DET

2025-26 Season

CHAZ LANIER

Detroit Pistons | Guard | 6-3
Chaz Lanier
2.3PPG
0.6RPG
0.5APG
7.5MPG
-6.4 Impact

Lanier produces at an poor rate for a 8-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-6.4
Scoring +1.7
Points Scored 2.3 PPG = +2.3
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -1.3
Shot Making above expected FG% = +0.7
Creation +0.1
Assists & Self-Creation 0.5 AST/g + self-creation = +0.1
Turnovers -0.2
Turnovers 0.1/g (live + dead blend) = -0.2
Defense +0.2
Steals 0.2/g = +0.5
Blocks 0.0/g = +0.0
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -0.3
Hustle & Effort +0.5
Rebounds 0.6 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +0.1
Contested Shots 0.5/g = +0.1
Deflections 0.3/g = +0.2
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.1/g = +0.1
Screen Assists 0.0/g = +0.0
Raw Impact +2.3
Baseline (game-average expected) −8.7
Net Impact
-6.4
12th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 246 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 4th
3.8 PPG
Efficiency 8th
45.4% TS
Playmaking 8th
0.9 APG
Rebounding 2th
1.1 RPG
Defense 2th
+2.4/g
Hustle 12th
+5.1/g
Creation 1th
+0.70/g
Shot Making 4th
+2.88/g
TO Discipline 100th
0.01/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Chaz Lanier’s first twelve games of the season were defined by a desperate, mostly fruitless fight to earn consistent rotation minutes. When thrown into the fire on 10/26 vs BOS, he looked entirely out of his depth. He missed both of his shots and posted an abysmal -12.0 impact score, dragged down by his complete inability to generate offense or grab a single rebound in five empty minutes. A brief window of opportunity opened on 11/11 vs WAS when he logged a season-high 26 minutes and scored 8 points. Yet, even in that extended run, erratic shot selection resulted in a -0.3 impact score as he bricked three of his five attempts from beyond the arc. He flashed slightly better playmaking on 11/15 vs PHI with four assists and four boards. However, his value remained stuck in the red with a -1.1 impact score because his persistent perimeter chucking—going 2-for-6 from deep without attempting a single two-pointer—continued to stall the second unit's offensive rhythm.

Chaz Lanier spent this entire stretch fighting a losing battle against irrelevance, logging brief, empty shifts at the end of the bench. His minutes were mostly an exercise in pure cardio, bottoming out entirely on 03/08 vs MIA. During that brutal eight-minute stint, he clanked all three of his field goal attempts and recorded zeroes across the rest of his box score, resulting in a dismal -13.4 Impact score. He occasionally found the bottom of the net, like when he poured in seven quick points on 3-of-4 shooting on 02/06 vs NYK to earn a rare +2.9 Impact. However, those fleeting offensive bursts were the exception to a grim rule. Take his 01/25 vs SAC appearance, where he managed two points and two rebounds in five minutes, yet still posted a staggering -11.2 Impact because he offered absolutely zero playmaking and bled value on the defensive end. If Lanier wants to crack a real NBA rotation, he has to find ways to actually affect the game instead of just taking up space.

This late-season stretch was defined by sheer offensive futility and hollow minutes at the end of the rotation. Chaz Lanier looked completely lost on the floor, forcing bad shots in limited action while offering zero playmaking to compensate. Look no further than 03/12 vs PHI, where he went scoreless in just five minutes and clanked three shots to earn a brutal -13.9 impact score. Giving him a longer leash only magnified his struggles. During a 16-minute shift on 04/06 vs ORL, he shot a dismal 1-for-7 from the field and missed all four of his three-point attempts, dragging his impact down to -10.7 because his erratic shot selection actively derailed offensive possessions. Even on the rare night his jumper actually fell, like when he hit a pair of threes for six points on 03/26 vs NOP, his overall impact remained stubbornly negative at -3.4. He simply failed to generate any peripheral value, finishing that night with just one rebound and one assist, leaving his team exposed whenever he wasn't actively scoring.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Lanier has posted negative impact in 94% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 17% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Small downward trend. First-half impact: -5.5, second-half: -7.3. Not alarming yet, but trending the wrong direction.

In a rough stretch — 17 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 17 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 58 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

C. Kispert 18.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Huerter 12.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.41
PTS 5
Q. Grimes 11.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
B. Sheppard 11.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Carter 11.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Dosunmu 9.7 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.62
PTS 6
R. Sheppard 9.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.32
PTS 3
B. Carrington 9.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 2
T. Johnson 8.6 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 3
L. Travers 8.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

Q. Grimes 17.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
B. Carrington 16.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
C. Kispert 13.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Huerter 11.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
R. Sheppard 11.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Carter 10.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 2
B. Sheppard 10.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
L. Travers 9.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Phillips 9.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Smith 8.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.57
PTS 5

SEASON STATS

36
Games
2.3
PPG
0.6
RPG
0.5
APG
0.2
SPG
0.0
BPG
31.5
FG%
27.9
3P%
83.3
FT%
7.5
MPG

GAME LOG

36 games played