Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
DET lead OKC lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
OKC 2P — 3P —
DET 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 185 attempts

OKC OKC Shot-making Δ

Wallace 9/17 +3.0
McCain Hard 6/16 +1.3
Wiggins Hard 6/16 -1.3
Williams Hard 9/14 +10.3
Williams 5/10 +1.0
Dort Hard 1/8 -4.6
Joe Hard 1/5 -1.1
Carlson 2/4 -0.3
Barnhizer Hard 0/3 -2.6
Topić Open 0/3 -3.5

DET DET Shot-making Δ

Duren Open 12/17 +4.7
Cunningham Hard 11/16 +9.6
Robinson Hard 4/11 +0.2
Holland II 4/9 -3.0
Thompson Open 5/7 +2.3
Reed Open 3/7 -1.9
LeVert Hard 3/6 +1.2
Jenkins Hard 2/6 -1.5
Harris Hard 2/5 -0.6
Green Hard 2/4 +2.1
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
OKC
DET
39/96 Field Goals 48/89
40.6% Field Goal % 53.9%
18/49 3-Pointers 9/27
36.7% 3-Point % 33.3%
20/21 Free Throws 19/26
95.2% Free Throw % 73.1%
55.1% True Shooting % 61.7%
47 Total Rebounds 59
12 Offensive 16
25 Defensive 36
28 Assists 29
2.00 Assist/TO Ratio 1.71
13 Turnovers 15
7 Steals 9
3 Blocks 12
20 Fouls 21
32 Points in Paint 70
8 Fast Break Pts 13
27 Points off TOs 16
30 Second Chance Pts 17
37 Bench Points 35
12 Largest Lead 17
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Jalen Duren
29 PTS · 15 REB · 2 AST · 31.3 MIN
+32.8
2
Jaylin Williams
30 PTS · 11 REB · 4 AST · 35.5 MIN
+24.83
3
Cade Cunningham
29 PTS · 4 REB · 13 AST · 38.1 MIN
+22.85
4
Cason Wallace
23 PTS · 2 REB · 5 AST · 30.1 MIN
+17.12
5
Ausar Thompson
11 PTS · 4 REB · 7 AST · 28.2 MIN
+14.2
6
Jared McCain
20 PTS · 3 REB · 2 AST · 29.9 MIN
+13.73
7
Duncan Robinson
16 PTS · 3 REB · 3 AST · 30.3 MIN
+13.69
8
Aaron Wiggins
20 PTS · 4 REB · 6 AST · 34.6 MIN
+10.22
9
Javonte Green
6 PTS · 4 REB · 0 AST · 17.4 MIN
+8.96
10
Kenrich Williams
13 PTS · 4 REB · 0 AST · 26.0 MIN
+8.88
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:08 J. Duren REBOUND (Off:5 Def:10) 116–124
Q4 0:10 MISS K. Williams tip Layup 116–124
Q4 0:12 K. Williams REBOUND (Off:3 Def:1) 116–124
Q4 0:13 MISS N. Topić driving Layup 116–124
Q4 0:20 C. Cunningham Free Throw 2 of 2 (29 PTS) 116–124
Q4 0:20 C. Cunningham Free Throw 1 of 2 (28 PTS) 116–123
Q4 0:20 C. Wallace personal FOUL (5 PF) (Cunningham 2 FT) 116–122
Q4 0:23 J. Williams bad pass out-of-bounds TURNOVER (4 TO) 116–122
Q4 0:28 J. Duren cutting DUNK (29 PTS) (C. Cunningham 13 AST) 116–122
Q4 0:39 A. Wiggins Free Throw 2 of 2 (20 PTS) 116–120
Q4 0:39 A. Wiggins Free Throw 1 of 2 (19 PTS) 115–120
Q4 0:39 J. Duren shooting personal FOUL (2 PF) (Wiggins 2 FT) 114–120
Q4 0:46 L. Dort STEAL (2 STL) 114–120
Q4 0:46 C. Cunningham bad pass TURNOVER (8 TO) 114–120
Q4 0:49 C. Cunningham STEAL (3 STL) 114–120

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

DET Detroit Pistons
S Cade Cunningham 38.1m
29
pts
4
reb
13
ast
Impact
+14.8

Masterful offensive orchestration and hyper-efficient shot-making anchored a stellar two-way performance. Picking apart the pick-and-roll coverage with precision passing generated high-quality looks all night. His engaged point-of-attack defense completely disrupted the opponent's primary actions.

Shooting
FG 11/16 (68.8%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 81.6%
USG% 27.4%
Net Rtg +22.3
+/- +17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.1m
Scoring +25.5
Creation +3.6
Shot Making +7.2
Hustle +1.2
Defense +3.3
Turnovers -17.7
STL 3
BLK 3
TO 8
S Jalen Duren 31.3m
29
pts
15
reb
2
ast
Impact
+34.3

Absolute dominance in the painted area fueled a monstrous overall impact score. Converting a massive volume of high-percentage looks at the rim and controlling the interior completely overwhelmed the opposing frontcourt. His physical presence dictated the terms of engagement on both ends of the floor.

Shooting
FG 12/17 (70.6%)
3PT 0/0
FT 5/7 (71.4%)
Advanced
TS% 72.2%
USG% 25.6%
Net Rtg +19.5
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.3m
Scoring +24.4
Creation +2.2
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +16.1
Defense -2.6
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
S Duncan Robinson 30.3m
16
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
+8.1

Cold shooting from deep neutralized his primary utility, resulting in a perfectly flat net impact. Clanking the vast majority of his outside shots allowed the defense to stay home and limit driving lanes for teammates. While his defensive rotations were surprisingly sharp, the lack of scoring gravity kept him from moving the needle.

Shooting
FG 4/11 (36.4%)
3PT 3/9 (33.3%)
FT 5/5 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 60.6%
USG% 17.1%
Net Rtg +24.4
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.3m
Scoring +10.8
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +2.8
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Ausar Thompson 28.1m
11
pts
4
reb
7
ast
Impact
+9.6

Elite defensive disruption and relentless hustle plays drove a massive positive rating. Attacking the glass and generating extra possessions masked his lack of perimeter shooting. His ability to convert nearly all his interior looks punished defenders who dared to leave him open on cuts.

Shooting
FG 5/7 (71.4%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/4 (25.0%)
Advanced
TS% 62.8%
USG% 17.1%
Net Rtg +28.4
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.1m
Scoring +7.8
Creation +2.5
Shot Making +2.3
Hustle +5.1
Defense +7.8
Turnovers -5.9
STL 3
BLK 2
TO 3
S Tobias Harris 23.8m
4
pts
8
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.3

Passive offensive involvement and missed perimeter looks tanked his overall value. Failing to assert himself in the half-court allowed the defense to key in on primary creators. Even with decent positional defense, his inability to command defensive attention dragged down the starting unit.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 40.0%
USG% 8.3%
Net Rtg +1.6
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.8m
Scoring +1.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.2
Hustle +2.4
Defense -1.1
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
6
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.0

Opportunistic perimeter shooting and relentless hustle perfectly complemented the primary creators. Drilling his perimeter looks punished defensive over-help. His willingness to do the dirty work on the margins provided a steady, stabilizing presence.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 8.7%
Net Rtg +26.5
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.4m
Scoring +4.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +2.2
Defense +1.3
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
Caris LeVert 17.3m
9
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-8.4

Defensive liabilities completely overshadowed a tidy, efficient shooting night. Getting lost on switches and failing to contain dribble penetration bled points on the other end. The inability to string together stops turned his offensive contributions into empty calories.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 65.4%
USG% 21.4%
Net Rtg -29.4
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.3m
Scoring +6.7
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.2
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -5.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
Paul Reed 16.6m
8
pts
6
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.3

Disruptive interior defense and high-energy rim runs drove a solid positive impact. Altering shots in the paint and fighting for position created a noticeable physical edge. Even with a few clunky offensive finishes, his motor dictated the tempo during his minutes.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 45.7%
USG% 24.4%
Net Rtg -8.4
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.6m
Scoring +4.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +6.7
Defense +0.1
Turnovers -1.1
STL 0
BLK 4
TO 1
8
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
-0.9

Slashing to the rim provided a modest offensive boost, though his broken perimeter jumper limited his ceiling. Coming up empty from beyond the arc allowed defenders to pack the paint. Ultimately, his energy in transition kept his head above water despite the spacing issues.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 44.4%
USG% 25.7%
Net Rtg +4.5
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.3m
Scoring +3.5
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +6.3
Defense -0.1
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
4
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.6

Poor shot selection and an inability to find an offensive rhythm dragged down the second unit. Missing the bulk of his attempts stalled out possessions and fueled opponent transition opportunities. His lack of impact plays on the margins compounded a highly ineffective stint.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 17.6%
Net Rtg -28.6
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.2m
Scoring +1.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +3.8
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-14.0

A completely invisible offensive stint severely hampered the team's spacing. Failing to convert his only attempt allowed his defender to freely roam and disrupt passing lanes. Getting targeted on defense only worsened a brutal, short-lived appearance.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 4.8%
Net Rtg -44.9
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.7m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -1.9
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
OKC Oklahoma City Thunder
S Jaylin Williams 35.5m
30
pts
11
reb
4
ast
Impact
+19.6

Elite shot selection and blistering perimeter efficiency drove a massive positive impact. Stretching the floor with a barrage of made triples completely warped the opposing defense. His constant activity on the glass and solid positional defense compounded the damage, making him a dominant two-way force in this matchup.

Shooting
FG 9/14 (64.3%)
3PT 5/10 (50.0%)
FT 7/7 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 87.8%
USG% 23.0%
Net Rtg -19.7
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.5m
Scoring +26.1
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +7.1
Hustle +3.3
Defense +1.3
Turnovers -8.9
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 4
S Aaron Wiggins 34.6m
20
pts
4
reb
6
ast
Impact
+1.1

High offensive usage masked a highly inefficient shooting night that actively hurt the team's half-court flow. A barrage of missed jumpers offset the value of his aggressive drives to the rim. While he found ways to contribute through secondary playmaking, the sheer number of wasted possessions resulted in a negative overall footprint.

Shooting
FG 6/16 (37.5%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 6/7 (85.7%)
Advanced
TS% 52.4%
USG% 25.3%
Net Rtg +2.1
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.6m
Scoring +11.8
Creation +1.9
Shot Making +4.0
Hustle +3.1
Defense -0.9
Turnovers -7.1
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 3
S Cason Wallace 30.1m
23
pts
2
reb
5
ast
Impact
+12.9

Aggressive rim pressure and confident outside shooting fueled a strong offensive rating, though his defensive impact remained surprisingly muted. Consistent conversion from deep kept the defense honest during key momentum swings. Ultimately, his scoring punch carried his overall value despite a lack of disruptive plays on the other end.

Shooting
FG 9/17 (52.9%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 64.3%
USG% 26.0%
Net Rtg -25.0
+/- -16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.1m
Scoring +17.3
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +5.4
Hustle +2.5
Defense -0.4
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Luguentz Dort 28.4m
3
pts
3
reb
4
ast
Impact
-5.9

Severe shooting struggles cratered his overall value, as clanking the vast majority of his perimeter attempts stalled the offense. Despite strong point-of-attack coverage that boosted his defensive rating, his inability to convert open looks ultimately dragged down his net impact. The sheer volume of empty possessions outweighed his physical perimeter pressure.

Shooting
FG 1/8 (12.5%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 18.8%
USG% 10.5%
Net Rtg -25.5
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.4m
Scoring -2.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +2.8
Defense +4.4
Turnovers +0.0
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
S Isaiah Joe 13.8m
3
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-13.2

A complete lack of rhythm from beyond the arc neutralized his primary weapon and tanked his offensive value. Missing nearly all of his outside looks allowed defenders to sag off and clog the driving lanes for his teammates. Though he provided a slight defensive lift, the spacing issues created by his cold streak defined his stint.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 30.0%
USG% 19.4%
Net Rtg -22.2
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.8m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense -0.8
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Jared McCain 29.9m
20
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
+7.2

Hustle plays and relentless off-ball movement salvaged a highly inefficient shooting performance. A high volume of missed jumpers limited his ceiling, but his willingness to fight for loose balls kept possessions alive. The constant threat of his deep range forced defensive rotations, even if the conversion rate left points on the board.

Shooting
FG 6/16 (37.5%)
3PT 4/10 (40.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 56.3%
USG% 22.0%
Net Rtg +2.2
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.9m
Scoring +12.6
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +4.8
Hustle +2.8
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
13
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
+2.5

Defensive lapses and poor rotation timing completely erased the value of a highly efficient shooting night. While knocking down timely corner looks boosted his offensive metrics, he was consistently exploited on the other end of the floor. The inability to string together stops meant his offensive contributions were effectively canceled out.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 62.3%
USG% 16.4%
Net Rtg -3.7
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.0m
Scoring +9.4
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +3.2
Hustle +5.1
Defense -2.2
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-12.4

A completely invisible offensive showing severely handicapped the second unit's spacing. Failing to convert a single shot allowed his primary defender to roam freely and muck up the paint. While he offered some resistance on the perimeter, the total lack of scoring gravity resulted in a brutal net negative.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 7.4%
Net Rtg +14.0
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.9m
Scoring -2.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +2.6
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
0
pts
2
reb
4
ast
Impact
-15.8

Passing vision couldn't compensate for a total lack of scoring threat, allowing the defense to play five-on-four. Coming up completely empty from the floor derailed the team's offensive rhythm. Despite decent effort on the margins, his inability to bend the defense doomed his overall impact.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 10.5%
Net Rtg -38.3
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.5m
Scoring -2.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.6
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
4
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
-5.1

Maximized a brief cameo by executing decisively within the flow of the offense. Finishing flawlessly around the basket provided an immediate spark off the bench. His short but mistake-free stint perfectly encapsulated how to provide positive filler minutes.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 41.7%
Net Rtg +152.4
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.7m
Scoring +2.4
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.7
Hustle +5.1
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.3

Logged only garbage-time seconds at the end of the game. Did not have enough runway to register any meaningful statistical footprint. Barely broke a sweat before the final buzzer sounded.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 0.5m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0