Detroit Pistons

Eastern Conference

Detroit
Pistons

HC J.B. Bickerstaff

66-28
L3

ROSTER — IMPACT RANKINGS

Jalen Duren
Center Yr 3 82G (82S)
+15.9
18.1 pts
10.2 reb
2.0 ast
28.6 min

This late-season stretch marked a terrifying offensive breakout for Jalen Duren, who transformed into an unstoppable, hyper-efficient force around the rim. He set the tone early on 02/27 vs CLE, logging a massive +47.9 impact score by bullying his way to 33 points and 16 rebounds across 42 grueling minutes. His shot selection was virtually flawless during this run. This ruthless interior efficiency was perfectly captured on 03/17 vs WAS, where he dropped 36 points on a ridiculous 13-of-17 from the floor to earn a +38.7 impact mark. Duren also started punishing defensive rotations with sharp passing from the post. On 03/26 vs NOP, he paired 30 points on 10-of-12 shooting with seven assists, generating a +37.0 impact score by tearing apart coverages and dominating the glass. When a center combines automatic finishing with relentless rebounding, opposing frontcourts simply run out of answers.

Cade Cunningham
Guard Yr 4 76G (76S)
+12.8
24.5 pts
5.5 reb
9.5 ast
34.9 min

This midseason run marked Cunningham’s volatile transition into a pure, high-volume offensive maestro. He operated as an unstoppable engine during the 02/19 vs NYK matchup, hanging 42 points and 13 assists on the defense to generate a staggering +37.4 impact score. But giving him the ultimate green light occasionally backfired. Look at the 02/23 vs SAS game, where he clanked his way to 16 points on a brutal 5-of-26 shooting performance. That miserable shot selection and the resulting wasted possessions dragged his impact down to a -3.6 for the night. Fortunately, he is learning how to salvage his value when the jumper fails him. During the 03/12 vs PHI contest, Cunningham attempted just six field goals for 8 points but still managed a +1.6 impact by pivoting entirely to facilitation and racking up 13 assists to keep the offense humming.

Tobias Harris
Forward Yr 14 75G (75S)
+6.5
14.3 pts
5.5 reb
2.3 ast
28.9 min

Tobias Harris spent this late-season stretch oscillating wildly between hyper-efficient offensive engine and completely invisible passenger. He opened the run on 03/01 vs ORL by pouring in 23 points on 10-of-18 shooting, attacking mismatches to generate a massive +28.3 Impact score. Yet, just over a week later, he morphed into an offensive ghost on 03/10 vs BKN. He managed a meager two points on 1-of-5 shooting, and his sheer lack of aggression dragged his Impact down to a dismal -12.4. Thankfully, he eventually learned to adapt. On 03/26 vs NOP, Harris scored only 12 points but still posted a +6.3 Impact score by crashing the glass for nine rebounds and keeping the offense humming with seven assists. He remains a frustratingly talented veteran who dictates his own value entirely through his willingness to engage.

Ausar Thompson
Guard-Forward Yr 2 85G (84S)
+5.4
9.6 pts
6.0 reb
3.1 ast
26.6 min

This late-season stretch was defined by Ausar Thompson settling into a highly efficient, connective role where his relentless motor often outweighed his scoring limitations. On 02/27 vs CLE, he carved up the defense for 18 points, eight rebounds, and five assists on 7-of-10 shooting, generating a massive +18.8 Impact score. That elite rating stemmed directly from his pristine shot selection and constant off-ball movement, punishing a sleeping defense without demanding isolation touches. He did not even need to hit double digits to completely tilt a game, as seen on 03/01 vs ORL. Despite scoring just nine points, he ripped down 11 rebounds and missed only a single shot to earn a +16.1 Impact score, creating immense non-scoring value by generating second-chance opportunities and blowing up passing lanes. However, when his interior finishing vanished, his overall effectiveness plummeted. During a rough outing on 03/15 vs TOR, he managed just four points on an ugly 2-of-8 from the floor, resulting in a bleak -10.4 Impact score as his empty offensive possessions bogged down the entire unit.

Duncan Robinson
Forward Yr 7 89G (88S)
+2.5
12.1 pts
2.6 reb
2.1 ast
27.8 min

Duncan Robinson's late-season stretch was defined by the extreme volatility of life as a one-dimensional shooting specialist. Even when his jumper was falling, his limitations constantly threatened to sink his value on the floor. Take his performance during the Mar 31 vs TOR game, where he poured in 19 points on 5-of-8 shooting from deep, yet still posted a -4.9 impact score because his defensive liabilities (-4.7) bled away all his offensive gains. Conversely, his relentless cutting and perimeter gravity during the Apr 08 vs MIL matchup yielded a stellar +9.9 impact score as he efficiently racked up 20 points and opened massive driving lanes for his teammates. But when the aggression vanished entirely, he became an active detriment. In the Mar 15 vs TOR contest, a complete lack of offensive aggression resulted in just 1 point on two shot attempts, plunging him to a disastrous -18.9 impact score.

Paul Reed
Forward Yr 5 72G (11S)
+1.4
7.6 pts
4.4 reb
1.2 ast
13.2 min

Paul Reed spent the back half of the 2025-26 season oscillating wildly between an end-of-bench afterthought and an unstoppable spot-starting force. When thrust into the starting lineup 03/30 vs OKC, he unleashed sheer havoc, logging 21 points and 10 rebounds in 34 minutes to generate a massive +18.0 impact score through relentless rim pressure. Yet, his erratic nature surfaced just a day later 03/31 vs TOR. Despite tallying 10 points and five assists in just 13 minutes, he managed a -0.6 impact score because his defensive gambles and chaotic rotations gave away whatever value he created on offense. He eventually learned to channel that chaotic energy perfectly, capping off this stretch with an absolute masterclass 04/12 vs IND. Starting once again, Reed poured in 26 points on a flawless 11-for-11 shooting night. He registered an absurd +33.4 impact by completely eliminating bad shots and overwhelming the interior with pure hustle.

Isaiah Stewart
Forward-Center Yr 5 70G (13S)
-0.3
9.0 pts
4.6 reb
1.0 ast
21.0 min

Isaiah Stewart’s midseason stretch was defined by maddening volatility, oscillating wildly between empty-calorie scoring and dominant two-way shifts. Take his 01/29 vs PHX appearance as a prime example of his frustrating floor. Despite scoring a highly efficient 11 points on 4-for-5 shooting, he dragged the team down with a -2.8 Impact. The hidden cost was his complete lack of peripheral production, grabbing just two rebounds and zero assists while floating passively on defense. Conversely, he found ways to salvage terrible offensive nights through sheer effort, like on 03/10 vs BKN. He bricked his way to just 4 points on 2-for-7 shooting but still posted a +2.6 Impact. He generated that non-scoring value by crashing the glass for 8 rebounds and doing the necessary dirty work inside. When everything finally clicked, as it did on 03/05 vs SAS, the results were lethal; he drilled three triples en route to 18 points and a towering +16.7 Impact.

Kevin Huerter
Guard-Forward Yr 7 29G (3S)
-1.5
7.6 pts
2.6 reb
2.3 ast
19.1 min

This late-season stretch was defined by maddening inconsistency, with Huerter oscillating wildly between detrimental bench stints and sudden bursts of offensive brilliance. His erratic shot selection often sank the second unit, a flaw glaringly evident during the 04/04 vs PHI matchup. Despite logging six assists in that contest, his abysmal 2-for-9 shooting and forced perimeter looks dragged his Impact down to a dismal -10.3. Yet, when he stopped settling for bad threes and attacked with purpose, his overall value skyrocketed. During the 03/19 vs WAS game, Huerter missed both of his deep attempts but shot an efficient 6-of-10 overall, pairing 14 points with active rebounding to post a massive +19.8 Impact. He even found a rhythm when thrust into the starting five. On 03/26 vs NOP, he exploded for 22 points on 9-of-14 shooting, generating a +11.7 Impact simply by catching fire and punishing sluggish defensive closeouts.

Javonte Green
Guard Yr 6 93G (6S)
-2.1
6.4 pts
2.7 reb
0.6 ast
17.0 min

Pure, unadulterated chaos defined Javonte Green's late-season stretch, as he swung wildly between game-breaking energy and spacing-killing blunders. He rarely needed to shoot to completely hijack a game. Look at Mar 23 vs LAL, where he tallied a mere 6 points but posted a massive +10.7 impact score. That elite rating stemmed entirely from relentless defensive disruption (+6.7) and elite hustle (+4.5) that wreaked absolute havoc on the floor. When his jumper actually fell, he became a lethal weapon, dropping 19 points and hitting five threes to earn a +9.2 impact on Mar 30 vs OKC. Yet, his hyper-active style carried hidden costs. On Mar 26 vs NOP, Green scored an efficient 8 points on 3/4 shooting, but a brutal -6.7 impact score exposed how his defensive lapses (-2.6) actively sabotaged the broader lineup. He remains the ultimate volatile sparkplug.

Daniss Jenkins
Guard Yr 1 84G (20S)
-2.4
9.1 pts
2.4 reb
3.7 ast
20.3 min

A mid-season promotion to the starting lineup defined Daniss Jenkins's late-season stretch, transforming him from a struggling reserve into a wildly volatile offensive engine. Given the keys to the offense, he caught fire on 03/23 vs LAL. He torched the defense for 30 points and eight assists on highly efficient 11-for-18 shooting, generating a stellar +20.3 Impact. Yet, raw box score numbers were sometimes deceiving. During a grueling 45-minute shift on 03/25 vs ATL, Jenkins tallied 19 points and 10 assists but still dragged the team down with a -6.9 Impact. This negative mark despite a double-double stemmed from hidden costs, specifically his erratic 1-for-6 perimeter shooting and defensive liabilities that bled points the other way. He eventually learned to manipulate defenses without dominating the shot clock. On 04/04 vs PHI, he prioritized distribution over volume scoring, tallying 16 points but dishing out a massive 14 assists to drive a +13.5 Impact through relentless ball movement.

Ronald Holland II
Forward Yr 1 86G (5S)
-2.9
7.6 pts
3.8 reb
1.1 ast
18.7 min

Ronald Holland II's late-season stretch was defined by maddening inconsistency, oscillating wildly between explosive offensive bursts and disastrous, momentum-killing stints. During the Mar 12 vs PHI matchup, he poured in 15 points but still posted a dismal -9.0 impact score because underlying inefficiencies and severe defensive breakdowns bled points the other way. He frequently suffered from severe tunnel vision, forcing low-quality shots into crowded paint areas instead of letting the game come to him. When he finally harnessed that chaotic energy, the results were thrilling. He wrecked the opposition on Apr 08 vs MIL, generating a stellar +9.6 impact score alongside 18 points by relying on relentless rim-running and explosive off-ball cuts rather than forced isolation plays. Unfortunately, those flashes of brilliance were quickly erased by catastrophic lows, like his performance on Apr 12 vs IND. Costly turnovers and massive defensive bleeding dragged him to an abysmal -20.2 impact score in that contest, exposing the steep hidden costs of his erratic decision-making.

Jaden Ivey
Guard Yr 3 33G (2S)
-3.0
8.2 pts
2.2 reb
1.6 ast
16.8 min

Jaden Ivey spent this midseason stretch battling his own irrelevance, floating through empty-calorie bench minutes before a brief starting promotion forced him to actually engage. During a dismal reserve outing on 01/25 vs SAC, he tallied 11 points on an efficient 4-of-6 shooting, yet dragged his team down with a -6.5 Impact score. That stark negative rating stemmed from his complete tunnel vision and poor defensive effort, as he failed to record a single assist while giving up easy looks on the other end. The slump hit rock bottom on 01/29 vs PHX with a scoreless, seven-minute cameo that yielded an abysmal -9.2 Impact. Given a sudden lifeline in the starting lineup, Ivey finally flipped the script on 02/09 vs BKN. Despite shooting a lackluster 3-for-8 from the floor for 13 points, he posted a stellar +8.0 Impact by crashing the glass for six rebounds, distributing three assists, and locking in defensively to generate crucial value without the ball.

Tolu Smith
Forward Yr 1 17G
-4.0
3.5 pts
3.0 reb
0.8 ast
8.5 min
Caris LeVert
Guard Yr 9 71G
-5.0
7.1 pts
2.0 reb
2.4 ast
18.6 min

This brutal twenty-game stretch was defined by a crippling shooting slump that rendered Caris LeVert nearly unplayable off the bench. The absolute nadir arrived on 03/13 vs MEM. He forced terrible looks all night, finishing with just four points on a dismal 2-of-10 from the floor. Clanking all five of his three-point attempts dragged his overall impact to a disastrous -16.8. He briefly snapped out of his funk on 03/19 vs WAS, pouring in an efficient 14 points alongside six assists. By letting the game come to him rather than chucking heavily contested jumpers, he earned a rare +5.6 impact score. Take his gritty outing on 04/10 vs CHA for a glimpse of his alternative value. Despite scoring only six points on ugly 2-of-7 shooting, he managed to scrape out a +0.1 impact by digging in defensively and keeping the ball moving with three assists.

Marcus Sasser
Guard Yr 2 42G (5S)
-5.4
5.1 pts
1.0 reb
1.8 ast
11.5 min

Marcus Sasser's late-season stretch was defined by a brutal offensive slump and passive play that steadily erased his spot in the rotation. During the 03/26 vs NOP matchup, his erratic shot selection resulted in a dismal 3-for-11 shooting night and a steep -12.2 Impact score. Two nights later on 03/28 vs MIN, he swung to the opposite extreme. He refused to take a single shot in 11 minutes of action, logging a -11.0 Impact score because his complete lack of offensive aggression allowed the defense to totally ignore him. Even when his jumper briefly returned, his overall floor game dragged him down. He poured in a stretch-high 12 points on 4-of-6 from deep on 03/30 vs OKC, yet still posted a -4.8 Impact because he offered virtually nothing in terms of rebounding or defensive resistance. When a backup guard becomes a complete liability on both ends of the floor, his playing time inevitably evaporates.

Chaz Lanier
Guard Yr 0 36G
-6.6
2.3 pts
0.6 reb
0.5 ast
7.5 min

This late-season stretch was defined by sheer offensive futility and hollow minutes at the end of the rotation. Chaz Lanier looked completely lost on the floor, forcing bad shots in limited action while offering zero playmaking to compensate. Look no further than 03/12 vs PHI, where he went scoreless in just five minutes and clanked three shots to earn a brutal -13.9 impact score. Giving him a longer leash only magnified his struggles. During a 16-minute shift on 04/06 vs ORL, he shot a dismal 1-for-7 from the field and missed all four of his three-point attempts, dragging his impact down to -10.7 because his erratic shot selection actively derailed offensive possessions. Even on the rare night his jumper actually fell, like when he hit a pair of threes for six points on 03/26 vs NOP, his overall impact remained stubbornly negative at -3.4. He simply failed to generate any peripheral value, finishing that night with just one rebound and one assist, leaving his team exposed whenever he wasn't actively scoring.

Wendell Moore Jr.
Guard Yr 3 6G
-7.4
1.7 pts
1.0 reb
0.7 ast
9.9 min
Isaac Jones
Forward Yr 1 4G
-8.9
1.5 pts
0.8 reb
0.0 ast
4.7 min
Bobi Klintman
Forward Yr 1 12G
-9.0
1.8 pts
1.6 reb
0.5 ast
6.0 min
L
vs CLE CLE
125 CLE DET 94
CLE vs CLE
94 125
Sun, May 17
Playoffs Analysis
-31
L
@ CLE CLE
103 DET CLE 112
CLE @ CLE
103 112
Mon, May 11
Playoffs Analysis
-9
L
@ CLE CLE
109 DET CLE 116
CLE @ CLE
109 116
Sat, May 9
Playoffs Analysis
-7
W
vs CLE CLE
97 CLE DET 107
CLE vs CLE
107 97
Thu, May 7
Playoffs Analysis
+10
W
vs CLE CLE
101 CLE DET 111
CLE vs CLE
111 101
Tue, May 5
Playoffs Analysis
+10
W
vs ORL ORL
94 ORL DET 116
ORL vs ORL
116 94
Sun, May 3
Playoffs Analysis
+22
W
@ ORL ORL
93 DET ORL 79
ORL @ ORL
93 79
Fri, May 1
Playoffs Analysis
+14
W
vs ORL ORL
109 ORL DET 116
ORL vs ORL
116 109
Wed, Apr 29
Playoffs Analysis
+7
L
@ ORL ORL
88 DET ORL 94
ORL @ ORL
88 94
Mon, Apr 27
Playoffs Analysis
-6
L
@ ORL ORL
105 DET ORL 113
ORL @ ORL
105 113
Sat, Apr 25
Playoffs Analysis
-8
W
vs ORL ORL
83 ORL DET 98
ORL vs ORL
98 83
Wed, Apr 22
Playoffs Analysis
+15
L
vs ORL ORL
112 ORL DET 101
ORL vs ORL
101 112
Sun, Apr 19
Playoffs Analysis
-11
W
@ IND IND
133 DET IND 121
IND @ IND
133 121
Sun, Apr 12
Analysis
+12
W
@ CHA CHA
118 DET CHA 100
CHA @ CHA
118 100
Fri, Apr 10
Analysis
+18
W
vs MIL MIL
111 MIL DET 137
MIL vs MIL
137 111
Wed, Apr 8
Analysis
+26
L
@ ORL ORL
107 DET ORL 123
ORL @ ORL
107 123
Mon, Apr 6
Analysis
-16
W
@ PHI PHI
116 DET PHI 93
PHI @ PHI
116 93
Sat, Apr 4
Analysis
+23
W
vs MIN MIN
108 MIN DET 113
MIN vs MIN
113 108
Thu, Apr 2
Analysis
+5
W
vs TOR TOR
116 TOR DET 127
TOR vs TOR
127 116
Tue, Mar 31
Analysis
+11
L
@ OKC OKC
110 DET OKC 114
OKC @ OKC
110 114
Mon, Mar 30
Analysis
-4
W
@ MIN MIN
109 DET MIN 87
MIN @ MIN
109 87
Sat, Mar 28
Analysis
+22
W
vs NOP NOP
108 NOP DET 129
NOP vs NOP
129 108
Thu, Mar 26
Analysis
+21
L
vs ATL ATL
130 ATL DET 129
ATL vs ATL
129 130
Wed, Mar 25
Analysis
-1
W
vs LAL LAL
110 LAL DET 113
LAL vs LAL
113 110
Mon, Mar 23
Analysis
+3
W
vs GSW GSW
101 GSW DET 115
GSW vs GSW
115 101
Fri, Mar 20
Analysis
+14
W
@ WAS WAS
117 DET WAS 95
WAS @ WAS
117 95
Thu, Mar 19
Analysis
+22
W
@ WAS WAS
130 DET WAS 117
WAS @ WAS
130 117
Tue, Mar 17
Analysis
+13
L
@ TOR TOR
108 DET TOR 119
TOR @ TOR
108 119
Sun, Mar 15
Analysis
-11
W
vs MEM MEM
110 MEM DET 126
MEM vs MEM
126 110
Fri, Mar 13
Analysis
+16
W
vs PHI PHI
109 PHI DET 131
PHI vs PHI
131 109
Thu, Mar 12
Analysis
+22
W
@ BKN BKN
138 DET BKN 100
BKN @ BKN
138 100
Tue, Mar 10
Analysis
+38
L
@ MIA MIA
110 DET MIA 121
MIA @ MIA
110 121
Sun, Mar 8
Analysis
-11
L
vs BKN BKN
107 BKN DET 105
BKN vs BKN
105 107
Sat, Mar 7
Analysis
-2
L
@ SAS SAS
106 DET SAS 121
SAS @ SAS
106 121
Thu, Mar 5
Analysis
-15
L
@ CLE CLE
109 DET CLE 113
CLE @ CLE
109 113
Tue, Mar 3
Analysis
-4
W
@ ORL ORL
106 DET ORL 92
ORL @ ORL
106 92
Sun, Mar 1
Analysis
+14
W
vs CLE CLE
119 CLE DET 122
CLE vs CLE
122 119
Fri, Feb 27
Analysis
+3
W
vs OKC OKC
116 OKC DET 124
OKC vs OKC
124 116
Wed, Feb 25
Analysis
+8
L
vs SAS SAS
114 SAS DET 103
SAS vs SAS
103 114
Mon, Feb 23
Analysis
-11
W
@ CHI CHI
126 DET CHI 110
CHI @ CHI
126 110
Sat, Feb 21
Analysis
+16
W
@ NYK NYK
126 DET NYK 111
NYK @ NYK
126 111
Thu, Feb 19
Analysis
+15
W
@ TOR TOR
113 DET TOR 95
TOR @ TOR
113 95
Wed, Feb 11
Analysis
+18
W
@ CHA CHA
110 DET CHA 104
CHA @ CHA
110 104
Mon, Feb 9
Analysis
+6
W
vs NYK NYK
80 NYK DET 118
NYK vs NYK
118 80
Fri, Feb 6
Analysis
+38
L
vs WAS WAS
126 WAS DET 117
WAS vs WAS
117 126
Thu, Feb 5
Analysis
-9
W
vs DEN DEN
121 DEN DET 124
DEN vs DEN
124 121
Tue, Feb 3
Analysis
+3
W
vs BKN BKN
77 BKN DET 130
BKN vs BKN
130 77
Sun, Feb 1
Analysis
+53
W
@ GSW GSW
131 DET GSW 124
GSW @ GSW
131 124
Fri, Jan 30
Analysis
+7
L
@ PHX PHX
96 DET PHX 114
PHX @ PHX
96 114
Thu, Jan 29
Analysis
-18
W
@ DEN DEN
109 DET DEN 107
DEN @ DEN
109 107
Wed, Jan 28
Analysis
+2
W
vs SAC SAC
116 SAC DET 139
SAC vs SAC
139 116
Sun, Jan 25
Analysis
+23
L
vs HOU HOU
111 HOU DET 104
HOU vs HOU
104 111
Sat, Jan 24
Analysis
-7
W
@ NOP NOP
112 DET NOP 104
NOP @ NOP
112 104
Thu, Jan 22
Analysis
+8
W
vs BOS BOS
103 BOS DET 104
BOS vs BOS
104 103
Tue, Jan 20
Analysis
+1
W
vs IND IND
78 IND DET 121
IND vs IND
121 78
Sun, Jan 18
Analysis
+43
W
vs PHX PHX
105 PHX DET 108
PHX vs PHX
108 105
Fri, Jan 16
Analysis
+3
L
vs LAC LAC
98 LAC DET 92
LAC vs LAC
92 98
Sun, Jan 11
Analysis
-6
W
vs CHI CHI
93 CHI DET 108
CHI vs CHI
108 93
Thu, Jan 8
Analysis
+15
W
vs NYK NYK
90 NYK DET 121
NYK vs NYK
121 90
Tue, Jan 6
Analysis
+31
W
@ CLE CLE
114 DET CLE 110
CLE @ CLE
114 110
Sun, Jan 4
Analysis
+4
L
vs MIA MIA
118 MIA DET 112
MIA vs MIA
112 118
Fri, Jan 2
Analysis
-6
W
@ LAL LAL
128 DET LAL 106
LAL @ LAL
128 106
Wed, Dec 31
Analysis
+22
L
@ LAC LAC
99 DET LAC 112
LAC @ LAC
99 112
Mon, Dec 29
Analysis
-13
L
@ UTA UTA
129 DET UTA 131
UTA @ UTA
129 131
Sat, Dec 27
Analysis
-2
W
@ SAC SAC
136 DET SAC 127
SAC @ SAC
136 127
Wed, Dec 24
Analysis
+9
W
@ POR POR
110 DET POR 102
POR @ POR
110 102
Tue, Dec 23
Analysis
+8
W
vs CHA CHA
86 CHA DET 112
CHA vs CHA
112 86
Sun, Dec 21
Analysis
+26
L
@ DAL DAL
114 DET DAL 116
DAL @ DAL
114 116
Fri, Dec 19
Analysis
-2
W
@ BOS BOS
112 DET BOS 105
BOS @ BOS
112 105
Tue, Dec 16
Analysis
+7
W
vs ATL ATL
115 ATL DET 142
ATL vs ATL
142 115
Sat, Dec 13
Analysis
+27
W
vs MIL MIL
112 MIL DET 124
MIL vs MIL
124 112
Sun, Dec 7
Analysis
+12
W
vs POR POR
116 POR DET 122
POR vs POR
122 116
Sat, Dec 6
Analysis
+6
L
@ MIL MIL
109 DET MIL 113
MIL @ MIL
109 113
Thu, Dec 4
Analysis
-4
W
vs ATL ATL
98 ATL DET 99
ATL vs ATL
99 98
Tue, Dec 2
Analysis
+1
W
@ MIA MIA
138 DET MIA 135
MIA @ MIA
138 135
Sun, Nov 30
Analysis
+3
L
vs ORL ORL
112 ORL DET 109
ORL vs ORL
109 112
Sat, Nov 29
Analysis
-3
L
@ BOS BOS
114 DET BOS 117
BOS @ BOS
114 117
Wed, Nov 26
Analysis
-3
W
@ IND IND
122 DET IND 117
IND @ IND
122 117
Tue, Nov 25
Analysis
+5
W
@ MIL MIL
129 DET MIL 116
MIL @ MIL
129 116
Sun, Nov 23
Analysis
+13
W
@ ATL ATL
120 DET ATL 112
ATL @ ATL
120 112
Wed, Nov 19
Analysis
+8
W
vs IND IND
112 IND DET 127
IND vs IND
127 112
Tue, Nov 18
Analysis
+15
W
vs PHI PHI
105 PHI DET 114
PHI vs PHI
114 105
Sat, Nov 15
Analysis
+9
W
vs CHI CHI
113 CHI DET 124
CHI vs CHI
124 113
Thu, Nov 13
Analysis
+11
W
vs WAS WAS
135 WAS DET 137
WAS vs WAS
137 135
Tue, Nov 11
Analysis
+2
W
@ PHI PHI
111 DET PHI 108
PHI @ PHI
111 108
Mon, Nov 10
Analysis
+3
W
@ BKN BKN
125 DET BKN 107
BKN @ BKN
125 107
Sat, Nov 8
Analysis
+18
W
vs UTA UTA
103 UTA DET 114
UTA vs UTA
114 103
Thu, Nov 6
Analysis
+11
W
@ MEM MEM
114 DET MEM 106
MEM @ MEM
114 106
Tue, Nov 4
Analysis
+8
W
vs DAL DAL
110 DAL DET 122
DAL vs DAL
122 110
Sun, Nov 2
Analysis
+12
W
vs ORL ORL
116 ORL DET 135
ORL vs ORL
135 116
Wed, Oct 29
Analysis
+19
L
vs CLE CLE
116 CLE DET 95
CLE vs CLE
95 116
Mon, Oct 27
Analysis
-21
W
vs BOS BOS
113 BOS DET 119
BOS vs BOS
119 113
Sun, Oct 26
Analysis
+6
W
@ HOU HOU
115 DET HOU 111
HOU @ HOU
115 111
Fri, Oct 24
Analysis
+4
L
@ CHI CHI
111 DET CHI 115
CHI @ CHI
111 115
Wed, Oct 22
Analysis
-4