DET

2025-26 Season

PAUL REED

Detroit Pistons | Forward | 6-9
Paul Reed
7.4 PPG
4.4 RPG
1.2 APG
13.7 MPG
+6.1 Impact

Reed produces at an elite rate for a 14-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+6.1
Scoring +5.2
Points 7.4 PPG × +1.00 = +7.4
Missed 2PT 1.7/g × -0.78 = -1.3
Missed 3PT 0.4/g × -0.87 = -0.3
Missed FT 0.6/g × -1.00 = -0.6
Creation +2.0
Assists 1.2/g × +0.50 = +0.6
Off. Rebounds 1.1/g × +1.26 = +1.4
Turnovers -1.8
Turnovers 0.9/g × -1.95 = -1.8
Defense +2.0
Steals 0.9/g × +2.30 = +2.1
Blocks 0.9/g × +0.90 = +0.8
Def. Rebounds 3.3/g × +0.30 = +1.0
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +3.1
Contested Shots 4.6/g × +0.20 = +0.9
Deflections 1.9/g × +0.65 = +1.2
Loose Balls 0.5/g × +0.60 = +0.3
Screen Assists 1.6/g × +0.30 = +0.5
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.1/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.2
Raw Impact +10.5
Baseline (game-average expected) −4.4
Net Impact
+6.1
95th pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 47th
8.8 PPG
Efficiency 94th
65.3% TS
Playmaking 43th
1.4 APG
Rebounding 67th
5.2 RPG
Rim Protection 98th
0.27/min
Hustle 98th
0.19/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 21th
0.06/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Paul Reed's opening stretch was defined by his uncanny ability to turn microscopic minutes into massive, game-altering swings of momentum. Even when he barely looked at the rim, his relentless motor generated immense value for the second unit. Look at his performance vs BKN on 11/07, where he scored just 6 points but posted a staggering +11.5 impact score by wreaking havoc as a weak-side helper and altering shots without fouling. He relied on that exact dirty-work blueprint vs ORL on 11/28, turning a quiet 1-point outing into a +2.7 impact mark strictly through incredible per-minute defensive activity and hustle. When finally unleashed in a starting role, that same high-motor energy translated into absolute offensive dominance. During a spot start vs CHI on 11/12, Reed destroyed the opposition in the pick-and-roll to log 28 points, 13 rebounds, and 6 assists. That hyper-efficient 31-minute masterclass generated an absurd +34.8 impact score. Whether he plays six minutes or thirty, Reed remains a chaotic disruptor who forces opponents to account for his sheer effort on every single possession.

Paul Reed’s mid-season stretch was defined by a violent, undeniable breakout that forced him from the end of the bench into a high-leverage spot-starting role. Even when he wasn't scoring, his manic energy tilted the floor. Look at his brief shift on 12/26 vs UTA, where he logged zero points in four minutes yet generated a massive +6.7 impact score simply by acting as a pure defensive disruptor. As the calendar flipped, that raw hustle evolved into hyper-efficient offensive destruction. He absolutely bullied his way to a +12.0 impact mark on 01/01 vs MIA, grabbing seven rebounds in just 12 minutes while converting all four of his shot attempts through flawless interior finishing. By February, he was anchoring the paint as a starter, erupting for 22 points on 02/11 vs TOR to yield a staggering +18.7 impact score. His astronomical ratings during this run were the direct result of relentless offensive glass-crashing, elite rim-running, and a complete refusal to settle for bad shots.

This stretch was defined by absolute micro-burst dominance, as Paul Reed transformed brief rotational cameos into game-tilting chaotic energy. His ability to completely hijack a game's momentum peaked on 03/08 vs MIA. In just six minutes of action, he logged an absurd +16.2 impact score. That astronomical rating stemmed from explosive offensive finishing and relentless energy that yielded a +1.5 hustle score. Even when his scoring volume vanished, his motor kept him firmly in the positive. During the 03/01 vs ORL matchup, Reed took just one shot for five points but still generated a +5.3 impact score by anchoring the backup unit with physical rim deterrence and high-value hustle plays (+3.3). The team eventually rewarded this two-way value with a spot start on 03/30 vs OKC. Given 34 minutes of run, Reed battered the Thunder interior for 21 points and 10 rebounds, driving a massive +13.9 impact score through elite rim protection and a staggering +6.2 hustle rating.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Very consistent. Reed posts positive impact in 87% of games — you almost always get a productive night. Scoring varies by ~6 points, but the overall contribution stays positive.

Reliable shooter — hits 45%+ from the field in 82% of games. You can count on efficient nights more often than not.

Defensive difference-maker. Reed consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: +5.3, second-half: +6.9. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

Hot right now — 11 straight games with positive impact. Longest positive run this season: 23 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 76 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

K. Towns 52.2 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 4
N. Vučević 47.8 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 14
T. Vukcevic 38.4 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 8
M. Robinson 32.1 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 10
C. Holmgren 31.7 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.38
PTS 12
K. Ware 28.9 poss
FG% 71.4%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.45
PTS 13
A. Gill 28.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 6
J. Poeltl 28.2 poss
FG% 88.9%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.6
PTS 17
J. Randle 27.9 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 4
I. Zubac 27.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 7

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

K. Towns 57.7 poss
FG% 41.7%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 16
T. Vukcevic 40.3 poss
FG% 70.0%
3P% 75.0%
PPP 0.52
PTS 21
N. Vučević 39.4 poss
FG% 27.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 6
K. Ware 35.4 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 8
M. Robinson 34.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 4
S. Mamukelashvili 29.5 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 4
J. Randle 29.3 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 6
I. Zubac 27.9 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 5
C. Holmgren 26.8 poss
FG% 55.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.37
PTS 10
B. Portis 26.4 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.38
PTS 10

SEASON STATS

60
Games
7.4
PPG
4.4
RPG
1.2
APG
0.9
SPG
0.9
BPG
59.7
FG%
33.3
3P%
65.7
FT%
13.7
MPG

GAME LOG

60 games played