CHI

2025-26 Season

ANFERNEE SIMONS

Chicago Bulls | Guard | 6-3
Anfernee Simons
14.3 PPG
2.5 RPG
2.4 APG
24.9 MPG
-1.8 Impact

Simons produces at an below average rate for a 25-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-1.8
Scoring +8.6
Points 14.3 PPG × +1.00 = +14.3
Missed 2PT 2.4/g × -0.78 = -1.9
Missed 3PT 4.2/g × -0.87 = -3.7
Missed FT 0.1/g × -1.00 = -0.1
Creation +2.0
Assists 2.4/g × +0.50 = +1.2
Off. Rebounds 0.6/g × +1.26 = +0.8
Turnovers -2.3
Turnovers 1.2/g × -1.95 = -2.3
Defense -0.1
Steals 0.5/g × +2.30 = +1.1
Blocks 0.1/g × +0.90 = +0.1
Def. Rebounds 1.8/g × +0.30 = +0.6
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +1.7
Contested Shots 2.9/g × +0.20 = +0.6
Deflections 1.2/g × +0.65 = +0.8
Loose Balls 0.2/g × +0.60 = +0.1
Screen Assists 0.2/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.0/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.1
Raw Impact +9.9
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.7
Net Impact
-1.8
41st pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 74th
14.3 PPG
Efficiency 65th
56.7% TS
Playmaking 43th
2.4 APG
Rebounding 36th
2.5 RPG
Rim Protection 8th
0.07/min
Hustle 8th
0.06/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 61th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Anfernee Simons's early season was defined by a volatile bench role where defensive apathy and erratic chucking routinely sabotaged his team. Look no further than 11/18 vs BKN, where he shot a highly efficient 3-for-4 from the field for 11 points but still posted a brutal -7.9 impact score. That dismal rating stemmed from severe defensive bleeding and costly live-ball turnovers that hemorrhaged points on the other end. He fell into a similar trap on 11/05 vs WAS, dropping 18 points but logging a -7.1 impact because his high-volume perimeter chucking completely stalled the offensive flow. He did occasionally catch fire in a way that actually helped. During 11/23 vs ORL, Simons poured in 23 points and generated a +7.5 impact score by torching the nets from deep with blistering efficiency. Ultimately, relying on him as a microwave scorer comes with a steep hidden cost; when the jumpers stop falling, his inability to separate from defenders makes him an outright liability.

A wildly erratic pendulum of lethal shot-making and defensive hemorrhaging defined Anfernee Simons's midseason stint as a microwave reserve. Even when his offensive numbers looked perfectly fine, hidden costs often torpedoed his actual value on the floor. During the 12/19 vs MIA matchup, for instance, he tallied an efficient 14 points on 6-for-10 shooting, yet posted a brutal -7.9 impact score because his presence actively disrupted the team's flow and bled points on the other end. Conversely, he found ways to tilt the math without dominating the box score during the 12/28 vs POR game. Despite scoring just 13 points, Simons generated a massive +12.0 impact score by executing surprisingly disruptive defensive rotations that yielded a +11.7 defensive mark. When his jumper truly caught fire, however, the defensive flaws hardly mattered. He unleashed an unrelenting barrage of perimeter shot-making on 01/15 vs MIA, dropping 39 points and breaking the opponent's defensive shell to drive another stellar +12.0 impact score. He remains a brilliant but flawed weapon, capable of shooting his team into a blowout victory just as easily as he shoots them out of rhythm.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Simons's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~7 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 41% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Simons locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: -2.8, second-half: -0.8. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

In a rough stretch — 6 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 6 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 57 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

I. Quickley 66.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 30.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 13
Q. Grimes 63.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 55.6%
PPP 0.3
PTS 19
T. Mann 41.0 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 9
K. Jakučionis 38.8 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 44.4%
PPP 0.36
PTS 14
Z. Williams 35.1 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 9
V. Edgecombe 34.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.03
PTS 1
T. McConnell 34.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 5
J. Walter 33.7 poss
FG% 36.4%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 11
J. Shead 33.0 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 3
D. Powell 32.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

Q. Grimes 67.6 poss
FG% 35.7%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 17
I. Quickley 55.2 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 14
K. Jakučionis 42.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 5
J. Walter 41.5 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.22
PTS 9
T. Mann 41.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
V. Edgecombe 37.7 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 75.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 11
C. LeVert 33.8 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 4
B. Sheppard 33.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Powell 31.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 7
N. Traore 30.4 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.46
PTS 14

SEASON STATS

55
Games
14.3
PPG
2.5
RPG
2.4
APG
0.5
SPG
0.1
BPG
44.0
FG%
38.5
3P%
89.6
FT%
24.9
MPG

GAME LOG

55 games played