UTA

2025-26 Season

LAURI MARKKANEN

Utah Jazz | Forward-Center | 7-1
Lauri Markkanen
26.7PPG
6.9RPG
2.1APG
34.4MPG
+18.2 Impact

Markkanen produces at an elite rate for a 34-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+18.2
Scoring +23.9
Points Scored 26.7 PPG = +26.7
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -7.8
Shot Making above expected FG% = +5.0
Creation +1.9
Assists & Self-Creation 2.1 AST/g + self-creation = +1.9
Turnovers -3.6
Turnovers 1.5/g (live + dead blend) = -3.6
Defense +0.5
Steals 1.0/g = +2.3
Blocks 0.5/g = +0.5
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -2.3
Hustle & Effort +6.4
Rebounds 6.9 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +3.4
Contested Shots 6.0/g = +1.2
Deflections 1.7/g = +1.1
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.4/g = +0.3
Screen Assists 1.2/g = +0.4
Raw Impact +29.1
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.9
Net Impact
+18.2
98th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 98th
26.7 PPG
Efficiency 81th
61.2% TS
Playmaking 66th
2.1 APG
Rebounding 88th
6.9 RPG
Defense 63th
+7.8/g
Hustle 83th
+16.8/g
Creation 91th
+4.42/g
Shot Making 93th
+9.52/g
TO Discipline 60th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Lauri Markkanen opened the 2025-26 season on an absolute scoring rampage, transforming into a high-volume offensive engine. His aggressive mentality peaked on 10/27 vs PHX. Launching 32 field goal attempts, he poured in 51 points and grabbed 14 rebounds over 45 grueling minutes. That relentless scoring pressure and dominant work on the glass yielded a staggering +50.5 Impact score. Even when his jumper completely abandoned him, he found ways to tilt the floor. On 11/08 vs MIN, Markkanen managed just 12 points on a brutal 4-for-14 shooting night, yet still salvaged a +6.3 Impact score. Instead of letting the cold streak sink him, he generated positive value by locking in defensively and disrupting Minnesota's rhythm. He quickly returned to his role as an unstoppable focal point on 11/17 vs CHI, putting up 47 points to drive a massive +38.0 Impact score by weaponizing his size from the perimeter.

This mid-season stretch was defined by a stark contrast between hollow volume shooting and absolute frontcourt dominance. High point totals sometimes masked severe inefficiency. Take his performance on 12/13 vs MEM, where he needed 22 shots to score 26 points. Despite the solid scoring output, his forced jumpers and poor shot selection dragged him down to a meager +4.9 Impact score. His value skyrocketed when he finally embraced physical basketball. On 12/16 vs DAL, Markkanen bullied his way to 33 points, 16 rebounds, and 5 assists, earning a massive +34.1 Impact score because of his relentless work on the glass and brilliant playmaking. He perfectly balanced volume and efficiency later in the month on 12/28 vs SAS, dropping 29 points on a clinical 11-of-16 from the floor. That pristine shot selection yielded a +29.5 Impact score, highlighting exactly how dangerous he becomes when he stops settling for bad looks.

This midseason stretch was defined by sheer, brute-force adaptability. When his usually reliable three-point stroke vanished, Markkanen simply battered opponents inside and hit the glass to maintain a massive positive influence on the floor. Look at his performance on 02/01 vs TOR. He clanked his way to an ugly 9-for-23 shooting night, yet still posted a staggering +34.4 Impact score because he relentlessly attacked the boards for 11 rebounds and created immense non-scoring value through sheer hustle. Even when his scoring volume plummeted on 02/09 vs MIA, he turned a quiet 17 points into a +9.3 Impact by securing eight vital rebounds and executing the dirty work in the paint. He applied that same interior aggression during a brutal 1-for-10 perimeter shooting slump on 02/23 vs HOU, salvaging an +18.6 Impact by hunting high-percentage twos to finish with 29 points. He stopped relying entirely on finesse, instead forcing his will on the game through physical grit.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Very consistent. Markkanen posts positive impact in 98% of games — you almost always get a productive night. Scoring varies by ~8 points, but the overall contribution stays positive.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 55% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Markkanen consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Performance has dropped off. First-half impact: +20.1, second-half: +16.2. Worth watching whether it's fatigue, injury, or opponents adjusting.

Hot right now — 25 straight games with positive impact. Longest positive run this season: 25 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 43 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

R. O'Neale 60.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 21
L. Dort 53.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 16
P. Washington 52.2 poss
FG% 63.6%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 17
J. Smith Jr. 48.9 poss
FG% 38.5%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 16
K. Murray 45.8 poss
FG% 14.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.04
PTS 2
I. Okoro 45.4 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 75.0%
PPP 0.4
PTS 18
J. Green 42.9 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 15
J. Butler III 41.4 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 10
J. Randle 37.4 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 4
S. Barnes 36.0 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 10

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

D. DeRozan 71.5 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 7
R. O'Neale 61.0 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.03
PTS 2
L. James 57.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 8
A. Thompson 56.5 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 8
K. Durant 44.1 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 8
C. Holmgren 42.6 poss
FG% 71.4%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 11
J. Randle 41.3 poss
FG% 45.5%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.39
PTS 16
Q. Post 41.0 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.07
PTS 3
P. Washington 40.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 6
J. Green 36.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2

SEASON STATS

42
Games
26.7
PPG
6.9
RPG
2.1
APG
1.0
SPG
0.5
BPG
47.7
FG%
35.5
3P%
89.6
FT%
34.4
MPG

GAME LOG

42 games played