CHI

2025-26 Season

ANFERNEE SIMONS

Chicago Bulls | Guard | 6-3
Anfernee Simons
14.3PPG
2.5RPG
2.4APG
24.9MPG
+1.9 Impact

Simons produces at an above average rate for a 25-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+1.9
Scoring +13.3
Points Scored 14.3 PPG = +14.3
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -4.9
Shot Making above expected FG% = +3.9
Creation +0.5
Assists & Self-Creation 2.4 AST/g + self-creation = +0.5
Turnovers -2.8
Turnovers 1.2/g (live + dead blend) = -2.8
Defense -0.4
Steals 0.5/g = +1.1
Blocks 0.1/g = +0.1
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -1.6
Hustle & Effort +1.6
Rebounds 2.5 RPG (OREB + DREB) = -0.0
Contested Shots 2.9/g = +0.6
Deflections 1.2/g = +0.8
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.2/g = +0.1
Screen Assists 0.2/g = +0.1
Raw Impact +12.2
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.3
Net Impact
+1.9
68th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 246 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 75th
14.3 PPG
Efficiency 68th
56.7% TS
Playmaking 45th
2.4 APG
Rebounding 37th
2.5 RPG
Defense 26th
+5.2/g
Hustle 34th
+7.6/g
Creation 49th
+2.77/g
Shot Making 91th
+10.14/g
TO Discipline 62th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Anfernee Simons's transition to a pure bench sparkplug defined this erratic 19-game stretch, resulting in a wildly inconsistent pendulum of microwave scoring and total disappearing acts. When his jumper caught fire, he was an absolute offensive wrecking ball. Look at 10/27 vs NOP, where he erupted for 25 points on six made threes, generating a massive +21.0 impact score through sheer shot-making volume. However, when the shots stopped falling, his utility plummeted. During a brutal outing on 11/16 vs LAC, Simons went completely scoreless in 12 minutes, resulting in a disastrous -19.7 impact score because he failed to contribute any meaningful defensive resistance or playmaking to offset his cold hands. Even on nights where he tallied decent point totals, poor shot selection and a lack of ball movement often sank his value. Despite scoring 12 points on 10/26 vs DET, he posted a dreadful -8.2 impact score because his inefficient 5-for-13 shooting and zero assists actively stalled the second unit. Ultimately, Simons is operating as a classic feast-or-famine reserve who lives and dies entirely by his jump shot.

Anfernee Simons's midseason stretch was defined by a frustrating shooting slump that suddenly mutated into a blistering hot streak. During the 12/27 vs IND matchup, poor shot selection dragged him down to a dismal -10.4 Impact score as he clanked his way to just eight points. Without a falling jumper, his inability to create for others leaves a glaring void on the floor. He completely reversed his fortunes the very next night on 12/28 vs POR, generating a robust +8.4 Impact score despite scoring a modest 13 points. He salvaged his minutes by providing crucial non-scoring value through locked-in defensive effort and relentless hustle. The true apex arrived on 01/06 vs CHI. Simons drained eight three-pointers for 27 points to post a massive +18.8 Impact score. That pure offensive eruption highlighted exactly how lethal he becomes when he stops forcing the issue and simply lets it fly.

This midseason stretch was defined by a chaotic pendulum swing between brilliant bench scoring and inefficient struggles as a starter. Operating as a reserve on 01/16 vs MIA, Simons erupted for 39 points on 13-of-28 shooting. He generated a massive +28.2 Impact score that night simply by burying the defense under an avalanche of seven three-pointers. However, his aggressive shot selection frequently betrayed him. This flaw was glaringly obvious during a brutal 01/24 vs BKN matchup where he clanked his way to 10 points on 4-of-16 shooting, posting a dismal -12.1 Impact score due to his heavily wasted offensive possessions. A brief hot streak eventually earned him a starting nod in early February, though his overall efficiency immediately tanked against tougher defensive assignments. Yet, even when his scoring output dipped to a modest 15 points on a rough 5-of-15 shooting night on 02/07 vs DEN, he still managed to scrape out a +1.8 Impact score. Rather than forcing more bad looks, he kept the offense humming with six assists, creating enough non-scoring value as a distributor to completely offset his cold perimeter touch.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Simons's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~7 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 41% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Average defender. Simons doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: +0.3, second-half: +3.4. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 8 games. Longest cold streak: 5 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 57 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

I. Quickley 66.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 30.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 13
Q. Grimes 63.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 55.6%
PPP 0.3
PTS 19
T. Mann 41.0 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 9
K. Jakučionis 38.8 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 44.4%
PPP 0.36
PTS 14
Z. Williams 35.1 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 9
V. Edgecombe 34.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.03
PTS 1
T. McConnell 34.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 5
J. Walter 33.7 poss
FG% 36.4%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 11
J. Shead 33.0 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 3
D. Powell 32.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

Q. Grimes 67.6 poss
FG% 35.7%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 17
I. Quickley 55.2 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 14
K. Jakučionis 42.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 5
J. Walter 41.5 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.22
PTS 9
T. Mann 41.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
V. Edgecombe 37.7 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 75.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 11
C. LeVert 33.8 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 4
B. Sheppard 33.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Powell 31.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 7
N. Traore 30.4 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.46
PTS 14

SEASON STATS

55
Games
14.3
PPG
2.5
RPG
2.4
APG
0.5
SPG
0.1
BPG
44.0
FG%
38.5
3P%
89.6
FT%
24.9
MPG

GAME LOG

55 games played