a +7.2 impact because his lethal off-ball movement constantly forced the defense into rotation. When everything clicked simultaneously, like on 12/27 vs SAS, he was an absolute terror. He torched San Antonio for 29 points on blistering 11-of-16 shooting, generating a massive +15.1 impact through pristine efficiency and stellar defensive positioning.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Very consistent. Markkanen posts positive impact in 79% of games — you almost always get a productive night. Scoring varies by ~8 points, but the overall contribution stays positive.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 55% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Markkanen consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Small downward trend. First-half impact: +7.2, second-half: +5.3. Not alarming yet, but trending the wrong direction.

Hot right now — 8 straight games with positive impact. Longest positive run this season: 8 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 43 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

R. O'Neale 60.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 21
L. Dort 53.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 16
P. Washington 52.2 poss
FG% 63.6%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 17
J. Smith Jr. 48.9 poss
FG% 38.5%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 16
K. Murray 45.8 poss
FG% 14.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.04
PTS 2
I. Okoro 45.4 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 75.0%
PPP 0.4
PTS 18
J. Green 42.9 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 15
J. Butler III 41.4 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 10
J. Randle 37.4 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 4
S. Barnes 36.0 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 10

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

D. DeRozan 71.5 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 7
R. O'Neale 61.0 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.03
PTS 2
L. James 57.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 8
A. Thompson 56.5 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 8
K. Durant 44.1 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 8
C. Holmgren 42.6 poss
FG% 71.4%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 11
J. Randle 41.3 poss
FG% 45.5%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.39
PTS 16
Q. Post 41.0 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.07
PTS 3
P. Washington 40.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 6
J. Green 36.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2

SEASON STATS

42
Games
26.7
PPG
6.9
RPG
2.1
APG
1.0
SPG
0.5
BPG
47.7
FG%
35.5
3P%
89.6
FT%
34.4
MPG

GAME LOG

42 games played